Eisenhower's Times

PoliticalChic

Diamond Member
Gold Supporting Member
Oct 6, 2008
124,904
60,285
2,300
Brooklyn, NY
General Eisenhower was elected as a coda to the war, and a hope for new beginnings.
And, perhaps he lived up to both.
But he carried baggage, and a view that surprised quite a few.






1. Let's begin at the middle....and, later, head back to the war years.
Eisenhower was a product of his times, malleable as most are, and the crucible of his times was Franklin Roosevelt. For whatever the reasons, Roosevelt was a devotee of Stalin and the Soviets, and his administration was thoroughly infused with Soviet spies and sympathizers.

Based on the above, and one's natural inclinations where his career was involved....what should one expect?


a. But, unfortunately, the same pressures were exerted on large segments of the American population.
"Back in the 1930s, American liberals excused the communists of the Soviet Union as being simply “Liberals in a Hurry.”

Doug Ross spots a Timesperson visiting North Korea, retching at the horror before her and quips, “New York Times visits North Korea, unintentionally reveals the endgame of the Democrats’ unchecked authoritarian agenda.” Ed Driscoll » When ?Liberals in a Hurry? Reach the Endzone

Then, just as now.





b. Here is a view from the top:
"As Hitler marched into Poland, [Soviet agent] Whittaker Chambers arranged a private meeting with Adolf Berle, President Roosevelt’s assistant Sec’y of State. Chambers detailed the Communist espionage network, naming at least two dozen Soviet spies in Roosevelt’s administration, including Alger Hiss. Berle reported this to Roosevelt, who laughed, and told Berle to go f--- himself."
(Arthur Herman, "Joseph McCarthy: Reexaming the Life and Legacy of America’s Most Hated Senator," p. 60)

No action was taken, and in fact, Roosevelt promoted Hiss.
Remember, FDR was Eisenhower's boss.

c. How about Truman?
President Truman denounced the Hiss investigation as a “red herring” by do-nothing Republicans (Whitaker Chambers, Witness, p. 564-74)
Felix Frankfurter and Adlai Stevenson offered to be character witnesses for Hiss.

Such were the times.....not very different from these times.








2. Eisenhower become President on January 20, 1953. Understanding the free rein communists had in the times doesn't mean that many weren't aware of the danger posed by the communists, as many are today.
On August 24, 1953, Senator Jenner's eight-member judiciary subcommittee on internal security issued a unanimous report declaring that the penetration of the United States government by the Soviet international organization "has not been fully disclosed....


Policies and programs laid down by members of this Soviet conspiracy are still in effect within our government and constitute a continuing hazard to our national security."

And...have been largely successful in subverting America....it has been "fundamentally transformed" from what the 'greatest generation' fought for.







3. The communist penetration of the government occurred in the Roosevelt and Truman administrations, but policies and programs laid down by the Soviet conspiracy were still in effect after the Eisenhower administration had been in office seven months, according to the unanimous report of eight senators...
... there were indications that the Eisenhower administration would be little more diligent than its predecessors in exposing and eliminating the Soviet conspirators still remaining in the government.

Is that what was expected from his election?







Much of the above is based on Chesly Manly's "The Twenty Year Revolution."
It should be read by those who want to understand what went wrong, and how we got to today.
 
General Eisenhower was elected as a coda to the war, and a hope for new beginnings.
And, perhaps he lived up to both.
But he carried baggage, and a view that surprised quite a few.






1. Let's begin at the middle....and, later, head back to the war years.
Eisenhower was a product of his times, malleable as most are, and the crucible of his times was Franklin Roosevelt. For whatever the reasons, Roosevelt was a devotee of Stalin and the Soviets, and his administration was thoroughly infused with Soviet spies and sympathizers.

Based on the above, and one's natural inclinations where his career was involved....what should one expect?


a. But, unfortunately, the same pressures were exerted on large segments of the American population.
"Back in the 1930s, American liberals excused the communists of the Soviet Union as being simply “Liberals in a Hurry.”

