edthecynic
Censored for Cynicism
- Oct 20, 2008
- 43,044
- 6,888
- 1,830
You do not know if Ciaramella is the whistleblower, your sources are the same lying sources who lied to you about the ICIG report!!!!!
EPIC! Trump UNLOADS on Fake News, Fired ICIG Atkinson and "Fake" Whistleblower Eric Ciaramella at W.H. Presser
- Thread starter Doc7505
- Start date
edthecynic
Censored for Cynicism
- Oct 20, 2008
- 43,044
- 6,888
- 1,830
I answered the question, you just can't handle the truth that ALL your sources are liars making a foolish SUCKER out of you1That is what the ICIG report says, showing just how BIG a SUCKER your Right-wing sources made out of YOU!!!!!I know the FAKE NEWS article doesn't say that, I cited the actual ICIG report the FAKE NEWS article claims to cite, that is why it is FAKE NEWS!!!!!!!Pure projection!The IGin this case the lie is a half truthThe Federalist is FAKE NEWS!Yes they did
ICIG Admission Of Whistleblower Changes Raises Explosive New Questions
A Monday press release from the ICIG admitting it changed whistleblower rules and forms raises explosive new questions about the anti-Trump complaint.thefederalist.com
THE ACTUAL LAW WAS NOT CHANGED, AND EVEN YOU KNOW IT!
The law was not changed
but the regulation implementing the law was changed
read the reference given and you wont have to ask
They'll rather argue without reading the reference.
I read the reference and quoted directly from it to expose your lie.
Here it is again:
The Disclosure of Urgent Concern form the Complainant submitted on August 12, 2019 is the same form the ICIG has had in place since May 24, 2018
The article does not say anything even close to that.
It does say that "The ICIG also disclosed for the first time that the anti-Trump complainant filed his complaint using the previously authorized form, the guidance for which explicitly stated the ICIG’s previous requirement for firsthand evidence for credible complaints. "
If he used that form, he must have known that whistle blower did not meet the requirements, as specified on the form.
From the text: "ICIG also explicitly admitted it changed its policies because of the anti-Trump complaint, raising significant questions about whether the watchdog cooked its own books to justify its treatment of the anti-Trump complaint".
Here is what the actual ICIG report says:
"The Disclosure of Urgent Concern form the Complainant submitted on August 12, 2019 is the same form the ICIG has had in place since May 24, 2018"
The ICIG report also says this:
"The Complainant on the form he or she submitted on August 12, 2019 in fact checked two relevant boxes: The first box stated that, “I have personal and/or direct knowledge of events or records involved”; and the second box stated that, “Other employees have told me about events or records involved.” As part of his determination that the urgent concern appeared credible, the Inspector General of the Intelligence Community determined that the Complainant had official and authorized access to the information and sources referenced in the Complainant’s Letter and Classified Appendix, including direct knowledge of certain alleged conduct, and that the Complainant has subject matter expertise related to much of the material information provided in the Complainant’s Letter and Classified Appendix. In short, the ICIG did not find that the Complainant could “provide nothing more than second-hand or unsubstantiated assertions"
Are you saying whistle blower had direct knowledge of Trump's phone call?
Why don't you answer the question?
Eric Arthur Blair
Diamond Member
- Jul 21, 2015
- 25,955
- 15,967
- 1,415
He was a CIA plant working in the White House as part of the NSA and he was Schiff's stooge.
Ciararmella was told by Vindman. Ciaramella told Schiff. Schiff put him in touch with some DNC
connected lawyers. Whistleblower Was Overheard in '17 Discussing With Ally How to Remove Trump | RealClearInvestigations
There is no one but desperate fools trying to keep this house of cards up denying who Schiff's whistleblower
was. Grow up.
Anyone who ever speaks up against Trump or tries to act in a professional non partisan manner is labeled a “a sworn enemy” by tbe a Cult.
Cute. Libs lie but Trump is only “misunderstood”.
