Evolution. Pfffft

Sure you did..

Yes I did.

So you have repeatedly stated in this thread this and equivalent statements:
The fact remains, a fish 66 million years ago is still just a fish

Since you have claimed that a fish existed 66 million years ago- where is the evidence that modern man existed 66 million years ago?

The premise of your entire laughable attempt to dispute evolution is based upon your claim that a fish has not changed in 66 million years ago.

If you don't believe that fish existed 66 million years ago- then this thread is a blatant lie.
Cutting out what I posted, tsk tsk. Violation of TOS. Want to go back and post my entire quote now?

I didn't alter what you said- that is your quote.

Want to answer the question? Of course not- it gets in the way of your false narrative.

Since you have claimed that a fish existed 66 million years ago- where is the evidence that modern man existed 66 million years ago?

The premise of your entire laughable attempt to dispute evolution is based upon your claim that a fish has not changed in 66 million years ago.

If you don't believe that fish existed 66 million years ago- then this thread is a blatant lie.


Or maybe such a delicate Snowflake as yourself can report me and whine about how unfair the moderators are.
Not my problem you want to avoid the issue of why there is no evidence of species evolving into other species by ignoring what I say.

It is not my problem that you are too scared to address why you claim that a fish has existed for 66 million years- but there are no modern human fossils that go back even 6 million years.
I do not claim it, troll.
Go tell your mommy your diapers need changing if you can't answer why there is evidence evolution has been proven to be not true.
 
Yes I did.

So you have repeatedly stated in this thread this and equivalent statements:
The fact remains, a fish 66 million years ago is still just a fish

Since you have claimed that a fish existed 66 million years ago- where is the evidence that modern man existed 66 million years ago?

The premise of your entire laughable attempt to dispute evolution is based upon your claim that a fish has not changed in 66 million years ago.

If you don't believe that fish existed 66 million years ago- then this thread is a blatant lie.
Cutting out what I posted, tsk tsk. Violation of TOS. Want to go back and post my entire quote now?

I didn't alter what you said- that is your quote.

Want to answer the question? Of course not- it gets in the way of your false narrative.

Since you have claimed that a fish existed 66 million years ago- where is the evidence that modern man existed 66 million years ago?

The premise of your entire laughable attempt to dispute evolution is based upon your claim that a fish has not changed in 66 million years ago.

If you don't believe that fish existed 66 million years ago- then this thread is a blatant lie.


Or maybe such a delicate Snowflake as yourself can report me and whine about how unfair the moderators are.
Not my problem you want to avoid the issue of why there is no evidence of species evolving into other species by ignoring what I say.

It is not my problem that you are too scared to address why you claim that a fish has existed for 66 million years- but there are no modern human fossils that go back even 6 million years.
I do not claim it, troll.
Go tell your mommy your diapers need changing if you can't answer why there is evidence evolution has been proven to be not true.

So you have repeatedly stated in this thread this and equivalent statements:
Weatherboy: The fact remains, a fish 66 million years ago is still just a fish

Since you have claimed that a fish existed 66 million years ago- where is the evidence that modern man existed 66 million years ago?

The premise of your entire laughable attempt to dispute evolution is based upon your claim that a fish has not changed in 66 million years ago.

If you don't believe that fish existed 66 million years ago- then this thread is a blatant lie
 
`

0df86e4593bfa0f095363056fd77f912.jpg

`
 
When did I take that position?

Here are direct quotes of what you claimed:

Coelacanth, thought to have been extinct 66 million years ago.


Why no changes in 6 million years, let alone 66 million years?


You have stated that the Coelacanth has existed for 66 million years now twice.

Where are the modern human fossils that go back as far as the Coelacanth?

And why are you so terrified to answer that question?
The OP is about evolution, not dating. Your lame attempts at having to avoid answering why species have not evolved over millions of years is obvious to all.

The fact remains, a fish 66 million years ago is still just a fish. An identical fish.

Okay- once again- 66 million years ago.

Why are there no fossils of modern man from 66 million years ago?

