Eric Cantor lost his seat

[JakeStarkey]

Still did NOT disprove my post . Go back to your little bubble now liberal since you refuse to learn the truth.

Yeah, your post was exploded.

You really need to do your homework before mixing with the heavyweights.

Dude, you're about as "heavyweight" as 100 cubic feet of hydrogen!

Dear, Jarl and you are light weight. I am not particularly a heavy weight, but even I have no problem with squeaks like you.

Once again, the post was exploded.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Luddly, I have been reading up on Brat, and he may be a "TP" member with whom Boehner and some of the sensible Democrats can work.

 

[thanatos144]

LMAO The whole post was you blaming the Jews for everything. You didn't need to say you hated them because we all understood your did from your bigoted post

I don't blame the Jews for everything by any means. I only blame them for those things which they are responsible.
I have shown some of those things which they are responsible for.

This should not be taken to mean that there are no white Anglo Saxons involved with them or doing the same things on their own. Indeed I have said so clearly many times.

It is very prohibitively time consuming to attempt to state all possible exceptions to the general rule for every instance in which it occurs.

I notice that you are guilty of this omission yourself when you speak of people in terms of whether they are Democrats or Republicans.
You speak of them as though they were all identical and are in lock step agreement on every issue down to the last detail. Common sense tells you this isn't so. But that doesn't stop one or the other party from making blanket condemnations of the other.

What are these political parties if they are not mental constructions? For they are supposed to be people who all share the same ideals and have philosophies which are supposed to serve as the basis for making political and social decisions.

The fact that you have no roster with specific names listed and cannot provide one, you still speak of them as though you know and understand the ideals, opinions, and viewpoints of each and everyone.

You as much as admitted this when you said to me that "Republicans don't need no Jew hating assholes" or something to that effect.

You made a pretense of speaking for all of them as a group. You made a pronouncement about their shared ideology which you cannot demonstrate holds for the entire collection of people who call themselves by that LABEL.

I pointed out to you that the predominant decision and policy makers for the "Republican Party" are now NEO-CONs. You and others like yourself want to ignore this fact, probably because it is well known that the originators of this NEO-Republican party are comprised mostly of Jews. Those who aren't Jewish, like John McCain serve as their lap dogs.

So why do you HATE Democrats?
The insignia you present for yourself says "Socialism is a cancer."

I assume that this means that you HATE SOCIALISTS.

Is this hatred you have for "Democrats" and Socialists based upon some reason which justifies your hatred or is it merely pathological?

Don't tell me that you don't hate them because your scathing criticisms of them clearly indicates that you do.

It is also apparent by your tone in speaking to others on this forum that you hate them as well.

Is this because you know that they all happen to be Democrats and Socialists and are therefore worthy of your hatred........asshole?


If criticism of Democrats, Socialist, or Republicans either for that matter, is no sure sign of hatred for all of them or any one in particular, then neither is criticism of JudaISM and/or Zionism or any of the myriad of politically active Jewish organizations or their social engineers.

For decades, "white men" and everything associated with them including their culture, their heritage, the predominant religion among them, and their race as well, has been wide open to all kinds of criticisms and even hateful defamation.
When have you ever heard any one in the Jewish media censor those critics as being motivated by hatred for those objects?

You never do! The reason why is because the Jews themselves have done so and continue to do so.
For them to condemn criticism of "WASP" America as being politically incorrect, they would have to condemn themselves for it because they are as much and probably more engaged in it as anyone else, including the blacks!


In the interest of political and academic fairness I'm declaring an open season on Jews, their culture, their activism, and their Supremacist religion in particular.

Let the bashing begin.

Like I said go be a libertarian or democrat we republicans don't need bigots like you

tapatalk post

 

[holston]

LMAO The whole post was you blaming the Jews for everything. You didn't need to say you hated them because we all understood your did from your bigoted post

I don't blame the Jews for everything by any means. I only blame them for those things which they are responsible.
I have shown some of those things which they are responsible for.

