you have no argument, you have a couple of talking points and become a troll immediately with your stupid insults.... Every Socialist Party and every socialist ever has believed in democracy and fair capitalism. That's all it is, nothing to do with communist dictatorships or your ridiculous GOP propaganda that has one goal, protect the greedy idiot lying rich.
This is objectively false. You literally don't know what you're talking about. You ought to read some histories of the socialist movement.
After the Russian Revolution of 1917, the Second International (the international Socialist organization) had deep splits almost everwhere in the world. Its left wing went over to the Communists.
And before the Russian Revolution, the great majority of Socialists believed in full-blooded Socialism, not in 'fair capitalism'. There was an argument, around the turn of the century (19th to 20th) about whether the transformation of capitalism into socialism could be achieved slowly, gradually, by piecemeal reforms -- or not. (The main protagonists in this debate were Karl Kautsky and Eduard Bernstein.)
I get the impression that you don't read books, but you can read a short summary of the debate here:
[
Karl Kautsky - Wikipedia ]
And the belief in full socialism --not in 'fair capitalism' -- continued, even among the Socialists who did not become Communists or apologists for Communism.
But many non-Communist Leftists did become apologists for Stalin, especially after 1934 and his turning of the world Communist parties towards the 'Popular Front' strategy. It's true that some did not (e.g. Karl Kautsky), and all honor to them.
This pro-Soviet attitude was especially strong among the European intelligentsia.
Now, of course, socialists disavow Communist socialism, because it was such an abject failure economically. Some of them had never been apologists for the Communist countries , but their objection was to the single-party totalitarian state, not to the planned economy.
I repeat: the disavowal of genuine socialism -- ie the planned economy -- by 'socialists' really only happened a few decades ago. For a very long time, 'democratic socialists' were in favor of full-fledged socialism -- their differences with the Communists were that they, the socialists, believed in democracy. (In the US, this tendency is still represented, in journal form, by the magazines
Dissent and
New Politics.)
So you are simply wrong with respect to your assertions about 'socialists' always just being for 'fair capitalism'.
Now, how about your objections to America's economic inequality and standard of living?
You must have some sources for your beliefs, some hard economic data. So what are they?
Over to you.