Why are you making such lame attempts to avoid answering the question?
Gee, now how did I know you had no answer as to why species remain unchanged over millions of years?
Why it's almost as if you know evolution of species is a lie.

I already answered your question yesterday- you lied about my answer and went on.

What you are doing is desperately dodging the question of why there is no evidence of modern man from 66 million years ago- even though you admit that the fish existed 66 million years ago.

Sure you did.
Why do you believe them when they say 66 million years?
The half-life of C14 is 5,730 years.
If you know how much C14 atoms were present at the time, you can calculate time.
Scientists assume the ratio of C14 is a constant.
C14 is formed in the atmosphere from cosmic rays.
I challenge it is not a constant ratio.
Look dumb fuck, there are many, many different methods of dating, and most scientists use several when trying to establish a date.

Geochronology - Wikipedia

Contents
[1Dating methods
If you were not so willfully ignorant, you would have looked them up before making an utter fool of yourself.
 
Simply from physical evidence, fossils and DNA, evolution is the sturdiest of the scientific Theories. We see the evidence for evolution in the rocks worldwide. We see our relationship to all other life on earth in the DNA of all our cells.
What people forget however is that Evolution is simply a theoretical model to explain why all the vertebrates have a backbone, and all the invertebrates do not.

The invertebrates are moved further down on the evolutionary scale as simpler creatures.

But the advantage in agility which the vertebrates have makes them ready predators on the invertebrates.

Take me for example. I love freediving into the ocean and grabbing abalone (big snails) and lobster (crustaceans). They are easy meat for my eyes, hands, legs, feet and lungs. Survival of the fittest.

It is amazing that these invertebrates can even survive in competition with us vertebrates. They would not either but for fish and wildlife regulations which protect them from over harvesting and poaching.

Abalone tastes best thinly sliced and raw.

Lobster tastes best lightly broiled and with melted butter.

Life Is Good -- if you are a vertebrate !!
 
Tilapia found in the Sea of Galilee. Which has been land locked for over 6 million years yet is still it's same old tasty self.
View attachment 115740

Coelacanth, thought to have been extinct 66 million years ago. Until science found out locals consider them tasty too and looking just like their 66 million year old ancestors.
View attachment 115741

Here is a picture of Jesus holding a Coelacanth just before he turned feed 5,000 people with it.

iu
listen-up-folks-if-you-want-some-fish-and-bread-youre-going-to-have-to-piss-in-a-cup-first-what-would-jesus-do-1437017501.jpg


:laugh:
Apparently no taxpayer money was used to pay for that bread and fish
I think this is all a fish story.

I can live with wine out of water.

But not with fish out of thin air, sorry.
 
Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day teach him to fish and he feeds himself for a lifetime.
Give a man a spear, and then he can pick and spear the fish he wants to fish and not have to wait for them.

Grouper (aka Jew Fish or Sea Bass) and halibut are the best.

But the various rockfish cod are not bad either.

Ling cod's are the easiest to spear.
 
The OP is about evolution, not dating. Your lame attempts at having to avoid answering why species have not evolved over millions of years is obvious to all.

The fact remains, a fish 66 million years ago is still just a fish. An identical fish.

Okay- once again- 66 million years ago.

Why are there no fossils of modern man from 66 million years ago?

Why are you making such lame attempts to avoid answering the question?
Gee, now how did I know you had no answer as to why species remain unchanged over millions of years?
Why it's almost as if you know evolution of species is a lie.

I already answered your question yesterday- you lied about my answer and went on.

What you are doing is desperately dodging the question of why there is no evidence of modern man from 66 million years ago- even though you admit that the fish existed 66 million years ago.

Sure you did.
Why do you believe them when they say 66 million years?
The half-life of C14 is 5,730 years.
If you know how much C14 atoms were present at the time, you can calculate time.
Scientists assume the ratio of C14 is a constant.
C14 is formed in the atmosphere from cosmic rays.
I challenge it is not a constant ratio.
Look dumb fuck, there are many, many different methods of dating, and most scientists use several when trying to establish a date.

