Facts Emerging from the Derek Chauvin Trial Show a Different Picture than the One Portrayed by Media

Guilty or innocent? No jury will be squared away...

View attachment 479053
It all depends on whether or not the jury caves in to the terrorists/Demoncrats.

Are all 12 of them pathetic cowards?
They may be racists like the OJ jury.
The jury in the OJ trial made the correct decision.
Really? What reasonable doubt was there?
OJ is innocent like Biden is president.
The DNA evidence was proven to be contaminated beyond any doubt whatsoever.

And the Democrats' star witness, Mark Fuhrman, committed perjury. You could tell just by the look on his face that he was a piece of shit lying pig.

And guess what... lo and behold, it turns out that Fuhrman was a lying piece of shit, a crooked cop. The lowest of the low IMNSFHO
1. Proving contamination helped introduce doubt.
2. Discrediting the overconfident incompetent job of the Prosecution helped introduce doubt
So the criminal charges failed due to
A. The harder standard to prove of being
Beyond reasonable doubt
B. The withholding of certain key evidence from the jury due to criminal procedures

However, OJ was found guilty in the Civil Case of Wrongful Death and still owes restitution. The reason the Civil Case was easier to prove:
A. The burden of proof in the Civil Case is lighter based on
Preponderance of Evidence
B. All the evidence was shown to Jurors
including key pieces struck down in the criminal case
 
The defense has established that Derek Chauvin did not have his knee on the neck of George Floyd,
Don't you LYING scum NAZIS ever get tired of LYING?
officer.jpeg
 
Facts Emerging from the Derek Chauvin Trial Show a Different Picture than the One Portrayed by Media


Comment:
If you recall in the Ferguson case against Darren Wilson NINE black witnesses later admitted having lied to the FBI about what they saw (with no prison time of course, that's only for the rest of us.)
Many of these people have no concept of honest objectivity outside of their own self-serving racist narrative--and they already have shown a tendency to riot with very little provocation, egged on by a corporate media that hates the historic American nation.
The defense has established that Derek Chauvin did not have his knee on the neck of George Floyd, he had ingested a leathal dose of Fentanyl and Methamphetamine (commonly called a Speed Ball). Additionally according to the Medical Examiner's report, Floyd's death was due to drugs and heart problems and suffered cardiac arrest.
Why has the prosecution failed to call the drug dealer that was also in the Mercedes SUV when Floyd was arrested?
It's obvious that Keith Ellison as AG, is obstructing the law by sequestering the drug dealer and claiming the Fifth Amendment from the Defense.
If they get a not guilty verdict then wait until 7 pm on a warm Friday night to announce--like they did with the Michael Brown thugicide, trial,
 
The defense has established that Derek Chauvin did not have his knee on the neck of George Floyd,
Don't you LYING scum NAZIS ever get tired of LYING?
officer.jpeg
Mr. scumbag piece of shit is probably already dead in that picture frame. At that moment in time, he's dead meat from an overdose.

Chauvin is bracing himself so that he doesn't get bucked out into traffic if the overdosing dead nigga starts bucking again. In my urban experience, I've learned that the simplest way to kill an animal is to shove them in front of a car at the right moment. It's simple physics.

A street smart career criminal such as GF knows that, and a veteran police officer such as DC also knows that. The two young rookies on his right flank may not know that. And DC must protect them.

What if DC let go of GF and he kicked one , or both, of those rookies out in front of a car? How would you explain that to their mothers?

That happens sometimes. Just when you think somebody is dead, they start kicking and having violent spasms again. Clonic-tonic seizures. AKA grand-mal seizures.
 
Last edited:
Facts Emerging from the Derek Chauvin Trial Show a Different Picture than the One Portrayed by Media


Comment:
If you recall in the Ferguson case against Darren Wilson NINE black witnesses later admitted having lied to the FBI about what they saw (with no prison time of course, that's only for the rest of us.)
Many of these people have no concept of honest objectivity outside of their own self-serving racist narrative--and they already have shown a tendency to riot with very little provocation, egged on by a corporate media that hates the historic American nation.
The defense has established that Derek Chauvin did not have his knee on the neck of George Floyd, he had ingested a leathal dose of Fentanyl and Methamphetamine (commonly called a Speed Ball). Additionally according to the Medical Examiner's report, Floyd's death was due to drugs and heart problems and suffered cardiac arrest.
Why has the prosecution failed to call the drug dealer that was also in the Mercedes SUV when Floyd was arrested?
It's obvious that Keith Ellison as AG, is obstructing the law by sequestering the drug dealer and claiming the Fifth Amendment from the Defense.

To be fair, the prosecutor isn't required to call witnesses to rebut his own case, nor is it the prosecutor who claims the Fifth Amendment on behalf of anyone.

Where the prosecutor can be faulted is in presumably making no effort to find out what the drug dealer has to say when making his decision whether to prosecute in the first place.
 
Lo and behold! It turns out that George Floyd was a common boot-lipped knappy-headed piece of shit rapist junkie who should have gotten the death penalty over a fucking decade ago.

Who would have guessed that? :dunno:

Everyone.
 
You can’t keep your knee pressured on a guys neck ..that is murder
The cop never released the pressure and it resulted in death
hun---pressure on the neck/back does not kill. It takes alot of pressure to cut off someone's airway and usually breaks bones leaving clear evidence......while we have carotic arteries and the cop was never in a position to stop blood flow from either.
 
Guilty or innocent? No jury will be squared away...

View attachment 479053
It all depends on whether or not the jury caves in to the terrorists/Demoncrats.

Are all 12 of them pathetic cowards?
They may be racists like the OJ jury.
The jury in the OJ trial made the correct decision.
Really? What reasonable doubt was there?
OJ is innocent like Biden is president.
The DNA evidence was proven to be contaminated beyond any doubt whatsoever.