This should not be taken to mean that there are no white Anglo Saxons involved with them or doing the same things on their own. Indeed I have said so clearly many times.

It is very prohibitively time consuming to attempt to state all possible exceptions to the general rule for every instance in which it occurs.

I notice that you are guilty of this omission yourself when you speak of people in terms of whether they are Democrats or Republicans.
You speak of them as though they were all identical and are in lock step agreement on every issue down to the last detail. Common sense tells you this isn't so. But that doesn't stop one or the other party from making blanket condemnations of the other.

What are these political parties if they are not mental constructions? For they are supposed to be people who all share the same ideals and have philosophies which are supposed to serve as the basis for making political and social decisions.

The fact that you have no roster with specific names listed and cannot provide one, you still speak of them as though you know and understand the ideals, opinions, and viewpoints of each and everyone.

You as much as admitted this when you said to me that "Republicans don't need no Jew hating assholes" or something to that effect.

You made a pretense of speaking for all of them as a group. You made a pronouncement about their shared ideology which you cannot demonstrate holds for the entire collection of people who call themselves by that LABEL.

I pointed out to you that the predominant decision and policy makers for the "Republican Party" are now NEO-CONs. You and others like yourself want to ignore this fact, probably because it is well known that the originators of this NEO-Republican party are comprised mostly of Jews. Those who aren't Jewish, like John McCain serve as their lap dogs.

So why do you HATE Democrats?
The insignia you present for yourself says "Socialism is a cancer."

I assume that this means that you HATE SOCIALISTS.

Is this hatred you have for "Democrats" and Socialists based upon some reason which justifies your hatred or is it merely pathological?

Don't tell me that you don't hate them because your scathing criticisms of them clearly indicates that you do.

It is also apparent by your tone in speaking to others on this forum that you hate them as well.

Is this because you know that they all happen to be Democrats and Socialists and are therefore worthy of your hatred........asshole?


If criticism of Democrats, Socialist, or Republicans either for that matter, is no sure sign of hatred for all of them or any one in particular, then neither is criticism of JudaISM and/or Zionism or any of the myriad of politically active Jewish organizations or their social engineers.

For decades, "white men" and everything associated with them including their culture, their heritage, the predominant religion among them, and their race as well, has been wide open to all kinds of criticisms and even hateful defamation.
When have you ever heard any one in the Jewish media censor those critics as being motivated by hatred for those objects?

You never do! The reason why is because the Jews themselves have done so and continue to do so.
For them to condemn criticism of "WASP" America as being politically incorrect, they would have to condemn themselves for it because they are as much and probably more engaged in it as anyone else, including the blacks!


In the interest of political and academic fairness I'm declaring an open season on Jews, their culture, their activism, and their Supremacist religion in particular.

Let the bashing begin.

Like I said go be a libertarian or democrat we republicans don't need bigots like you

tapatalk post

Like I said, I'm none of the above. And I don't need your advice.

 

[thanatos144]

I don't blame the Jews for everything by any means. I only blame them for those things which they are responsible.
I have shown some of those things which they are responsible for.

This should not be taken to mean that there are no white Anglo Saxons involved with them or doing the same things on their own. Indeed I have said so clearly many times.

It is very prohibitively time consuming to attempt to state all possible exceptions to the general rule for every instance in which it occurs.

I notice that you are guilty of this omission yourself when you speak of people in terms of whether they are Democrats or Republicans.
You speak of them as though they were all identical and are in lock step agreement on every issue down to the last detail. Common sense tells you this isn't so. But that doesn't stop one or the other party from making blanket condemnations of the other.

What are these political parties if they are not mental constructions? For they are supposed to be people who all share the same ideals and have philosophies which are supposed to serve as the basis for making political and social decisions.

The fact that you have no roster with specific names listed and cannot provide one, you still speak of them as though you know and understand the ideals, opinions, and viewpoints of each and everyone.

You as much as admitted this when you said to me that "Republicans don't need no Jew hating assholes" or something to that effect.

