Explanation of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict

What are you talking about. Hopefully, they can work out a peaceful solution, but to say that the Palestinians should accept the blame for being colonized is absolutely ridiculous. The original problem is the movement of Europeans to Palestine with the intention of removing the inhabitants.

There you go with that Palestinian propaganda again. That was not the intention of the European Jews. Their intention was to escape anti Semitism and create Jewish homeland for themselves. It was the intention of the Arabs to get rid of the Jews from the region.

Propaganda? The Zionists stated what they intended to do clearly. Toast, look up cognitive dissonance.

Successful Jewish Colonization Will Extend Beyond Palestine Frontier, Weizmann Tells Actions Committ
July 25, 1926

"The contemplated trip to the United States of Dr. Chaim Weizmann, president of the World Zionist Organization, the continuation of his efforts while in America to extend the Jewish Agency through his negotiations with the Marshall group, the possibilities of extending Jewish colonization work outside of the present Palestine frontiers, including. Transjordania and certain parts of Syria, were the main features around which the deliberations centered."


Share on twitterShare on facebookShare on google_plusone_shareMore Sharing ServicesShare on emailShare on print



London (Jul. 23)
 
What are you talking about. Hopefully, they can work out a peaceful solution, but to say that the Palestinians should accept the blame for being colonized is absolutely ridiculous. The original problem is the movement of Europeans to Palestine with the intention of removing the inhabitants.

There you go with that Palestinian propaganda again. That was not the intention of the European Jews. Their intention was to escape anti Semitism and create Jewish homeland for themselves. It was the intention of the Arabs to get rid of the Jews from the region.

Propaganda? The Zionists stated what they intended to do clearly. Toast, look up cognitive dissonance.

Successful Jewish Colonization Will Extend Beyond Palestine Frontier, Weizmann Tells Actions Committ
July 25, 1926

"The contemplated trip to the United States of Dr. Chaim Weizmann, president of the World Zionist Organization, the continuation of his efforts while in America to extend the Jewish Agency through his negotiations with the Marshall group, the possibilities of extending Jewish colonization work outside of the present Palestine frontiers, including. Transjordania and certain parts of Syria, were the main features around which the deliberations centered."


Share on twitterShare on facebookShare on google_plusone_shareMore Sharing ServicesShare on emailShare on print



London (Jul. 23)

Ya right, that's why Israel gave back the Sinai, offered to give back the entire Golan and have made several offers to return virtually the entire West Bank. They also withdrew their troops and settlers from Gaza. Ya, some colonization :rolleyes:

But since you are allergic to the truth , you're going to continue to spew your usual propaganda. That's just who you are Monti, a propagandist and a liar.
 
What are you talking about. Hopefully, they can work out a peaceful solution, but to say that the Palestinians should accept the blame for being colonized is absolutely ridiculous. The original problem is the movement of Europeans to Palestine with the intention of removing the inhabitants.

There you go with that Palestinian propaganda again. That was not the intention of the European Jews. Their intention was to escape anti Semitism and create Jewish homeland for themselves. It was the intention of the Arabs to get rid of the Jews from the region.

Propaganda? The Zionists stated what they intended to do clearly. Toast, look up cognitive dissonance.

Successful Jewish Colonization Will Extend Beyond Palestine Frontier, Weizmann Tells Actions Committ
July 25, 1926

"The contemplated trip to the United States of Dr. Chaim Weizmann, president of the World Zionist Organization, the continuation of his efforts while in America to extend the Jewish Agency through his negotiations with the Marshall group, the possibilities of extending Jewish colonization work outside of the present Palestine frontiers, including. Transjordania and certain parts of Syria, were the main features around which the deliberations centered."


