Election day is election day not week or month or whatever

eagle7-31

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 24, 2020
Messages
6,998
Reaction score
9,214
Points
2,138
Early voting, combined with mail-in voting renders Election Day moot. Moreover, when paired with ‘drop-off boxes’ and the Democrats’ “No I.D. needed” scam, the declared result is virtually guaranteed to be controversial. For good reason.

To be valid, elections must be conducted in person on one day -- with paper ballots that are counted the same day, like they are in nearly every other legitimate democracy and republic on earth.

With the votes cast early and by mail-in ballots, it is as if the first three quarters of the Super Bowl were played in the weeks before the ‘actual’ event -- with just the fourth quarter played on Super Bowl Sunday.

And then, of course, whatever the score happens to be at the ‘end’ of the game, the final result wouldn't be announced until days -- or perhaps weeks -- later… after some necessary, completely unbiased and trustworthy behind the scenes analysis to make sure the ‘correct’ outcome is achieved.

Naturally, in true Democrat party fashion, the winner of the game -- and the attendant media -- would then declare this Super Bowl the “most fair and transparent” in history, and the final score to be “the most certain and accurate” in the annals of the game.

Moral of the story? If Americans’ votes are to truly mean something, one side cannot be allowed to set the parameters and make all the rules. If Republicans really wish to compete and win, they cannot sit idly by as their political opponents call the shots -- and the penalties. And, alone, conduct the ‘further reviews.’ The playing field must be leveled if it is to be ‘fair’ and ‘equitable,’ two things that Democrats claim to love. Of course, this is just as preposterous as their claim that they want to ‘save our democracy.’ Democrats don’t give a donkey’s ass about fairness, equity, or democracy. The only thing they care about is power.

And that is why they will do anything to win. And many on the GOP side of the uniparty are the same way.






It is up to the rest of us to make certain the playing field is a fair one
 
Early voting, combined with mail-in voting renders Election Day moot. Moreover, when paired with ‘drop-off boxes’ and the Democrats’ “No I.D. needed” scam, the declared result is virtually guaranteed to be controversial. For good reason.
Nobody had any problem with early or mail in voting before the blob got on the scene. In truth nobody has a problem with it now.

Boebert or whatever her name is was elected with 100% mail in votes. The number of “outraged” voters? Zero. Cellulite queen Marjorie Taylor Greene was elected in the same “fraudulent” election in Georgia that flipped it Blue. Any outrage from the Right on her election? Nope.

To put it another way, there is no controversy....you guys are just upset that your idol lost.
To be valid, elections must be conducted in person on one day -- with paper ballots that are counted the same day, like they are in nearly every other legitimate democracy and republic on earth.
We haven’t done that in the US in our lifetimes. Ballots were never counted in one day. The military has been voting by mail for over a century.
With the votes cast early and by mail-in ballots, it is as if the first three quarters of the Super Bowl were played in the weeks before the ‘actual’ event -- with just the fourth quarter played on Super Bowl Sunday.
Moronic example.

Naturally, in true Democrat party fashion, the winner of the game -- and the attendant media -- would then declare this Super Bowl the “most fair and transparent” in history, and the final score to be “the most certain and accurate” in the annals of the game.
Every re-count/audit/challenge proved that the results were fair and accurate from top to bottom.
Moral of the story? If Americans’ votes are to truly mean something, one side cannot be allowed to set the parameters and make all the rules.
One side doesn’t set the parameters or make all the rules.
If Republicans really wish to compete and win, they cannot sit idly by as their political opponents call the shots -- and the penalties.
That doesn’t happen now. Otherwise Pennsylvania (the state you’re bitching about being tardy announcing the results) would be able to triage their ballots well ahead of election day. The GOP Legislature forces counties to wait until election day to open the ballots.

Why? So people like you can bitch about it.
And, alone, conduct the ‘further reviews.’ The playing field must be leveled if it is to be ‘fair’ and ‘equitable,’ two things that Democrats claim to love. Of course, this is just as preposterous as their claim that they want to ‘save our democracy.’ Democrats don’t give a donkey’s ass about fairness, equity, or democracy. The only thing they care about is power.

