EXCLUSIVE: U.S. Attorney Weiss Colluded With DOJ To Thwart Congressional Questioning, Emails Show

[Oldestyle]

In some countries, Orange Jesus would have been given a blindfold and a last donut for inciting a riot.

Like Russia, China and Cuba? Places where the political opposition is jailed and or shot? You must be so proud of what the Biden DOJ has turned the US into, August!

 

[Marener]

Explain what heresay is?

And out of court statement used to assert the truth of an issue.

Since the whistleblower was not present for the discussion between Garland and Weiss, their testimony about what they heard about that conversation is hearsay.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

And out of court statement used to assert the truth of an issue.

Since the whistleblower was not present for the discussion between Garland and Weiss, their testimony about what they heard about that conversation is hearsay.

When your told directly by someone you can't do something it's not heresay dumbass.
Heresay is when someone else said they were told by someone else other than Weiss

 

[Marener]

Actually according to what Weiss told six witnesses, including the IRS agents who became whistleblowers and an FBI witness who corroborated the IRS whistleblower testimony that he had attempted to bring charges in both DC and in California but was denied by Biden appointed DA's in both locations at which point he AGAIN said he asked for Special Counsel status from Garland and was once again DENIED that status!

Not a very accurate statement.

They were following standard DoJ process, which first meant to ask for cooperation from the California DA who declined.

After that, Weiss did not request special counsel status until August when it was approved immediately.

 

[Oldestyle]

Hes claiming it was heresay

Easy way to determine who's lying. Subpoena everyone who was present at that meeting and have them testify under oath as to what Weiss said.

 

[Oldestyle]

Not a very accurate statement.

They were following standard DoJ process, which first meant to ask for cooperation from the California DA who declined.

After that, Weiss did not request special counsel status until August when it was approved immediately.

According to multiple witnesses at that meeting, Marener...Weiss said he asked for Special Counsel status from Garland when the DA's from DC and California turned down his request. So was Weiss lying or was Garland?

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Easy way to determine who's lying. Subpoena everyone who was present at that meeting and have them testify under oath as to what Weiss said.

The whistle blowers have already went before Congress

 

[Marener]

When your told directly by someone you can't do something it's not heresay dumbass.
Heresay is when someone else said they were told by someone else other than Weiss

Nope. Hearsay is when you are testifying about something you were told by someone else had occurred.

The whistleblower testified that he was told that Weiss had been told he couldn't have special counsel status.

That's the definition of hearsay. The whistleblower was not part of the actual conversation they're testifying had occurred, it was only described to them (supposedly).

 

[Marener]

According to multiple witnesses at that meeting, Marener...Weiss said he asked for Special Counsel status from Garland when the DA's from DC and California turned down his request. So was Weiss lying or was Garland?

Let's see the testimony then. I think you have the details wrong, yet again.

 

[Marener]

Easy way to determine who's lying. Subpoena everyone who was present at that meeting and have them testify under oath as to what Weiss said.

What Weiss said at that meeting doesn't actually establish the fact as to what happened between Weiss and Garland.

It only establishes what happened at that meeting.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Nope. Hearsay is when you are testifying about something you were told by someone else had occurred.

The whistleblower testified that he was told that Weiss had been told he couldn't have special counsel status.

That's the definition of hearsay. The whistleblower was not part of the actual conversation they're testifying had occurred, it was only described to them (supposedly).

Wrong whose lying Weiss or garland?
After all it was Weiss who said he couldn't get special conceal status

 

[Oldestyle]

The whistle blowers have already went before Congress

And they testified under oath! David Weiss however has NOT! There is a reason why Merrick Garland appointed Weiss as Special Counsel now after not doing it earlier, Big and that reason is that if he's Special Counsel in charge of an "ongoing investigation" he can refuse to answer questions about it! Jim Jordan wanted Weiss to testify. Now Weiss can duck those awkward questions.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

What Weiss said at that meeting doesn't actually establish the fact as to what happened between Weiss and Garland.

It only establishes what happened at that meeting.

Quit spewing your stupidity

 

[Marener]

After all it was Weiss who said he couldn't get special conceal status

Nope. Weiss said the opposite.

What They Are Saying: U.S. Attorney Weiss’ Response to Graham Creates More Questions Than Answers | United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary

WASHINGTON – At the end of June, U.S. Senator Lindsey Graham (R-South Carolina), Ranking Member of...

www.judiciary.senate.gov

 

[Oldestyle]

What Weiss said at that meeting doesn't actually establish the fact as to what happened between Weiss and Garland.

It only establishes what happened at that meeting.

So you think Weiss lied when he told those six other people at that meeting that he'd asked to be named Special Counsel and was turned down?

 

[Marener]

Quit spewing your stupidity

These are facts. All you have is hearsay.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

And they testified under oath! David Weiss however has NOT! There is a reason why Merrick Garland appointed Weiss as Special Counsel now after not doing it earlier, Big and that reason is that if he's Special Counsel in charge of an "ongoing investigation" he can refuse to answer questions about it! Jim Jordan wanted Weiss to testify. Now Weiss can duck those awkward questions.

Exactly

 

[Marener]

So you think Weiss lied when he told those six other people at that meeting that he'd asked to be named Special Counsel and was turned down?

More than likely he misspoke or was misunderstood.

Or maybe you're not accurately reporting what these 6 people have said.

 

[Oldestyle]

Because either Weiss is lying or Merrick Garland is...

 

[bigrebnc1775]

These are facts. All you have is hearsay.

Not when you don't understand what heresay is you don't know what facts are