Share on twitterShare on facebookShare on google_plusone_shareMore Sharing ServicesShare on emailShare on print



London (Jul. 23)

Ya right, that's why Israel gave back the Sinai, offered to give back the entire Golan and have made several offers to return virtually the entire West Bank. They also withdrew their troops and settlers from Gaza. Ya, some colonization :rolleyes:

But since you are allergic to the truth , you're going to continue to spew your usual propaganda. That's just who you are Monti, a propagandist and a liar.

How can I be a liar and propagandist when I simply posted the Jewish Telegraphic Agency article of 1926? You are becoming unsettled Toast. You are another poster boy for cognitive dissonance.
 
So in other words you don't have a link, figures. And you don't have the mental capacity to work that one out

Phoney, if you cannot be bothered to go look at the video then why the fuck should I bother posting you dumb fucking idiot!





So in other words you don't have a link, figures. And you don't have the mental capacity to work that one out.

Nor work out that you are having a major hissy fit and meltdown

Phoney, if you are the only person on this board who has not seen the link then that is YOUR issue NOT mine :ahole-1:






So in other words you don't have a link, figures. And you don't have the mental capacity to work that one out.

Nor work out that you are having a major hissy fit and meltdown

Link has been provided...

Step away from the computer, put your flat cap on and take your whippets for a nice walk, there's a good Phoney!







So in other words you don't have a link, figures. And you don't have the mental capacity to work that one out.

Nor work out that you are having a major hissy fit and meltdown
 
What are you talking about. Hopefully, they can work out a peaceful solution, but to say that the Palestinians should accept the blame for being colonized is absolutely ridiculous. The original problem is the movement of Europeans to Palestine with the intention of removing the inhabitants.

There you go with that Palestinian propaganda again. That was not the intention of the European Jews. Their intention was to escape anti Semitism and create Jewish homeland for themselves. It was the intention of the Arabs to get rid of the Jews from the region.

Propaganda? The Zionists stated what they intended to do clearly. Toast, look up cognitive dissonance.

Successful Jewish Colonization Will Extend Beyond Palestine Frontier, Weizmann Tells Actions Committ
July 25, 1926

"The contemplated trip to the United States of Dr. Chaim Weizmann, president of the World Zionist Organization, the continuation of his efforts while in America to extend the Jewish Agency through his negotiations with the Marshall group, the possibilities of extending Jewish colonization work outside of the present Palestine frontiers, including. Transjordania and certain parts of Syria, were the main features around which the deliberations centered."


Share on twitterShare on facebookShare on google_plusone_shareMore Sharing ServicesShare on emailShare on print



London (Jul. 23)

Ya right, that's why Israel gave back the Sinai, offered to give back the entire Golan and have made several offers to return virtually the entire West Bank. They also withdrew their troops and settlers from Gaza. Ya, some colonization :rolleyes:

But since you are allergic to the truth , you're going to continue to spew your usual propaganda. That's just who you are Monti, a propagandist and a liar.

How can I be a liar and propagandist when I simply posted the Jewish Telegraphic Agency article of 1926? You are becoming unsettled Toast. You are another poster boy for cognitive dissonance.






If you cant work that one out then you are a bigger dunce than I first thought
 
What are you talking about. Hopefully, they can work out a peaceful solution, but to say that the Palestinians should accept the blame for being colonized is absolutely ridiculous. The original problem is the movement of Europeans to Palestine with the intention of removing the inhabitants.

There you go with that Palestinian propaganda again. That was not the intention of the European Jews. Their intention was to escape anti Semitism and create Jewish homeland for themselves. It was the intention of the Arabs to get rid of the Jews from the region.

Propaganda? The Zionists stated what they intended to do clearly. Toast, look up cognitive dissonance.

Successful Jewish Colonization Will Extend Beyond Palestine Frontier, Weizmann Tells Actions Committ
July 25, 1926

"The contemplated trip to the United States of Dr. Chaim Weizmann, president of the World Zionist Organization, the continuation of his efforts while in America to extend the Jewish Agency through his negotiations with the Marshall group, the possibilities of extending Jewish colonization work outside of the present Palestine frontiers, including. Transjordania and certain parts of Syria, were the main features around which the deliberations centered."


