Epstein Files passed House UPDATE: AND Senate

[Doc7505]

Democrats always intended to accuse Trump of altering the records.

~~~~~~>
Indeed. Bur it kinda blew up in their faces...

 

[WEATHER53]

~~~~~~>
Indeed. Bur it kinda blew up in their faces...

Liberals won’t accept facts that disprove their feelings

 

[Care4all]

Well if the above lists are The List then Trump is not in it
How many on that list knew of the abominations and how many Participated in them?

Good questions.

The FBI was investigating 20 people that were persons of interest...

So, lots on the so called list were not suspect...and the 20 are not necessarily guilty either....

 

[Mac-7]

It's well supported, and you're going to keep supporting it for me. Guaranteed. You will do exactly what I described.

You are babbling nonsense

 

[progressive hunter]

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

He did. It's a fact. Look it up. Trump rewarded him by appointing him to his administration.

If you weren't utterly brainwashed, it would gross you out.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

You are babbling nonsense

I'm sure a lot of things that make sense are nonsense, to you.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

~~~~~~>
Indeed. Bur it kinda blew up in their faces...

Brainwashing Level 10.

No, i assure you, Trump is paying the political price.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

As predictable as the sunrise...

 

[Bitterhook]

As hot as the press is on the Epstein issue, once all the names released,
there will be no prisoners, they all will be guilty, whether they are guilty or not.
Kind of like, "kill them all, and let God sort it out" mentality.
I think that's why Johnson voted the way he did.

If the files are fast-tracked and come out soon, it might be a good idea for folks to spend the weekend enjoying family activities somewhere far from the modern world. That will allow a lot of blanket allegations to make it through the initial grinder and fall down to where only the rapid partisans can continue to push for nonsense.

If you don't have a family you might want to try hunting or fishing, and maybe just a barbecue with friends if the woods aren't your thing. Just keep the television turned off and collect cell phones or other electronic devices in a bucket at the door.

Wow, what an appropriate topic for Thanksgiving dinner next week. I bet that is not going to work out well for everyone.

 

[Care4all]

Democrats always intended to accuse Trump of altering the records.

The records were redacted....that was reported months ago.

FBI Redacted Trump’s Name in Epstein Files for Privacy Reasons

The Federal Bureau of Investigation redacted President Donald Trump’s name and those of other high-profile individuals from government files related to Jeffrey Epstein, according to three people familiar with the matter.

news.bgov.com

FBI Redacted Trump’s Name in Epstein Files for Privacy Reasons​

Aug. 1, 2025, 1:34 PM EDT

Jason Leopold

The Federal Bureau of Investigation redacted President Donald Trump’s name and those of other high-profile individuals from government files related to Jeffrey Epstein, according to three people familiar with the matter.

The redactions were made by a team of FBI employees tasked with reviewing the Epstein files for potential public release. The names were withheld under privacy protections because those individuals, including Trump, were private citizens when the federal investigation into Epstein began in 2006, the people said. They spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the matter publicly.


© 2025 Bloomberg Industry Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/newsletters/2025-08-01/epstein-files-trump-s-name-was-redacted-by-the-fbi

Then on Feb. 27, during a highly publicized event at the White House, Bondi rolled out what the Justice Department referred to as the “first phase” of the release of the Epstein files....

​

​

...Trump’s name blacked out​

 

[Meister]

The records were redacted....that was reported months ago.

FBI Redacted Trump’s Name in Epstein Files for Privacy Reasons

The Federal Bureau of Investigation redacted President Donald Trump’s name and those of other high-profile individuals from government files related to Jeffrey Epstein, according to three people familiar with the matter.

news.bgov.com

FBI Redacted Trump’s Name in Epstein Files for Privacy Reasons​

Aug. 1, 2025, 1:34 PM EDT

Jason Leopold

The Federal Bureau of Investigation redacted President Donald Trump’s name and those of other high-profile individuals from government files related to Jeffrey Epstein, according to three people familiar with the matter.

The redactions were made by a team of FBI employees tasked with reviewing the Epstein files for potential public release. The names were withheld under privacy protections because those individuals, including Trump, were private citizens when the federal investigation into Epstein began in 2006, the people said. They spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the matter publicly.


© 2025 Bloomberg Industry Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/newsletters/2025-08-01/epstein-files-trump-s-name-was-redacted-by-the-fbi

Then on Feb. 27, during a highly publicized event at the White House, Bondi rolled out what the Justice Department referred to as the “first phase” of the release of the Epstein files....

​

​

...Trump’s name blacked out​

".....according to three people familiar with the matter."
"They spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the matter publicly."

I always have issues with the disclaimers for obvious reasons.

 

[Bitterhook]

You tell me? Why didn't he? You're parroting that tired talking point for a reason, so what are you implying?

Perhaps he is implying that he doesn't really know any more than you do and giving an ambiguous answer to a question you are not expressing your thoughts on would be the appropriate response? Unless of course you are implying that he should give you something to try and defeat in attempts to maintain that he is probably wrong while you risked nothing and only suckered him into saying something more in regard to what neither of you really know anything about.

But hey, **** it, that's just a guess, although I don't mind telling you my guess.

 

[Bitterhook]

The list everyone has been wanting to see. The clean one first, then the highlighted one next. Guess whose name isnt on the list? Gator is a democrat shill puppet.

View attachment 1185818

View attachment 1185820

Oh My God, Charles Barkley is on the list, and I am never buying Nike Athletic Gear again. Oh damn, I am already not buying Nike for completely different reasons, that sucks. Let me look at the list again, and I am pretty sure I can find something else to get outraged about, because that's just the way I roll.

 

[dudmuck]

".....according to three people familiar with the matter."
"They spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the matter publicly."

I always have issues with the disclaimers for obvious reasons.

 

[TheGreatSatan]

Trump will have Patel and Bondi scrubbing all references made to his conduct in his decades long personal friendship with Epstein.

But, someone with a conscience will get the truth out, as good usually triumphs over evil.

If only democrats released the files they hid for 4 years.

If Kamala won, none of this would be happening

 

[drudge X]

Hilarious. Leftists are now saying the files are fake unless there are information showing wrongdoing by Trump.

Democrats put up one shitty excuse, worse than a 10 year old giving excuse after getting caught with hand in the cookie jar.

 

[Care4all]

".....according to three people familiar with the matter."
"They spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the matter publicly."

I always have issues with the disclaimers for obvious reasons.

Agree if it were one anonymous source, but three separate sources.....uhhhh....the likelihood comes closer to it being true.

And this is just Bloomberg's sources, there are several News Media outlets reporting the same, with their own sources if you Google it...some.... months earlier than this news source.



Remember, in the Watergate Scandal, Deep Throat, was a single anonymous source!

 

[Mac-7]

I'm sure a lot of things that make sense are nonsense, to you.

We are on different sides

Two enemies together in one country

 

[Care4all]

If the files are fast-tracked and come out soon, it might be a good idea for folks to spend the weekend enjoying family activities somewhere far from the modern world. That will allow a lot of blanket allegations to make it through the initial grinder and fall down to where only the rapid partisans can continue to push for nonsense.

If you don't have a family you might want to try hunting or fishing, and maybe just a barbecue with friends if the woods aren't your thing. Just keep the television turned off and collect cell phones or other electronic devices in a bucket at the door.

Wow, what an appropriate topic for Thanksgiving dinner next week. I bet that is not going to work out well for everyone.

You're worried about the billionaires involved with Epstein, who wouldn't know what a barbecue is, or the woods? They'll be just fine...they've weathered worse and if they want to avoid scrutiny, they would be calling for the full release of the Epstein files.