Doug Ross spots a Timesperson visiting North Korea, retching at the horror before her and quips, “New York Times visits North Korea, unintentionally reveals the endgame of the Democrats’ unchecked authoritarian agenda.” Ed Driscoll » When ?Liberals in a Hurry? Reach the Endzone

Then, just as now.





b. Here is a view from the top:
"As Hitler marched into Poland, [Soviet agent] Whittaker Chambers arranged a private meeting with Adolf Berle, President Roosevelt’s assistant Sec’y of State. Chambers detailed the Communist espionage network, naming at least two dozen Soviet spies in Roosevelt’s administration, including Alger Hiss. Berle reported this to Roosevelt, who laughed, and told Berle to go f--- himself."
(Arthur Herman, "Joseph McCarthy: Reexaming the Life and Legacy of America’s Most Hated Senator," p. 60)

No action was taken, and in fact, Roosevelt promoted Hiss.
Remember, FDR was Eisenhower's boss.

c. How about Truman?
President Truman denounced the Hiss investigation as a “red herring” by do-nothing Republicans (Whitaker Chambers, Witness, p. 564-74)
Felix Frankfurter and Adlai Stevenson offered to be character witnesses for Hiss.

Such were the times.....not very different from these times.








2. Eisenhower become President on January 20, 1953. Understanding the free rein communists had in the times doesn't mean that many weren't aware of the danger posed by the communists, as many are today.
On August 24, 1953, Senator Jenner's eight-member judiciary subcommittee on internal security issued a unanimous report declaring that the penetration of the United States government by the Soviet international organization "has not been fully disclosed....


Policies and programs laid down by members of this Soviet conspiracy are still in effect within our government and constitute a continuing hazard to our national security."

And...have been largely successful in subverting America....it has been "fundamentally transformed" from what the 'greatest generation' fought for.







3. The communist penetration of the government occurred in the Roosevelt and Truman administrations, but policies and programs laid down by the Soviet conspiracy were still in effect after the Eisenhower administration had been in office seven months, according to the unanimous report of eight senators...
... there were indications that the Eisenhower administration would be little more diligent than its predecessors in exposing and eliminating the Soviet conspirators still remaining in the government.

Is that what was expected from his election?







Much of the above is based on Chesly Manly's "The Twenty Year Revolution."
It should be read by those who want to understand what went wrong, and how we got to today.

DwightEisenhower.jpg
 
General Eisenhower was elected as a coda to the war, and a hope for new beginnings.
And, perhaps he lived up to both.
But he carried baggage, and a view that surprised quite a few.






1. Let's begin at the middle....and, later, head back to the war years.
Eisenhower was a product of his times, malleable as most are, and the crucible of his times was Franklin Roosevelt. For whatever the reasons, Roosevelt was a devotee of Stalin and the Soviets, and his administration was thoroughly infused with Soviet spies and sympathizers.

Based on the above, and one's natural inclinations where his career was involved....what should one expect?


a. But, unfortunately, the same pressures were exerted on large segments of the American population.
"Back in the 1930s, American liberals excused the communists of the Soviet Union as being simply “Liberals in a Hurry.”

Doug Ross spots a Timesperson visiting North Korea, retching at the horror before her and quips, “New York Times visits North Korea, unintentionally reveals the endgame of the Democrats’ unchecked authoritarian agenda.” Ed Driscoll » When ?Liberals in a Hurry? Reach the Endzone

Then, just as now.





b. Here is a view from the top:
"As Hitler marched into Poland, [Soviet agent] Whittaker Chambers arranged a private meeting with Adolf Berle, President Roosevelt’s assistant Sec’y of State. Chambers detailed the Communist espionage network, naming at least two dozen Soviet spies in Roosevelt’s administration, including Alger Hiss. Berle reported this to Roosevelt, who laughed, and told Berle to go f--- himself."
(Arthur Herman, "Joseph McCarthy: Reexaming the Life and Legacy of America’s Most Hated Senator," p. 60)

No action was taken, and in fact, Roosevelt promoted Hiss.
Remember, FDR was Eisenhower's boss.

c. How about Truman?
President Truman denounced the Hiss investigation as a “red herring” by do-nothing Republicans (Whitaker Chambers, Witness, p. 564-74)
Felix Frankfurter and Adlai Stevenson offered to be character witnesses for Hiss.

Such were the times.....not very different from these times.








