If you don't like him using Wikipedia, don't be lazy, just go to the primary sources then. Wow. You are just being lazy.
And in debate, they have always taught us, the person that supplies evidence ALWAYS wins an argument in lieu of those who present NO counter evidence at all. WHERE ARE YOUR SOURCES?
Here, this is the references that the wiki used. Now, let us all see what you are using to define your epistemology, O.K.?
White nationalism
‘White Nationalism,’ Explained
Self-proclaimed white nationalists have embraced Donald J. Trump’s victory. Are they the same as white supremacists? Not exactly.
web.archive.org
". . . Eric Kaufmann, a professor of politics at Birkbeck University in London, has spent years studying the ways that ethnicity intersects with politics. While most researchers in that field focus on ethnic minorities, Professor Kaufmann does the opposite: He studies the behavior of ethnic majorities, particularly whites in the United States and Britain.
White nationalism, he said, is the belief that national identity should be built around white ethnicity, and that white people should therefore maintain both a demographic majority and dominance of the nation’s culture and public life.
So, like white supremacy, white nationalism places the interests of white people over those of other racial groups. White supremacists and white nationalists both believe that racial discrimination should be incorporated into law and policy.
Some will see the distinction between white nationalism and white supremacy as a semantic sleight of hand. But although many white supremacists are also white nationalists, and vice versa, Professor Kaufmann says the terms are not synonyms: White supremacy is based on a racist belief that white people are innately superior to people of other races; white nationalism is about maintaining political and economic dominance, not just a numerical majority or cultural hegemony. . . . "
White supremacy
“Exterminate All the Brutes,” Reviewed: A Vast, Agonizing History of White Supremacy
Raoul Peck’s four-hour documentary on HBO Max reveals the racist underpinnings of American national mythology and European society.
Raoul Peck’s four-hour documentary on HBO Max reveals the racist underpinnings of American national mythology and European society.
www.newyorker.com
". . . The story that he tells is a vast one, a millennial one—that of white supremacy, or, more specifically, whites’ presumption to supremacy, a presumption that, as he makes clear, continues, to this day, to be asserted with violence and justified with lies. Peck ranges back to the Crusades, documenting the claims of white, Christian, European superiority as the argument for conquests in Asia. These events were soon followed by the Spanish Inquisition and its persecution of Jews and Muslims, and—at the same time—the voyage of Columbus to the New World and the genocidal destruction of indigenous peoples that his expedition, and the many explorers that followed, committed. . . "