Eots why did wtc 7 collapse

[LA RAM FAN]

Heres a really good humorous video on bld 7 with a guy confronting Clinton..Of course the OCTA'S wont look at it since it shows this other building in a controlled demolition collapsing in the exact same manner.YouTube - The Tourette's Guy Meets Bill Clinton

that guy yelling out at Clinton is hysterical.

We all know that idiot with the neck brace is your dumb ass.

sorry to break the news to you dumbass,I dont look anything like that.

 

[Mr.Fitnah]

Please list the reason/ reasons and the source.
A
B
C

Fashion would be helpful .
Thanks.

 

[eots]

Please list the reason/ reasons and the source.
A
B
C

Fashion would be helpful .
Thanks.

Nope, your words to your opinion and the scientific facts to base them on.

I am not re-typing basically everything this man just said ..listen to him if you have any dispute with specific points of the presentation then I would be more than happy to address them

 

[KissMy]

I am not re-typing basically everything this man just said ..listen to him if you have any dispute with specific points of the presentation then I would be more than happy to address them

The fire fighter in the video started & based his whole argument on the basis that forensics were not conducted at WTC. Forensics were conducted so his & your entire argument is false.

 

[elvis]

what utter disrespect for the lives lost..a sure sign of a individual that has no clue about any of the realties of 9/11 a manipulated cretin offering opinions on things he knows nothing about

Wait. I thought Alex Jones held the theory that the Hulkster destroyed the towers. can't be any more stupid than the theories he's presented before.

 

[Dante]

Please list the reason/ reasons and the source.
A
B
C

Fashion would be helpful .
Thanks.

are you asking for the official reasons or my opinion ? if you are asking my opinion it is well reflected by this first responder

rl=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TULmLtqRXZ4&feature=player_embedded]YouTube - FirefightersFor911TRUTH.org - Erik Lawyer - Press Conference[/url]

too bad opinions aren't considered facts.

 

[Dante]

I am not re-typing basically everything this man just said ..listen to him if you have any dispute with specific points of the presentation then I would be more than happy to address them

The fire fighter in the video started & based his whole argument on the basis that forensics were not conducted at WTC. Forensics were conducted so his & your entire argument is false.

 

[KissMy]

If people actually study the design of the Twin Towers & WTC7 you will discover how faulty their design was against fire.

WTC7 had little support in the center because it was built over an electrical power station so all the weight had to be transfered towards the exterior of the building on a couple of main trusses. To top that there was many times more fuel stored in that building than those jetliners had in them that hit WTC 1 & 2.

The long span trusses in WTC 1 & 2 were extremely vulnerable to heat. Add the weight of a few collapsed floors & a loaded 767 Jet Plane to the floor below & it is easy to see why each floor would drop onto the next tearing them out one by one gaining mass & momentum. Without the floors the walls could not stand & every wall section would fall away as soon as the floors holding them together gave way.

 

[eots]

i am not re-typing basically everything this man just said ..listen to him if you have any dispute with specific points of the presentation then i would be more than happy to address them

the fire fighter in the video started & based his whole argument on the basis that forensics were not conducted at wtc. Forensics were conducted so his & your entire argument is false.

nist admits there is no physical evidence and that they entire report is based on data from photos ,videos, interviews and computer simulations

 

[eots]

Your entire investigation included no physical evidence. How can you be so sure you know what happened?

the NIST investigation of WTC 7 is based on a huge amount of data. These data come from extensive research, interviews, and studies of the building, including audio and video recordings of the collapse. Rigorous, state-of-the-art computer methods were designed to study and model the building's collapse. These validated computer models produced a collapse sequence that was confirmed by observations of what actually occurred. In addition to using its in-house expertise, NIST relied upon private sector technical experts; accumulated copious documents, photographs and videos of this disaster; conducted first-person interviews of building occupants and emergency responders; analyzed the evacuation and emergency response operations in and around WTC 7; performed computer simulations of the behavior of WTC 7 on Sept. 11, 2001, and combined the knowledge gained into a probable collapse sequence.

Questions and Answers about the NIST WTC 7 Investigation

 

[Obamerican]

If people actually study the design of the Twin Towers & WTC7 you will discover how faulty their design was against fire.

WTC7 had little support in the center because it was built over an electrical power station so all the weight had to be transfered towards the exterior of the building on a couple of main trusses. To top that there was many times more fuel stored in that building than those jetliners had in them that hit WTC 1 & 2.

The long span trusses in WTC 1 & 2 were extremely vulnerable to heat. Add the weight of a few collapsed floors & a loaded 767 Jet Plane to the floor below & it is easy to see why each floor would drop onto the next tearing them out one by one gaining mass & momentum. Without the floors the walls could not stand & every wall section would fall away as soon as the floors holding them together gave way.

Funny how the tin foil hat crowd can't understand that simple concept.

 

[Dante]

i am not re-typing basically everything this man just said ..listen to him if you have any dispute with specific points of the presentation then i would be more than happy to address them

the fire fighter in the video started & based his whole argument on the basis that forensics were not conducted at wtc. Forensics were conducted so his & your entire argument is false.

nist admits there is no physical evidence and that they entire report is based on data from photos ,videos, interviews and computer simulations

and your evidence to the contrary is base on..?

 

[eots]

If people actually study the design of the Twin Towers & WTC7 you will discover how faulty their design was against fire.