You made a pretense of speaking for all of them as a group. You made a pronouncement about their shared ideology which you cannot demonstrate holds for the entire collection of people who call themselves by that LABEL.

I pointed out to you that the predominant decision and policy makers for the "Republican Party" are now NEO-CONs. You and others like yourself want to ignore this fact, probably because it is well known that the originators of this NEO-Republican party are comprised mostly of Jews. Those who aren't Jewish, like John McCain serve as their lap dogs.

So why do you HATE Democrats?
The insignia you present for yourself says "Socialism is a cancer."

I assume that this means that you HATE SOCIALISTS.

Is this hatred you have for "Democrats" and Socialists based upon some reason which justifies your hatred or is it merely pathological?

Don't tell me that you don't hate them because your scathing criticisms of them clearly indicates that you do.

It is also apparent by your tone in speaking to others on this forum that you hate them as well.

Is this because you know that they all happen to be Democrats and Socialists and are therefore worthy of your hatred........asshole?


If criticism of Democrats, Socialist, or Republicans either for that matter, is no sure sign of hatred for all of them or any one in particular, then neither is criticism of JudaISM and/or Zionism or any of the myriad of politically active Jewish organizations or their social engineers.

For decades, "white men" and everything associated with them including their culture, their heritage, the predominant religion among them, and their race as well, has been wide open to all kinds of criticisms and even hateful defamation.
When have you ever heard any one in the Jewish media censor those critics as being motivated by hatred for those objects?

You never do! The reason why is because the Jews themselves have done so and continue to do so.
For them to condemn criticism of "WASP" America as being politically incorrect, they would have to condemn themselves for it because they are as much and probably more engaged in it as anyone else, including the blacks!


In the interest of political and academic fairness I'm declaring an open season on Jews, their culture, their activism, and their Supremacist religion in particular.

Let the bashing begin.

Like I said go be a libertarian or democrat we republicans don't need bigots like you

tapatalk post

Like I said, I'm none of the above. And I don't need your advice.

It wasn't advice it was a statement of fact

tapatalk post

 

[Jarlaxle]

Yeah, your post was exploded.

You really need to do your homework before mixing with the heavyweights.

Dude, you're about as "heavyweight" as 100 cubic feet of hydrogen!

Dear, Jarl and you are light weight. I am not particularly a heavy weight, but even I have no problem with squeaks like you.

Once again, the post was exploded.

Self-delusion is an ugly thing, boy.

 

[Listening]

Luddly, I have been reading up on Brat, and he may be a "TP" member with whom Boehner and some of the sensible Democrats can work.

Imagine that !

The left screams about labels, but is more than willing to utilize them to further their ends.

The democrats can work with Ted Cruz too. On certain issues.

 

[holston]

It wasn't advice it was a statement of fact

tapatalk post

You don't seem to understand the difference between facts and your opinion.

Here are some facts>

Neocons and the Incredible Jewish Ethnic Infrastructure | The Occidental Observer - White Identity, Interests, and Culture

Or as Bill Kristol remarked in 2005, the neoconservatives have done such an excellent job building institutions and infrastructure for developing the next generation of neocons that “soon there are going to be more neoconservative magazines than there are neoconservatives.” There are dozens of twenty-something, thirty-something, forty-something and older neocons throughout Washington, working at think tanks, editorial pages, in government and elsewhere.

As pointed out here repeatedly, usually in fundraising posts, Jewish causes are lavishly funded, whether it’s the ADL, the SPLC, the Democratic Party, or the neocon foreign policy infrastructure. Compared to this avalanche of cash, money for White advocacy is virtually non-existent.

Needless to say, Jews are well aware of the power of money and a there is a long list of Jewish donors to political causes. As just one example, über-Zionist Haim Saban is quoted listing the sources of political influence: Donations to political parties, establishing think tanks, and controlling media outlets.

