Ex-Judge Roy Moore Files Supreme Court Brief to Urge End to Marriage Equality

[miketx]

Update; this case is dead in the water

Justices Thomas and Alito lash out at the decision that cleared way for same-sex marriage

Justice Clarence Thomas, joined by Justice Samuel Alito, lashed out on Monday at the religious liberty implications of the Supreme Court's 2015 decision that cleared the way for same-sex marriage nationwide.

www.cnn.com

The case that prompted Thomas' statement concerned Kim Davis, a former county clerk in Kentucky who gained national attention in 2015 and was jailed after declining to issue marriage licenses out of an objection to same sex marriages. The high court on Monday declined to hear an appeal in her case.

Thomas called Davis "one of the first victims" of the court's "cavalier treatment of religion" in the Obergefell v. Hodges decision but warned "she will not be the last." He said that his it uou er case was not properly presented before the court, but he urged his colleagues to revisit the religious liberty implications of the landmark opinion down the road.

Why is it you only post in threads about faggots or child molesters?

You think that is all I do because it is the only place that you hang out so you have no fucking idea what I do.

All one need do is look at your posts. Like all progs, you lie.

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

Update; this case is dead in the water

Justices Thomas and Alito lash out at the decision that cleared way for same-sex marriage

Justice Clarence Thomas, joined by Justice Samuel Alito, lashed out on Monday at the religious liberty implications of the Supreme Court's 2015 decision that cleared the way for same-sex marriage nationwide.

www.cnn.com

The case that prompted Thomas' statement concerned Kim Davis, a former county clerk in Kentucky who gained national attention in 2015 and was jailed after declining to issue marriage licenses out of an objection to same sex marriages. The high court on Monday declined to hear an appeal in her case.

Thomas called Davis "one of the first victims" of the court's "cavalier treatment of religion" in the Obergefell v. Hodges decision but warned "she will not be the last." He said that his it uou er case was not properly presented before the court, but he urged his colleagues to revisit the religious liberty implications of the landmark opinion down the road.

Why is it you only post in threads about faggots or child molesters?

You think that is all I do because it is the only place that you hang out so you have no fucking idea what I do.

All one need do is look at your posts. Like all progs, you lie.

My watched threads and posts dip shit

https://www.usmessageboard.com/watched/threads

 

[miketx]

Update; this case is dead in the water

Justices Thomas and Alito lash out at the decision that cleared way for same-sex marriage

Justice Clarence Thomas, joined by Justice Samuel Alito, lashed out on Monday at the religious liberty implications of the Supreme Court's 2015 decision that cleared the way for same-sex marriage nationwide.

www.cnn.com

The case that prompted Thomas' statement concerned Kim Davis, a former county clerk in Kentucky who gained national attention in 2015 and was jailed after declining to issue marriage licenses out of an objection to same sex marriages. The high court on Monday declined to hear an appeal in her case.

Thomas called Davis "one of the first victims" of the court's "cavalier treatment of religion" in the Obergefell v. Hodges decision but warned "she will not be the last." He said that his it uou er case was not properly presented before the court, but he urged his colleagues to revisit the religious liberty implications of the landmark opinion down the road.

Why is it you only post in threads about faggots or child molesters?

You think that is all I do because it is the only place that you hang out so you have no fucking idea what I do.

All one need do is look at your posts. Like all progs, you lie.

My watched threads and posts dip shit

https://www.usmessageboard.com/watched/threads

I was just kidding, fairy. Calm down.

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

Update; this case is dead in the water

Justices Thomas and Alito lash out at the decision that cleared way for same-sex marriage

Justice Clarence Thomas, joined by Justice Samuel Alito, lashed out on Monday at the religious liberty implications of the Supreme Court's 2015 decision that cleared the way for same-sex marriage nationwide.

www.cnn.com

The case that prompted Thomas' statement concerned Kim Davis, a former county clerk in Kentucky who gained national attention in 2015 and was jailed after declining to issue marriage licenses out of an objection to same sex marriages. The high court on Monday declined to hear an appeal in her case.

Thomas called Davis "one of the first victims" of the court's "cavalier treatment of religion" in the Obergefell v. Hodges decision but warned "she will not be the last." He said that his it uou er case was not properly presented before the court, but he urged his colleagues to revisit the religious liberty implications of the landmark opinion down the road.

Why is it you only post in threads about faggots or child molesters?

The Child Molester vote is very important this year, as liberals have successfully pushed to win the Chomo-Americans as well as other criminal classes the franchise. Did Nambla give their official endorsement to Sleepy Joe yet?

Watch that stupid shit Princess!!

