Not seeing how that is a good thing. Given the extreme gerrymandering in state legislatures, that could potentially cement control of entire states under one party for representation. Could also open the door to more corruption and cronyism....
Why do you think that the Founding Fathers set it up that way?
Naturally, democrats abhor Republics and want pure democracy at any price, because they are masters at propaganda for the clueless masses, by taking over education, the media, etc. and always dangling free stuff
Have you ever studied both chambers of Congress on how they were set up?. The House was elected directly by the people, who served only 2 terms and the numbers of them based upon population, as where the Senate has ONLY 2 people and serve 6 years. Now who was given more power? Was it not the Senate? So the Founding Fathers held a higher regard for those in the state legislature, in terms of what is really gone on verse the average voter who is clueless, by letting them appoint the most powerful chamber of Congress. The Founding Fathers were horrified at a pure democracy and mob rule, which means only one thing, they had a little thing called common sense, which is probably a racist term by now.
But as always, the Left abhors this sort of thinking, which is the same reason they want rid of the Electoral College. And if the Left gets their way with the Electoral College like they did with the Senate, then the states of New York and California will always decide who sits in the Oval Office for the other 48 states due to their larger population levels. Gee, I wonder which party would ALWAYS win?
As for the Senate, the moment they let them be elected directly was the moment having two different chambers became absurd.
