candycorn
Diamond Member
He was asked to denounce them at the debate. He embraced them. Deaf much?He was asked to denounce them at the debate. He embraced them. Deaf much?He was asked to denounce them at the debate. He embraced them.1. "Do you believe in Climate Science?" The false implication is that there is scientific proof that climate change is not a naturally occurring phenomenon and that human activities are responsible for it.
2. "Will you wait until the election is independently certified?" There is no mechanism for independent certification of a national election. The Secretaries of State for each state certify elections results, and most are elected or appointed based on political party affiliation.
Any others?
Global warming is a fact.
Independent meant independent of either campaign.
Yeah, everyone know the climate is changing. Has since the last ice age, and before it.
No campaign has ever certified an election. There is no "independent" system, other than the one we have.The false notion that Trump supports white supremacists.1. "Do you believe in Climate Science?" The false implication is that there is scientific proof that climate change is not a naturally occurring phenomenon and that human activities are responsible for it.
2. "Will you wait until the election is independently certified?" There is no mechanism for independent certification of a national election. The Secretaries of State for each state certify elections results, and most are elected or appointed based on political party affiliation.
Any others?
He just doesn't denounce them when asked point blank to do so. And those organizations celebrate it the next day.
No, that's just flat out a lie.
Let us both read Trump's full statement after Charlottesville.
"You had some very bad people in that group, but you also had people that were very fine people, on both sides. ... I saw the same pictures as you did. You had people in that group that were there to protest the taking down of, to them, a very, very important statue and the renaming of a park from Robert E. Lee to another name. ... So you know what, it's fine. You're changing history. You're changing culture. And you had people — and I'm not talking about the neo-Nazis and the White nationalists, because they should be condemned totally — but you had many people in that group other than neo-Nazis and White nationalists. Okay? And the press has treated them absolutely unfairly. Now, in the other group also, you had some fine people. But you also had troublemakers, and you see them come with the black outfits and with the helmets and with the baseball bats. You had a lot of bad people in the other group."
Do you need help here? Or are you capable of reading and comprehending that on your own without political bias?
Let me repeat the statement he made, that completely destroys your lies about him not condemning white supremacists.
and I'm not talking about the neo-Nazis and the White nationalists, because they should be condemned totally
What part of that is "Not condemning white supremacists" in your world?
That's from 2017. Clearly documented everywhere.
Stop lying. Facts contradict your opinion.
Please read the title of the thread. He was asked to denounce them at the debate. He embraced them.
Again, he already did it in 2017. And he's right. Most of the violence is coming from the left.
So he did it already. The problem now is on the left wing. Why can't any of you left-wingers denounce the violence from all these left-wingers looting and burn, and murdering?
Honestly, we already have 2 or 3 clips of reporters in front of cities on fire, saying they are peaceful, and you want to claim Trump won't denounce white supremacist when he already has?
Hypocrite much?
As I said....
Again, he already did it in 2017. And he's right. Most of the violence is coming from the left.
So he did it already. The problem now is on the left wing. Why can't any of you left-wingers denounce the violence from all these left-wingers looting and burn, and murdering?
Honestly, we already have 2 or 3 clips of reporters in front of cities on fire, saying they are peaceful, and you want to claim Trump won't denounce white supremacist when he already has?
Hypocrite much?
No, but do post facts.... facts like....
Again, he already did it in 2017. And he's right. Most of the violence is coming from the left.
So he did it already. The problem now is on the left wing. Why can't any of you left-wingers denounce the violence from all these left-wingers looting and burn, and murdering?
Honestly, we already have 2 or 3 clips of reporters in front of cities on fire, saying they are peaceful, and you want to claim Trump won't denounce white supremacist when he already has?
Hypocrite much?
Since you've admitted that you did not watch -- I think YOU missed it.. As to Wallace's question about denouncing them -- he said "Sure" and then "Sure, I'd be willing to do that"...
Not required to GROVEL and go full "virtue signaling"... He's already done this on at least 4 other occasions..
He was asked to denounce them at the debate. He didn't do it.
It isn't groveling to do the decent thing. He's just not used to doing the decent thing.
As I've said, he has already denounced them openly in the past. He doesn't need to continue to do anything to appease stupid people, that won't vote for him no matter what he does, and will constantly call everyone they don't like 'racist' regardless of truth.... you on here, being proof of my point.
And on Tuesday he didn't denounce them, he told them to "stand by".
Those are the facts and that is no in dispute. Except from Trump worshipers like yourself.
And as I said, he already denounced them in 2017. He doesn't need to do it again, because someone who wouldn't vote for him anyway, got their panties all bunched up over it.
Honestly, if he had repeated what he said before, would you be a Trump supporter right now? No. Of course not. So I don't care, you don't care, and he doesn't care.
So what you think doesn't matter to me, or him, and you can keep saying that over and over, and I'll keep replying over and over, for however long you wish to keep repeating something false.
As we saw on Tuesday, he was asked to denounce a hate group. And he chose not to.
It was the case on Tuesday, it is the case today and it will be the case next week....no matter how many times you deny it.
And as I said, he already denounced them in 2017. He doesn't need to do it again, because someone who wouldn't vote for him anyway, got their panties all bunched up over it.
Honestly, if he had repeated what he said before, would you be a Trump supporter right now? No. Of course not. So I don't care, you don't care, and he doesn't care.
So what you think doesn't matter to me, or him, and you can keep saying that over and over, and I'll keep replying over and over, for however long you wish to keep repeating something false.
Keep going as much as you like. I'll be happy to repeat the truth the next time I'm on.
On Tuesday he embraced hate groups. He didn't denounce them.
And as I said, he already denounced them in 2017. He doesn't need to do it again, because someone who wouldn't vote for him anyway, got their panties all bunched up over it.
Honestly, if he had repeated what he said before, would you be a Trump supporter right now? No. Of course not. So I don't care, you don't care, and he doesn't care.
So what you think doesn't matter to me, or him, and you can keep saying that over and over, and I'll keep replying over and over, for however long you wish to keep repeating something false.
Keep going as much as you like. I'll be happy to repeat the truth the next time I'm on.
For some reason, the blob decided to embrace hate groups while he was on the stage last Tuesday. When he was asked to denounce them...he didn't. Blob supporters crave violence...he proved it. And you're constantly proving it now. Thanks. Please continue.