Share on twitterShare on facebookShare on google_plusone_shareMore Sharing ServicesShare on emailShare on print



London (Jul. 23)

Ya right, that's why Israel gave back the Sinai, offered to give back the entire Golan and have made several offers to return virtually the entire West Bank. They also withdrew their troops and settlers from Gaza. Ya, some colonization :rolleyes:

But since you are allergic to the truth , you're going to continue to spew your usual propaganda. That's just who you are Monti, a propagandist and a liar.

How can I be a liar and propagandist when I simply posted the Jewish Telegraphic Agency article of 1926? You are becoming unsettled Toast. You are another poster boy for cognitive dissonance.

Read my post again. I never denied what you posted concerning the quote.
 
What does "Ya, some colonization" followed by an emoticom mean?
 
What does "Ya, some colonization" followed by an emoticom mean?

Do I really need to explain my post to you Monti ?

You made my point. You deny that it was colonization even though the Zionists themselves knew it was colonization. That's called cognitive dissonance.

I just proved that Israel had no intent on colonizing land. My earlier post clearly explains that.

How did you prove that the Zionists had no intention of colonizing Palestine? Are you trying to imply that Israel does not want to colonize more territory in Palestine? If so, you would be wrong again, the settlements would make such an assertion ridiculous.
 
What does "Ya, some colonization" followed by an emoticom mean?

Do I really need to explain my post to you Monti ?

You made my point. You deny that it was colonization even though the Zionists themselves knew it was colonization. That's called cognitive dissonance.

I just proved that Israel had no intent on colonizing land. My earlier post clearly explains that.

How did you prove that the Zionists had no intention of colonizing Palestine? Are you trying to imply that Israel does not want to colonize more territory in Palestine? If so, you would be wrong again, the settlements would make such an assertion ridiculous.

If they were going to colonize Palestine, them why did they withdraw their settlers and troops from Gaza? Why did they offer to return virtually the entire West Bank several times?
Israel did not annex the West Bank, therefore the settlements could potentially be dismantled in a future deal. Now, are there Israeli citizens and government officials who WANT all of Palestine to be Israel? For sure, but guess what, I want a Boston Whaler 345 Conquest Pilot House.
Israel could colonize all of Palestine if they wanted, but instead they have tried to make peace with the Palestinians who have refused every offer.
 
Wow, that's a leap. Let me get this straight. The Zionists did not intend to colonize Palestine because they only colonized a large part of it. Setting aside that they control all of Palestine and the Israeli PM has stated that there will be no Palestinian state, most of Palestine was, in fact colonized. Your dog won't hunt.
 
What does "Ya, some colonization" followed by an emoticom mean?

Do I really need to explain my post to you Monti ?

You made my point. You deny that it was colonization even though the Zionists themselves knew it was colonization. That's called cognitive dissonance.

I just proved that Israel had no intent on colonizing land. My earlier post clearly explains that.

How did you prove that the Zionists had no intention of colonizing Palestine? Are you trying to imply that Israel does not want to colonize more territory in Palestine? If so, you would be wrong again, the settlements would make such an assertion ridiculous.

If they were going to colonize Palestine, them why did they withdraw their settlers and troops from Gaza? Why did they offer to return virtually the entire West Bank several times?
Israel did not annex the West Bank, therefore the settlements could potentially be dismantled in a future deal. Now, are there Israeli citizens and government officials who WANT all of Palestine to be Israel? For sure, but guess what, I want a Boston Whaler 345 Conquest Pilot House.
Israel could colonize all of Palestine if they wanted, but instead they have tried to make peace with the Palestinians who have refused every offer.


Jews came and bought land but palestinians decided those sales were null and void on the basis that the buyers were jewish.
They had not problem taking an inflated amount of money for the land but then tried to fine a way to weasel out and get the now developed land back without returning the money.