Crepitus
Diamond Member
- Mar 28, 2018
- 105,624
- 156,442
- 3,615
They live in "opposite land"
I know the FAKE NEWS article doesn't say that, I cited the actual ICIG report the FAKE NEWS article claims to cite, that is why it is FAKE NEWS!!!!!!!Pure projection!The IGin this case the lie is a half truthThe Federalist is FAKE NEWS!Yes they did
ICIG Admission Of Whistleblower Changes Raises Explosive New Questions
A Monday press release from the ICIG admitting it changed whistleblower rules and forms raises explosive new questions about the anti-Trump complaint.
THE ACTUAL LAW WAS NOT CHANGED, AND EVEN YOU KNOW IT!
The law was not changed
but the regulation implementing the law was changed
read the reference given and you wont have to ask
They'll rather argue without reading the reference.
I read the reference and quoted directly from it to expose your lie.
Here it is again:
The Disclosure of Urgent Concern form the Complainant submitted on August 12, 2019 is the same form the ICIG has had in place since May 24, 2018
The article does not say anything even close to that.
It does say that "The ICIG also disclosed for the first time that the anti-Trump complainant filed his complaint using the previously authorized form, the guidance for which explicitly stated the ICIG’s previous requirement for firsthand evidence for credible complaints. "
If he used that form, he must have known that whistle blower did not meet the requirements, as specified on the form.
From the text: "ICIG also explicitly admitted it changed its policies because of the anti-Trump complaint, raising significant questions about whether the watchdog cooked its own books to justify its treatment of the anti-Trump complaint".
Here is what the actual ICIG report says:
"The Disclosure of Urgent Concern form the Complainant submitted on August 12, 2019 is the same form the ICIG has had in place since May 24, 2018"
The ICIG report also says this:
"The Complainant on the form he or she submitted on August 12, 2019 in fact checked two relevant boxes: The first box stated that, “I have personal and/or direct knowledge of events or records involved”; and the second box stated that, “Other employees have told me about events or records involved.” As part of his determination that the urgent concern appeared credible, the Inspector General of the Intelligence Community determined that the Complainant had official and authorized access to the information and sources referenced in the Complainant’s Letter and Classified Appendix, including direct knowledge of certain alleged conduct, and that the Complainant has subject matter expertise related to much of the material information provided in the Complainant’s Letter and Classified Appendix. In short, the ICIG did not find that the Complainant could “provide nothing more than second-hand or unsubstantiated assertions"
I wouldn’t waste your time with this. These are the same who believe Obama was born in Kenya.
edthecynic
Censored for Cynicism
- Oct 20, 2008
- 43,044
- 6,888
- 1,830
FAKE NEWS!!!!!
Winco
Diamond Member
- Nov 1, 2019
- 29,292
- 20,546
- 2,290
He, Atkinson, is doing his JOB.
trump is going to jail when he leaves office.
He will probably TRY to pardon himself, and if/when he does, that is a clear sign of guilt.
I know the FAKE NEWS article doesn't say that, I cited the actual ICIG report the FAKE NEWS article claims to cite, that is why it is FAKE NEWS!!!!!!!Pure projection!The IGin this case the lie is a half truthThe Federalist is FAKE NEWS!Yes they did
ICIG Admission Of Whistleblower Changes Raises Explosive New Questions
A Monday press release from the ICIG admitting it changed whistleblower rules and forms raises explosive new questions about the anti-Trump complaint.
THE ACTUAL LAW WAS NOT CHANGED, AND EVEN YOU KNOW IT!
The law was not changed
but the regulation implementing the law was changed
read the reference given and you wont have to ask
They'll rather argue without reading the reference.
I read the reference and quoted directly from it to expose your lie.
Here it is again:
The Disclosure of Urgent Concern form the Complainant submitted on August 12, 2019 is the same form the ICIG has had in place since May 24, 2018
The article does not say anything even close to that.