 

[Blues Man]

If gays want their marriages left alone they should leave everyone else alone. Not everyone wants to be part of the celebration of your love. Keep it to yourself and those who care.

Then you keep yours to yourself. Don't hold hands with or kiss your spouse in public etc

And I guarantee that you are bothered by gay marriage far more than they are bothered by yours

 

[Blues Man]

Why do you people care what other people do?

 

[Bob Blaylock]

My watched threads and posts dip shit

https://www.usmessageboard

That link leads anyone who follows it to his own watched threads, not yours.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

If gays want their marriages left alone they should leave everyone else alone. Not everyone wants to be part of the celebration of your love. Keep it to yourself and those who care.

Then you keep yours to yourself. Don't hold hands with or kiss your spouse in public etc

And I guarantee that you are bothered by gay marriage far more than they are bothered by yours

I don't have a spouse. When I did I did not engage in pda. Except with my dog. I was once sued by a couple of lesbians who wanted me to paint their wedding portrait. I claimed a freedom to refuse. They disagreed. I won. That greatly bothered me.

 

[Borillar]

Lesbian marriages are surely a disaster, based on the divorce rate.

Regular straight marriages fail at almost 50% rate. Sounds pretty disastrous to me.

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

My watched threads and posts dip shit

https://www.usmessageboard

That link leads anyone who follows it to his own watched threads, not yours.

Meh

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

Lesbian marriages are surely a disaster, based on the divorce rate.

Do tell. What is the respective divorce rate gay vs. straight marriages? I doubt that you know

 

[Blues Man]

Lesbian marriages are surely a disaster, based on the divorce rate.

Do tell. What is the respective divorce rate gay vs. straight marriages? I doubt that you know

There isn't enough long term data to compare

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

Lesbian marriages are surely a disaster, based on the divorce rate.

Do tell. What is the respective divorce rate gay vs. straight marriages? I doubt that you know

There isn't enough long term data to compare

Gays have been marring is some states for over a decade and in other countries for much longer. The fact is that it's complicated.

Differences Between Same-Sex Divorce and Straight Divorce, By the Numbers - Brown Law Offices

The legalization of same-sex marriage came with a major caveat: same-sex couples can now pursue both marriage and divorce. Now that same-sex marriage has been legal for over a decade in some states, we're beginning to gain a better sense of how often LGBT couples divorce—and how this process...

www.brownlawoffices.com

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

Lesbian marriages are surely a disaster, based on the divorce rate.

Do tell. What is the respective divorce rate gay vs. straight marriages? I doubt that you know

There isn't enough long term data to compare

Gays have been marring is some states for over a decade and in other countries for much longer. The fact is that it's complicated.

Differences Between Same-Sex Divorce and Straight Divorce, By the Numbers - Brown Law Offices

The legalization of same-sex marriage came with a major caveat: same-sex couples can now pursue both marriage and divorce. Now that same-sex marriage has been legal for over a decade in some states, we're beginning to gain a better sense of how often LGBT couples divorce—and how this process...

www.brownlawoffices.com

What's so damned funny Bobby? Is that the best that the best that you can do.? Do you anything at all to actually contribute. ? Never mind. I know the answer. We all do.

 

[Blues Man]

Lesbian marriages are surely a disaster, based on the divorce rate.

Do tell. What is the respective divorce rate gay vs. straight marriages? I doubt that you know

There isn't enough long term data to compare

Gays have been marring is some states for over a decade and in other countries for much longer. The fact is that it's complicated.

Differences Between Same-Sex Divorce and Straight Divorce, By the Numbers - Brown Law Offices

The legalization of same-sex marriage came with a major caveat: same-sex couples can now pursue both marriage and divorce. Now that same-sex marriage has been legal for over a decade in some states, we're beginning to gain a better sense of how often LGBT couples divorce—and how this process...

www.brownlawoffices.com

It's still a minuscule number compared to centuries of hetero marriages

But I think the divorce rates will eventually be the same.

People are people after all

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

In Related News:

Anti-Equality Forces See Amy Coney Barrett Nomination as Key to Reversing LGBTQ Progress | Right Wing Watch

Opinion As a gay man who is happily married to the love of my life, it may seem strange that I welcomed a recent statement from hard-right Supreme Court

www.rightwingwatch.org

These people are in serious need of getting a fucking life and stop worrying about how others live
Their claim that the marriage of gay people violates their religious freedom is a major crock of shit

Let’s start by recognizing that a supermajority of Americans supports marriage equality for same-sex couples and legal protections for LGBTQ Americans from discrimination. Anti-equality activists are demanding, and now eagerly anticipating, that a Supreme Court dominated by right-wing ideologues will undermine the fundamental and popularly supported principle of equality under law when it comes to LGBTQ people.

