Exclusive: Justice Department launches a criminal investigation into Trump accuser E. Jean Carroll

[AZrailwhale]

For most people, that claim would be doubted by a jury.
But when the person in question openly claims he likes to “grab women by the “p*ssy” the jury will believe it happened.

Why do you keep repeating that lie. More than one person has linked to or written the entire quote to you and you still keep lying.

 

[Southern Dad]

If she did indeed commit perjury, we certainly want to know, right?

 

[AZrailwhale]

For most people, that claim would be doubted by a jury.
But when the person in question openly claims he likes to “grab women by the “p*ssy” the jury will believe it happened.

Why do you keep repeating that lie. More than one person has linked to or written the entire quote to you and you still keep lying.

 

[meaner gene]

Think if one of Bush's guys put sea shells the same way. Media 24/7.

You side made up T-shirts saying 8646

 

[meaner gene]

If she did indeed commit perjury, we certainly want to know, right?

It isn't perjury, because that requires the statement being germane to the case.

First, district courts regularly exclude evidence of litigation
financing under Rule 401, finding it "irrelevant to credibility" and that it "does not assist the factfinder in determining whether or not the witness is telling the
truth." Benitez v. Lopez, No. 17-cv-3827, 2019 WL 1578167, at *1 (E.D.N.Y. Mar. 14,
2019);

 

[jknowgood]

You side made up T-shirts saying 8646

Lol, that t-shirt should've never been made. His brain was fried before he became president. Anyway I don't wish death on anyone.

 

[meaner gene]

Why do you keep repeating that lie. More than one person has linked to or written the entire quote to you and you still keep lying.

Thus, the district court ruled that a "jury reasonably
could find, even from the Access Hollywood tape alone, that Mr. Trump admitted in the Access Hollywood tape that he in fact has had contact with women's genitalia in the past without their consent, or that he has attempted to do so."
Carroll, 660 F. Supp. 3d at 203.

the first rationale adopted by the district court -- that the recording was evidence
of one or more prior sexual assaults and therefore admissible under Rules 413 and 415 -- provided a proper basis for the district court's exercise of its broad discretion.

 

[BluesLegend]

"Objective to a fault".....shit, you'll never have to worry about that, Trump cuck.

Trump has been accused of sexually assaulting over 20 women...they are not all lying. You don't have an objective bone in your body.

^^^ 2,863 posts, 105% troll rating impressive.

 

[g5000]

Why do you keep repeating that lie. More than one person has linked to or written the entire quote to you and you still keep lying.

The full quote makes Trump look even worse.

 

[Mac1958]

This is just harassment, plain and simple. And Blanche had to recuse himself, because he was the lawyer to lost the Carroll case.

And another example of how he's intimidating pretty much everyone from uttering a discouraging word in any way.

The world has seen this before. Now we know the answer to the question "how could they have let this happen?"

 

[struth]

The court allowed Trump's lawyers to probe the error in Carroll's deposition, and they could not show either intentional deception in the deposition answer, or financial influence on the case. With the court of appeals upholding those findings by the judge, in excluding raising questions about the deposition answer at trial.

Good point this criminal probe is much more then Carroll being a pawn

 

[struth]

And your side turned sea shells into an assassination threat.

That’s because a wacko used seashells to spell out a command to assassinate the president

 

[August West]

Kangaroo court of Trump haters

That would include most of the people on this planet.
I hate everyone who robs cancer charities and buys whores when their wives are pregnant. I`m not too thrilled about cult leaders who order their thugs to beat up the police. "fight like hell" your Jesus told them. I`m hoping to see gas go to $7-$10 a gallon.

 

[rightwinger]

Why do you keep repeating that lie. More than one person has linked to or written the entire quote to you and you still keep lying.

Trumps bragging about “Grabbing p*ssies” was played to the jury and was influential to their decision.

As usual, in court, Trump is his own worst enemy

 

[Lisa558]

They were found guilty by a jury of their peers, or plea bargained to avoid a trial. Almost a 100% conviction rate.

We saw the video, we know the violence and destruction that took place. Trump rewarded his Brownshirts.

You might really be that stupid, my mistake.

^^^ No this is an interesting post.

This leftist calls Trump supporters “Brownshirts” - Nazis - while Democrats are running an actual Nazi for the Senate, running another one who says Jews who support Israel should be imprisoned in detention centers, and defend the calls to genocide Jews as “free speech.”

 

[Lisa558]

That’s because a wacko used seashells to spell out a command to assassinate the president

Not just any old wacko - the former head of the FBI.

 

[rightwinger]

Not just any old wacko - the former head of the FBI.

Evil genius planning an assassination with seashells

Justice Dept is being mocked around the world

 

[struth]

Evil genius planning an assassination with seashells

Justice Dept is being mocked around the world

Nobody claimed he was a genius

Frankly he’s obviously pretty dumb

 

[DonGlock26]

"On Thursday, however, that source followed up and said Carroll is not the target of the investigation, which is focused on funding that Hoffman's nonprofit, American Future Republic, provided to help cover some of her legal team's expenses.

On Thursday evening, after this report published, the U.S. attorney for the Northern District of Illinois, Andrew Boutros, said in a statement on X: "In light of wide-spread reporting and intense media and public interest into the E. Jean Carroll matter in New York, the Chicago U.S. Attorney's Office can confirm that it has not opened—and has never opened—a criminal investigation into E. Jean Carroll. Any claim to the contrary is categorically false.""

Justice Dept. investigating outside funding E. Jean Carroll received for civil lawsuits against Trump, sources say

DOJ is probing a nonprofit run by billionaire Reid Hoffman that funded a portion of E. Jean Carroll's civil litigation against President Trump, several sources said.

www.cbsnews.com

CBS's "source" is changing their tune, if the "source" actually exists.

 

[struth]

"On Thursday, however, that source followed up and said Carroll is not the target of the investigation, which is focused on funding that Hoffman's nonprofit, American Future Republic, provided to help cover some of her legal team's expenses.

On Thursday evening, after this report published, the U.S. attorney for the Northern District of Illinois, Andrew Boutros, said in a statement on X: "In light of wide-spread reporting and intense media and public interest into the E. Jean Carroll matter in New York, the Chicago U.S. Attorney's Office can confirm that it has not opened—and has never opened—a criminal investigation into E. Jean Carroll. Any claim to the contrary is categorically false.""

Justice Dept. investigating outside funding E. Jean Carroll received for civil lawsuits against Trump, sources say

DOJ is probing a nonprofit run by billionaire Reid Hoffman that funded a portion of E. Jean Carroll's civil litigation against President Trump, several sources said.

www.cbsnews.com

CBS's "source" is changing their tune, if the "source" actually exists.

Another thread that didn’t age well