And that is why they will do anything to win. And many on the GOP side of the uniparty are the same way.
One would have to wonder how the Dems lost the House in 2022 and lost seats in 2020. Any thoughts on that sonny boy?
It is up to the rest of us to make certain the playing field is a fair one
The last elections were fair. The most dubious one in recent memory was 1960. There were questions in 2004 but they remain murky.
 
What a stupid, false narrative you live by.

What's that you say???

"Death to Murika !" you say?
"Kill whitey !" you say?

Aren't you just a real sweetie?
 
Early voting, combined with mail-in voting renders Election Day moot. Moreover, when paired with ‘drop-off boxes’ and the Democrats’ “No I.D. needed” scam, the declared result is virtually guaranteed to be controversial. For good reason.

To be valid, elections must be conducted in person on one day -- with paper ballots that are counted the same day, like they are in nearly every other legitimate democracy and republic on earth.

With the votes cast early and by mail-in ballots, it is as if the first three quarters of the Super Bowl were played in the weeks before the ‘actual’ event -- with just the fourth quarter played on Super Bowl Sunday.

And then, of course, whatever the score happens to be at the ‘end’ of the game, the final result wouldn't be announced until days -- or perhaps weeks -- later… after some necessary, completely unbiased and trustworthy behind the scenes analysis to make sure the ‘correct’ outcome is achieved.

Naturally, in true Democrat party fashion, the winner of the game -- and the attendant media -- would then declare this Super Bowl the “most fair and transparent” in history, and the final score to be “the most certain and accurate” in the annals of the game.

Moral of the story? If Americans’ votes are to truly mean something, one side cannot be allowed to set the parameters and make all the rules. If Republicans really wish to compete and win, they cannot sit idly by as their political opponents call the shots -- and the penalties. And, alone, conduct the ‘further reviews.’ The playing field must be leveled if it is to be ‘fair’ and ‘equitable,’ two things that Democrats claim to love. Of course, this is just as preposterous as their claim that they want to ‘save our democracy.’ Democrats don’t give a donkey’s ass about fairness, equity, or democracy. The only thing they care about is power.

And that is why they will do anything to win. And many on the GOP side of the uniparty are the same way.






It is up to the rest of us to make certain the playing field is a fair one

So, you're not voting?
 
Nobody had any problem with early or mail in voting before the blob got on the scene. In truth nobody has a problem with it now.

Boebert or whatever her name is was elected with 100% mail in votes. The number of “outraged” voters? Zero. Cellulite queen Marjorie Taylor Greene was elected in the same “fraudulent” election in Georgia that flipped it Blue. Any outrage from the Right on her election? Nope.

To put it another way, there is no controversy....you guys are just upset that your idol lost.

We haven’t done that in the US in our lifetimes. Ballots were never counted in one day. The military has been voting by mail for over a century.

Moronic example.



Every re-count/audit/challenge proved that the results were fair and accurate from top to bottom.

One side doesn’t set the parameters or make all the rules.

That doesn’t happen now. Otherwise Pennsylvania (the state you’re bitching about being tardy announcing the results) would be able to triage their ballots well ahead of election day. The GOP Legislature forces counties to wait until election day to open the ballots.

Why? So people like you can bitch about it.

One would have to wonder how the Dems lost the House in 2022 and lost seats in 2020. Any thoughts on that sonny boy?

The last elections were fair. The most dubious one in recent memory was 1960. There were questions in 2004 but they remain murky.
Spin it all you like you and your clowns are fixing the system for yourselves. 2020 was a mess.
 
To be valid, elections must be conducted in person on one day -- with paper ballots that are counted the same day, like they are in nearly every other legitimate democracy and republic on earth.
Can you cite where this is done in other first world nations? For example, you can vote early in Canada. IN the Uk you can vote by mail without reason, and even by proxy. IN Germany you can also vote by mail.
 
Spin it all you like you and your clowns are fixing the system for yourselves. 2020 was a mess.

So you don’t want to explain how the Deomcrats both “fixed the system for your[them]selves” and still managed to lose seats in the House?

I can’t blame you. You’ll sound like more of a fucking idiot than you do already.
 
Spin it all you like you and your clowns are fixing the system for yourselves. 2020 was a mess.
Texas has had early voting for decades. It is easy, requires an ID, and is extremely efficient. Are you saying Texas, bastion of conservatism, is fixing the system?
 
