Prophet Jesus is NOT Zionist
Jesus was not a prophet.
Jesus was a preacher and a teacher - a minister to his people - teaching new, radical, powerful, innovative and highly attractive ideas.
His business was not conjuring-up prophetic utterances but teaching a new packaging of peace and love and tolerance and good works.
The belief-system built upon his teachings - some 2000 years old - musters somewhere between 1.6 and 2.0 billion souls on the face of the planet - actual practitioners of that belief system or members of societies and cultures richly steeped in its traditions.
Many hold him to be either divinely inspired or himself an earthly receptacle for the spirit of the godhead and a spiritual savior to his own people and/or mankind in generatl.
The Muslim perception of Jesus as a prophet was a Johnny-come-lately idea foisted by early Mulsims and is not supported by mainstream Christianity nor Judaism.
Given that Jesus remained within his own countryside and people, we may infer that he believed his ministry to be primarily of benefit to the Jews of Israel-Judea.
It was only later - at the end of his own personal ministry - that he was reported to have sent his disciples out amongst the Gentiles.
In his own time and in his own country and given the Imperial occupation of his lands, and choosing to contain his ministry within Israel-Judea, we may conclude that Jesus most likely stood with his own people.
A Jew standing with his own people may arguably and rightly have been considered a proto-Zionist, 2000 years ago.
I doubt Jesus would have been happy with the Romans sacking Jerusalem and trashing his beloved land and scattering and enslaving a goodly percentage of his beloved people in the period 70-120 AD.
I doubt Jesus would have been happy with the Arabs for taking-over the land from the Romans (Byzantines) some centuries later and continuing to oppress his peple.
In all likelihood, Jesus was a 'Zionist' in many ways, insofar as some of the more peaceable aspects of his nature and teachings would allow.