Exxon accurately predicted GW in the 70s but kept casting doubt for decades

We're going to have to find something on which we disagree! Perhaps she wasn't saying that she's concerned with levels being too LOW? Would it be reasonable to think that she was voicing concern over levels that are too high?
If she did she would be wrong like you.
 
What do you disagree with? Ms. Curry? If so then I'm ready to state my position on the question.

Right here, we won't need a bullring.
That's kind of an open ended question. Let's talk about CO2 being too high. How's that? Let's put on a show for everyone in the Bull Ring. I can give you more of what you are looking for there. Don't be scared. I'll be gentle.
 
It's not just that CO2 is too high now, it's that it's going higher.
When 400 PPM becomes 'Equalized-CS' (what I have called "in the oven just waiting to Cook through") we're in for several more degees C and Tens of feet of Sea Level.

`
 
It's not just that CO2 is too high now, it's that it's going higher.
When 400 PPM becomes 'Equalized-CS' (what I have called "in the oven just waiting to Cook through") we're in for several more degees C and Tens of feet of Sea Level.

`

Will we have enough time to walk to higher ground?
 
IMG_8706.webp
 
It's not just that CO2 is too high now, it's that it's going higher.
When 400 PPM becomes 'Equalized-CS' (what I have called "in the oven just waiting to Cook through") we're in for several more degees C and Tens of feet of Sea Level.

`
What is China doing about their world leading carbon footprint?
 
It's not just that CO2 is too high now, it's that it's going higher.
When 400 PPM becomes 'Equalized-CS' (what I have called "in the oven just waiting to Cook through") we're in for several more degees C and Tens of feet of Sea Level.

`
Tens of feet of sea level rise? When will that be?
 
No problem. When should I expect the tens of feet of sea level rise?
90% One line Burden shifting posts, just Baiting/Trolling/Last-Wording, Never Rebutting his opponents.
Because he has No case.
A poor relation to the "Demand Endless detail Fallacy."

`
 
Last edited:
Exxon realised that when the earth comes out of glacial period, things warm up. They first realised this in the 70's :rolleyes:
 
Exxon realised that when the earth comes out of glacial period, things warm up. They first realised this in the 70's :rolleyes:

No, that's False.
They predicted the SPIKE in Warming because of the SPIKE in Human GHG emissions from the last and most explosive part of the Industrial Revolution.
We had long since been very stable in Temp for 10,000 years (even cooling for the last 5000 years) since the end of the last ice age, along with our CO2 component at no more than 280 PPM.
Now 425 PPM most in the last 100 years and accelerating.
`


last 12,000 years
1747159478418.webp


1747159798819.webp


`


1747160150099.webp

`
 
Last edited:
No, that's False.
They predicted the SPIKE in Warming because of the SPIKE in Human GHG emissions from the last and most explosive part of the Industrial Revolution.
We had long since been very stable in Temp for 10,000 years (even cooling for the last 5000 years) since the end of the last ice age, along with our CO2 component at no more than 280 PPM.
Now 425 PPM most in the last 100 years and accelerating.
`


last 12,000 years
View attachment 1110869

View attachment 1110875

`


View attachment 1110877
`

Hockey sticks are cool!
They can be expensive though.
Is Michael Mann making any progress paying the legal judgements against him?
Ouch!
 
Hockey sticks are cool!
They can be expensive though.
Is Michael Mann making any progress paying the legal judgements against him?
Ouch!
Call whatever time period you like whatever name you like...
But the numbers are the numbers, even before and besides Mann.

Have a party you Trolling Asshole who contributes Nothing but Harassment here, NO DATA, NO Links, etc.
(another one line riddler/HarASSment Troll usually with the question mark burden shift/no rebuttal)




`
 
Last edited:
90% One line Burden shifting posts, just Baiting/Trolling/Last-Wording, Never Rebutting his opponents.
Because he has No case.
A poor relation to the "Demand Endless detail Fallacy."

`
You've spammed three threads with the same ad hominin. YOU made the statement IN THIS THREAD that sea level will rise by tens of feet. I want to know when you believe that will be. Well? When will that be?
 
Call whatever time period you like whatever name you like...
But the numbers are the numbers, even before and besides Mann.

Have a party you Trolling Asshole who contributes Nothing but Harassment here, NO DATA, NO Links, etc.
(another one line riddler/HarASSment Troll usually with the question mark burden shift/no rebuttal)




`

Yes, the numbers are the numbers, that's why the doomers had to make them look more dramatic by lying and manipulating.

Speaking of numbers, where is the new UN number for needed spending to stop the AGW doomsday?
 
15th post
Yes, the numbers are the numbers, that's why the doomers had to make them look more dramatic by lying and manipulating.

Speaking of numbers, where is the new UN number for needed spending to stop the AGW doomsday?

ToasterParrot is a Troll.
He just lost a debate with me providing the Info in the form of a google image page.

Every post is a lazy quip, most with a ??question marks?? demanding you search for his answers... more answers.
NO Data, NO links, nothing but Juvenile quips/Harassment.
`
 
Last edited:
ToasterParrot is a Troll.
He just lost a debate with me providing the Info in the form of a google image page.

Every post is a lazy quip, most with a ??question marks?? demanding you search for his answers... more answers.
NO Data, NO links, nothing but Juvenile quips/Harassment.
`

You were trying to debate? LOL!

DURR
 
Back
Top Bottom