And the Democrats' star witness, Mark Fuhrman, committed perjury. You could tell just by the look on his face that he was a piece of shit lying pig.

And guess what... lo and behold, it turns out that Fuhrman was a lying piece of shit, a crooked cop. The lowest of the low IMNSFHO
1. Proving contamination helped introduce doubt.
2. Discrediting the overconfident incompetent job of the Prosecution helped introduce doubt
So the criminal charges failed due to
A. The harder standard to prove of being
Beyond reasonable doubt
B. The withholding of certain key evidence from the jury due to criminal procedures

However, OJ was found guilty in the Civil Case of Wrongful Death and still owes restitution. The reason the Civil Case was easier to prove:
A. The burden of proof in the Civil Case is lighter based on
Preponderance of Evidence
B. All the evidence was shown to Jurors
including key pieces struck down in the criminal case

No -
It was simple Jury Nullification.
 
When you really can’t breathe you cannot continuously belch out “I can’t breathe”
 
Facts Emerging from the Derek Chauvin Trial Show a Different Picture than the One Portrayed by Media


Comment:
If you recall in the Ferguson case against Darren Wilson NINE black witnesses later admitted having lied to the FBI about what they saw (with no prison time of course, that's only for the rest of us.)
Many of these people have no concept of honest objectivity outside of their own self-serving racist narrative--and they already have shown a tendency to riot with very little provocation, egged on by a corporate media that hates the historic American nation.
The defense has established that Derek Chauvin did not have his knee on the neck of George Floyd, he had ingested a leathal dose of Fentanyl and Methamphetamine (commonly called a Speed Ball). Additionally according to the Medical Examiner's report, Floyd's death was due to drugs and heart problems and suffered cardiac arrest.
Why has the prosecution failed to call the drug dealer that was also in the Mercedes SUV when Floyd was arrested?
It's obvious that Keith Ellison as AG, is obstructing the law by sequestering the drug dealer and claiming the Fifth Amendment from the Defense.
Have you watched any of the trial?! It sounds like all youre doing is repeating old talking points. Asking why the prosecution didn’t call a drug dealer onto the stand?! Serious question... are you retarded?
 
When you really can’t breathe you cannot continuously belch out “I can’t breathe”

Y'know, this is actually what they teach you in first aid in regards to giving someone the Heimlich Maneuver: if they're coughing or talking at all, don't do the maneuver, because that means they can breathe (although obviously not well).

The "party of science" once more ignores basic biology.
 
Facts Emerging from the Derek Chauvin Trial Show a Different Picture than the One Portrayed by Media


Comment:
If you recall in the Ferguson case against Darren Wilson NINE black witnesses later admitted having lied to the FBI about what they saw (with no prison time of course, that's only for the rest of us.)
Many of these people have no concept of honest objectivity outside of their own self-serving racist narrative--and they already have shown a tendency to riot with very little provocation, egged on by a corporate media that hates the historic American nation.
The defense has established that Derek Chauvin did not have his knee on the neck of George Floyd, he had ingested a leathal dose of Fentanyl and Methamphetamine (commonly called a Speed Ball). Additionally according to the Medical Examiner's report, Floyd's death was due to drugs and heart problems and suffered cardiac arrest.
Why has the prosecution failed to call the drug dealer that was also in the Mercedes SUV when Floyd was arrested?
It's obvious that Keith Ellison as AG, is obstructing the law by sequestering the drug dealer and claiming the Fifth Amendment from the Defense.
Have you watched any of the trial?! It sounds like all youre doing is repeating old talking points. Asking why the prosecution didn’t call a drug dealer onto the stand?! Serious question... are you retarded?
Hey idiot, he was there and sold Floyd the drugs that killed him. That’s fairly important you retard. Obviously YOU aren’t paying attention as the prosecution’s witnesses destroy their own case.
 
Facts Emerging from the Derek Chauvin Trial Show a Different Picture than the One Portrayed by Media


Comment:
If you recall in the Ferguson case against Darren Wilson NINE black witnesses later admitted having lied to the FBI about what they saw (with no prison time of course, that's only for the rest of us.)
Many of these people have no concept of honest objectivity outside of their own self-serving racist narrative--and they already have shown a tendency to riot with very little provocation, egged on by a corporate media that hates the historic American nation.
The defense has established that Derek Chauvin did not have his knee on the neck of George Floyd, he had ingested a leathal dose of Fentanyl and Methamphetamine (commonly called a Speed Ball). Additionally according to the Medical Examiner's report, Floyd's death was due to drugs and heart problems and suffered cardiac arrest.
Why has the prosecution failed to call the drug dealer that was also in the Mercedes SUV when Floyd was arrested?
It's obvious that Keith Ellison as AG, is obstructing the law by sequestering the drug dealer and claiming the Fifth Amendment from the Defense.
Have you watched any of the trial?! It sounds like all youre doing is repeating old talking points. Asking why the prosecution didn’t call a drug dealer onto the stand?! Serious question... are you retarded?
Hey idiot, he was there and sold Floyd the drugs that killed him. That’s fairly important you retard. Obviously YOU aren’t paying attention as the prosecution’s witnesses destroy their own case.
Well its a good thing you are not a prosecutor because if you called Floyds drug dealer onto the stand then you would be the worst prosecutor in the world. The defense attorney can call the guy if he thinks it’s relevant.

Relevance is another point. What about this guy do you think is relevant to this case? Sounds to me like you just want to defame Floyd’s character and harp on the fact he used drugs. It has nothing to do with the excessive force we can all see on video which ended up killing the man. Did you forget what the case is actually about?
 

Forum List

Back
Top