Geochronology - Wikipedia

Contents
[1Dating methods
If you were not so willfully ignorant, you would have looked them up before making an utter fool of yourself.
All of which begin with general assumptions that the earth is 4 billion years old and everything has always been static. "Dumb fuck". Good one. Learn that in kindergarten last week?
 
Cutting out what I posted, tsk tsk. Violation of TOS. Want to go back and post my entire quote now?

I didn't alter what you said- that is your quote.

Want to answer the question? Of course not- it gets in the way of your false narrative.

Since you have claimed that a fish existed 66 million years ago- where is the evidence that modern man existed 66 million years ago?

The premise of your entire laughable attempt to dispute evolution is based upon your claim that a fish has not changed in 66 million years ago.

If you don't believe that fish existed 66 million years ago- then this thread is a blatant lie.


Or maybe such a delicate Snowflake as yourself can report me and whine about how unfair the moderators are.
Not my problem you want to avoid the issue of why there is no evidence of species evolving into other species by ignoring what I say.

It is not my problem that you are too scared to address why you claim that a fish has existed for 66 million years- but there are no modern human fossils that go back even 6 million years.
I do not claim it, troll.
Go tell your mommy your diapers need changing if you can't answer why there is evidence evolution has been proven to be not true.

So you have repeatedly stated in this thread this and equivalent statements:
Weatherboy: The fact remains, a fish 66 million years ago is still just a fish

Since you have claimed that a fish existed 66 million years ago- where is the evidence that modern man existed 66 million years ago?

The premise of your entire laughable attempt to dispute evolution is based upon your claim that a fish has not changed in 66 million years ago.

If you don't believe that fish existed 66 million years ago- then this thread is a blatant lie

You first need to understand how fossils are created. They need to be instantly covered in silt. A dead creature exposed a few days will be consumed and spread over a wide area. Put a dead chicken in a rural field sometime for a week. You will not find any trace. At best maybe a bone or two a hundred yards away.
Only around 0.1% of fossils found are land creatures. There are good reasons for this, but that is for another thread. Your question of why human remains are not found with dinosaur fossils is good, but simply answered by statistical probability. It is why it is very rare to find even one what you consider human relative fossil, yet you know there has to have been many. This August I am going fossil hunting in Utah. All I will find are marine creatures. At best I will find footprints of land creatures as they walked in mud. That is because of the many reasons land creatures skeletons do not become fossilized.
 
I believe My god is powerful enough to be tens of billions of years old and created a process that we call evolution.


Your idea of god is a much weaker god that is much more limited.
On the other hand, if evolution is true, and humans have lived on Earth for three million years, many trillions have lived and died. Where are their fossils? This is the more vexing question.
 
Okay- once again- 66 million years ago.

Why are there no fossils of modern man from 66 million years ago?

Why are you making such lame attempts to avoid answering the question?
Gee, now how did I know you had no answer as to why species remain unchanged over millions of years?
Why it's almost as if you know evolution of species is a lie.

I already answered your question yesterday- you lied about my answer and went on.

What you are doing is desperately dodging the question of why there is no evidence of modern man from 66 million years ago- even though you admit that the fish existed 66 million years ago.

Sure you did.
Why do you believe them when they say 66 million years?
The half-life of C14 is 5,730 years.
If you know how much C14 atoms were present at the time, you can calculate time.
Scientists assume the ratio of C14 is a constant.
C14 is formed in the atmosphere from cosmic rays.
I challenge it is not a constant ratio.
Look dumb fuck, there are many, many different methods of dating, and most scientists use several when trying to establish a date.

Geochronology - Wikipedia

Contents
[1Dating methods
If you were not so willfully ignorant, you would have looked them up before making an utter fool of yourself.
All of which begin with general assumptions that the earth is 4 billion years old and everything has always been static. "Dumb fuck". Good one. Learn that in kindergarten last week?
Crap, learn some geology in your kindergarden. LOL
Precambrian Time
The Precambrian's lower limit is not defined, but ended about 542 million years ago. The Precambrian encompasses about 90% of Earth's history.

