and now we are confounded by Russian's interference, and a President who wants to suppress the vote by calling for photo ID's 98 days before the next election.
What's a citizen to do?
It's been 18 years + since hanging chads and a divided Supreme Court decided the Presidential Election in 2000.
Cutting back the number of polling places, the days and hours of voting, and denying others to vote who do not have an ID defined by St. Legislators or Governors, have worked to suppress the vote of too many legitimate voters.
If you voted yes, should the Several States and each county an parish abide by such a Congressional Act?
How do you suppress a vote by requiring a photo ID? That has never been satisfactorily explained. The Supreme Court did not decide the election between gore and bush, as has been repeatedly reported, numerous news groups did their own recounts and found that bush legitimately won by around 250 votes. That is KNOWN! Why do you insist on perpetuating that particular lie?
Straw Man Alert ^^^. It is not the photo ID which bothers me, it is the timing and the type of photo ID which the State decides is legit or not.
The Supreme Court voted 5-4 in Bush v. Gore:
Bush v. Gore | Summary, Decision, Significance, & Facts
?Bush v. Gore, case in which, on December 12, 2000, the
Supreme Court of the United States reversed a
Florida Supreme Court request for a selective manual recount of that state’s U.S.
presidential election ballots. The 5–4 decision effectively awarded Florida’s 25 votes in the
electoral college—and thus the election itself—to
Republican candidate
George W. Bush.?
Bush v. Gore | Summary, Decision, Significance, & Facts
It matters not that Bush received 250 more votes, if the number of hanging chads for Gore were not counted.