It does say that "The ICIG also disclosed for the first time that the anti-Trump complainant filed his complaint using the previously authorized form, the guidance for which explicitly stated the ICIG’s previous requirement for firsthand evidence for credible complaints. "
If he used that form, he must have known that whistle blower did not meet the requirements, as specified on the form.
From the text: "ICIG also explicitly admitted it changed its policies because of the anti-Trump complaint, raising significant questions about whether the watchdog cooked its own books to justify its treatment of the anti-Trump complaint".
Here is what the actual ICIG report says:
"The Disclosure of Urgent Concern form the Complainant submitted on August 12, 2019 is the same form the ICIG has had in place since May 24, 2018"
The ICIG report also says this:
"The Complainant on the form he or she submitted on August 12, 2019 in fact checked two relevant boxes: The first box stated that, “I have personal and/or direct knowledge of events or records involved”; and the second box stated that, “Other employees have told me about events or records involved.” As part of his determination that the urgent concern appeared credible, the Inspector General of the Intelligence Community determined that the Complainant had official and authorized access to the information and sources referenced in the Complainant’s Letter and Classified Appendix, including direct knowledge of certain alleged conduct, and that the Complainant has subject matter expertise related to much of the material information provided in the Complainant’s Letter and Classified Appendix. In short, the ICIG did not find that the Complainant could “provide nothing more than second-hand or unsubstantiated assertions"
I wouldn’t waste your time with this. These are the same who believe Obama was born in Kenya.
He's not born in Kenya, but he's Kenyan as his farther was. If he can claim that he has Irish ancestors that makes him part Irish, then he certainly is half Kenyan regardless of where he was born.
I know the FAKE NEWS article doesn't say that, I cited the actual ICIG report the FAKE NEWS article claims to cite, that is why it is FAKE NEWS!!!!!!!Pure projection!The IGin this case the lie is a half truthThe Federalist is FAKE NEWS!Yes they did
ICIG Admission Of Whistleblower Changes Raises Explosive New Questions
A Monday press release from the ICIG admitting it changed whistleblower rules and forms raises explosive new questions about the anti-Trump complaint.
THE ACTUAL LAW WAS NOT CHANGED, AND EVEN YOU KNOW IT!
The law was not changed
but the regulation implementing the law was changed
read the reference given and you wont have to ask
They'll rather argue without reading the reference.
I read the reference and quoted directly from it to expose your lie.
Here it is again:
The Disclosure of Urgent Concern form the Complainant submitted on August 12, 2019 is the same form the ICIG has had in place since May 24, 2018
The article does not say anything even close to that.
It does say that "The ICIG also disclosed for the first time that the anti-Trump complainant filed his complaint using the previously authorized form, the guidance for which explicitly stated the ICIG’s previous requirement for firsthand evidence for credible complaints. "
If he used that form, he must have known that whistle blower did not meet the requirements, as specified on the form.
From the text: "ICIG also explicitly admitted it changed its policies because of the anti-Trump complaint, raising significant questions about whether the watchdog cooked its own books to justify its treatment of the anti-Trump complaint".
Here is what the actual ICIG report says:
"The Disclosure of Urgent Concern form the Complainant submitted on August 12, 2019 is the same form the ICIG has had in place since May 24, 2018"
The ICIG report also says this:
"The Complainant on the form he or she submitted on August 12, 2019 in fact checked two relevant boxes: The first box stated that, “I have personal and/or direct knowledge of events or records involved”; and the second box stated that, “Other employees have told me about events or records involved.” As part of his determination that the urgent concern appeared credible, the Inspector General of the Intelligence Community determined that the Complainant had official and authorized access to the information and sources referenced in the Complainant’s Letter and Classified Appendix, including direct knowledge of certain alleged conduct, and that the Complainant has subject matter expertise related to much of the material information provided in the Complainant’s Letter and Classified Appendix. In short, the ICIG did not find that the Complainant could “provide nothing more than second-hand or unsubstantiated assertions"
I wouldn’t waste your time with this. These are the same who believe Obama was born in Kenya.
He's not born in Kenya, but he's Kenyan as his farther was. If he can claim that he has Irish ancestors that makes him part Irish, then he certainly is half Kenyan regardless of where he was born.
He's American. Like you, presumably.
Mac-7
Diamond Member
- Oct 9, 2019
- 89,197
- 67,141
- 3,565
And anyone who does not hate trump like you do is labeled a cultist
Mac-7
Diamond Member
- Oct 9, 2019
- 89,197
- 67,141
- 3,565
I hear liberals repeating lies about trump every day
I assume some are just misinformed but others just lie for the fun of it
Mac-7
Diamond Member
- Oct 9, 2019
- 89,197
- 67,141
- 3,565
I have never said thatI know the FAKE NEWS article doesn't say that, I cited the actual ICIG report the FAKE NEWS article claims to cite, that is why it is FAKE NEWS!!!!!!!Pure projection!The IGin this case the lie is a half truthThe Federalist is FAKE NEWS!Yes they did
ICIG Admission Of Whistleblower Changes Raises Explosive New Questions
A Monday press release from the ICIG admitting it changed whistleblower rules and forms raises explosive new questions about the anti-Trump complaint.
THE ACTUAL LAW WAS NOT CHANGED, AND EVEN YOU KNOW IT!
The law was not changed
but the regulation implementing the law was changed
read the reference given and you wont have to ask
They'll rather argue without reading the reference.
I read the reference and quoted directly from it to expose your lie.
Here it is again:
The Disclosure of Urgent Concern form the Complainant submitted on August 12, 2019 is the same form the ICIG has had in place since May 24, 2018
The article does not say anything even close to that.
It does say that "The ICIG also disclosed for the first time that the anti-Trump complainant filed his complaint using the previously authorized form, the guidance for which explicitly stated the ICIG’s previous requirement for firsthand evidence for credible complaints. "
If he used that form, he must have known that whistle blower did not meet the requirements, as specified on the form.
From the text: "ICIG also explicitly admitted it changed its policies because of the anti-Trump complaint, raising significant questions about whether the watchdog cooked its own books to justify its treatment of the anti-Trump complaint".
Here is what the actual ICIG report says:
"The Disclosure of Urgent Concern form the Complainant submitted on August 12, 2019 is the same form the ICIG has had in place since May 24, 2018"
The ICIG report also says this:
"The Complainant on the form he or she submitted on August 12, 2019 in fact checked two relevant boxes: The first box stated that, “I have personal and/or direct knowledge of events or records involved”; and the second box stated that, “Other employees have told me about events or records involved.” As part of his determination that the urgent concern appeared credible, the Inspector General of the Intelligence Community determined that the Complainant had official and authorized access to the information and sources referenced in the Complainant’s Letter and Classified Appendix, including direct knowledge of certain alleged conduct, and that the Complainant has subject matter expertise related to much of the material information provided in the Complainant’s Letter and Classified Appendix. In short, the ICIG did not find that the Complainant could “provide nothing more than second-hand or unsubstantiated assertions"
I wouldn’t waste your time with this. These are the same who believe Obama was born in Kenya.
With his mother and white grandparents dead its possible that no living American knows for sure where he was born
I answered the question, you just can't handle the truth that ALL your sources are liars making a foolish SUCKER out of you1That is what the ICIG report says, showing just how BIG a SUCKER your Right-wing sources made out of YOU!!!!!I know the FAKE NEWS article doesn't say that, I cited the actual ICIG report the FAKE NEWS article claims to cite, that is why it is FAKE NEWS!!!!!!!Pure projection!The IGin this case the lie is a half truthThe Federalist is FAKE NEWS!Yes they did
ICIG Admission Of Whistleblower Changes Raises Explosive New Questions
A Monday press release from the ICIG admitting it changed whistleblower rules and forms raises explosive new questions about the anti-Trump complaint.