2. Eisenhower become President on January 20, 1953. Understanding the free rein communists had in the times doesn't mean that many weren't aware of the danger posed by the communists, as many are today.
On August 24, 1953, Senator Jenner's eight-member judiciary subcommittee on internal security issued a unanimous report declaring that the penetration of the United States government by the Soviet international organization "has not been fully disclosed....


Policies and programs laid down by members of this Soviet conspiracy are still in effect within our government and constitute a continuing hazard to our national security."

And...have been largely successful in subverting America....it has been "fundamentally transformed" from what the 'greatest generation' fought for.







3. The communist penetration of the government occurred in the Roosevelt and Truman administrations, but policies and programs laid down by the Soviet conspiracy were still in effect after the Eisenhower administration had been in office seven months, according to the unanimous report of eight senators...
... there were indications that the Eisenhower administration would be little more diligent than its predecessors in exposing and eliminating the Soviet conspirators still remaining in the government.

Is that what was expected from his election?







Much of the above is based on Chesly Manly's "The Twenty Year Revolution."
It should be read by those who want to understand what went wrong, and how we got to today.

DwightEisenhower.jpg


20130320-084542.jpg
 
General Eisenhower was elected as a coda to the war, and a hope for new beginnings.
And, perhaps he lived up to both.
But he carried baggage, and a view that surprised quite a few.






1. Let's begin at the middle....and, later, head back to the war years.
Eisenhower was a product of his times, malleable as most are, and the crucible of his times was Franklin Roosevelt. For whatever the reasons, Roosevelt was a devotee of Stalin and the Soviets, and his administration was thoroughly infused with Soviet spies and sympathizers.

Based on the above, and one's natural inclinations where his career was involved....what should one expect?


a. But, unfortunately, the same pressures were exerted on large segments of the American population.
"Back in the 1930s, American liberals excused the communists of the Soviet Union as being simply “Liberals in a Hurry.”

Doug Ross spots a Timesperson visiting North Korea, retching at the horror before her and quips, “New York Times visits North Korea, unintentionally reveals the endgame of the Democrats’ unchecked authoritarian agenda.” Ed Driscoll » When ?Liberals in a Hurry? Reach the Endzone

Then, just as now.





b. Here is a view from the top:
"As Hitler marched into Poland, [Soviet agent] Whittaker Chambers arranged a private meeting with Adolf Berle, President Roosevelt’s assistant Sec’y of State. Chambers detailed the Communist espionage network, naming at least two dozen Soviet spies in Roosevelt’s administration, including Alger Hiss. Berle reported this to Roosevelt, who laughed, and told Berle to go f--- himself."
(Arthur Herman, "Joseph McCarthy: Reexaming the Life and Legacy of America’s Most Hated Senator," p. 60)

No action was taken, and in fact, Roosevelt promoted Hiss.
Remember, FDR was Eisenhower's boss.

c. How about Truman?
President Truman denounced the Hiss investigation as a “red herring” by do-nothing Republicans (Whitaker Chambers, Witness, p. 564-74)
Felix Frankfurter and Adlai Stevenson offered to be character witnesses for Hiss.

Such were the times.....not very different from these times.








2. Eisenhower become President on January 20, 1953. Understanding the free rein communists had in the times doesn't mean that many weren't aware of the danger posed by the communists, as many are today.
On August 24, 1953, Senator Jenner's eight-member judiciary subcommittee on internal security issued a unanimous report declaring that the penetration of the United States government by the Soviet international organization "has not been fully disclosed....


Policies and programs laid down by members of this Soviet conspiracy are still in effect within our government and constitute a continuing hazard to our national security."

And...have been largely successful in subverting America....it has been "fundamentally transformed" from what the 'greatest generation' fought for.







3. The communist penetration of the government occurred in the Roosevelt and Truman administrations, but policies and programs laid down by the Soviet conspiracy were still in effect after the Eisenhower administration had been in office seven months, according to the unanimous report of eight senators...
... there were indications that the Eisenhower administration would be little more diligent than its predecessors in exposing and eliminating the Soviet conspirators still remaining in the government.

Is that what was expected from his election?







