Election 2016: The paranoia of gun owners

[M14 Shooter]

Hillary believes the Supreme Court “Got it wrong” when it said the 2nd protects an individual right not connected with service in the militia.

Leaked Audio: Clinton Says Supreme Court Is ‘Wrong’ on Second Amendment

She believes ‘assault weapons’ should be banned.
Clinton calls for a new ban on assault weapons, 12 years after the last one expired

She seeks a national gun registry, photo licensing for gun owners, and ballistic fingerprinting of guns
Mrs. Clinton Backs Gun-Control Initiatives

She seeks universal background checks, a law that cannot be enforced without universal registration of firearms.
Hillary Clinton on gun violence prevention

Seeks to allow liability lawsuits against gun manufacturers when someone steals a legal gun from its legal owner and commits a crime with it
Hillary Clinton on gun violence prevention

Believes it is ‘worth looking at” an Aussie-style mandatory buy back of firearms, followed by confiscation of weapons not surrendered
Hillary Clinton Says A National Gun Buyback Program Is 'Worth Considering'

Please explain, in specific terms, how gun owners are paranoid, with regard to her potential election and her position on the right to keep and bear arms.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

No paranoia. Regardless of any political situation the guns are out there, the Constitution stands, and owners won't be giving them back.

 

[LuckyDuck]

No paranoia. Regardless of any political situation the guns are out there, the Constitution stands, and owners won't be giving them back.

You got that right about gun owners not giving them back. If her administration somehow got the 2nd Amendment repealed and made a law whereby we were required to turn in our weapons, all those coming for my weapons would get, would be the bullets, heading in their direction, very fast.

 

[saintmichaeldefendthem]

No paranoia. Regardless of any political situation the guns are out there, the Constitution stands, and owners won't be giving them back.

You got that right about gun owners not giving them back. If her administration somehow got the 2nd Amendment repealed and made a law whereby we were required to turn in our weapons, all those coming for my weapons would get, would be the bullets, heading in their direction, very fast.

There's very few causes I would kill and die for, but this certainly is one of them I agree.

 

[LuckyDuck]

No paranoia. Regardless of any political situation the guns are out there, the Constitution stands, and owners won't be giving them back.

You got that right about gun owners not giving them back. If her administration somehow got the 2nd Amendment repealed and made a law whereby we were required to turn in our weapons, all those coming for my weapons would get, would be the bullets, heading in their direction, very fast.

There's very few causes I would kill and die for, but this certainly is one of them I agree.

I think that the Clinton camp needs to hear via emails from any and all gun owners that would fight to keep their weapons, that that is their stance, either that or gun owners funding an advertisement over television that they are prepared to fight to keep their weapons.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

The unwarranted fear of some gun owners – gun owners on the partisan right, needless to say; conservative demagogues hostile to Clinton who contrive lies about Clinton and guns.

As was the case with Obama, Clinton as president will have no adverse effects on the rights of gun owners, the right to possess firearms, or current Second Amendment jurisprudence.

As was the case with Obama, what Clinton thinks or believes about the Second Amendment and Heller will have no bearing on the law – there will be no ‘new’ AWB under Clinton, just as there was no ‘new’ AWB under Obama, although both would like to see such legislation enacted.

And as for Clinton appointments to the Federal courts and Supreme Court, ‘liberal’ jurists consider Heller/McDonald settled, accepted case law, they have no issue with current Second Amendment jurisprudence, and will indeed rule to uphold that Second Amendment jurisprudence.

The Heller Court reaffirmed a fundamental fact of Constitutional law ‘liberals’ have always acknowledged and accepted: as is the case with other rights, the Second Amendment right is not ‘absolute,’ as is the case with other rights, the Second Amendment right is subject to reasonable restrictions by government.

“It is not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose[.]” ibid

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

The unwarranted fear of some gun owners – gun owners on the partisan right, needless to say; conservative demagogues hostile to Clinton who contrive lies about Clinton and guns.

