Exclusive: WSJ Reveals Trump’s Epstein Birthday Note…Authentic, In Congress, and Undeniable

ABC is not reliable news... sorry they did it to themselves...
You have no idea what you are babbling about. Just excuse after excuse. Here is left wing Fox News.


"There is no news there." he told Fox News Digital.

"We have already deposed former Attorney General Bill Barr, the Department of Justice provided nearly 34,000 pages of documents and will produce more, which are being made public as we speak." The committee member claimed that some 97% of those documents were already public, however.
 
Which doesn’t exist and certainly no credible evidence.
Are you claiming that 20 years ago democrats set up fellow democrat (Trump)? Quite the long game.

That is 100% his card. He is skeevy.
 


Transcription:

It’s reassuring isn’t it, to have lasted so long, across all the years of learning and knowing, adventures and (illegible), and still to have your childlike curiosity, the drive to make a difference and the solace of friends” Clinton wrote.

Now thats what a normal happy birthday note looks like.
 
You have no idea what you are babbling about. Just excuse after excuse. Here is left wing Fox News.


"There is no news there." he told Fox News Digital.

"We have already deposed former Attorney General Bill Barr, the Department of Justice provided nearly 34,000 pages of documents and will produce more, which are being made public as we speak." The committee member claimed that some 97% of those documents were already public, however.
Yes and Barr said nowhere is Trump implemented in any crime involving Epstein... so you are dreaming dude... once again for the very slow... IF TRUMP WERE IN THE FILES OR ON A LIST BIDEN WOULD HAVE USED IT....
now find another empty tree to bark at....
 
Yes and Barr said nowhere is Trump implemented in any crime involving Epstein... so you are dreaming dude... once again for the very slow... IF TRUMP WERE IN THE FILES OR ON A LIST BIDEN WOULD HAVE USED IT....
now find another empty tree to bark at....
Then release the files!
 
Then release the files!
Why?.... I'm hearing they will soon enough... I'm sure Trump wants it released just before the midterms... there is no there there....
 
Are you claiming that 20 years ago democrats set up fellow democrat (Trump)? Quite the long game.

That is 100% his card. He is skeevy.
No. I’m making no such claim. I’m just saying that the contention that he signed any such card is absolutely unverified.

FFS, we don’t even know when that card was made or altered.

There is simply zero credible evidence.

Plus, there’s this: let’s pretend that there was any verification of that card and Trump’s supposed addition to it. That established that sometime way back in time, Trump and Epstein were buddies. So what? We all already knew that.

It might also tend to establish a certain bawdy nature of those who may have associated with Epstein. It does not thereby establish anything about Trump’s behavior. It says nothing about sexual relations with kids or even minors under 17 by him or anyone else for that matter.
 
citygator your party is about to step in another huge pile of shit just before the midterms.... and they are too stupid to see it coming... Trump has learned to use the dems hatred and mistrust of him to make them look crazy... and its working as you are proof of it....
 
Then release the files!
No. That could undermine the criminal investigations and possible prosecutions.

Also, it could smear perfectly innocent people with a taint of pedo behavior simply on the basis of guilt by association.
 
Are you claiming that 20 years ago democrats set up fellow democrat (Trump)? Quite the long game.

That is 100% his card. He is skeevy.
its-not-his-signature-or-it-is-but-it-must-be-fake-v0-r5xk38ezb5of1.jpeg
 
Yes and Barr said nowhere is Trump implemented in any crime involving Epstein...

1. That is a lie.

What Barr said was that he didn't see evidence of Trump criminally implicated. Barr didn't discuss the extent of what materials he actually looked at.

I called you out on this falsehood before, so pretty clearly this time you are just straight lying.


2. Barr knows what it takes to prove a crime in a court of law.

You need evidence of a SPECIFIC criminal act, against a specific victim and it's more likely than not there is not going be something like that found in Epstein materials. Not against Trump and probably not against anyone else who wasn't already criminally charged.
 
Last edited:
Why?.... I'm hearing they will soon enough... I'm sure Trump wants it released just before the midterms... there is no there there....
Fine with me. I dont want to make up stuff just want to know. All I know now is that I thought it was a big nothing burger and then Trump tries to squash the releases, puts out old stuff twice, calls it all a hoax (wasnt a hoax to the victims), has some skeevy stuff come out and yet still wont release the rest. Makes me think I was wrong. Can you imagine how bad the rest is if he wont let it out?
 
15th post
..




































A birthday card from 2003????????????????????????

ALERT THE PRESS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


IMPEACH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!








































:dance::dance::dance::dance::dance::dance::dance::dance:
Trump said he didn't do it. He knows notting!

But thanks for admitting he lied, Cletus. :abgg2q.jpg:
 
No. That could undermine the criminal investigations and possible prosecutions.

Bullshit, DOJ explicitly said there is no evidence to support further investigations:

This systematic review revealed no incriminating “client list.” There was also no credibleevidence found that Epstein blackmailed prominent individuals as part of his actions. We did not uncover evidence that could predicate an investigation against uncharged third parties.

 
Lib loons leap light years looking for “young” to mean underage.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom