For their part Tuesday, House Democrats maintained their negotiating posture: that discussions about border security should not take place until the partial government shutdown is ended.
“Let’s be clear: Democrats are willing to discuss the best way to keep the border secure, but there’s no reason for the government to be shut down while those discussions take pace,” House Majority Leader Steny H. Hoyer of Maryland said in a statement.
Trump says a recent surge in border apprehensions is caused by a lack of border security, but apprehensions of undocumented immigrants have actually trended downward for almost 20 years now.
The year 2000 saw the most apprehensions of undocumented immigrants at the border, with 1.6 million caught. In subsequent years, through 2006, about 1 million per year were apprehended. Then they began a steady decline so that by the end of the Obama administration, they were down to about 300,000 per year.
But a surge in apprehensions of unaccompanied children and families from Guatemala, Honduras and El Salvador, beginning in 2014, has altered the face of illegal immigration. Fleeing gang violence and extreme poverty, these children and families sought asylum at the border in increasing numbers in the past four years. The levels are now 400,000 to 500,000 per year.
Because these migrants are seeking entry into the United States under asylum rules — which is a legal path to immigration — they need only present themselves at a legal point of entry and the U.S. government then must consider whether they have a credible fear of violence or injury back in their home countries. The government cannot quickly deport these Central Americans, because they come from countries with no contiguous borders to the United States. Under the law they cannot be turned back, unlike Mexican migrants, who can.
All sides of this issue acknowledge that this surge of Central Americans seeking asylum has taken its toll on the U.S. immigration system, on immigration judges, Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents, Border Patrol agents and the like.
But it’s also important to know that the U.S. government has way more assets at the border than it did in the early 2000s. During their administrations, both George W. Bush and Barack Obama increased fences, electronic measures and manpower.
At border, Homeland Security Department stats paint complex situation
That isn't a "negotiating posture." That's a refusal to negotiate. They demand Trump give them everything they demand before they will "negotiate." Only some kind of brain damaged snowflake wouldn't see how utterly absurd that is.
Everything they demand? Bull crap....
all they are saying is open the government.... instead of being an asshole and purposely using these workers, and businesses who rely on them, as pawns in your game, when they have absolutely nothing to do with border security differences between the congress, who constitutionally have the power of the purse, and the president.
And let them discuss and negotiate the border wall and border security as it should be planned through committee analysis and discussed by the two parties who are involved.
Nothing has been settled on border security nor have the Dems gotten anything from it...
it is in EVERYONE'S BEST INTEREST to allow govt workers to go back to work.... this 3 year old tyrant in the oval office needs to be thrown out... the sooner the better for our whole nation imo.... but of course you know how I think about him already from previous discussions....
dude too funny, you want a win ahead of the negotiation. that isn't negotiating. duhhhhhh
And again, you wish to victimize 300 million people ahead of giving five bucks for security. what an asshole.
There is nothing like bargaining in good faith as a leftist.
I'm not a dude and have never wanted to be a dude, I have always been quite happy, being a dame/damsel!
there is no winning by holding government workers hostage and there is no negotiating being done on border security by doing it.... they have nothing to do with border security.
the negotiating begins when the president and congress begin talking and wheeling and dealing, without any hostages.
holding hostages, is cheating and stupid as stupid is imo....
Congress should not do this piece meal... it should be analyzed, reviewed, with a proposal in hand of what the president actually wants with border security and a cost/effective analysis, so they know how best to allocate the money.... and also to determine how much money for all of border security is needed, as congress does with all other appropriations....
The president is claiming this national security only to distract from the Trump campaign's collusion with the Russians coming out....
if it were a national security risk he would have shut the gvt down when republicans were in charge the past 2 years.... but HE DIDN'T.... this is simply a political ploy, to get the news off of what really is happening.