THE ACTUAL LAW WAS NOT CHANGED, AND EVEN YOU KNOW IT!
The law was not changed
but the regulation implementing the law was changed
read the reference given and you wont have to ask
They'll rather argue without reading the reference.
I read the reference and quoted directly from it to expose your lie.
Here it is again:
The Disclosure of Urgent Concern form the Complainant submitted on August 12, 2019 is the same form the ICIG has had in place since May 24, 2018
The article does not say anything even close to that.
It does say that "The ICIG also disclosed for the first time that the anti-Trump complainant filed his complaint using the previously authorized form, the guidance for which explicitly stated the ICIG’s previous requirement for firsthand evidence for credible complaints. "
If he used that form, he must have known that whistle blower did not meet the requirements, as specified on the form.
From the text: "ICIG also explicitly admitted it changed its policies because of the anti-Trump complaint, raising significant questions about whether the watchdog cooked its own books to justify its treatment of the anti-Trump complaint".
Here is what the actual ICIG report says:
"The Disclosure of Urgent Concern form the Complainant submitted on August 12, 2019 is the same form the ICIG has had in place since May 24, 2018"
The ICIG report also says this:
"The Complainant on the form he or she submitted on August 12, 2019 in fact checked two relevant boxes: The first box stated that, “I have personal and/or direct knowledge of events or records involved”; and the second box stated that, “Other employees have told me about events or records involved.” As part of his determination that the urgent concern appeared credible, the Inspector General of the Intelligence Community determined that the Complainant had official and authorized access to the information and sources referenced in the Complainant’s Letter and Classified Appendix, including direct knowledge of certain alleged conduct, and that the Complainant has subject matter expertise related to much of the material information provided in the Complainant’s Letter and Classified Appendix. In short, the ICIG did not find that the Complainant could “provide nothing more than second-hand or unsubstantiated assertions"
Are you saying whistle blower had direct knowledge of Trump's phone call?
Why don't you answer the question?
You answered what you haven't been asked. The question was: "Are you saying whistle blower had direct knowledge of Trump's phone call? "
edthecynic
Censored for Cynicism
- Oct 20, 2008
- 43,044
- 6,888
- 1,830
Learn to read!I answered the question, you just can't handle the truth that ALL your sources are liars making a foolish SUCKER out of you1That is what the ICIG report says, showing just how BIG a SUCKER your Right-wing sources made out of YOU!!!!!I know the FAKE NEWS article doesn't say that, I cited the actual ICIG report the FAKE NEWS article claims to cite, that is why it is FAKE NEWS!!!!!!!Pure projection!The IGin this case the lie is a half truthThe Federalist is FAKE NEWS!Yes they did
ICIG Admission Of Whistleblower Changes Raises Explosive New Questions
A Monday press release from the ICIG admitting it changed whistleblower rules and forms raises explosive new questions about the anti-Trump complaint.
THE ACTUAL LAW WAS NOT CHANGED, AND EVEN YOU KNOW IT!
The law was not changed
but the regulation implementing the law was changed
read the reference given and you wont have to ask
They'll rather argue without reading the reference.
I read the reference and quoted directly from it to expose your lie.
Here it is again:
The Disclosure of Urgent Concern form the Complainant submitted on August 12, 2019 is the same form the ICIG has had in place since May 24, 2018
The article does not say anything even close to that.
It does say that "The ICIG also disclosed for the first time that the anti-Trump complainant filed his complaint using the previously authorized form, the guidance for which explicitly stated the ICIG’s previous requirement for firsthand evidence for credible complaints. "
If he used that form, he must have known that whistle blower did not meet the requirements, as specified on the form.
From the text: "ICIG also explicitly admitted it changed its policies because of the anti-Trump complaint, raising significant questions about whether the watchdog cooked its own books to justify its treatment of the anti-Trump complaint".
Here is what the actual ICIG report says:
"The Disclosure of Urgent Concern form the Complainant submitted on August 12, 2019 is the same form the ICIG has had in place since May 24, 2018"
The ICIG report also says this:
"The Complainant on the form he or she submitted on August 12, 2019 in fact checked two relevant boxes: The first box stated that, “I have personal and/or direct knowledge of events or records involved”; and the second box stated that, “Other employees have told me about events or records involved.” As part of his determination that the urgent concern appeared credible, the Inspector General of the Intelligence Community determined that the Complainant had official and authorized access to the information and sources referenced in the Complainant’s Letter and Classified Appendix, including direct knowledge of certain alleged conduct, and that the Complainant has subject matter expertise related to much of the material information provided in the Complainant’s Letter and Classified Appendix. In short, the ICIG did not find that the Complainant could “provide nothing more than second-hand or unsubstantiated assertions"
Are you saying whistle blower had direct knowledge of Trump's phone call?
Why don't you answer the question?
You answered what you haven't been asked. The question was: "Are you saying whistle blower had direct knowledge of Trump's phone call? "
the Inspector General of the Intelligence Community determined that the Complainant had official and authorized access to the information and sources referenced in the Complainant’s Letter and Classified Appendix, including direct knowledge of certain alleged conduct, and that the Complainant has subject matter expertise related to much of the material information provided in the Complainant’s Letter and Classified Appendix. In short, the ICIG did not find that the Complainant could “provide nothing more than second-hand or unsubstantiated assertions"
Mac-7
Diamond Member
- Oct 9, 2019
- 89,197
- 67,141
- 3,565
The ICIG is full of shitLearn to read!I answered the question, you just can't handle the truth that ALL your sources are liars making a foolish SUCKER out of you1That is what the ICIG report says, showing just how BIG a SUCKER your Right-wing sources made out of YOU!!!!!I know the FAKE NEWS article doesn't say that, I cited the actual ICIG report the FAKE NEWS article claims to cite, that is why it is FAKE NEWS!!!!!!!Pure projection!The IGin this case the lie is a half truthThe Federalist is FAKE NEWS!Yes they did
ICIG Admission Of Whistleblower Changes Raises Explosive New Questions
A Monday press release from the ICIG admitting it changed whistleblower rules and forms raises explosive new questions about the anti-Trump complaint.
THE ACTUAL LAW WAS NOT CHANGED, AND EVEN YOU KNOW IT!
The law was not changed
but the regulation implementing the law was changed
read the reference given and you wont have to ask
They'll rather argue without reading the reference.
I read the reference and quoted directly from it to expose your lie.
Here it is again:
The Disclosure of Urgent Concern form the Complainant submitted on August 12, 2019 is the same form the ICIG has had in place since May 24, 2018
The article does not say anything even close to that.
It does say that "The ICIG also disclosed for the first time that the anti-Trump complainant filed his complaint using the previously authorized form, the guidance for which explicitly stated the ICIG’s previous requirement for firsthand evidence for credible complaints. "
If he used that form, he must have known that whistle blower did not meet the requirements, as specified on the form.
From the text: "ICIG also explicitly admitted it changed its policies because of the anti-Trump complaint, raising significant questions about whether the watchdog cooked its own books to justify its treatment of the anti-Trump complaint".
Here is what the actual ICIG report says:
"The Disclosure of Urgent Concern form the Complainant submitted on August 12, 2019 is the same form the ICIG has had in place since May 24, 2018"
The ICIG report also says this:
"The Complainant on the form he or she submitted on August 12, 2019 in fact checked two relevant boxes: The first box stated that, “I have personal and/or direct knowledge of events or records involved”; and the second box stated that, “Other employees have told me about events or records involved.” As part of his determination that the urgent concern appeared credible, the Inspector General of the Intelligence Community determined that the Complainant had official and authorized access to the information and sources referenced in the Complainant’s Letter and Classified Appendix, including direct knowledge of certain alleged conduct, and that the Complainant has subject matter expertise related to much of the material information provided in the Complainant’s Letter and Classified Appendix. In short, the ICIG did not find that the Complainant could “provide nothing more than second-hand or unsubstantiated assertions"
Are you saying whistle blower had direct knowledge of Trump's phone call?
