Everyone caught up in the Trump investigations

  • Page meeting: Carter Page met in Moscow with Russia's deputy prime minister and a Russian oil official in June 2016.

You really understand so little of this litany of Bullshit you dumped here.

Carter Page was doing BUSINESS in Russia. That is not a crime. He's an ENERGY SPECIALIST. Helped Russia write applications to the WTO and things with the FULL APPROVAL and knowledge of the US Govt. IN FACT, they were "watching him" because he cooperated with the FBI and Intel people on his relationships over there. There is NO THERE THERE..

PapaDop WAS FED dirt on possible "hillary russian connections". But it's now KNOWN that there was an elaborate network of CIA/FBI IMPLANTS that were feeding him all this with the sole purpose of dirtying up enough people in the Trump campaign to have the option of prosecuting them later. Do you even KNOW WHO that "professor" was? Or his connections to the CIA and DIA? He's a professional instigator with a specialty in monkeying political campaigns. HIRED by YOUR govt to "infect" PapaDop and then "expose" them with beautiful woman in Australia who introduces him to the Aussie Ambassador when he's fully alcohol loaded and the rest is ESPIONAGE by YOUR govt.

You got the right list --- but these 2 and the Trump Tower meeting with Honey Pot Russian Beaver lawyer are ALL part of the monkey wrenching and spying and instigating in a political campaign that YOUR GOVT set up.

And this will become totally apparent to the retarded eventually. When your "media co-conspirators" are forced to report the sanctions and indictments on the US Federal officials that played roles in this sedition.

Largest political scandal of our lifetimes, and CNN/MSNBC/NYTimes/WashPo have eaten your brain and kept in the dark feeding you porn star/Playboy/2 scoops of ice cream scandals and you've missed the total 1st half of this drama. You won't miss the end of it tho...
Geeezzzz, don't you ever get tired of mindlessly parroting Limbaugh Lies???

Your MessiahRushie has fed your skull of mush and kept you in the dark feeding you outlandish conspiracy theories only the most gullible fool on Earth could swallow!
 


At 2:11 is an interesting list.

And at 2:45...he makes (IMO) a great point.

The CIA Network News with "America was never great" Cuomo? I"ll pass if it's all the same to you.
LOL!

I wish I could get you at my poker table! You do not know when to walk away! Hint now is the time to run! The good n ews is the idiocy is evenly spread I find idiots at every table!
 
  • Page meeting: Carter Page met in Moscow with Russia's deputy prime minister and a Russian oil official in June 2016.

You really understand so little of this litany of Bullshit you dumped here.

Fine...now show me link(s) to unbiased factual proof that you can successfully ascertain what percentage of the OP I understand. Because, without that, you cannot accurately determine whether my understanding of said material is 'little' or not.

Your understanding is tiny. Because the media zealots that feed you shit and keep you in the dark like a mushroom are partisan zealots.

Do you KNOW the name of the Professor that ENTICED PapaDop to travel to England? Do you KNOW he is the key "spy" of the "spies" that were ADMITTEDLY placed into the Trump Campaign to prank and pawn and entrap various members of the campaign? What's his name? Show me his background. And I'll show you all the sources you need to back up what I'm telling you..

Same with the Lady Beaver Russian lawyer. She met with Fusion GPS the DAY BEFORE and the DAY AFTER the meeting with DJT Jr. She got a SPECIAL VISA to even be allowed into the country to lobby against Russian sanctions with the help of top officials at the State Dept. Tell me what HER relation with Fusion GPS. Depending on what tiny bits you know -- I'll back up EVERYTHING about the rest.

All set-ups. All campaign pranks. Performed by Intel resources that were EXPERTS in election tampering provided by the Intel agencies.
 
Do you even KNOW WHO that "professor" was? Or his connections to the CIA and DIA? He's a professional instigator with a specialty in monkeying political campaigns. HIRED by YOUR govt
Yeah he is a Reaganite "professional instigator," but you knew that already. Interesting that you left out his Republican connections.
Interesting but not surprising!

That's ALL YOU CARE ABOUT? A connection to Reagan? You just hop,skip, jump over the GINORMOUS outrage of inserting professional political pranksters into an AMERICAN political campaign by your OWN GOVERNMENT?

Check yourself dude. You've lost your sense of self-preservation and ALL your objectivity. You're on the wrong side here. Because it's APPALLING how devious and seditious all this interference was.
 
in fact,

Cohen's attorney says he has information on Trump that would interest Mueller - CNNPolitics

and

Davis told The Washington Post that Cohen’s knowledge reached beyond “the obvious possibility of a conspiracy to collude” and included also the question of Trump’s participation in a “criminal conspiracy” to hack into the emails of Democratic officials during the 2016 election.

On “The Rachel Maddow Show,” Davis, who is a veteran of the Clinton White House, said his client had “knowledge about the computer crime of hacking and whether or not Mr. Trump knew ahead of time about that crime and even cheered it on.”

It was already clear, Davis said, that Trump “publicly cheered it on” — an apparent reference to then-candidate Trump’s appeal to Russia in July 2016 to “find the 30,000 emails that are missing.” The question that Trump’s former attorney might be able to answer, Davis said, is “did he also have private information?”

“Donald Trump and all of his henchmen miss when they say ‘no collusion, no collusion, no collusion'” is the issue of criminal conspiracy, which he distinguished from collusion. (For the record, Davis said he thinks there was also collusion, meaning “active coordination between people in the Trump campaign and Russian government officials.”)

A conspiracy to commit a crime becomes a crime if there’s one overt act — meaning you do anything to implement the crime,” Davis added. “So if there is a conversation and a plan for there to be dirt on Hillary Clinton, and then someone knows the way you’re willing to get the dirt is a Russian agent called WikiLeaks… and then WikiLeaks hacks into an email account, which is a crime, then you have committed a crime of conspiracy.”

A crime of conspiracy, he maintained, “could mean that somebody knows about a crime about to be committed and doesn’t call the FBI.”


oooopsie - :abgg2q.jpg:



Cohns attorney has evidence Mewler may be interested in? Hmm, so Mewler is trying to impeach Trump because he tried to get his old job back but got told to pound sand instead, and he hands his silver bullets case over to a New York DA to prosecute? I mean, that’s the wrong court, you know that right?
 
in fact,

Cohen's attorney says he has information on Trump that would interest Mueller - CNNPolitics

and

Davis told The Washington Post that Cohen’s knowledge reached beyond “the obvious possibility of a conspiracy to collude” and included also the question of Trump’s participation in a “criminal conspiracy” to hack into the emails of Democratic officials during the 2016 election.

On “The Rachel Maddow Show,” Davis, who is a veteran of the Clinton White House, said his client had “knowledge about the computer crime of hacking and whether or not Mr. Trump knew ahead of time about that crime and even cheered it on.”

It was already clear, Davis said, that Trump “publicly cheered it on” — an apparent reference to then-candidate Trump’s appeal to Russia in July 2016 to “find the 30,000 emails that are missing.” The question that Trump’s former attorney might be able to answer, Davis said, is “did he also have private information?”

“Donald Trump and all of his henchmen miss when they say ‘no collusion, no collusion, no collusion'” is the issue of criminal conspiracy, which he distinguished from collusion. (For the record, Davis said he thinks there was also collusion, meaning “active coordination between people in the Trump campaign and Russian government officials.”)

A conspiracy to commit a crime becomes a crime if there’s one overt act — meaning you do anything to implement the crime,” Davis added. “So if there is a conversation and a plan for there to be dirt on Hillary Clinton, and then someone knows the way you’re willing to get the dirt is a Russian agent called WikiLeaks… and then WikiLeaks hacks into an email account, which is a crime, then you have committed a crime of conspiracy.”

A crime of conspiracy, he maintained, “could mean that somebody knows about a crime about to be committed and doesn’t call the FBI.”


oooopsie - :abgg2q.jpg:



Cohns attorney has evidence Mewler may be interested in? Hmm, so Mewler is trying to impeach Trump because he tried to get his old job back but got told to pound sand instead, and he hands his silver bullets case over to a New York DA to prosecute? I mean, that’s the wrong court, you know that right?


nobodys trying to impeach anyone - you know that right ?
 
in fact,

Cohen's attorney says he has information on Trump that would interest Mueller - CNNPolitics

and

Davis told The Washington Post that Cohen’s knowledge reached beyond “the obvious possibility of a conspiracy to collude” and included also the question of Trump’s participation in a “criminal conspiracy” to hack into the emails of Democratic officials during the 2016 election.

