Zone1 Fake or real ?



Does this look real or is it real ?
1. That capsule looked like a kids blow up toy when it landed back on earth.

2. Then when the door was opened, did that door in the way that it was opened, look like something that could withstand the pressures that would be applied to that capsule as it rose into the atmosphere ?

3. Was this some sort of liberal attempt to gain back their humanity after the bull crap they have supported and who they have supported ?

4. So how is it that we have NASA, Space X, and now this Blue Origin stuff going on in this country, but Americans everyday are being inundated with save the planet, climate change, fossil fuel is going to kill us, cow farts are bad, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. Hollywood hypocrisy at it again maybe ?...

Good googly moogly, I'm a party pooper I guess... 😆 Bah humbug...

Pft.

It's a publicity stunt. When she kissed the ground, you knew how uncultured and pampered these ladies were.
 
I know, not even any 0-G pics of Katy's cans floating about. :boobies:
2oPgARvB5rqQteMKgSqpqT-1200-80.jpg

DaFk3znqMQEUCNFKhMhds7.jpg.webp

images%2FvoltaxMediaLibrary%2Fmmsport%2Fsi_swimsuit%2F01j7xq5me8tyn7qfkn18.jpg
 
100% FAKE

Full Report -- see link below plus opening few words with just the first blunder explained . Several others follow in the full article

-----Anyway, the reason we all knew it was fake without a second look is that it includes the booster rocket returning to Earth and landing backwards. Every real scientist or person with any knowledge of physics knows that is impossible. Rockets were never engineered to fly backwards, and nothing has changed in the past 40 years in that regard.
What changed is that they developed CGI in the meantime, so it is now fabulously easy to fake things like that.
But there are further problems, since CGI, though good, is still in its early stages. So it is easy to spot if you know what to look for. The first thing to look for, of course, is objects breaking the laws of physics or the laws of current tech (or the laws of perspective).
we see objects doing impossible things, we know they are fake without further argument.
That is what is happening here. In fact, it is a perfect test for those scientists you may know. If you have any scientists in the family or in the office, ask them what they think of these rockets landing backwards.
If they try to tell you it is no problem, you have them pegged. You know they are either agents of some sort or are being paid to sell this fake for some other reason. There is no third possibility. Well, I guess there is one third possibility: they are very dim and you should never listen to them again on anything important. ------
 
100% FAKE

Full Report -- see link below plus opening few words with just the first blunder explained . Several others follow in the full article


-----Anyway, the reason we all knew it was fake without a second look is that it includes the booster rocket returning to Earth and landing backwards. Every real scientist or person with any knowledge of physics knows that is impossible. Rockets were never engineered to fly backwards, and nothing has changed in the past 40 years in that regard.
What changed is that they developed CGI in the meantime, so it is now fabulously easy to fake things like that.
But there are further problems, since CGI, though good, is still in its early stages. So it is easy to spot if you know what to look for. The first thing to look for, of course, is objects breaking the laws of physics or the laws of current tech (or the laws of perspective).
we see objects doing impossible things, we know they are fake without further argument.
That is what is happening here. In fact, it is a perfect test for those scientists you may know. If you have any scientists in the family or in the office, ask them what they think of these rockets landing backwards.
If they try to tell you it is no problem, you have them pegged. You know they are either agents of some sort or are being paid to sell this fake for some other reason.
Says you.
There is no third possibility. Well, I guess there is one third possibility: they are very dim and you should never listen to them again on anything important. ------
The third possibility is that you are suffering from dyslexia and it looks "backwards" to you but it isn't sdrawkcab at all. :auiqs.jpg:
 


Does this look real or is it real ?
1. That capsule looked like a kids blow up toy when it landed back on earth.

2. Then when the door was opened, did that door in the way that it was opened, look like something that could withstand the pressures that would be applied to that capsule as it rose into the atmosphere ?

3. Was this some sort of liberal attempt to gain back their humanity after the bull crap they have supported and who they have supported ?

4. So how is it that we have NASA, Space X, and now this Blue Origin stuff going on in this country, but Americans everyday are being inundated with save the planet, climate change, fossil fuel is going to kill us, cow farts are bad, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. Hollywood hypocrisy at it again maybe ?...

Good googly moogly, I'm a party pooper I guess... 😆 Bah humbug...

Whatta ya know, billionaires don't really seem to care about saving the planet. Shocking.
 
The funniest part was when one of the ladies inside mistakenly prematurely opened the door from the inside before it was supposed to be opened, from the outside. Then the woman standing with Bezos quickly rushed over to close the flimsy looking door. Then later, Bezos "opened" it with some sort of tool.
 
Well, understand that:
  1. These were not astronauts. Gus Grissom would be turning over in his grave. These women did nothing. They were hired chimps. The entire flight was automated and all they did was go along for the ride.
  2. These people never left the atmosphere. They were rocketed up to the upper atmosphere (exosphere) and floated back down. Big difference between that and going to the Moon.
This was nothing more than a glorified sight-seeing flight for people with deep pockets.
That capsule didn't look sturdy enough to ride atop a rocket.

Infact, the inside when looking through those windows after touch down, we'll it didn't appear that it was safe enough to be rocketing up that many human beings (by looking at the size of that capsule or the way that it appeared inside when gazing through those windows).

I mean what type of seating arrangement did they have ? Where was the oxygen system and other crucial systems for the monitoring of the vehicle while it lifted itself up at g-forces that require such system's for safety and for tempered monitoring ??????
 
As long as they enjoyed it, just non eventful or interesting to me tbh.
Agree, but after all the terrible crap that has been thrown at Trump by hollyweirdo's and the leftist, I just can't help but think that they need some sort of distraction in hopes to somehow redeem themselves. Seems as if many of the D player's were involved in this thing maybe, and that's why it's just so suspect to me. 😆
 
That capsule didn't look sturdy enough to ride atop a rocket.
Infact, the inside when looking through those windows after touch down, we'll it didn't appear that it was safe enough to be rocketing up that many human beings (by looking at the size of that capsule or the way that it appeared inside when gazing through those windows).
I mean what type of seating arrangement did they have ? Where was the oxygen system and other crucial systems for the monitoring of the vehicle while it lifted itself up at g-forces that require such system's for safety and for tempered monitoring ??????

I don't have the design plans, but keep in mind that the Blue Origin thing was conceived from the start as nothing more than a giant roman candle, a joy ride thrill for the uber rich.

All it does is go straight up about 13X higher than Mt Everest, detach, the single stage engine comes back down by itself and the capsule parachutes to the ground.

The thing doesn't need to be space-worthy. All it really needs is to be able to withstand a gentle lift up to about 300,000 feet up while being able to contain pressurized 14 PSI air inside for 20 minutes.

I doubt the thing even has an oxygen system as they are not up there long enough to even need anymore than the air they took up with them.
 
Back
Top Bottom