’Everything Calm’ Prior to Benghazi Attack, No Protests

[GoneBezerk]

Asshole....sending in the Marines during an attack on US personnel is common sense.

Jimmy Carter's "invasion" of Iran was a fuck up because there was no emergency to get in there like Libya once the Iranians were only holding hostages not killing them like in Libya.

Again you are too fucking stupid to know the difference.

You make so many excuses for obamination is shows you have a pathetic life.

The EUCOM FAST team of Marines was told stand by until it was too late.

That is their mission, to do quick missions in Europe and Africa from their Med location.

Also, there were Army and Air Force special forces in Somalia which could have been sent to Libya.

obamination did nothing because he is a limp dick piece of shit that needs months to make a decision like he did with UBL. He needs to be 110% sure of succcess before he will say do it.

When American Citizens appear to be in harms way, US Marines were always tasked to evacuate them.
This should have been done once there was a request for more security. Who made the decision, to turn down the request. Where is the paper trail leading to the person who made the actual decision.

Marines should have been sent in during the attack to save the US Citizens and take back the control
of the Consulate. Obviously there was a written order not to deploy them. Where is the order and who signed it. The Marines are quite adept at analyzing situations on the ground and taking action to complete their mission.

I'm sure a hack like you would have given him the benefit of the doubt, if another Desert One incident was the result. Do you think we're idiots? You would have argued a mistake was made which ever way it went.

 

[GoneBezerk]

Just go straight to hell.....you are worthless.

Shit stain....Bush was given intel that Saddam had WMDs and you can't prove they didn't go to Syria.

obamination openly lied to the media and public that some protest got people killed in Libya when he fucking watched the attack on a UAV feed....he is a criminal, you stupid pile of shit.

The difference is the timing of the deaths. Bush's lies resulted in deaths. If lies were told by Obama, and that's still a BIG if, they were AFTER the fact. GET IT, fuckwit?

Once again you refuse to face/acknowledge facts. Bush, lies THEN deaths. Obama, deaths THEN so-called "lies". Are you really that idiotic or do you think we're so stupid we can't follow a timeline?

 

[konradv]

Just go straight to hell.....you are worthless.

Shit stain....Bush was given intel that Saddam had WMDs and you can't prove they didn't go to Syria.

obamination openly lied to the media and public that some protest got people killed in Libya when he fucking watched the attack on a UAV feed....he is a criminal, you stupid pile of shit.

Once again you refuse to face/acknowledge facts. Bush, lies THEN deaths. Obama, deaths THEN so-called "lies". Are you really that idiotic or do you think we're so stupid we can't follow a timeline?

But I can follow a timeline. What's your excuse?

 

[Antares]

Yes we do actually, it is the job of the military to protect american citizens.

One squad of Marines could have prevented those deaths.

The EUCOM FAST team of Marines was told stand by until it was too late.

That is their mission, to do quick missions in Europe and Africa from their Med location.

Also, there were Army and Air Force special forces in Somalia which could have been sent to Libya.

obamination did nothing because he is a limp dick piece of shit that needs months to make a decision like he did with UBL. He needs to be 110% sure of succcess before he will say do it.

When American Citizens appear to be in harms way, US Marines were always tasked to evacuate them.
This should have been done once there was a request for more security. Who made the decision, to turn down the request. Where is the paper trail leading to the person who made the actual decision.

Marines should have been sent in during the attack to save the US Citizens and take back the control
of the Consulate. Obviously there was a written order not to deploy them. Where is the order and who signed it. The Marines are quite adept at analyzing situations on the ground and taking action to complete their mission.

I'm sure a hack like you would have given him the benefit of the doubt, if another Desert One incident was the result. Do you think we're idiots? You would have argued a mistake was made which ever way it went.

 

[Antares]

Wow kid, you DO know that the Clintons and every Dem Leader claimed he had them????

Are we talking "lies" or are we talking disagreements? What would be the reason to lie? Disagreements happen all the time. I think Occam's Razor applies here. Whatever the case is, it has little bearing on the deaths. That's a separate issue.

OK, whatever they were doing for a full two weeks do you at least agree it turned out to not be true what they said?

Now, the why of what they said we can only speculate. I see no reason a video reason is better then NO reason. Maybe they really believe that it was over a video, if so then they are not telling the truth about what the CIA told them. At some point the left has to realize we were not told the truth. The only question remains is why. Maybe it was justified, maybe not. Now if you can convince me that from the git go they believe it to be about a video then fine they didn't lie. But that isn't what they are now saying. Hell we heard what they said but the left argues then didn't say what they said. Quite amazing. But what difference does it make? Nothing will come of it, our men died for no real reason.

What they believed has nothing to do with why the men died. Why is that so important to you? Even if they did lie, no one died because of it, (and here's a gift to help you confirm what you'll believe regardless of what's said), unlike when Boooooosh lied about WMDs. You're welcome.

 

[Antares]

In all of its glory...the list of quotes from Dems on Saddams wmd

snopes.com: Weapons of Mass Destruction Quotes

So the CIA and British intel agencies said Saddam had WMDs......but Bush is a liar because he believed them?