Land that the palestinians would not or could not develop or pay taxes on that might have been occupied for a few years or generations is not vastly more valuable now than when they sold it or walk away from it almost 3/4 of a century ago

Many could have returned and become Israelis, but their hate kept them from reentering Israel, or fear of other palestininas prevented them from trying.
150,000 did return over the years through reunification and other programs.
 
Setting aside the fact that these were Europeans with the intent to colonize Palestine, you are making things up as Zionists do. Nothing of sort happened. The Europeans did buy some land but the non-Jews still owned at least 85% of the land at the time of partition.

"164. The Arab population, despite the strenuous efforts of Jews to acquire land in Palestine, at present remains in possession of approximately 85 per cent of the land. "

http://unispal.un.org/UNISPAL.NSF/0/07175DE9FA2DE563852568D3006E10F3

The Christians and Muslims were prevented from returning to their homes by the Jews that had expelled them by the Israeli imposition of the the Absentees’ Property Law, 5710- 1950. You can look it up, but in short it says that any Palestinian that left between 1947 and 1950 lost his home and land to the Jewish state.
 
Setting aside the fact that these were Europeans with the intent to colonize Palestine, you are making things up as Zionists do. Nothing of sort happened. The Europeans did buy some land but the non-Jews still owned at least 85% of the land at the time of partition.

"164. The Arab population, despite the strenuous efforts of Jews to acquire land in Palestine, at present remains in possession of approximately 85 per cent of the land. "

A 364 of 3 September 1947

The Christians and Muslims were prevented from returning to their homes by the Jews that had expelled them by the Israeli imposition of the the Absentees’ Property Law, 5710- 1950. You can look it up, but in short it says that any Palestinian that left between 1947 and 1950 lost his home and land to the Jewish state.
Then Israel colonized that Palestinian land and built settlements.
 
montelatici, et al,

Well, this is not exactly accurate and some what exaggerated.

Wow, that's a leap. Let me get this straight. The Zionists did not intend to colonize Palestine because they only colonized a large part of it. Setting aside that they control all of Palestine and the Israeli PM has stated that there will be no Palestinian state, most of Palestine was, in fact colonized. Your dog won't hunt.
(COMMENT)

Some salient points under Mandate:
  • Not all Jewish Immigrants were Zionist.
  • Jewish immigration was encourage.
  • Immigration included all Jews who were willing to assist in the establishment of the Jewish national home.
  • In co-operation with the Jewish Agency, close settlement by Jews on the land, west of the Jordan River.
Some salient points after Mandate:
  • The Jewish Agency completed the UN Steps Preparatory to Independence.
  • In 1949 the Gaza Strip came under the administration of the All Palestine Government (dissolved in 1959) controlled by the Egyptian Military Governorship.
  • In 1950, the West Bank (Unification of the Two Banks) became sovereign Jordanian Territory.
  • On 5 June 1967, hostilities broke out between Israel and Egypt, Jordan and Syria. By the time a ceasefire called for by the Security Council was accepted by the parties, Israeli military forces had occupied the Egyptian Sinai, the Gaza Strip, the West Bank including East Jerusalem, and part of the Syrian Golan Heights.
  • 1997 Oslo II - Area C under full Israeli civil and security control. Settlements are subject to permanent status negotiations:
    • By Agreement with the PLO, "the Settlements" means,
      • In the West Bank - the settlements in Area C;
      • and in the Gaza Strip -
      • the Gush Katif and Erez settlement areas
The Israelis never occupied Palestinian Territory; they did occupied Egyptian Governed Territory and Jordanian Sovereign Territory. The Arab Palestinian rejected the opportunity to establish a State (more than once) until 1988, when they finally declared Independence while the territory was already under military occupation; but four months after the Jordanians cut all ties with the West Bank. During the tenure of the Mandate and the and the time since independence, the Jewish Immigrants never never represented a colonial power; no relationships between a colonial power and any Jewish Settlement was established while the territory was under under the Mandate. In fact the Jewish Immigrants were not all from the same country, or even the same continent; and could not represent a single power.