Saban has practiced what he preaches: He controls Univision, the Spanish language network and led a group that bought Kirsch Media Group, a German media conglomerate; he has contributed millions of dollars to Democratic political causes and lesser amounts to Republicans; and he funded the Saban Center for Middle East Policy at the [left-leaning] Brookings Institution to the tune of $13 million. This strategy, which ultimately stems from Jewish wealth and active engagement in the political process, has given Jews influence far beyond their numbers. (See here)

Indeed, Jewish ownership of media and their prominence as commentators and writers should be properly seen as an aspect of the Jewish ethnic infrastructure

Whereas Saban funds ultra-Zionism from the political left, the financial angel of the neocons is Bruce Kovner, a New York hedge fund billionaire who “over two decades, has underwritten the infrastructure the neocons have used to achieve their current prominence.” Kovner funds the American Enterprise Institute, the Manhattan Institute, and the New York Sun. He was also a major backer of President George W. Bush: “when George Bush’s chestnuts were in the fire [over the Iraq war], Kovner helped to pull them out.

(Nevertheless, as Philip Weiss notes, “the biggest money game in town on the Republican side is Sheldon Adelson, a Zionist Jew, who got engaged in 2000 with the specific aim of nullifying the ‘peace process.’”)

Kovner’s creations led the charge in promoting the Iraq war:

On the fifth floor of the AEI building, the Project for the New American Century helped lay the ground for the Iraq war by regular statements describing Saddam Hussein as the greatest threat to peace in the Middle East. The [New York] Sun [financially backed by Kovner] ran an editorial asserting that people protesting the Iraq war were committing treason, while AEI’s Perle and David Frum published An End to Evil, in which they argued that extreme Islam wants to dominate the world, and the U.S. faces “victory or holocaust.” The U.S. should show as little compunction about “destroying regimes” as a police sniper feels icing a hostage-taker. When George Bush was elected in 2000, Dick Cheney swept in a raft of neoconservative thinkers, many from AEI [American Enterprise Institute].

Finally, it’s interesting that Kovner’s history “recapitulates the arc of the neocons.” His family was part of the far left Jewish mainstream of the early decades of the 20th century:

Kovner’s grandfather Nathan, along with Nathan’s brother Benjamin, came to Williamsburg, Brooklyn, from Vilna, Russia, in the early 1900s because they were revolutionary socialists who feared arrest by the czar. “They were atheists. They were fleeing religion as much as they were fleeing the czar,” Kovner’s cousin Pat Kovner says of her ancestors.

In the only statements Kovner has made about his background, to the Wall Street Journalfourteen years ago, he said that his family was full of socialists. The word favored by some of his relatives is communist. Two of his father’s cousins were accused of being communists in the labor movement and were called before the House Un-American Activities Committee in the fifties.

Like the other neocons, the only area of social policy where they are “conservative” is in supporting the ethnonationalist right in Israel. His idea of conservativism doubtless includes advocacy of massive non-White immigration into the U.S. (not Israel) as championed by his think tanks (e.g., Tamar Jacoby of the Manhattan Institute).

Neoconservatism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Neoconservatism is a political movement born in the United States during the 1960s. Many of its adherents rose to political fame during the Republican presidential administrations of the 1970s, 1980s, 1990s and 2000s. Neoconservatives peaked in influence during the presidency of George W. Bush, when they played a major role in promoting and planning the invasion of Iraq.[1] Prominent neoconservatives in the Bush administration included Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Paul Wolfowitz, John Bolton, Elliott Abrams, Richard Perle, and Paul Bremer.

Count the Jews.

The term "neoconservative" was popularized in the United States during 1973 by Socialist leader Michael Harrington, who used the term to define Daniel Bell, Daniel Patrick Moynihan, and Irving Kristol, whose ideologies differed from Harrington's.[9]

The "neoconservative" label was used by Irving Kristol in his 1979 article "Confessions of a True, Self-Confessed 'Neoconservative.'"