Eonothem eon Duration1 Eras Events
Archaean (Greek archaios = ancient ) 2,500? Eoarchean (Greek eos = dawn + archaios = ancient)
Paleoarchean (Greek palaios = old)
Mesoarchean (Greek mesos = middle)
Neoarchean (Greek neo = new) Formation of oceans,
atmosphere, and continents;
bacteria
Proterozoic (Greek proteros = earlier + zoön = animal) c. 2,000 Paleoproterozoic (Greek palaios = old)
Mesoproterozoic (Greek mesos = middle)
Neoproterozoic (Greek neo = new) Oxygen build-up;
multicelled organisms
1. In millions of years.
Paleozoic Era
This era began 542 million years ago and lasted about 291 million years. The name was compounded from Greek palaios (old) and zoön (animal).

Period Duration1 Epochs Events
Cambrian (Cambria, Latin name for Wales) 54 Lower Cambrian
Middle Cambrian
Upper Cambrian Invertebrate sea life proliferating during this and the following period
Ordovician (Latin Ordovices, people of early Britain) 45 Lower Ordovician
Upper Ordovician Diverse marine life, including vertebrates; vascular plants
Silurian (Latin Silures, people of early Wales) 28 Lower Silurian
Upper Silurian Coral reefs; giant scorpions; first jawed fish
Devonian (Devonshire in England) 57 Lower Devonian
Upper Devonian Numerous fishes, other sea life; many plants, first trees; wingless insects
Carboniferous (Latin carbo = coal + fero = to bear) 60 Upper, Middle, and
Lower Mississippian2
Upper, Middle, and
Lower Pennsylvanian2 Maximum coal formation in swampy forests; insects, amphibians, reptiles; fishes, clams, crustaceans
Permian (district of Perm in Russia) 48 Lower Permian
Upper Permian Large reptiles, amphibians; most species become extinct
1. In millions of years.
2. Mississippian and Pennsylvanian names are used only in the U.S.
Mesozoic Era
This era began 251 million years ago and lasted about 186 million years. The name was compounded from Greek mesos (middle) and zoön (animal). Popular name: Age of Reptiles.

Period Duration1 Epochs Events
Triassic (trias = triad) 51 Lower Triassic
Middle Triassic
Upper Triassic Early dinosaurs, crocodiles, turtles; first mammals
Jurassic (Jura Mountains) 54 Lower Jurassic
Middle Jurassic
Upper Jurassic Many seagoing reptiles; early large dinosaurs; later, flying reptiles (pterosaurs), earliest known birds
Cretaceous (Latin creta = chalk) 80 Lower Cretaceous
Upper Cretaceous Dinosaurs and other reptiles dominate; seed-bearing plants appear
1. In millions of years.
Cenozoic Era1
This era began 66 million years ago and includes the geological present. The name was compounded from Greek kainos (new) and zoön (animal). Popular name: Age of Mammals.

Period Duration2 Epochs Events
Paleogene (Greek palaios = old + genes = born) 42 Paleocene (Greek palaios = old + kainos = new). Eocene (Greek eos = dawn). Oligocene (Greek oligos = few). Rich insect fauna, early bats, increasingly diverse varieties of mammals and birds
Neogene (Greek neo = new + genes = born) 23 Miocene (Greek meios = less + kainos = new). Pliocene (Greek pleios = more). Pleistocene (Greek pleistos = most) (popular name: Ice Age). Holocene (Greek holos = entire), the last 10,000 years to the present. Further development of mammals and birds. Various forms of humans, including Homo sapiens
1. This table reflects the divisions used by the International Commission on Stratigraphy. The U.S. Geological Survey divides the Cenezoic Era into the Tertiary Period (with the Paleocene, Eocene, Oligocene, Miocene, and Pliocene Epochs) and the Quaternary Period (with the Pleistocene and Holocene Epochs).
2. In millions of years.

http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0001822.html

Now does that look static, you silly ass?
 