The purpose of the occupation is to extend the protections to the sovereignty and integrity of Israel against an opponent that does not recognize the State of Israel; and holds the political position that the Arab Palestinian is the only legitimate sovereign to the territory that covers the land west of the Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sea. This is the same opponent that has declared Jihad (Holy War), and considers any means necessary to take in the eviction of the State of Israel as legal and legitimate. This threat was made in February 1948, and has appeared in the Islamic Resistance Movement Covenant, the Palestinian Nation Charter, and most recently, the the 2013 Official Position Paper published by the Khaled Mashaal, Political Leader, Islamic Resistance Movement and Unity Government Partner. Given the previous history of past behaviors, and actual response to the 2005 Disengagement from the Gaza Strip, the Occupation of Palestinian territory there is no reason to believe that an agreement to suspend combat (or any formal Peace Agreement) will be honored by the Palestinian Regime; and that the Palestinians have every intention of attacking by surprise the enemy relying on Peace Agreement they conclude. Based on the current position of the Arab Palestinians there is essentially little prospect for a peace agreement that will have any success.

Most Respectfully,
R
 
montelatici, et al,

Well, this is not exactly accurate and some what exaggerated.

Wow, that's a leap. Let me get this straight. The Zionists did not intend to colonize Palestine because they only colonized a large part of it. Setting aside that they control all of Palestine and the Israeli PM has stated that there will be no Palestinian state, most of Palestine was, in fact colonized. Your dog won't hunt.
(COMMENT)

Some salient points under Mandate:
  • Not all Jewish Immigrants were Zionist.
  • Jewish immigration was encourage.
  • Immigration included all Jews who were willing to assist in the establishment of the Jewish national home.
  • In co-operation with the Jewish Agency, close settlement by Jews on the land, west of the Jordan River.
Some salient points after Mandate:
  • The Jewish Agency completed the UN Steps Preparatory to Independence.
  • In 1949 the Gaza Strip came under the administration of the All Palestine Government (dissolved in 1959) controlled by the Egyptian Military Governorship.
  • In 1950, the West Bank (Unification of the Two Banks) became sovereign Jordanian Territory.
  • On 5 June 1967, hostilities broke out between Israel and Egypt, Jordan and Syria. By the time a ceasefire called for by the Security Council was accepted by the parties, Israeli military forces had occupied the Egyptian Sinai, the Gaza Strip, the West Bank including East Jerusalem, and part of the Syrian Golan Heights.
  • 1997 Oslo II - Area C under full Israeli civil and security control. Settlements are subject to permanent status negotiations:
    • By Agreement with the PLO, "the Settlements" means,
      • In the West Bank - the settlements in Area C;
      • and in the Gaza Strip -
      • the Gush Katif and Erez settlement areas
The Israelis never occupied Palestinian Territory; they did occupied Egyptian Governed Territory and Jordanian Sovereign Territory. The Arab Palestinian rejected the opportunity to establish a State (more than once) until 1988, when they finally declared Independence while the territory was already under military occupation; but four months after the Jordanians cut all ties with the West Bank. During the tenure of the Mandate and the and the time since independence, the Jewish Immigrants never never represented a colonial power; no relationships between a colonial power and any Jewish Settlement was established while the territory was under under the Mandate. In fact the Jewish Immigrants were not all from the same country, or even the same continent; and could not represent a single power.

