Truthmatters
Diamond Member
- May 10, 2007
- 80,182
- 2,276
- 1,283
- Banned
- #801
hes toast
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Just for shits and giggles, why don't you tell us who *you* think said it was ok to close the lanes.Christy team USED the tax dollars of the people to PUNISH the people for not voting for him.
that is fine with republicans.
THEY HATE THE PEOPLE
cite who said it was ok to close the lanes.
you're a liar.
No, it was based on information that was wrong and had been wrong for over a decade. Even Saddam's people were shocked that there were no WMDs to defend themselves with at the beginning of the invasion.
Seriously.
It wasn't "wrong". It was a lie.
The Bush administration cherry picked intelligence and tried to cobble it to fulfill the agenda of the PNAC.
They've been trying to get the US to invade since Clinton and the Saudis have been pushing for an invasion well before that.
Bush lied. So much so that Powell was embarrassed by the stuff he had to present to the UN..which is why they gave up on that.
But congress were different. They were scared and compliant. Mapping 9/11 to Iraq as well as the possibility of nuclear attack was a loathsome but effective thing to do.
Now, YOU are just lying. The Bush Administration didn't say anything about Iraq that the Clinton Administration had not said...that's because the intelligence built on itself and once they missed Saddam getting rid of the stuff that he'd been given in the 80's and knowing that as early as March 27, 1979, Saddam had announced he wanted nuclear weapons, they believed he had 'em and was working to obtain more.
Remember, Saddam was becoming more and more combative toward the end of the Clinton Administration. There was nothing to indicate he was trying to be friendly.

What did liberals do that was so offensive to the conservatives? Liberals got women the right to vote. Liberals got African-Americans the right to vote. Liberals created Social Security and lifted millions of elderly people out of poverty. Liberals ended segregation. Liberals passed the Civil Rights Act, the Voting Rights Act. Liberals created Medicare. Liberals passed the Clean Air Act, the Clean Water Act. What did Conservatives do? They opposed them on every one of those things. So when you try to hurl that label at my feet, Liberal, as if it were something to be ashamed of, something dirty, something to run away from, it wont work, because I will pick up that label and I will wear it as a badge of honor. - Lawrence ODonnell Jr.
Conservatives don't object to women voting. Democrats opposed Blacks voting, while Republicans led a war to free Blacks and ensure they were treated as full citizens. Democrats opposed desegregation, not just in the South, but in the Northern States as well, it took a Republican President (Richard Nixon) to make Affirmative Action work in the 70's as well as the Clean Air Act, and the Clean Water Act. (Nixon wanted to ensure that the Cayuga River never caught fire again, as it had done just after he was sworn in). You may try to rewrite history, but it's not an effective debating tool.
TM, a cell phone isn't a radio ...![]()
![]()
![]()
Why did Christy maintain RADIO SILENCE if he didn't know the plan?
No call was returned or answered by Christy or team to the mayor or local reps of the area who called and called and called and called and called trying to figure out what was going on.
They refused to answer ANYONE
that is fact
You can't be serious, really? really?Just for shits and giggles, why don't you tell us who *you* think said it was ok to close the lanes.cite who said it was ok to close the lanes.
you're a liar.
i don't think anyone said it.
Thanks for the forthright admission to your ghoulishness.Hmmmm... you mean.
Whenver there is one of these gun incidents.
We find out two things.
The person who did it was completely out of his ******* mind and everyone knew it.
And he was still able to get a gun.
You know, maybe the first time these questions are asked, it's "ghoulish", but if we keep having the same conversation every time it happens, then it's a policy discussion.
I'll take it.
you're the one who thinks that gun companies should profit off dead children.
Hey, here's an idea. Sell all the guns you want, but anyone who dies can sue the gun manufacturers.
Yurt is correct: no evidence backs up TM's assertions.