As was the case with Obama, Clinton as president will have no adverse effects on the rights of gun owners, the right to possess firearms, or current Second Amendment jurisprudence.

As was the case with Obama, what Clinton thinks or believes about the Second Amendment and Heller will have no bearing on the law – there will be no ‘new’ AWB under Clinton, just as there was no ‘new’ AWB under Obama, although both would like to see such legislation enacted.

And as for Clinton appointments to the Federal courts and Supreme Court, ‘liberal’ jurists consider Heller/McDonald settled, accepted case law, they have no issue with current Second Amendment jurisprudence, and will indeed rule to uphold that Second Amendment jurisprudence.

The Heller Court reaffirmed a fundamental fact of Constitutional law ‘liberals’ have always acknowledged and accepted: as is the case with other rights, the Second Amendment right is not ‘absolute,’ as is the case with other rights, the Second Amendment right is subject to reasonable restrictions by government.

“It is not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose[.]” ibid

"Congress shall make no law" is applicable to all amendments. The purpose is to restrict the government, not authorize it.

 

[Brynmr]

As was the case with Obama, Clinton as president will have no adverse effects on the rights of gun owners, the right to possess firearms, or current Second Amendment jurisprudence.

 

[2aguy]

The unwarranted fear of some gun owners – gun owners on the partisan right, needless to say; conservative demagogues hostile to Clinton who contrive lies about Clinton and guns.

As was the case with Obama, Clinton as president will have no adverse effects on the rights of gun owners, the right to possess firearms, or current Second Amendment jurisprudence.

As was the case with Obama, what Clinton thinks or believes about the Second Amendment and Heller will have no bearing on the law – there will be no ‘new’ AWB under Clinton, just as there was no ‘new’ AWB under Obama, although both would like to see such legislation enacted.

And as for Clinton appointments to the Federal courts and Supreme Court, ‘liberal’ jurists consider Heller/McDonald settled, accepted case law, they have no issue with current Second Amendment jurisprudence, and will indeed rule to uphold that Second Amendment jurisprudence.

The Heller Court reaffirmed a fundamental fact of Constitutional law ‘liberals’ have always acknowledged and accepted: as is the case with other rights, the Second Amendment right is not ‘absolute,’ as is the case with other rights, the Second Amendment right is subject to reasonable restrictions by government.

“It is not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose[.]” ibid

You are a fool....

Obama's first priority was taking over health care.....he did not want to lose democrats in congress to a vote on gun control issues in the mid terms.......so he simply appointed anti 2nd amendment justices out of sight of the public while he pushed Obama care...

Had he had a chance to change the Supreme Court he would have as well....

Hilary now has the position to gut the second amendment without needing congress to do it.....

And no...there is no such thing as Precedent to a left wing justice...look how they have ruled against concealed carry laws and rifle bans.......

 

[saintmichaeldefendthem]

The unwarranted fear of some gun owners – gun owners on the partisan right, needless to say; conservative demagogues hostile to Clinton who contrive lies about Clinton and guns.

As was the case with Obama, Clinton as president will have no adverse effects on the rights of gun owners, the right to possess firearms, or current Second Amendment jurisprudence.

As was the case with Obama, what Clinton thinks or believes about the Second Amendment and Heller will have no bearing on the law – there will be no ‘new’ AWB under Clinton, just as there was no ‘new’ AWB under Obama, although both would like to see such legislation enacted.

And as for Clinton appointments to the Federal courts and Supreme Court, ‘liberal’ jurists consider Heller/McDonald settled, accepted case law, they have no issue with current Second Amendment jurisprudence, and will indeed rule to uphold that Second Amendment jurisprudence.

The Heller Court reaffirmed a fundamental fact of Constitutional law ‘liberals’ have always acknowledged and accepted: as is the case with other rights, the Second Amendment right is not ‘absolute,’ as is the case with other rights, the Second Amendment right is subject to reasonable restrictions by government.