The purpose of the occupation is to extend the protections to the sovereignty and integrity of Israel against an opponent that does not recognize the State of Israel; and holds the political position that the Arab Palestinian is the only legitimate sovereign to the territory that covers the land west of the Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sea. This is the same opponent that has declared Jihad (Holy War), and considers any means necessary to take in the eviction of the State of Israel as legal and legitimate. This threat was made in February 1948, and has appeared in the Islamic Resistance Movement Covenant, the Palestinian Nation Charter, and most recently, the the 2013 Official Position Paper published by the Khaled Mashaal, Political Leader, Islamic Resistance Movement and Unity Government Partner. Given the previous history of past behaviors, and actual response to the 2005 Disengagement from the Gaza Strip, the Occupation of Palestinian territory there is no reason to believe that an agreement to suspend combat (or any formal Peace Agreement) will be honored by the Palestinian Regime; and that the Palestinians have every intention of attacking by surprise the enemy relying on Peace Agreement they conclude. Based on the current position of the Arab Palestinians there is essentially little prospect for a peace agreement that will have any success.

Most Respectfully,
R
Not all Jewish Immigrants were Zionist.​

That is true. The Zionists imported Jews from anywhere to populate their settlements. Most were probably unaware of the colonial project.

The Arab Palestinian rejected the opportunity to establish a State (more than once) until 1988,...​

Not true. Palestine was already a provisional state under mandate and they declared independence in 1948 after the Mandate left Palestine.
 
Arabs who live on the same continent may call themselves Arabs (just like Europeans that live on the same continent call themselves Europeans and define themselves through the EU) but they aren't all culturally the same. It's not rocket science dude.


So what about arabs in Lebanon, Jordan, Syria? Same continent?
It's not rocket science, but You seem to loose the initial point of argument. They are all arabs.

Just like they're all Europeans. It's not "rocket science" but it's misleading.





Not even close as the arabs see themselves as all being arabs, it is arab nationality disease that caused the conflict in the first place. The Europeans see themselves as separate nationalities and have their own culture. Just as the Americans have different nationalities and cultures that don't mix. In the UK the migrant cultures have mixed with UK culture to produce a cuisine and fashion distinctive to the rest of the world. ALL BUT ISLAM THAT KEEPS ITSELF ALOOF AND APART FROM THE REST OF THE UK

There is a European "identity" expressed through the EU. The countries in western Europe share many commonalities - religion, political systems and cultural traditions. There also seperate nationalities/ethnic groups/cultural differences. They are all dominant Christian.

"Arabs" are defined as: Arabs - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

Arabs (Arabic: عرب‎, ʿarab) are a major panethnic group.[14] They primarily inhabit Western Asia, North Africa, parts of the Horn of Africa, and other areas in the Arab world. Arabic-speaking populations in general are a highly heterogeneous collection of peoples, with different ancestral origins and identities. The ties that bind the Arab peoples are a veneer of shared heritage by virtue of common linguistic, cultural, and political traditions. As such, Arab identity is based on one or more of genealogical, linguistic or cultural grounds,[15] although with competing identities often taking a more prominent role,[16] based on considerations including regional, national, clan, kin, sect, and tribe affiliations and relationships. If the Arab panethnicity is regarded as a single population, then it constitutes one of the world's largest groups after Han Chinese.


The Arabian Peninsula itself was not entirely originally Arab. Arabization occurred in some parts of the Arabian Peninsula. For example, the language shift to Arabic displaced the indigenous South Semitic Old South Arabian languages of modern-day Yemen and southern Oman. These were the languages spoken in the civilisations of Sheba, Ubar, Magan, Dilmun, and Meluhha—which were spread via migrants from the Arabian peninsula, together with written script, in the 8th and 7th centuries BC to the Horn of Africa (Ethiopia, Eritrea, Djibouti, and Somalia).


Like with Africa, I think we just assume that they are all "pretty much the same"...we're just very ethnocentric and blind to the differences.