On “The Rachel Maddow Show,” Davis, who is a veteran of the Clinton White House, said his client had “knowledge about the computer crime of hacking and whether or not Mr. Trump knew ahead of time about that crime and even cheered it on.”

It was already clear, Davis said, that Trump “publicly cheered it on” — an apparent reference to then-candidate Trump’s appeal to Russia in July 2016 to “find the 30,000 emails that are missing.” The question that Trump’s former attorney might be able to answer, Davis said, is “did he also have private information?”

“Donald Trump and all of his henchmen miss when they say ‘no collusion, no collusion, no collusion'” is the issue of criminal conspiracy, which he distinguished from collusion. (For the record, Davis said he thinks there was also collusion, meaning “active coordination between people in the Trump campaign and Russian government officials.”)

A conspiracy to commit a crime becomes a crime if there’s one overt act — meaning you do anything to implement the crime,” Davis added. “So if there is a conversation and a plan for there to be dirt on Hillary Clinton, and then someone knows the way you’re willing to get the dirt is a Russian agent called WikiLeaks… and then WikiLeaks hacks into an email account, which is a crime, then you have committed a crime of conspiracy.”

A crime of conspiracy, he maintained, “could mean that somebody knows about a crime about to be committed and doesn’t call the FBI.”


oooopsie - :abgg2q.jpg:



Cohns attorney has evidence Mewler may be interested in? Hmm, so Mewler is trying to impeach Trump because he tried to get his old job back but got told to pound sand instead, and he hands his silver bullets case over to a New York DA to prosecute? I mean, that’s the wrong court, you know that right?


nobodys trying to impeach anyone - you know that right ?




Mewler is only there to write an impeachment report. Not the point anyway. Point is if Cohn has anything Mewler would not have handed him off to a DA in New York.
 
Kinda odd how a Trump investigation can get a few people around him on tax issues from 2005 but a Clinton investigation gets people around them immunity.
 
Do you even KNOW WHO that "professor" was? Or his connections to the CIA and DIA? He's a professional instigator with a specialty in monkeying political campaigns. HIRED by YOUR govt
Yeah he is a Reaganite "professional instigator," but you knew that already. Interesting that you left out his Republican connections.
Interesting but not surprising!

That's ALL YOU CARE ABOUT? A connection to Reagan? You just hop,skip, jump over the GINORMOUS outrage of inserting professional political pranksters into an AMERICAN political campaign by your OWN GOVERNMENT?

Check yourself dude. You've lost your sense of self-preservation and ALL your objectivity. You're on the wrong side here. Because it's APPALLING how devious and seditious all this interference was.
No US government inserted anyone in Tramp's campaign! You've been had by professional liars like Limbaugh and Tramp. They see you as a SUCKER and you have proven them correct!!!!
 
Do you even KNOW WHO that "professor" was? Or his connections to the CIA and DIA? He's a professional instigator with a specialty in monkeying political campaigns. HIRED by YOUR govt
Yeah he is a Reaganite "professional instigator," but you knew that already. Interesting that you left out his Republican connections.
Interesting but not surprising!

That's ALL YOU CARE ABOUT? A connection to Reagan? You just hop,skip, jump over the GINORMOUS outrage of inserting professional political pranksters into an AMERICAN political campaign by your OWN GOVERNMENT?

Check yourself dude. You've lost your sense of self-preservation and ALL your objectivity. You're on the wrong side here. Because it's APPALLING how devious and seditious all this interference was.


No US government inserted anyone in Tramp's campaign! You've been had by professional liars like Limbaugh and Tramp. They see you as a SUCKER and you have proven them correct!!!!

You a special type of news denier? Or just propangandized into a functional lobotomy?

Is this the FBI informant who 'spied' on the Trump campaign? | Daily Mail Online

Is this the FBI informant who 'spied' on the Trump campaign? US academic with links to the CIA and MI6 who met with three advisers of the president in 2016 while investigating Russian collusion is named as the source

Retired professor was working as an informant on the Trump campaign for FBI

He met with several Trump aides and discussed foreign policy in summer 2016

Reports suggest he was Professor Stefan Halper, American working in the UK

Is said to have 'randomly' brought up Russia in meetings, prompting suspicions

Trump tweeted: 'If the FBI or DOJ was infiltrating a campaign for the benefit of another campaign, that is a really big deal'

Analysis | How the FBI informant’s outreach to Trump staffers fits into overall investigation

On Monday evening, The Washington Post revealed the identity of the FBI informant at the center of President Trump’s recent frustrations. Over the course of 2016, emeritus professor at the University of Cambridge Stefan A. Halper contacted three people affiliated with Trump’s foreign-policy advisory team, two of whom were subjects of known FBI investigations beginning that summer.

