Failure of our liberal unconstitutional big government

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Failure of our liberal unconstitutional big government

To all idiot liberal Dumbocrats, I sarcastically say thank you for creating this over-regulated, unconstitutional goverment that doesn't even properly respond to inquiries by the people and which will soon be $16 trillion in debt thanks to the waste and spending of you greedy, lazy liberals.

You’ve cited no evidence that the government is ‘liberal’ (whatever that means) or that the Act is un-Constitutional, or that ‘the government is un-Constitutional' (again, whatever that means).

Was there a ruling by the Supreme Court that declared the entire government ‘un-Constitutional’? If so, cite it, please.

Probably some socialist liberal environmentalist gay guy.

You represent conservatives well.

 

[Moonglow]

you are confused on the facts

I was there, tell me again i was confused,

im sure if i told you real hippies in the 60's never wore anything tie-died

you wouldnt believe me either.

Im 53 years old and was there also and had 5 older siblings.

Yes people did wear tie died clothes

You and I know that hippes wore tie-died and jeans. Gosh I miss those days.

 

[BoycottTheday]

Well, if you lived in caly between '62-'68 you saw real hippies.

if you lived anywhere else you were watching the 60's on the tele

Big difference.

 

[P@triot]

Today’s shining example of how liberals have created a government that is failing the American people comes from Coralville, IA:

"In another example of the increasing trend towards a nanny state, local authorities in Coralville, IA have shut down a 4-year-old girl’s lemonade stand because she does not have the proper operating permit.

According to the city ordinance, the 4-year-old must apply for a permit and get a health inspection.

A health inspection for a lemonade stand?

The AP reports, “An officer told Abigail Krutsinger‘s father Friday that she couldn’t run the stand as RAGBRAI bicyclers poured into Coralville. RAGBRAI is The Des Moines Register’s Annual Great Bicycle Ride Across Iowa, which ended Saturday.”

Little Krutsinger was clever in setting up a lemonade stand for an event that would naturally drive up the demand for her product. A bike race requires constant hydration and she decided to fulfill a need in the marketplace.

But rather than reward her individualism and entrepreneurial drive, local authorities are applying to a 4-year-old girl the same standards they apply to people her parent’s age.

Abigail’s father, Dustin Krutsinger, said the ordinance and its enforcers are going too far if they force a 4-year-old to abandon her lemonade stand.

One can only hope that Abigail has hired a good accountant for when local authorities demand that she file her personal property returns." - from The Blaze (need to add citation for the idiot liberal moderator of this site who is clueless about copyright laws).

Running Gag: Another Lemonade Stand Shut Down By Authorities | Video | TheBlaze.com

Once again, I'd like to sarcastically thank the big government nanny state liberal Dumbocrats who are soft on actual crime, always painting hardcore criminals as the "victims" of their environment, but who come down on 11-year old and 4-year old little girls with an iron fist. Seriously, you people are an embarassment to America. I can't imagine how our founding fathers are rolling over in their graves while vomitting over the way liberals have perverted the wonderful freedoms they died to give us.

 

[P@triot]

Failure of our liberal unconstitutional big government

To all idiot liberal Dumbocrats, I sarcastically say thank you for creating this over-regulated, unconstitutional goverment that doesn't even properly respond to inquiries by the people and which will soon be $16 trillion in debt thanks to the waste and spending of you greedy, lazy liberals.

You’ve cited no evidence that the government is ‘liberal’ (whatever that means) or that the Act is un-Constitutional, or that ‘the government is un-Constitutional' (again, whatever that means).

Was there a ruling by the Supreme Court that declared the entire government ‘un-Constitutional’? If so, cite it, please.

Probably some socialist liberal environmentalist gay guy.

You represent conservatives well.

My apologies - I forget that liberals are completely uninformed sheep who reject the Constitution and therefore have no idea what is legal and what is not. Most of America is well aware of how much of our federal government is unconstitutional, so I forgot that I needed to cite it for the liberals. I do have one problem though - it would take weeks and sever space that USMessageBoard doesn't have to cite all of the unconstitutional actions of our federal government. But let's start with the most obvious:

1.) Obamacare. The US government simply does not have the authority to force citizens to purchase a product or service. Period.

2.) The Department of Education. Education is a state issue. If you actually read the Constitution, you would know that the federal government is delegated 18 enumerated powers from the states. Education is not one of them.

3.) The Department of Energy. Again, not delegated as one of the 18 enumerated powers by the states.

4.) The Department of Health and Human Services. Once again, not delegated as one of the 18 enumerated powers by the states.

5.) Tell you what - as I already stated, there is not enough time or server space available to list the unconstitutional parts of this federal monstrosity created by the big government nanny state liberals. So let me simplify it - pretty much any department (with a few exceptions) other than the department of defense, is unconstitutional.

I'll finish with addressing your absurd "Supreme Court" comment. Just because big government, nanny state, liberal administrations appointed big government, nanny state, liberal "judges" (and I use that term loosely) who refuse to adhere to the oath they took to uphold and defend the constitution, and for that reason refuse to find unconstitutional actions unconstitutional, doesn't mean they are not in fact unconstitutional. To make an analogy for the simple minded out there: Just because OJ Simpson was found "not guilty" by a jury designed to find him "not guilty", doesn't mean he is innocent of the crime. It just means he and his attorney's worked the system to get what they wanted. That's exactly the same with your Supreme Court. Just recently, Barack Hussein appointed two radical nut cases who have never read the Constitution, and who reject the very Constitution they took an oath to uphold and defend. Evil troll and Obama worshipper Elana Kagen has never even been a judge, yet somehow gets appointed to the Supreme Court as a judge, and radical anti-constitution Sonia Sotomayor gets appointed after claiming judges "make law from the bench". In other words, it's stacked with people who reject the constitution, and therefore will never properly rule against anything that is in fact in violation of the constitution. But it doesn't require a Supreme Court "judge" to let you know if something is unconstitutional or not. All you have to do is read the 10th Amendment. It's all there in black and white and cannot be denied:

The 10th Amendment states that all prerogatives not vested in the federal government nor prohibited of the states are reserved to the states and to the people, which means that the only prerogatives of the Congress (as well as the Executive Branch and the Judicial Branch) are limited to those explicitly stated in the Constitution.

The "prerogatives" mentioned are the 18 enumerated powers found in Article I, section 8. In other words, if it's not one of those 18 delegated powers, it is unconstitutional. See how simple that is? You just have to take the time to read my friend...