You do know about the animosity between Catholics and Protestants I take it, and how it rampant in Europe. Imagine N.I. only spread across Europe, so no commonality of religion. Then there are the offshoots of religion that caused the colonisation of America in the first place, the Lutherans and Quakers. There is no European identity as we are not a concerted whole, but disjointed and separate. We don't even have a common language or culture to bind us together. We are still fighting the last lot of wars. Don't try and see Europe as a federal nation like America as we will never be like that

Of course it's not.
 
montelatici, et al,

Well, this is not exactly accurate and some what exaggerated.

Wow, that's a leap. Let me get this straight. The Zionists did not intend to colonize Palestine because they only colonized a large part of it. Setting aside that they control all of Palestine and the Israeli PM has stated that there will be no Palestinian state, most of Palestine was, in fact colonized. Your dog won't hunt.
(COMMENT)

Some salient points under Mandate:
  • Not all Jewish Immigrants were Zionist.
  • Jewish immigration was encourage.
  • Immigration included all Jews who were willing to assist in the establishment of the Jewish national home.
  • In co-operation with the Jewish Agency, close settlement by Jews on the land, west of the Jordan River.
Some salient points after Mandate:
  • The Jewish Agency completed the UN Steps Preparatory to Independence.
  • In 1949 the Gaza Strip came under the administration of the All Palestine Government (dissolved in 1959) controlled by the Egyptian Military Governorship.
  • In 1950, the West Bank (Unification of the Two Banks) became sovereign Jordanian Territory.
  • On 5 June 1967, hostilities broke out between Israel and Egypt, Jordan and Syria. By the time a ceasefire called for by the Security Council was accepted by the parties, Israeli military forces had occupied the Egyptian Sinai, the Gaza Strip, the West Bank including East Jerusalem, and part of the Syrian Golan Heights.
  • 1997 Oslo II - Area C under full Israeli civil and security control. Settlements are subject to permanent status negotiations:
    • By Agreement with the PLO, "the Settlements" means,
      • In the West Bank - the settlements in Area C;
      • and in the Gaza Strip -
      • the Gush Katif and Erez settlement areas
The Israelis never occupied Palestinian Territory; they did occupied Egyptian Governed Territory and Jordanian Sovereign Territory. The Arab Palestinian rejected the opportunity to establish a State (more than once) until 1988, when they finally declared Independence while the territory was already under military occupation; but four months after the Jordanians cut all ties with the West Bank. During the tenure of the Mandate and the and the time since independence, the Jewish Immigrants never never represented a colonial power; no relationships between a colonial power and any Jewish Settlement was established while the territory was under under the Mandate. In fact the Jewish Immigrants were not all from the same country, or even the same continent; and could not represent a single power.

The purpose of the occupation is to extend the protections to the sovereignty and integrity of Israel against an opponent that does not recognize the State of Israel; and holds the political position that the Arab Palestinian is the only legitimate sovereign to the territory that covers the land west of the Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sea. This is the same opponent that has declared Jihad (Holy War), and considers any means necessary to take in the eviction of the State of Israel as legal and legitimate. This threat was made in February 1948, and has appeared in the Islamic Resistance Movement Covenant, the Palestinian Nation Charter, and most recently, the the 2013 Official Position Paper published by the Khaled Mashaal, Political Leader, Islamic Resistance Movement and Unity Government Partner. Given the previous history of past behaviors, and actual response to the 2005 Disengagement from the Gaza Strip, the Occupation of Palestinian territory there is no reason to believe that an agreement to suspend combat (or any formal Peace Agreement) will be honored by the Palestinian Regime; and that the Palestinians have every intention of attacking by surprise the enemy relying on Peace Agreement they conclude. Based on the current position of the Arab Palestinians there is essentially little prospect for a peace agreement that will have any success.

Most Respectfully,
R

The "purpose of the occupation" has extended far beyond the "protections to the sovereignty and integrity of Israel" - it has extended to attempting to permanently keep the land it is occupying through "settlements" and through restricting Palestinian settlements.

Why do people keep pretending that it is ONLY about security when their very actions indicate it isn't?
 
Back
Top Bottom