I believe My god is powerful enough to be tens of billions of years old and created a process that we call evolution.


Your idea of god is a much weaker god that is much more limited.
On the other hand, if evolution is true, and humans have lived on Earth for three million years, many trillions have lived and died. Where are their fossils? This is the more vexing question.
Silly ass, modern man, Homo Sapiens, has existed only about 200,000 years.

Here you go for 8 million years of our ancestors.

Human Evolution Timeline Interactive | The Smithsonian Institution's Human Origins Program
 
Gee, now how did I know you had no answer as to why species remain unchanged over millions of years?
Why it's almost as if you know evolution of species is a lie.

I already answered your question yesterday- you lied about my answer and went on.

What you are doing is desperately dodging the question of why there is no evidence of modern man from 66 million years ago- even though you admit that the fish existed 66 million years ago.

Sure you did.
Why do you believe them when they say 66 million years?
The half-life of C14 is 5,730 years.
If you know how much C14 atoms were present at the time, you can calculate time.
Scientists assume the ratio of C14 is a constant.
C14 is formed in the atmosphere from cosmic rays.
I challenge it is not a constant ratio.
Look dumb fuck, there are many, many different methods of dating, and most scientists use several when trying to establish a date.

Geochronology - Wikipedia

Contents
[1Dating methods
If you were not so willfully ignorant, you would have looked them up before making an utter fool of yourself.
All of which begin with general assumptions that the earth is 4 billion years old and everything has always been static. "Dumb fuck". Good one. Learn that in kindergarten last week?
Crap, learn some geology in your kindergarden. LOL
Precambrian Time
The Precambrian's lower limit is not defined, but ended about 542 million years ago. The Precambrian encompasses about 90% of Earth's history.

Eonothem eon Duration1 Eras Events
Archaean (Greek archaios = ancient ) 2,500? Eoarchean (Greek eos = dawn + archaios = ancient)
Paleoarchean (Greek palaios = old)
Mesoarchean (Greek mesos = middle)
Neoarchean (Greek neo = new) Formation of oceans,
atmosphere, and continents;
bacteria
Proterozoic (Greek proteros = earlier + zoön = animal) c. 2,000 Paleoproterozoic (Greek palaios = old)
Mesoproterozoic (Greek mesos = middle)
Neoproterozoic (Greek neo = new) Oxygen build-up;
multicelled organisms
1. In millions of years.
Paleozoic Era
This era began 542 million years ago and lasted about 291 million years. The name was compounded from Greek palaios (old) and zoön (animal).

Period Duration1 Epochs Events
Cambrian (Cambria, Latin name for Wales) 54 Lower Cambrian
Middle Cambrian
Upper Cambrian Invertebrate sea life proliferating during this and the following period
Ordovician (Latin Ordovices, people of early Britain) 45 Lower Ordovician
Upper Ordovician Diverse marine life, including vertebrates; vascular plants
Silurian (Latin Silures, people of early Wales) 28 Lower Silurian
Upper Silurian Coral reefs; giant scorpions; first jawed fish
Devonian (Devonshire in England) 57 Lower Devonian
Upper Devonian Numerous fishes, other sea life; many plants, first trees; wingless insects
Carboniferous (Latin carbo = coal + fero = to bear) 60 Upper, Middle, and
Lower Mississippian2
Upper, Middle, and
Lower Pennsylvanian2 Maximum coal formation in swampy forests; insects, amphibians, reptiles; fishes, clams, crustaceans
Permian (district of Perm in Russia) 48 Lower Permian
Upper Permian Large reptiles, amphibians; most species become extinct
1. In millions of years.
2. Mississippian and Pennsylvanian names are used only in the U.S.
Mesozoic Era
This era began 251 million years ago and lasted about 186 million years. The name was compounded from Greek mesos (middle) and zoön (animal). Popular name: Age of Reptiles.