The term "neoconservative" was the subject of increased media coverage during the presidency of George W. Bush,[17][18] with particular emphasis on a perceived neoconservative influence on American foreign policy, as part of the Bush Doctrine.[19]

Norman Podhoretz's magazine Commentary of the American Jewish Committee, originally a journal of liberalism, became a major publication for neoconservatives during the 1970s.

New York Intellectuals

Many neoconservatives had been leftist during the 1930s and 1940s, when they opposed Stalinism. After World War II, they continued to oppose Stalinism and to endorse democracy during the Cold War. Of these, many were from the Jewish[30] intellectual milieu of New York City.[31]

Leo Strauss and his students

Neoconservatism draws on several intellectual traditions. The students of political science Professor Leo Strauss (1899–1973) comprised one major group. Eugene Sheppard notes that, "Much scholarship tends to understand Strauss as an inspirational founder of American neoconservatism."[36] Strauss was a refugee from Nazi Germany who taught at the New School for Social Research in New York (1939–49) and the University of Chicago (1949–1958).[37]

Allegations of antisemitism


Some writers and intellectuals have argued that criticism of neoconservatism is often a euphemism for criticism of Jews, and that the term has been adopted by independents and the political left to stigmatize endorsement of Israel. In The Chronicle of Higher Education, Robert J. Lieber wrote that writers such as Michael Lind, Eric Alterman and Pat Buchanan have created a theory that identified neoconservative Paul Wolfowitz as the center of a conspiracy involving the manipulation of the Presidency of George W. Bush to gain control of the US military and make war on Iraq in the interest of Israel rather than the US.[86]

I would say that's a fair appraisal.

Joe Klein, in Time magazine, has suggested it is legitimate to examine the religion of neoconservatives. He does not say there was a conspiracy but says there is a case to be made for disproportionate influence of Jewish neoconservatives on US foreign policy, and that several of them endorsed the Iraq war because of Israel's interests, though sometimes in an unconscious contradiction to American interests:

I do believe that there is a group of people who got involved and had a disproportionate influence on U.S. foreign policy. There were people out there in the Jewish community who saw this as a way to create a benign domino theory and eliminate all of Israel's enemies.... I think it represents a really dangerous anachronistic neocolonial sensibility. And I think it is a very, very dangerous form of extremism. I think it's bad for Israel and it's bad for America. And these guys have been getting a free ride. And now these people are backing the notion of a war with Iran and not all of them, but some of them, are doing it because they believe that Iran is an existential threat to Israel.[87]

David Brooks derided the "fantasies" of "full-mooners fixated on a... sort of Yiddish Trilateral Commission", beliefs which had "hardened into common knowledge... In truth, people labeled neocons (con is short for 'conservative' and neo is short for 'Jewish') travel in widely different circles..."[88] Barry Rubin argued that the neoconservative label is used as an antisemitic pejorative:[89]

First, 'neo-conservative' is a codeword for Jewish. As antisemites did with big business moguls in the nineteenth century and Communist leaders in the twentieth, the trick here is to take all those involved in some aspect of public life and single out those who are Jewish. The implication made is that this is a Jewish-led movement conducted not in the interests of all the, in this case, American people, but to the benefit of Jews, and in this case Israel.

Trotskyism allegation

Trotskyism is the type of communism advocated by Leon Trotsky and his followers, emphasizing orthodox Marxist concepts of workers' power in opposition to state bureaucracy, and international proletarian revolution, while critical of Stalinism and the USSR. Critics of neo-conservatism have charged that neo-conservatism is descended from Trotskyism, and that Trotskyist traits continue to characterize ideologies and practices of neo-conservatism

I'll agree with all of that, although I would draw a Zionist's conclusion from it.
No doubt you would.

 

[holston]

Like I said go be a libertarian or democrat we republicans don't need bigots like you

tapatalk post

Here's a list of some of the prominent Neo-Cons of the Bush reign. Count the Jews.
It's was interesting to note hear Yomamma praising Comrade Bush for his support for the push for a Global Carbon tax.