Why don't you answer the question?
You answered what you haven't been asked. The question was: "Are you saying whistle blower had direct knowledge of Trump's phone call? "
the Inspector General of the Intelligence Community determined that the Complainant had official and authorized access to the information and sources referenced in the Complainant’s Letter and Classified Appendix, including direct knowledge of certain alleged conduct, and that the Complainant has subject matter expertise related to much of the material information provided in the Complainant’s Letter and Classified Appendix. In short, the ICIG did not find that the Complainant could “provide nothing more than second-hand or unsubstantiated assertions"
Learn to read!I answered the question, you just can't handle the truth that ALL your sources are liars making a foolish SUCKER out of you1That is what the ICIG report says, showing just how BIG a SUCKER your Right-wing sources made out of YOU!!!!!I know the FAKE NEWS article doesn't say that, I cited the actual ICIG report the FAKE NEWS article claims to cite, that is why it is FAKE NEWS!!!!!!!Pure projection!The IGin this case the lie is a half truthThe Federalist is FAKE NEWS!Yes they did
ICIG Admission Of Whistleblower Changes Raises Explosive New Questions
A Monday press release from the ICIG admitting it changed whistleblower rules and forms raises explosive new questions about the anti-Trump complaint.
THE ACTUAL LAW WAS NOT CHANGED, AND EVEN YOU KNOW IT!
The law was not changed
but the regulation implementing the law was changed
read the reference given and you wont have to ask
They'll rather argue without reading the reference.
I read the reference and quoted directly from it to expose your lie.
Here it is again:
The Disclosure of Urgent Concern form the Complainant submitted on August 12, 2019 is the same form the ICIG has had in place since May 24, 2018
The article does not say anything even close to that.
It does say that "The ICIG also disclosed for the first time that the anti-Trump complainant filed his complaint using the previously authorized form, the guidance for which explicitly stated the ICIG’s previous requirement for firsthand evidence for credible complaints. "
If he used that form, he must have known that whistle blower did not meet the requirements, as specified on the form.
From the text: "ICIG also explicitly admitted it changed its policies because of the anti-Trump complaint, raising significant questions about whether the watchdog cooked its own books to justify its treatment of the anti-Trump complaint".
Here is what the actual ICIG report says:
"The Disclosure of Urgent Concern form the Complainant submitted on August 12, 2019 is the same form the ICIG has had in place since May 24, 2018"
The ICIG report also says this:
"The Complainant on the form he or she submitted on August 12, 2019 in fact checked two relevant boxes: The first box stated that, “I have personal and/or direct knowledge of events or records involved”; and the second box stated that, “Other employees have told me about events or records involved.” As part of his determination that the urgent concern appeared credible, the Inspector General of the Intelligence Community determined that the Complainant had official and authorized access to the information and sources referenced in the Complainant’s Letter and Classified Appendix, including direct knowledge of certain alleged conduct, and that the Complainant has subject matter expertise related to much of the material information provided in the Complainant’s Letter and Classified Appendix. In short, the ICIG did not find that the Complainant could “provide nothing more than second-hand or unsubstantiated assertions"
Are you saying whistle blower had direct knowledge of Trump's phone call?
Why don't you answer the question?
You answered what you haven't been asked. The question was: "Are you saying whistle blower had direct knowledge of Trump's phone call? "
the Inspector General of the Intelligence Community determined that the Complainant had official and authorized access to the information and sources referenced in the Complainant’s Letter and Classified Appendix, including direct knowledge of certain alleged conduct, and that the Complainant has subject matter expertise related to much of the material information provided in the Complainant’s Letter and Classified Appendix. In short, the ICIG did not find that the Complainant could “provide nothing more than second-hand or unsubstantiated assertions"
I did not asked you what ICIG said, I asked you "Are you saying whistle blower had direct knowledge of Trump's phone call? "
Answer the question.