Trump and his allies have criticized Halper’s contribution to the FBI’s investigation as an unwarranted intrusion into Trump’s campaign itself. Trump has repeatedly insisted that reports about Halper’s work showed bias on the part of the FBI that was a scandal “bigger than Watergate.”

As you can see even the Democrat mouth organ the WashPo HAD to cover this story. Although they elected to skip over the details and instead recount the long litany of PHONY accusations against Trump campaign to make it LOOK --- legit. It was not.

Believe it or not -- I'm tired of watching my lefty buds look like complete tater-heads in public. It's sad. Wish I could stop the beat-downs. But when you double down on stupid like you just did with your one issue Limbaugh grudge match -- the pity just drips away..
 
Yep, because not one of those people convicted have had anything to do with Trump and the so-called collusion. It is so sad that you libtards are too stupid to connect the dots.

Yoda:I cannot teach him. The boy has no patience.
Obi Wan:He will learn patience
Yoda: Much anger in him... like his father
Obi Wan: Was I any different when you thought me...

This very young Padawan learner fails to understand that the Russia related trial starts in September for Manafort.
Paul Manafort’s tangle with the justice system is far from over

And... collusion is not a crime. The word to remember here is conspiracy.
Investigations require patience.... being patient in a fast-food world is as fun as scraping a steel shovel on concrete.
 
Yep, because not one of those people convicted have had anything to do with Trump and the so-called collusion. It is so sad that you libtards are too stupid to connect the dots.

Yoda:I cannot teach him. The boy has no patience.
Obi Wan:He will learn patience
Yoda: Much anger in him... like his father
Obi Wan: Was I any different when you thought me...

This very young Padawan learner fails to understand that the Russia related trial starts in September for Manafort.
Paul Manafort’s tangle with the justice system is far from over

And... collusion is not a crime. The word to remember here is conspiracy.
Investigations require patience.... being patient in a fast-food world is as fun as scraping a steel shovel on concrete.


The word is "taught".
 
Yep, because not one of those people convicted have had anything to do with Trump and the so-called collusion. It is so sad that you libtards are too stupid to connect the dots.

Yoda:I cannot teach him. The boy has no patience.
Obi Wan:He will learn patience
Yoda: Much anger in him... like his father
Obi Wan: Was I any different when you thought me...

This very young Padawan learner fails to understand that the Russia related trial starts in September for Manafort.
Paul Manafort’s tangle with the justice system is far from over

And... collusion is not a crime. The word to remember here is conspiracy.
Investigations require patience.... being patient in a fast-food world is as fun as scraping a steel shovel on concrete.


The word is "taught".

LMAO ... I stand auto-corrected :)
 
  • Page meeting: Carter Page met in Moscow with Russia's deputy prime minister and a Russian oil official in June 2016.

You really understand so little of this litany of Bullshit you dumped here.

Fine...now show me link(s) to unbiased factual proof that you can successfully ascertain what percentage of the OP I understand. Because, without that, you cannot accurately determine whether my understanding of said material is 'little' or not.

Your understanding is tiny. Because the media zealots that feed you shit and keep you in the dark like a mushroom are partisan zealots.

Do you KNOW the name of the Professor that ENTICED PapaDop to travel to England? Do you KNOW he is the key "spy" of the "spies" that were ADMITTEDLY placed into the Trump Campaign to prank and pawn and entrap various members of the campaign? What's his name? Show me his background. And I'll show you all the sources you need to back up what I'm telling you..

Same with the Lady Beaver Russian lawyer. She met with Fusion GPS the DAY BEFORE and the DAY AFTER the meeting with DJT Jr. She got a SPECIAL VISA to even be allowed into the country to lobby against Russian sanctions with the help of top officials at the State Dept. Tell me what HER relation with Fusion GPS. Depending on what tiny bits you know -- I'll back up EVERYTHING about the rest.