Can you cite where this is done in other first world nations? For example, you can vote early in Canada. IN the Uk you can vote by mail without reason, and even by proxy. IN Germany you can also vote by mail.
Start with France, the others you mention have some kind of ID requirement to register and have safeguards that the demrats refuse to do.
 
So you don’t want to explain how the Deomcrats both “fixed the system for your[them]selves” and still managed to lose seats in the House?

I can’t blame you. You’ll sound like more of a fucking idiot than you do already.
Go spit. As for the races you mention in some areas the dems did not pay attemtion to some down ballot races, they were obessed about Trump.
 
LOL...too damn funny.
As for the races you mention in some areas the dems did not pay attemtion to some down ballot races, they were obessed about Trump.
Wow, that was pretty lame. They decided to actually lose seats in the election while rigging it?

That makes no sense.

Are you on cocaine, heroin or both?

But since you’re on a roll...since Boebert was elected with 100% mail in voting...she’s not a legitimate representative right?
 
Start with France, the others you mention have some kind of ID requirement to register and have safeguards that the demrats refuse to do.
You did not mention ID requirements. You griped about early and mail in voting.

France has a two round system for Presidential voting. The President is elected directly. No electoral system. ;)
 
You did not mention ID requirements. You griped about early and mail in voting.

France has a two round system for Presidential voting. The President is elected directly. No electoral system. ;)
I was referring to voting procedures not form of government.
 
But it's rigged, so why waste your time?
My way of saying up yours to the deep state. Though it does look like the GOP is paying closer attention this time but I am not holding my breath on this being a straight up election.
 
LOL...too damn funny.

Wow, that was pretty lame. They decided to actually lose seats in the election while rigging it?

That makes no sense.

Are you on cocaine, heroin or both?

But since you’re on a roll...since Boebert was elected with 100% mail in voting...she’s not a legitimate representative right?
 
Early voting, combined with mail-in voting renders Election Day moot. Moreover, when paired with ‘drop-off boxes’ and the Democrats’ “No I.D. needed” scam, the declared result is virtually guaranteed to be controversial. For good reason.

To be valid, elections must be conducted in person on one day -- with paper ballots that are counted the same day, like they are in nearly every other legitimate democracy and republic on earth.

With the votes cast early and by mail-in ballots, it is as if the first three quarters of the Super Bowl were played in the weeks before the ‘actual’ event -- with just the fourth quarter played on Super Bowl Sunday.

And then, of course, whatever the score happens to be at the ‘end’ of the game, the final result wouldn't be announced until days -- or perhaps weeks -- later… after some necessary, completely unbiased and trustworthy behind the scenes analysis to make sure the ‘correct’ outcome is achieved.

Naturally, in true Democrat party fashion, the winner of the game -- and the attendant media -- would then declare this Super Bowl the “most fair and transparent” in history, and the final score to be “the most certain and accurate” in the annals of the game.

Moral of the story? If Americans’ votes are to truly mean something, one side cannot be allowed to set the parameters and make all the rules. If Republicans really wish to compete and win, they cannot sit idly by as their political opponents call the shots -- and the penalties. And, alone, conduct the ‘further reviews.’ The playing field must be leveled if it is to be ‘fair’ and ‘equitable,’ two things that Democrats claim to love. Of course, this is just as preposterous as their claim that they want to ‘save our democracy.’ Democrats don’t give a donkey’s ass about fairness, equity, or democracy. The only thing they care about is power.

And that is why they will do anything to win. And many on the GOP side of the uniparty are the same way.






It is up to the rest of us to make certain the playing field is a fair one
Are you claiming that Democratic voters have different rules for voting which maga fuckups don't have?


Or just whiny shitting your pants.
 
Are you claiming that Democratic voters have different rules for voting which maga fuckups don't have?


Or just whiny shitting your pants.

Go spit in the wind.
 

LOL.... you keep getting more and more pathetic. Christianitydaily? LOL.

The results of the election was audited, re-counted, and litigated in court.

Every one said that the elections were fair and accurate.

You never explained how the dems both rigged it and lost more than they won. Well, you did try but you don’t even believe what you wrote.
 
Back
Top Bottom