edthecynic
Censored for Cynicism
- Oct 20, 2008
- 43,044
- 6,888
- 1,830
I answered it many times, you need to learn to read!Learn to read!I answered the question, you just can't handle the truth that ALL your sources are liars making a foolish SUCKER out of you1That is what the ICIG report says, showing just how BIG a SUCKER your Right-wing sources made out of YOU!!!!!I know the FAKE NEWS article doesn't say that, I cited the actual ICIG report the FAKE NEWS article claims to cite, that is why it is FAKE NEWS!!!!!!!Pure projection!The IGin this case the lie is a half truthThe Federalist is FAKE NEWS!Yes they did
ICIG Admission Of Whistleblower Changes Raises Explosive New Questions
A Monday press release from the ICIG admitting it changed whistleblower rules and forms raises explosive new questions about the anti-Trump complaint.
THE ACTUAL LAW WAS NOT CHANGED, AND EVEN YOU KNOW IT!
The law was not changed
but the regulation implementing the law was changed
read the reference given and you wont have to ask
They'll rather argue without reading the reference.
I read the reference and quoted directly from it to expose your lie.
Here it is again:
The Disclosure of Urgent Concern form the Complainant submitted on August 12, 2019 is the same form the ICIG has had in place since May 24, 2018
The article does not say anything even close to that.
It does say that "The ICIG also disclosed for the first time that the anti-Trump complainant filed his complaint using the previously authorized form, the guidance for which explicitly stated the ICIG’s previous requirement for firsthand evidence for credible complaints. "
If he used that form, he must have known that whistle blower did not meet the requirements, as specified on the form.
From the text: "ICIG also explicitly admitted it changed its policies because of the anti-Trump complaint, raising significant questions about whether the watchdog cooked its own books to justify its treatment of the anti-Trump complaint".
Here is what the actual ICIG report says:
"The Disclosure of Urgent Concern form the Complainant submitted on August 12, 2019 is the same form the ICIG has had in place since May 24, 2018"
The ICIG report also says this:
"The Complainant on the form he or she submitted on August 12, 2019 in fact checked two relevant boxes: The first box stated that, “I have personal and/or direct knowledge of events or records involved”; and the second box stated that, “Other employees have told me about events or records involved.” As part of his determination that the urgent concern appeared credible, the Inspector General of the Intelligence Community determined that the Complainant had official and authorized access to the information and sources referenced in the Complainant’s Letter and Classified Appendix, including direct knowledge of certain alleged conduct, and that the Complainant has subject matter expertise related to much of the material information provided in the Complainant’s Letter and Classified Appendix. In short, the ICIG did not find that the Complainant could “provide nothing more than second-hand or unsubstantiated assertions"
Are you saying whistle blower had direct knowledge of Trump's phone call?
Why don't you answer the question?
You answered what you haven't been asked. The question was: "Are you saying whistle blower had direct knowledge of Trump's phone call? "
the Inspector General of the Intelligence Community determined that the Complainant had official and authorized access to the information and sources referenced in the Complainant’s Letter and Classified Appendix, including direct knowledge of certain alleged conduct, and that the Complainant has subject matter expertise related to much of the material information provided in the Complainant’s Letter and Classified Appendix. In short, the ICIG did not find that the Complainant could “provide nothing more than second-hand or unsubstantiated assertions"
I did not asked you what ICIG said, I asked you "Are you saying whistle blower had direct knowledge of Trump's phone call? "
Answer the question.
direct knowledge of certain alleged conduct,
Similar threads
New Topics
-
The Catholic right is pro-Israel. America’s online converts are the exception- Started by Pastelli
- Replies: 1
-
-
Trump puts off threat to bomb Iran energy facitilities if they did not open up the strait of Hormuz in 48 hours- Started by ElmerMudd
- Replies: 3
-
This teacher gives valuable lessons in the law- Started by Robert W
- Replies: 6
-