Much of the above is based on Chesly Manly's "The Twenty Year Revolution."
It should be read by those who want to understand what went wrong, and how we got to today.

DwightEisenhower.jpg


20130320-084542.jpg








So....your time-saving technique is not to read the material to which you are ostensibly giving a reply?


Great.


You must be a government school grad, huh?
 
Last edited:
Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired, signifies in the final sense a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and are not clothed.

Dwight D. Eisenhower

Read more at Dwight D. Eisenhower Quotes - BrainyQuote


Great man
 
Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired, signifies in the final sense a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and are not clothed.

Dwight D. Eisenhower

Read more at Dwight D. Eisenhower Quotes - BrainyQuote


Great man




Another government school grad checks in.


Of course....nothing to do with the essence of the well constructed OP....
 
Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired, signifies in the final sense a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and are not clothed.

Dwight D. Eisenhower

Read more at Dwight D. Eisenhower Quotes - BrainyQuote


Great man




Another government school grad checks in.


Of course....nothing to do with the essence of the well constructed OP....

You know I don't read your OPs....

They are like literary diarrhea
 
Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired, signifies in the final sense a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and are not clothed.

Dwight D. Eisenhower

Read more at Dwight D. Eisenhower Quotes - BrainyQuote


Great man




Another government school grad checks in.


Of course....nothing to do with the essence of the well constructed OP....

You know I don't read your OPs....

They are like literary diarrhea




You're a liar...and a Liberal.

Is that redundant?


The truth is that you read 'em, grind your teeth, and do the best you can to respond to 'em....

...which means, change the subject.
 
What Eisenhower had to say about Political Chic

An intellectual is a man who takes more words than necessary to tell more than he knows.

Dwight D. Eisenhower

 
What Eisenhower had to say about Political Chic

An intellectual is a man who takes more words than necessary to tell more than he knows.

Dwight D. Eisenhower





How would you know....you just claimed you don't read 'em....



[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rEQCUgOxShc]BaZing! - YouTube[/ame]





Another liar hoist by his own petard.....whatever the heck a petard is.
 
Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired, signifies in the final sense a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and are not clothed.

Dwight D. Eisenhower

Read more at Dwight D. Eisenhower Quotes - BrainyQuote


Great man




Another government school grad checks in.


Of course....nothing to do with the essence of the well constructed OP....

You know I don't read your OPs....

They are like literary diarrhea

I don't usually read PC posts. It's auto messages by a computer bot with auto responses.
 
Last edited:
So with all these commie dupe presidents we've had since Hoover, who won the battle, America or the USSR?
 
Much of the above is based on Chesly Manly's "The Twenty Year Revolution."
It should be read by those who want to understand what went wrong, and how we got to today.


Much of your work is based on Manly. So, who was he. Did he exist, or was he the alter ego Col. Robert McCormick, the owner of the Chicago Tribune.

The name Manly became somewhat famous when the Tribune released WWII contingency war plans (RAINBOW FIVE) a few days before Pearl Harbor. Hitler used the leaked article in his declaration of war against the USA.
http://MISES.org/Literature/Author/1332/Chesly-Manly
 
Last edited:
Much of the above is based on Chesly Manly's "The Twenty Year Revolution."
It should be read by those who want to understand what went wrong, and how we got to today.


Much of your work is based on Manly. So, who was he. Did he exist, or was he the alter ego Col. Robert McCormick, the owner of the Chicago Tribune.

The name Manly became somewhat famous when the Tribune released WWII contingency war plans (RAINBOW FIVE) a few days before Pearl Harbor. Hitler used the leaked article in his declaration of war against the USA.
Author: Chesly-Manly




Have you ever noticed how when one cannot dispute the correctness of an idea, they try to attack the one who said it.
The characteristic identifies bout the ignorant and the disingenuous.


Of course, if you believe that that was a correct course of action, you would have stopped using Arabic numerals after 9/11.



So....you agree with every single iota in the OP?

Or at least, there is nothing in the OP with which you are able to find fault?



Good to know.




As usual, I have provided astoundingly correct information.
You find it offensive...I find it truthful. I'm just more perceptive.
 
So with all these commie dupe presidents we've had since Hoover, who won the battle, America or the USSR?




