Good question. Maybe you should find that out before claiming there's a bribery scandal.
But that's not the point, dummy.
Hillary got $145 million from Russians. It was only important that she approve it, the others just voted along
How do you know that either Clinton needed to be bribed to give approval or that "The others just voted along"?
I'll tell you. You don't know that.
Dummy.
Why Russians gave $145 million to Clinton Foundation?
Most of that money was donated prior to 2008 election, and there is no evidence it influenced Uranium One deal.
Really? The timeline below looks quite incriminating to any honest rational person:
2008-2010: Uranium One and former UrAsia investors make $8.65 million in donations to the Clinton Foundation. Uranium One investors stand to profit on a Rosatom deal
June 2009: Rosatom subsidiary ARMZ takes a 17 percent ownership stake in Uranium One
2010-2011: Investors give millions more in donations to the Clinton Foundation
June 2010: Rosatom seeks majority ownership of Uranium One, pending approval by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States, of which the State Department is a member. Rosatom says it does not plan to increase its stake in Uranium One or to take the company private.
June 29, 2010: Bill Clinton is paid $500,000 for a speech in Moscow by a Russian investment bank with ties to the Kremlin that assigned a buy rating to Uranium One stock.
October 2010: Rosatom’s majority ownership approved by Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States
January 2013: Rosatom takes full control of Uranium One and takes it private