It doesn’t take a lot of tea-leaf reading to understand that marriage equality is vulnerable. Barrett sided with the right-wing justices who dissented angrily from the court’s 2015 marriage equality ruling, suggesting the issue should have been left to the states. She has also suggested that laws against sex discrimination don’t protect people from discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity.

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

This just in:

These people are sick and disgusting. Who the hell do they think that they are to try to tell others who they can love and marry? They have to be deeply disturbed and insecure individuals.

Amy Coney Barrett Puts Reversal of Marriage Equality ‘Clearly Within Sight,’ Says Anti-Equality National Organization for Marriage | Right Wing Watch

While many Republicans and right-wing activists are pretending that they have no idea how Amy Coney Barrett will rule on major issues, anti-equality

www.rightwingwatch.org

Brown was gleeful that Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, D-R.I., mentioned NOM during his questioning of Barrett, calling it evidence that “leading politicians from both parties see NOM as a powerful force for marriage and all the issues we care so deeply about.”

Brown continued, “We may already have the five votes we need on the US Supreme Court to overturn the Obergefell decision that redefined marriage, but there is no question that the addition of Amy Coney Barrett to the Court significantly strengthens our hand.”

Their problem is bring a case on behalf of someone who has standing and who can claim that they have been personally harmed by same sex marriage. Roy Moore on behalf of Kim Davis-claiming religious freedom- just tried and got shot down. Can an one think of an argument that might actually fly ?

 

[John T. Ford]

Any resistance to the Left's agenda to normalize all perversions is a Good Thing.

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

Any resistance to the Left's agenda to normalize all perversions is a Good Thing.

Shat the fuck does that mean. ? All perversions? List them!

 

[Dick Foster]

This is sickening, disgusting and heart breaking ! There is something seriously wrong with people who think that they have the right to control the lives of other people in the name of their distorted and bastardized version of religious liberty.

Same sex marriage has been the law of the land since June of 2015. Five years. Same sex couples have actually been getting married much longer than that in some states. Society has not been undermined and the institution of marriage has not been destroyed. In fact, in my estimation, is stronger when there is inclusion and the base is broadened.

Furthermore, it is not even an issue for the vast majority of Americans. These same sex couple have just become part of the social fabric and are an integral part of the community like everyone else. They work, they pay taxes, they volunteer, the maintain homes and establish families. And now they and their children can enjoy the same legal protections , financial advantages and social status as the rest of us take for granted.

And what will happen if Obergefell is overturned. No doubt some states- and we could pretty much name then- would halt such weddings. But it is unknown if they would, or could void the marriages that have taken place already. Straight people should consider how they would feel if their marriage was somehow annulled for some bogus religious reason- such as not being married in a church. They should think about how their lives would be upended by a cascade of legal and financial issues thrown at them.

It is clear to me that people like Davis and Moore have serious problems and suffer from something bordering on a religious psychosis. They have absolutely no compassion or empathy for the people who would be devastated by this.

I can think of no time in the history of this nation that a right was established and then revoked. It would truly be a dark day in America if such a thing were to happen . My only hope is that John Roberts, a conservative to be sure- but one who is also concerned about his legacy, and that of his court-would not let this happen.

Ex-Judge Roy Moore Files Supreme Court Brief to Urge End to Equal Marriage

"The Foundation believes that the Framers of the Fourteenth Amendment did not intend for it to protect a right to same-sex marriage," the briefing said.

www.newsweek.com

When Obergefell v. Hodges was decided in 2015, Moore ordered Alabama judges to ignore the ruling. Moore was suspended for that action.

Same-sex marriage was legalized in 2015 by the Supreme Court's decision in the Obergefell v. Hodges case in which justices found that the Fourteenth Amendment protects both opposite-sex and same-sex marriage.

"The Foundation has an interest in this case because it believes that religious liberty is the foremost gift of God," the briefing read, "and Kim Davis was deprived of her religious liberty because of this Court's decision in Obergefell."

"In addition, the Foundation believes that the Framers of the Fourteenth Amendment did not intend for it to protect a right to same-sex marriage," the briefing continued.

Well marriage between a man and a woman was been the law for a lot longer, faggot. Besides why do you give a shit? Marriage was basically an institution to protect children and to prevent inbreeding and queers can't breed anyway, thankfully. Of course you could always move to someplace where life is easier for queers, whoever that place maybe if it exists. I know why not try the middle east and some of the Muslim countries? LOL