All set-ups. All campaign pranks. Performed by Intel resources that were EXPERTS in election tampering provided by the Intel agencies.

So...you have ZERO links that provide unbiased, factual proof that you can successfully ascertain what percentage of the OP I understand. Despite the fact that you matter-of-factly claimed to know that I knew little of it.

Instead - as I expected, btw - I get some nonsensical and rather long-winded verbiage (I actually don't know for certain as I did not bother reading it after the first few sentences - one can only roll their eyes so far into the back of one's head).

So, your initial statement is total nonsense...as expected.

Only an idiot/small minded person goes around telling people (whom they have never even met) what they know about something. That is beyond feeble.

I have wasted enough time on you. Other than you appear to be a free market/small government lover (as am I) and reasonably intelligent, you seem a complete waste of my time. You go on and on with rambling, arrogant nonsense. You seem to rarely - if ever - back up your statements/assertions/insults with unbiased data/facts. And, to top it off, you seem to be a self-centered jerk.

If I could, I would put you on my ignore list.

So I will just learn to tune you out...starting with your inevitable reply to this post.


We are done here.

Have a nice day.
 
Investigation? You mean the witch hunt?

Going on over a year, no evidence of Trump Russia collusion found.

I think my summary is far more effective than yours.
 
Do you even KNOW WHO that "professor" was? Or his connections to the CIA and DIA? He's a professional instigator with a specialty in monkeying political campaigns. HIRED by YOUR govt
Yeah he is a Reaganite "professional instigator," but you knew that already. Interesting that you left out his Republican connections.
Interesting but not surprising!

You've lost your sense of self-preservation and ALL your objectivity.
(okay - I am bored)

Prove it.

Prove - with actual unbiased evidence (and not your verbose assumptions/generalizations) - that edthecynic has lost ALL of his/her objectivity?

I guarantee that you cannot (unless - for some reason - they admit to it).

And when you cannot...you will yet again be shown how you either are typing words that you do not fully understand and/or you are exaggerating and/or you are flat out lying.

You throw insults/generalizations around like confetti. I doubt you would not know 'exactitude' if it bit you on the ass.


And just to state something on topic for you mod...you are WAY over-analyzing this, IMO.
(and don't bother commenting about this last sentence as I don't much care - nor will I read - what your response to it is)
 
Last edited:
in fact,

Cohen's attorney says he has information on Trump that would interest Mueller - CNNPolitics

and

Davis told The Washington Post that Cohen’s knowledge reached beyond “the obvious possibility of a conspiracy to collude” and included also the question of Trump’s participation in a “criminal conspiracy” to hack into the emails of Democratic officials during the 2016 election.

On “The Rachel Maddow Show,” Davis, who is a veteran of the Clinton White House, said his client had “knowledge about the computer crime of hacking and whether or not Mr. Trump knew ahead of time about that crime and even cheered it on.”

It was already clear, Davis said, that Trump “publicly cheered it on” — an apparent reference to then-candidate Trump’s appeal to Russia in July 2016 to “find the 30,000 emails that are missing.” The question that Trump’s former attorney might be able to answer, Davis said, is “did he also have private information?”

“Donald Trump and all of his henchmen miss when they say ‘no collusion, no collusion, no collusion'” is the issue of criminal conspiracy, which he distinguished from collusion. (For the record, Davis said he thinks there was also collusion, meaning “active coordination between people in the Trump campaign and Russian government officials.”)

A conspiracy to commit a crime becomes a crime if there’s one overt act — meaning you do anything to implement the crime,” Davis added. “So if there is a conversation and a plan for there to be dirt on Hillary Clinton, and then someone knows the way you’re willing to get the dirt is a Russian agent called WikiLeaks… and then WikiLeaks hacks into an email account, which is a crime, then you have committed a crime of conspiracy.”

A crime of conspiracy, he maintained, “could mean that somebody knows about a crime about to be committed and doesn’t call the FBI.”


oooopsie - :abgg2q.jpg:

You sure are funny.

The Obama intelligence and cyber people knew all about it and did nothing.

Trump was a candidate for President. What do you expect he should have done.

Oh and Hitlery, the DNC paid Steele through Fusion for the dossier on Trump. How illegal do you think that was??

Carry on dumbass.
 

Forum List

Back
Top