“It is not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose[.]” ibid

"Congress shall make no law" is applicable to all amendments. The purpose is to restrict the government, not authorize it.

You're talking to someone who thinks mythical beasts like "case law" actually supersede the Constitution itself.

 

[QuickHitCurepon]

The unwarranted fear of some gun owners – gun owners on the partisan right, needless to say; conservative demagogues hostile to Clinton who contrive lies about Clinton and guns.

As was the case with Obama, Clinton as president will have no adverse effects on the rights of gun owners, the right to possess firearms, or current Second Amendment jurisprudence.

As was the case with Obama, what Clinton thinks or believes about the Second Amendment and Heller will have no bearing on the law – there will be no ‘new’ AWB under Clinton, just as there was no ‘new’ AWB under Obama, although both would like to see such legislation enacted.

And as for Clinton appointments to the Federal courts and Supreme Court, ‘liberal’ jurists consider Heller/McDonald settled, accepted case law, they have no issue with current Second Amendment jurisprudence, and will indeed rule to uphold that Second Amendment jurisprudence.

The Heller Court reaffirmed a fundamental fact of Constitutional law ‘liberals’ have always acknowledged and accepted: as is the case with other rights, the Second Amendment right is not ‘absolute,’ as is the case with other rights, the Second Amendment right is subject to reasonable restrictions by government.

“It is not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose[.]” ibid

"Congress shall make no law" is applicable to all amendments. The purpose is to restrict the government, not authorize it.

You're talking to someone who thinks mythical beasts like "case law" actually supersede the Constitution itself.

Do you believe the Constitution is a relic?

 

[saintmichaeldefendthem]

The unwarranted fear of some gun owners – gun owners on the partisan right, needless to say; conservative demagogues hostile to Clinton who contrive lies about Clinton and guns.

As was the case with Obama, Clinton as president will have no adverse effects on the rights of gun owners, the right to possess firearms, or current Second Amendment jurisprudence.

As was the case with Obama, what Clinton thinks or believes about the Second Amendment and Heller will have no bearing on the law – there will be no ‘new’ AWB under Clinton, just as there was no ‘new’ AWB under Obama, although both would like to see such legislation enacted.

And as for Clinton appointments to the Federal courts and Supreme Court, ‘liberal’ jurists consider Heller/McDonald settled, accepted case law, they have no issue with current Second Amendment jurisprudence, and will indeed rule to uphold that Second Amendment jurisprudence.

The Heller Court reaffirmed a fundamental fact of Constitutional law ‘liberals’ have always acknowledged and accepted: as is the case with other rights, the Second Amendment right is not ‘absolute,’ as is the case with other rights, the Second Amendment right is subject to reasonable restrictions by government.

“It is not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose[.]” ibid

"Congress shall make no law" is applicable to all amendments. The purpose is to restrict the government, not authorize it.

You're talking to someone who thinks mythical beasts like "case law" actually supersede the Constitution itself.

Do you believe the Constitution is a relic?

No.

 

[2aguy]

The unwarranted fear of some gun owners – gun owners on the partisan right, needless to say; conservative demagogues hostile to Clinton who contrive lies about Clinton and guns.

As was the case with Obama, Clinton as president will have no adverse effects on the rights of gun owners, the right to possess firearms, or current Second Amendment jurisprudence.

As was the case with Obama, what Clinton thinks or believes about the Second Amendment and Heller will have no bearing on the law – there will be no ‘new’ AWB under Clinton, just as there was no ‘new’ AWB under Obama, although both would like to see such legislation enacted.

And as for Clinton appointments to the Federal courts and Supreme Court, ‘liberal’ jurists consider Heller/McDonald settled, accepted case law, they have no issue with current Second Amendment jurisprudence, and will indeed rule to uphold that Second Amendment jurisprudence.