List of prominent Jewish Neocons

 

[thanatos144]

Like I said go be a libertarian or democrat we republicans don't need bigots like you

tapatalk post

Here's a list of some of the prominent Neo-Cons of the Bush reign. Count the Jews.
It's was interesting to note hear Yomamma praising Comrade Bush for his support for the push for a Global Carbon tax.

List of prominent Jewish Neocons

Grow up boy

tapatalk post

 

[holston]

Grow up boy

tapatalk post

Bernstein Blames 'Jewish Neo-Cons' For Persuading Bush On Iraq War | NewsBusters

Bernstein Blames 'Jewish Neo-Cons' For Persuading Bush On Iraq War

By Mark Finkelstein

Carl Bernstein claimed that because he's Jewish, he could accuse "Jewish" neo-cons of talking George W. Bush into starting an "insane" war against Iraq. Joe Scarborough wasn't so sure.

Who's yo Daddy?

 

[holston]

Like I said go be a libertarian or democrat we republicans don't need bigots like you

tapatalk post

No you don't. You need more bigots like the Neo-Cons.


The Pied Pipers of Neoconservatism

Neoconservative Roots

In 1995, neocon godfather Kristol candidly stated, "I regard myself to have been a young Trostkyite and I have not a single bitter memory." You can see in that statement his willingness to identify with Trotsky. As far back as 1983, he claimed that "a conservative welfare state … is perfectly consistent with the neoconservative perspective." A conservative welfare state? That qualifies as the oxymoron of the decade.

Writing in Kristol’s journal, The National Interest, in 1989, fellow neocon Charles Krauthammer called for the integration of Europe, Japan, and the United States to create a "super-sovereign" government. He even voiced his desire to see "the conscious depreciation not only of American sovereignty but of the notion of sovereignty in general." So, it’s safe to say that these people are the enemies of a constitutionally limited government in an independent nation. They are enemies; they are neoconservatives. Add in Midge Decter, Norman Podhoretz, Elliott Abrams, Ben Wattenberg, the magazine Commentary led by Podhoretz, The Weekly Standard led by Irving Kristol’s son William, and many others.

Let's see you wash the Kosher out of that. Better yet, let everyone else see.

 

[holston]

The Pied Pipers of Neoconservatism

The Neocon Influence

Do you wonder why Republicans are caving in when they should be standing firm against socialistic and internationalist programs?
Do you wonder why Republicans in the Senate refused even to consider going after Bill Clinton for bribery and other serious crimes during the impeachment process?
Do you wonder why opposition to the UN, World Bank, IMF, Export-Import Bank, Federal Reserve, etc. is almost nonexistent in the supposedly conservative political party?

Well, stop wondering and consider that neoconservatives promoting their socialist and world government schemes have taken over not only the Republican Party but the conservative wing of the party.

One of the more important promoters of the neocon program was Newt Gingrich. But we are still told that he’s a conservative. I know people who scratch their head and wonder what has happened to Trent Lott, Dick Armey, Phil Crane, Orrin Hatch, and others. The answer is that they aren’t conservatives any more; they’re neoconservatives even if the mass media won’t tell you. Add in Rush Limbaugh, Bill Bennett, Jack Kemp, Henry Kissinger, and a host of Republicans who toe the neocon line and you have your answer.

Again, neoconservatism is socialism and internationalism.

 

[JWBooth]

Just drop it. In thanatroll you are dealing with one of the dumbest mouth breathers ever to wield a key board. It isn't worth your time or trouble. The dude is a middle aged clerk at the Circle K. That should tell you all you need to know about him.

 

[Warrior102]

So now the Libberhoids are cheering a Tea Party victory?
Awesome.

 

[The T]

So now the Libberhoids are cheering a Tea Party victory?
Awesome.

That or cheering one of Obama's perceived enemies...they still haven't come to a conclusion...they remain lost in the Ethernet of indecision as to what benefits them more.

 

[Borillar]

He could always run as an independant ala Lieberman and caucus with the Repugs.