WTC7 had little support in the center because it was built over an electrical power station so all the weight had to be transfered towards the exterior of the building on a couple of main trusses. To top that there was many times more fuel stored in that building than those jetliners had in them that hit WTC 1 & 2.

The long span trusses in WTC 1 & 2 were extremely vulnerable to heat. Add the weight of a few collapsed floors & a loaded 767 Jet Plane to the floor below & it is easy to see why each floor would drop onto the next tearing them out one by one gaining mass & momentum. Without the floors the walls could not stand & every wall section would fall away as soon as the floors holding them together gave way.

NIST has never coincided design flaw there are many other buildings with similar construction

Does this mean there are hundreds or thousands of unsafe tall buildings with long span supports that must be retrofitted in some way?

While the partial or total collapse of a tall building due to fires is a rare event, NIST strongly urges building owners, operators, and designers to evaluate buildings to ensure the adequate fire performance of structural systems. Of particular concern are the effects of thermal expansion in buildings with one or more of the following characteristics: long-span floor systems, connections that cannot accommodate thermal effects, floor framing that induces asymmetric forces on girders, and composite floor systems, whose shear studs could fail due to differential thermal expansion (i.e., heat-induced expansion of material at different rates). Engineers should be able to design cost-effective fixes to address any areas of concern identified by such evaluations.
Several existing, emerging, or even anticipated capabilities could have helped prevent the collapse of WTC 7. The degree to which these capabilities improve performance remains to be evaluated.
Questions and Answers about the NIST WTC 7 Investigation

 

[eots]

If people actually study the design of the Twin Towers & WTC7 you will discover how faulty their design was against fire.

WTC7 had little support in the center because it was built over an electrical power station so all the weight had to be transfered towards the exterior of the building on a couple of main trusses. To top that there was many times more fuel stored in that building than those jetliners had in them that hit WTC 1 & 2.

The long span trusses in WTC 1 & 2 were extremely vulnerable to heat. Add the weight of a few collapsed floors & a loaded 767 Jet Plane to the floor below & it is easy to see why each floor would drop onto the next tearing them out one by one gaining mass & momentum. Without the floors the walls could not stand & every wall section would fall away as soon as the floors holding them together gave way.

Funny how the tin foil hat crowd can't understand that simple concept.

shut up..NIST rejected this theory completely and wheres your link !!!

 

[eots]

the fire fighter in the video started & based his whole argument on the basis that forensics were not conducted at wtc. Forensics were conducted so his & your entire argument is false.

nist admits there is no physical evidence and that they entire report is based on data from photos ,videos, interviews and computer simulations

and your evidence to the contrary is base on..?

logic, reason and the laws of physics

 

[elvis]

Fuck all that. the Hulkster did it. He was funded by Mr. T and Sylvester Stallone.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

If people actually study the design of the Twin Towers & WTC7 you will discover how faulty their design was against fire.

WTC7 had little support in the center because it was built over an electrical power station so all the weight had to be transfered towards the exterior of the building on a couple of main trusses. To top that there was many times more fuel stored in that building than those jetliners had in them that hit WTC 1 & 2.

The long span trusses in WTC 1 & 2 were extremely vulnerable to heat. Add the weight of a few collapsed floors & a loaded 767 Jet Plane to the floor below & it is easy to see why each floor would drop onto the next tearing them out one by one gaining mass & momentum. Without the floors the walls could not stand & every wall section would fall away as soon as the floors holding them together gave way.

You been reading too many of the fairy tales of Popular Mechanics.John Skilling after the 93 bombing told reporters when asked what would happen to the towers if struck by an airliner said they anticipated the fires replying-There would be a great loss of life due to the fires but the structure itself would remain standing.

They also reinforced the steel with more fireproofing after the 93 bombing also the majority of the fires explosion took place outside the towers not to mention the black smoke that emits from the towers proves it was oxygen starved.Also steel framed towers steel columns are thicker and stronger from the base.They are less thick and are thinner higher up so that destroys that theory. You used to make good posts saying that explosives brought the towers down.sounds like lately you have changed your mind and been taken in by propaganda.those fires werent hot enough to melt a marshmellow,let alone weaken the steel.

not to mention it was the first time in history that a steel framed highrise building collapsed due to fire.The Meridian hotel in Philly in 97 burned for 18 hours on end and was a far more serious fire than the twin towers were.it was lit up like a torch and remained standing.you are also obviously not aware that NIST rejected your theory.

 

[Dante]

nist admits there is no physical evidence and that they entire report is based on data from photos ,videos, interviews and computer simulations

and your evidence to the contrary is base on..?

logic, reason and the laws of physics

all of which you claim to posses or understand?




next

 

[LA RAM FAN]

nist admits there is no physical evidence and that they entire report is based on data from photos ,videos, interviews and computer simulations

and your evidence to the contrary is base on..?

logic, reason and the laws of physics

Not to mention to accept the fairy tales of the 9/11 coverup commission,you are ignoring what high quality architects,scientists,demolition experts and engineers say and that to accept it,then your using the logic that the laws of physics scientists have gone by for thousands of years,no longer applies anymore.

 

[eots]

and your evidence to the contrary is base on..?

logic, reason and the laws of physics

all of which you claim to posses or understand?




next

why do people like you that have not even examined the claims of the NIST report or how they where reached pretend that they have..can you explain this ?