The reason is that Epstein was the only person who had legal standing to sue the investigators trying to comb through the evidence in his mansions and penthouses, including videotapes of young girls and documents that may mention the names of people who were at his properties on specific dates. Had Epstein lived, and made it to trial, his attorneys could have filed motions to throw out that evidence. Now, however, no one has standing to put the brakes on the investigation.
Epstein’s friends just lost any chance of having penthouse evidence tossed by courts — here’s why
The suicides might not be over yet.
Here's someone who might put the brakes on any investigation into prominent Republicans:
"Christmas day of 1992, the New York Times featured a
screaming all-caps headline across the top of its front page: Attorney General Bill Barr had covered up evidence of crimes by Reagan and Bush in the Iran-Contra scandal.
"Earlier that week of Christmas, 1992, George H.W. Bush was on his way out of office.
"Bill Clinton had won the White House the month before, and in a few weeks would be sworn in as president.
"But Bush’s biggest concern wasn’t that he’d have to leave the White House to retire back to Connecticut, Maine, or Texas (where he had homes) but, rather, that he may end up embroiled even deeper in Iran-Contra and that his colleagues may face time in a federal prison after he left office.
"Independent Counsel Lawrence Walsh was closing in fast on him, and Bush’s private records, subpoenaed by the independent counsel’s office, were the key to it all."
Cover-up Attorney General Bill Barr strikes again
"Was the Iran-Contra criminal conspiracy limited, as Reagan and Bush insisted (and Reagan
confessed on TV), to later years in the Reagan presidency, in response to a hostage-taking in Lebanon?
"
Or had it started in the 1980 campaign with collusion with the Iranians, as the then-president of Iran asserted?
"Who knew what, and when?And what was George H.W. Bush’s role in it all?