Period Duration1 Epochs Events
Triassic (trias = triad) 51 Lower Triassic
Middle Triassic
Upper Triassic Early dinosaurs, crocodiles, turtles; first mammals
Jurassic (Jura Mountains) 54 Lower Jurassic
Middle Jurassic
Upper Jurassic Many seagoing reptiles; early large dinosaurs; later, flying reptiles (pterosaurs), earliest known birds
Cretaceous (Latin creta = chalk) 80 Lower Cretaceous
Upper Cretaceous Dinosaurs and other reptiles dominate; seed-bearing plants appear
1. In millions of years.
Cenozoic Era1
This era began 66 million years ago and includes the geological present. The name was compounded from Greek kainos (new) and zoön (animal). Popular name: Age of Mammals.

Period Duration2 Epochs Events
Paleogene (Greek palaios = old + genes = born) 42 Paleocene (Greek palaios = old + kainos = new). Eocene (Greek eos = dawn). Oligocene (Greek oligos = few). Rich insect fauna, early bats, increasingly diverse varieties of mammals and birds
Neogene (Greek neo = new + genes = born) 23 Miocene (Greek meios = less + kainos = new). Pliocene (Greek pleios = more). Pleistocene (Greek pleistos = most) (popular name: Ice Age). Holocene (Greek holos = entire), the last 10,000 years to the present. Further development of mammals and birds. Various forms of humans, including Homo sapiens
1. This table reflects the divisions used by the International Commission on Stratigraphy. The U.S. Geological Survey divides the Cenezoic Era into the Tertiary Period (with the Paleocene, Eocene, Oligocene, Miocene, and Pliocene Epochs) and the Quaternary Period (with the Pleistocene and Holocene Epochs).
2. In millions of years.

http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0001822.html

Now does that look static, you silly ass?
Parroting outrageous time periods proves nothing.
The geological layering suggests that a short, abrupt time period, not a long drawn out time period. You don't get the clean abrupt lines in a slow process that you see over the entire world.
sh4.webp

Something else is missing in all these abrupt transition zones. There is no evidence of streams or rivers. At some point you should find where a river or stream once flowed.

But you do see geological layering with abrupt zones in rapid formations. Like this one in Mount St Helens.
sh3.webp


You also do not need long periods of time to form features that "take millions of years of erosion". This one took a few months to form.
sh.webp
 
I believe My god is powerful enough to be tens of billions of years old and created a process that we call evolution.


Your idea of god is a much weaker god that is much more limited.
On the other hand, if evolution is true, and humans have lived on Earth for three million years, many trillions have lived and died. Where are their fossils? This is the more vexing question.
Silly ass, modern man, Homo Sapiens, has existed only about 200,000 years.

Here you go for 8 million years of our ancestors.

Human Evolution Timeline Interactive | The Smithsonian Institution's Human Origins Program
The so called ancestors to man date back over 8 million years as you say. Which means there has to have been trillions who lived and died.
Yet only a handful of fossils have been located.
Point made.
 
I didn't alter what you said- that is your quote.

Want to answer the question? Of course not- it gets in the way of your false narrative.

Since you have claimed that a fish existed 66 million years ago- where is the evidence that modern man existed 66 million years ago?

The premise of your entire laughable attempt to dispute evolution is based upon your claim that a fish has not changed in 66 million years ago.

If you don't believe that fish existed 66 million years ago- then this thread is a blatant lie.


Or maybe such a delicate Snowflake as yourself can report me and whine about how unfair the moderators are.
Not my problem you want to avoid the issue of why there is no evidence of species evolving into other species by ignoring what I say.

It is not my problem that you are too scared to address why you claim that a fish has existed for 66 million years- but there are no modern human fossils that go back even 6 million years.
I do not claim it, troll.
Go tell your mommy your diapers need changing if you can't answer why there is evidence evolution has been proven to be not true.

So you have repeatedly stated in this thread this and equivalent statements:
Weatherboy: The fact remains, a fish 66 million years ago is still just a fish

Since you have claimed that a fish existed 66 million years ago- where is the evidence that modern man existed 66 million years ago?

The premise of your entire laughable attempt to dispute evolution is based upon your claim that a fish has not changed in 66 million years ago.

