Dragon
Senior Member
- Sep 16, 2011
- 5,481
- 588
- 48
[No I don't know anything of the sort.
Like hell you don't. You're disgusting.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
[No I don't know anything of the sort.
All you and I are talking about is what hank johnson said nothing else so drop the OP spin and twist deflectionThat's exactly what it's about.Hank said that the island of Guam would tip over if it was over populated.
YOU, I believe are honestly confused. Si Modo is not. She, unlike you, has a scientific background and knows EXACTLY what the OP on that thread meant by "ignorance."
You are not lying, you are just wrong.
She is lying.
Alright.[No I don't know anything of the sort.
Like hell you don't. You're disgusting.
All you and I are talking about is what hank johnson said
I'm telling you that your statement that Hank is not ignorant when he says that an island can capsize is stunning.
I'm telling you that your statement that Hank is not ignorant when he says that an island can capsize is stunning.
You know perfectly well I made no such claim. You may be able to fool the likes of bigreb that I did, but you know better yourself, and so do I.
I've had it with you. Don't even bother addressing any further comments to me unless you feel like being honest. You'll be ignored.
Honestly, I have no idea what thread you're talking about. I am talking about Hank thinking an island can capsize. He said that in Congress.Sooooooo, thinking an island can tip over is not ignorance, even though most grammar school children learn what an island is.
By proper use of the word, it is. But it's obvious that on that thread, the word was being misused to mean stubborn, don't-confuse-me-with-facts-my-mind-is-made-up dogmatic thinking that is, and is determined to remain, completely out of touch with reality. That is not what Henry was displaying.
The OP should have chosen another word, but I knew what was meant. You have the background to understand it, too. I have my doubts that any unscientific religious dogmatist can grok it, though.
All you and I are talking about is what hank johnson said
Untrue. That isn't even very important to what we're really talking about. In fact, I don't think you remotely understand what we're really talking about.
and in the case of evolution its a theory
Your statement proves that you absolutely deny all the anthropological reaserch which has been conducted by scientists over the last century. Congratulations
How did scientists prove God does not exist?
Everything that cannot be studied and tested does not exist in the minds of scientists.
I'm telling you that your statement that Hank is not ignorant when he says that an island can capsize is stunning.
You know perfectly well I made no such claim. You may be able to fool the likes of bigreb that I did, but you know better yourself, and so do I.
I've had it with you. Don't even bother addressing any further comments to me unless you feel like being honest. You'll be ignored.
How did scientists prove God does not exist?
Everything that cannot be studied and tested does not exist in the minds of scientists.
And this didn't have anything to do with it I suppose:
The entire universe being created in six days 6,000 years ago
Mankind and dinosaurs on a boat till nearly four mile deep waters
receded/evaporated
Big fish puking up live men
Folks enduring a 1200 degreefurnace
Seas opening long enough for the white hats to pass then closing on the bad guys
Stone walls falling on command
Evil people being turned into salt
The sun blacked out by a god
5,000 hungry pilgrims plus women and children being fed with two fish and five loaves then twelve baskets of leftovers collected
Virgin Birth
Healing leprosy by touching
Walking on water
Water into wine
Raising from the dead
Hanging a man up and bleeding him to death only to see
him fit as a fiddle two days later
Another thing...If the south sea islands are included there are more than 4000 gods being worshipped now. Break down Christianity and there are more than 44,000 different denominations, conventions, sects, cults, sub cults, etc.
Which god
I'm telling you that your statement that Hank is not ignorant when he says that an island can capsize is stunning.
You know perfectly well I made no such claim. You may be able to fool the likes of bigreb that I did, but you know better yourself, and so do I.
I've had it with you. Don't even bother addressing any further comments to me unless you feel like being honest. You'll be ignored.
Ouch, you must've nailed him, Si. He ignores me too, ever since I fingered him for an idiot, and he recognized it. He put me on ignore to save himself from having to itemize his idiocy.
You know perfectly well I made no such claim. You may be able to fool the likes of bigreb that I did, but you know better yourself, and so do I.
I've had it with you. Don't even bother addressing any further comments to me unless you feel like being honest. You'll be ignored.
Ouch, you must've nailed him, Si. He ignores me too, ever since I fingered him for an idiot, and he recognized it. He put me on ignore to save himself from having to itemize his idiocy.
Why would anyone want to ignore an avatar like that
Ouch, you must've nailed him, Si. He ignores me too, ever since I fingered him for an idiot, and he recognized it. He put me on ignore to save himself from having to itemize his idiocy.
Why would anyone want to ignore an avatar like that
Well....I do have a theory about that as well....
Hank Johnson is down this way. He is well known for his humor. He defeated the moron Cynthia McKinney so he ain't all bad.
Look at the context of what he said. He was stating that he didn't believe they could handle the increase in those goods adequately and timely.
I oppose him politically because he is a liberal but the bit about him believing an island would sink is absurd. No one around here believes that.
Sir Isaac Newton's Universal Law of Gravitation is a general physical law derived from empirical observations. I would not call it a theory.Evolution Is Not A Theory..........................
FYI, Gravity is a THEORY, too.
Mutations are common and the whole beneficial thing is a misnomer.
There's a valid distinction to be drawn between a mutation that harms chances of survival and/or procreation, and so will tend to be selected out, and one that helps survival or procreation chance, and so will tend to be selected in. The latter might reasonably be termed "beneficial" and it is certainly much rarer than the former.
Wrong.Evolution has never been proven. Proof of God is in his CREATION.
god has never been proven, proof of evolution is that we exist.![]()