Let's see.....the United Nations was a Soviet idea, ...
"A young American diplomat was the leading force in the designing of the United Nations. He was secretary of the Dumbarten Oaks Conversations from August to October of 1944 where most of the preliminary planning for the U.N. was done.

He was Roosevelt's right-hand man in February of 1945 at Yalta where the postwar boundaries of Europe were drawn (Roosevelt was a dying man at the time. His death came only ten weeks later).

At Yalta it was agreed that the Soviet Union would have three votes (one each for Russia, Ukraine, and Byelorussia) in the U.N. General Assembly, even though the United States had only one. At Yalta much of Europe was placed under the iron heel of communist rule. At Yalta, Churchill, Roosevelt, and Stalin appointed this young diplomatic shining star to be the first Secretary-general of the U.N. for the founding conference held in San Francisco,April/June of 1945.

All of this seemed well and good until three years later. Alger Hiss was exposed as a communist spy...."

What The U.N. Doesn't Want You To Know




Just about every aim of the Communist Party of the United States has been realized....



Did you know that ObamaCare was first proposed by the Soviets?



How about you answer your query.
 
Much of the above is based on Chesly Manly's "The Twenty Year Revolution."
It should be read by those who want to understand what went wrong, and how we got to today.


Much of your work is based on Manly. So, who was he. Did he exist, or was he the alter ego Col. Robert McCormick, the owner of the Chicago Tribune.

The name Manly became somewhat famous when the Tribune released WWII contingency war plans (RAINBOW FIVE) a few days before Pearl Harbor. Hitler used the leaked article in his declaration of war against the USA.
Author: Chesly-Manly




Have you ever noticed how when one cannot dispute the correctness of an idea, they try to attack the one who said it.
The characteristic identifies bout the ignorant and the disingenuous.


Of course, if you believe that that was a correct course of action, you would have stopped using Arabic numerals after 9/11.



So....you agree with every single iota in the OP?

Or at least, there is nothing in the OP with which you are able to find fault?



Good to know.




As usual, I have provided astoundingly correct information.
You find it offensive...I find it truthful. I'm just more perceptive.

There is nothing challenging in my post and I offer not agreement or disagreement with you OP. The Col. was a fascinating individual. He was a giant in his era, yet mysterious and controversial.
You, as I stated, base much of your work on the works of Manly. Since bio's and information about him can not be found and don't seem to exist, it is fair to assume the name was first used as a "staff" alias at the Tribune and later as a name used by McCormick. This is speculation on my part, but Manly/McCormick views and insights certainly seem to match up pretty well.
So, who was McCormick and how did he use the Chicago Tribune?
 
Last edited:
Much of your work is based on Manly. So, who was he. Did he exist, or was he the alter ego Col. Robert McCormick, the owner of the Chicago Tribune.

The name Manly became somewhat famous when the Tribune released WWII contingency war plans (RAINBOW FIVE) a few days before Pearl Harbor. Hitler used the leaked article in his declaration of war against the USA.
Author: Chesly-Manly




Have you ever noticed how when one cannot dispute the correctness of an idea, they try to attack the one who said it.
The characteristic identifies bout the ignorant and the disingenuous.


Of course, if you believe that that was a correct course of action, you would have stopped using Arabic numerals after 9/11.



So....you agree with every single iota in the OP?

Or at least, there is nothing in the OP with which you are able to find fault?



Good to know.




As usual, I have provided astoundingly correct information.
You find it offensive...I find it truthful. I'm just more perceptive.

There is nothing challenging in my post and I offer not agreement or disagreement with you OP. The Col. was a fascinating individual. He was a giant in his era, yet mysterious and controversial.
You, as I stated, base much of your work on the works of Manly. Since bio's and information about him can not be found and don't seem to exist, it is fair to assume the name was first used as a "staff" alias at the Tribune and later as a name used by McCormick. This is speculation on my part, but Manly/McCormick views and insights certainly seem to match up pretty well.
So, who was McCormick and how did he use the Chicago Tribune?




"There is nothing challenging in my post...."



Great.



So we agree........I have a proprietary pride in veracity.
 
He was before my time ... how was Eisenhower on the economy?
 

Forum List

Back
Top