The Heller Court reaffirmed a fundamental fact of Constitutional law ‘liberals’ have always acknowledged and accepted: as is the case with other rights, the Second Amendment right is not ‘absolute,’ as is the case with other rights, the Second Amendment right is subject to reasonable restrictions by government.

“It is not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose[.]” ibid

"Congress shall make no law" is applicable to all amendments. The purpose is to restrict the government, not authorize it.

You're talking to someone who thinks mythical beasts like "case law" actually supersede the Constitution itself.

Do you believe the Constitution is a relic?

I don't but it can be ignored......which we see today. Even Nixon had more respect for the Constitution than the democrats of today......the republicans drove him out...had they done what democrats have done......and locked shields around Nixon.....he would never have had to resign...that is the lesson Hilary learned from working on Watergate.....you can do whatever you want if you control the law enforcement arm of the government..........since you control the people who will investigate your crimes......

 

[Iceweasel]

The unwarranted fear of some gun owners – gun owners on the partisan right, needless to say; conservative demagogues hostile to Clinton who contrive lies about Clinton and guns.

As was the case with Obama, Clinton as president will have no adverse effects on the rights of gun owners, the right to possess firearms, or current Second Amendment jurisprudence.

Bullshit, counselor. The next set of SCOTUS judges will over turn it. Heller made it by one vote. Her executive orders will be challenged but some may very well stand. Liberals learn law so they can twist it into their favor.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

The unwarranted fear of some gun owners – gun owners on the partisan right, needless to say; conservative demagogues hostile to Clinton who contrive lies about Clinton and guns.

As was the case with Obama, Clinton as president will have no adverse effects on the rights of gun owners, the right to possess firearms, or current Second Amendment jurisprudence.

Bullshit, counselor. The next set of SCOTUS judges will over turn it. Heller made it by one vote. Her executive orders will be challenged but some may very well stand. Liberals learn law so they can twist it into their favor.

If that were to occur, there would be business in the country.

 

[August West]

Gun fetishists said Bill Clinton was going to take away all of their guns and then it was Obama who was going to take them. Keep sending the gun and criminals lobby your money and they`ll keep feeding you nonsense. How easily played gun nuts are

 

[Iceweasel]

Gun fetishists said Bill Clinton was going to take away all of their guns and then it was Obama who was going to take them. Keep sending the gun and criminals lobby your money and they`ll keep feeding you nonsense. How easily played gun nuts are

Mighty broad you have there, Littlemind.

 

[August West]

Gun fetishists said Bill Clinton was going to take away all of their guns and then it was Obama who was going to take them. Keep sending the gun and criminals lobby your money and they`ll keep feeding you nonsense. How easily played gun nuts are

Mighty broad you have there, Littlemind.

I`m not the one paying people to lie to me.

 

[Iceweasel]

Gun fetishists said Bill Clinton was going to take away all of their guns and then it was Obama who was going to take them. Keep sending the gun and criminals lobby your money and they`ll keep feeding you nonsense. How easily played gun nuts are

Mighty broad you have there, Littlemind.

I`m not the one paying people to lie to me.

Neither am I, Littlemind.

 

[2aguy]

Gun fetishists said Bill Clinton was going to take away all of their guns and then it was Obama who was going to take them. Keep sending the gun and criminals lobby your money and they`ll keep feeding you nonsense. How easily played gun nuts are

moron...they did the assault weapon ban and they lost control of congress...which they had for 40 years......the democrats went into hybernation on the issue because they didn't want to lose more seats......then Bush wasn't going to attack the 2nd Amendment and obama didn't want to lose democrat seats to gun control when he wanted to get obamacare passed........he did appoint anti 2nd Amendment justices to the lower courts......Mark Levin talked about this on Thursday...the 4th circuit that upheld the lower court stupidiity on Voter I.D. is now 2 to 1 left wing judges.....

Now....they have a shot at the gold standard of left wing control...the Supreme Court...if they get that they can destroy the 2nd Amendment without having to vote on banning one gun in congress.....