The CIA told obmination that AQIM killed the Ambassador and 3 other Americans.....but obamination didn't lie when he claimed people at a "protest" ended up killing them?

Typical liberal bullshit.

The difference is the timing of the deaths. Bush's lies resulted in deaths. If lies were told by Obama, and that's still a BIG if, they were AFTER the fact. GET IT, fuckwit?

 

[francoHFW]

Rush/Beck/Foxbots, everything you know is Pubcrappe. No help could get there in time...

No lies, just a a tragic terrorist attack in a chaotic area, and a ton of total Pubcrappe. relax and wait for the next BS "outrage", dupes.

 

[Antares]

LOL, what an idiot.

Rush/Beck/Foxbots, everything you know is Pubcrappe. No help could get there in time...

No lies, just a a tragic terrorist attack in a chaotic area, and a ton of total Pubcrappe. relax and wait for the next BS "outrage", dupes.

 

[francoHFW]

"So the CIA and British intel agencies said Saddam had WMDs......but Bush is a liar because he believed them?"

No, he's a liar because he cherry picked the few reports that backed him up and used innuendo and lied nonstop.

Stupidest war ever and best recruiting tool Alqaeda will ever have. Great job, Pubbies and silly dupes.

 

[Antares]

Shut up moron.

snopes.com: Weapons of Mass Destruction Quotes

"So the CIA and British intel agencies said Saddam had WMDs......but Bush is a liar because he believed them?"

No, he's a liar because he cherry picked the few reports that backed him up and used innuendo and lied nonstop.

Stupidest war ever and best recruiting tool Alqaeda will ever have. Great job, Pubbies and silly dupes.

 

[Antares]

"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line."
--President Bill Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998

"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."
--President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998

"Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face."
--Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998

"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983."
--Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998

"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs."
Letter to President Clinton, signed by:
-- Democratic Senators Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others, Oct. 9, 1998

"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
-Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998

"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies."
-- Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999

"There is no doubt that ... Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies."
Letter to President Bush, Signed by:
-- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), and others, Dec 5, 2001

"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and th! e means of delivering them."
-- Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002

"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country."
-- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power."
-- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002

"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..."
-- Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002

"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force -- if necessary -- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security."
-- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002

"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years ... We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002

"He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do"
-- Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
-- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002

"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002

"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real..."
-- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003

snopes.com: Weapons of Mass Destruction Quotes

 

[francoHFW]

Most of your snopes link is about what out of context BS your quotes and Bush propaganda was...

 

[Antares]

Nope, you just another retard who cannot stand being proven wrong.

Youve the Dems in their own words kid...I know it hurts.

Most of your snopes link is about what out of context BS your quotes and Bush propaganda was...

 

[Antares]

You kids just LOVE Hillary....


"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
-- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002

 

[Antares]

How about our NEW Secratary of State?

"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real..."
-- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003

 

[Antares]

I see a pattern.....

 

[francoHFW]

Yup, out of context BS, like your Snopes link says. But thanks for all the discredited Pubspam, troll.

 

[Antares]

Soory puke, they are "substantially" correct, you have no credibility and you have been bitch slapped

EVERYBODY believed he had them.

I know it hurts, but you'll be ok.

Yup, out of context BS, like your Snopes link says. But thanks for all the discredited Pubspam, troll.

 

[konradv]

Shut up moron.

snopes.com: Weapons of Mass Destruction Quotes

"So the CIA and British intel agencies said Saddam had WMDs......but Bush is a liar because he believed them?"

No, he's a liar because he cherry picked the few reports that backed him up and used innuendo and lied nonstop.

Stupidest war ever and best recruiting tool Alqaeda will ever have. Great job, Pubbies and silly dupes.

How about these?

He(Saddam Hussein) has not developed any significant capability with respect to weapons of mass destruction. He is unable to project conventional power against his neighbors. So in effect, our policies have strengthened the security of the neighbors of Iraq...

Feb. 24, 2001- Colin Powell at a press conference in Cairo, Egypt

The sanctions, as they are called, have succeeded over the last 10 years, not in deterring him from moving in that direction, but from actually being able to move in that direction. The Iraqi regime militarily remains fairly weak. It doesn't have the capacity it had 10 or 12 years ago. It has been contained. And even though we have no doubt in our mind that the Iraqi regime is pursuing programs to develop weapons of mass destruction -- chemical, biological and nuclear -- I think the best intelligence estimates suggest that they have not been terribly successful.

May 15, 2001- Colin Powell before a Senate committee

But in terms of Saddam Hussein being there, let's remember that his country is divided, in effect. He does not control the northern part of his country. We are able to keep arms from him. His military forces have not been rebuilt.

July 29, 2001- Condaleeza Rice to Wolf Blitzer

The Memory Hole > 2001: Powell & Rice Declare Iraq Has No WMD and Is Not a Threat

 

[konradv]

Found video proving what was said above. Powell and Rice from 2001.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4rHBttJ4EGw]Colin Powell and Condoleezza Rice 2001: Iraq Has No WMD's/Is Not A Threat - YouTube[/ame]