Lankford followed marching orders from trump, as all others with an R....to kill voting in the bill.Oh nonsense. How bills ",generally work" is just a cheap excuse to dodge the question. Your gods won't be pleased with such dishonesty.
So yes. We agree the fraud border bill was a scheme to add funding for Ukrainec with a mere pittance used for US border security. And yes, Lankford bailed on the bill.
Lankford Votes ‘No’ on Dems Attempt to Use the Border as Political Prop - Senator James Lankford
CLICK HERE to view the floor speech on YouTube. CLICK HERE to view the floor speech on Rumble. WASHINGTON, DC – Senator James Lankford (R-OK) spoke on the Senate floor ahead of a vote on the Senate Democrats’ partisan push on the border security package. The bill failed on a vote of 43-50...www.lankford.senate.gov
No, she will give a load of money to some friendly company, who will then do nothing but disappear the money, a good portion of which will then find its way into her bank accounts.
NOPE!
No. The Republicans rejected the border bill and later passed the Ukraine funding...which kind of implies the opposite of what you are claiming.So yes. We agree the fraud border bill was a scheme to add funding for Ukrainec with a mere pittance used for US border security. And yes, Lankford bailed on the bill.
Lankford Votes ‘No’ on Dems Attempt to Use the Border as Political Prop - Senator James Lankford
CLICK HERE to view the floor speech on YouTube. CLICK HERE to view the floor speech on Rumble. WASHINGTON, DC – Senator James Lankford (R-OK) spoke on the Senate floor ahead of a vote on the Senate Democrats’ partisan push on the border security package. The bill failed on a vote of 43-50...
www.murphy.senate.gov
Not sure why you think that represents all the wall that was built during the Obama administration.As for the Obama/Biden border wall:
"Obama Administration Ends High-Tech Border Fence
"January 14, 2011 / 10:21 PM EST / AP
WASHINGTON - The Obama administration on Friday ended a high-tech border fence project that cost taxpayers nearly $1 billion but did little to improve security. Congress ordered the high-tech fence along the border with Mexico in 2006 amid a clamor over the porous border, but it yielded only 53 miles of protection. . ."
Obama Administration Ends High-Tech Border Fence
High-Tech Border Fence Project That Cost Taxpayers Nearly $1 Billion Did Little to Improve Securitywww.cbsnews.com
Make excuses as you will for the fraudulent Ukraine slush fund money tied to US border securityLol. So you think bills don't usually more then one thing being voted on per bill?
Wow. Talk about a disconnect from reality.
No. The Republicans rejected the border bill and later passed the Ukraine funding...which kind of implies the opposite of what you are claiming.
And yes, Lankford tanked the bill because Trump told him to this proving my point.
Trump didn't want border security, he wanted a wedge issue to run on.
What a weak pathetic man child Trump is.
Murphy Announces Reintroduction Of Bipartisan Border Bill: My Hope Is That Republicans Will Choose This Country Over Donald Trump's Campaign | U.S. Senator Chris Murphy of Connecticut
WASHINGTON—U.S. Senator Chris Murphy (D-Conn.), Chairman of the U.S. Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Homeland Security, on Wednesday spoke on...
“You don't have to listen to me. Senator McConnell said it out loud. Senator Lankford said it out loud. The reason that this bill was defeated 98 days ago is because Donald Trump told Republicans that it's better for Republicans to keep this issue alive and to not change the law to secure the country.
“But Republicans voted against it, with the exception of four of our colleagues, for one reason, and one reason only. President Trump said it would be better for Republicans to keep this issue open to keep the border a mess. Better for Republican presidential and congressional campaign prospects. So [tonight], I will reintroduce this legislation.
www.usmessageboard.com
You’re drunk again on propaganda. Come back to Earth Hollie let’s have a real conversation
Claiming the wall that Harris had flip flopped on is somehow different that Trump's wall. That her wall is magically not "racist" or "medieval" or a "waste of money" or simply a "vanity project"
Hmmm $650 million vs $18 Billion how in the world could you pretend that’s apples to apples? Get real
I need not seek their help. I have made the journey and found the one true God.
Becacase we know she's full of shit. She's simply mouthing these words in the hopes of deceiving ill informed voters.
You're ignorant of the facts or in denial. Either way, You offered nothing but a screeching tirade absent any facts.
Bills "frequently submitted this way" is all you have? You yous acknowledge that bills aren't always submitted with slush fund amounts that have nothing to do with the bill's purpose.
Trump rejected an actual bipartisan bill because he wanted to run on the border issue.
Oh I don’t think k a wall can be racist. His rhetoric around the wall definitely stirred up a lot or racism and hate though. Don’t see how anybody could deny that
Really? So you don’t think if that bill hit her desk she would sign it? Even after saying she would on the campaign trail?