If you don't believe that fish existed 66 million years ago- then this thread is a blatant lie

You first need to understand how fossils are created. They need to be instantly covered in silt. A dead creature exposed a few days will be consumed and spread over a wide area. Put a dead chicken in a rural field sometime for a week. You will not find any trace. At best maybe a bone or two a hundred yards away.
Only around 0.1% of fossils found are land creatures. There are good reasons for this, but that is for another thread. Your question of why human remains are not found with dinosaur fossils is good, but simply answered by statistical probability. It is why it is very rare to find even one what you consider human relative fossil, yet you know there has to have been many. This August I am going fossil hunting in Utah. All I will find are marine creatures. At best I will find footprints of land creatures as they walked in mud. That is because of the many reasons land creatures skeletons do not become fossilized.

Funny that.

I have found dinosaur fossils in Utah myself.

Not that I asked why human fossils are not found with dinosaur fossils.

So do you believe that the fish existed 66 million years ago- and humans did too? Or that neither existed 66 million years ago- and that the entire premise of this thread was you lying?
 
I believe My god is powerful enough to be tens of billions of years old and created a process that we call evolution.


Your idea of god is a much weaker god that is much more limited.
On the other hand, if evolution is true, and humans have lived on Earth for three million years, many trillions have lived and died. Where are their fossils? This is the more vexing question.
Silly ass, modern man, Homo Sapiens, has existed only about 200,000 years.

Here you go for 8 million years of our ancestors.

Human Evolution Timeline Interactive | The Smithsonian Institution's Human Origins Program
The so called ancestors to man date back over 8 million years as you say. Which means there has to have been trillions who lived and died.
Yet only a handful of fossils have been located.
Point made.
j

Where are the modern human fossils from the same time period?
 
Not my problem you want to avoid the issue of why there is no evidence of species evolving into other species by ignoring what I say.

It is not my problem that you are too scared to address why you claim that a fish has existed for 66 million years- but there are no modern human fossils that go back even 6 million years.
I do not claim it, troll.
Go tell your mommy your diapers need changing if you can't answer why there is evidence evolution has been proven to be not true.

So you have repeatedly stated in this thread this and equivalent statements:
Weatherboy: The fact remains, a fish 66 million years ago is still just a fish

Since you have claimed that a fish existed 66 million years ago- where is the evidence that modern man existed 66 million years ago?

The premise of your entire laughable attempt to dispute evolution is based upon your claim that a fish has not changed in 66 million years ago.

If you don't believe that fish existed 66 million years ago- then this thread is a blatant lie

You first need to understand how fossils are created. They need to be instantly covered in silt. A dead creature exposed a few days will be consumed and spread over a wide area. Put a dead chicken in a rural field sometime for a week. You will not find any trace. At best maybe a bone or two a hundred yards away.
Only around 0.1% of fossils found are land creatures. There are good reasons for this, but that is for another thread. Your question of why human remains are not found with dinosaur fossils is good, but simply answered by statistical probability. It is why it is very rare to find even one what you consider human relative fossil, yet you know there has to have been many. This August I am going fossil hunting in Utah. All I will find are marine creatures. At best I will find footprints of land creatures as they walked in mud. That is because of the many reasons land creatures skeletons do not become fossilized.

Funny that.

I have found dinosaur fossils in Utah myself.

Not that I asked why human fossils are not found with dinosaur fossils.

So do you believe that the fish existed 66 million years ago- and humans did too? Or that neither existed 66 million years ago- and that the entire premise of this thread was you lying?
Why didn't you find any signs of a human ansestor? There should be trillions out there.

Fact remains:
  • ~95% of all fossils are shallow marine organisms, such as corals and shellfish.
  • ~95% of the remaining 5% are algae and plants.
  • ~95% of the remaining 0.25% are invertebrates, including insects.
  • The remaining 0.0125% are vertebrates, mostly fish. (95% of land vertebrates consist of less than one bone, and 95% of mammal fossils are from the Ice Age.)
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom