They were attempting to intimidate the police whom they knew was going to be showing up.
How do you know what they "knew" and their intent? Speculating?
The cops have guns (obviously, as we all can clearly see by the photos). It looks to me like the cops (sheriff and deputies) were the ones attempting to intimidate.
You are under the mistaken belief that armed=dangerous.
They claim they were on private property, but others seem to disagree. Either way, their visible armed presence (on private property or not) was there to intimidate, not protest.
Intimidate WHO? The Cops?
Armed does not mean dangerous or attempting to intimidate. Armed is just armed. Get treated for your hoplophobia. It's not healthy.
And, on PRIVATE PROPERTY, one can carry weapons as he/she chooses in Texas. The police/sheriff had no right to stop it.
They said they were allowed to protest without weapons. Then they showed up with weapons. It’s not rocket science.
No, you need to re-read it. Here it is again:
“Ellison says she even called the Ector County Sheriff's Department ahead of time to let them know there would be a peaceful protest at the bar when she reopened Monday. Ellison maintains she was told there wouldn't be any trouble
as long people were not seen carrying firearms on the property. (aka in the bar - 51% of revenue from alcohol sales)
“
So Ellison made sure the demonstration took place
in an area behind the bar, (not the bar) which she says is her private property. It was met with and shut down by force.
“Ector County Sheriff Mike Griffis sent in his department's SWAT team with guns drawn. The deputies arrested eight people, including Ellison.”
Ellison made sure the demonstration did not take place IN THE BAR, in response to the sheriff telling her the conditions of allowing the protest (because carrying in a bar is illegal).
.