Economics; For The Clueless

[Mr. Shaman]

Clueless = Tax-Cut Echo-Chamber

LINK

(Does this make it easier for you clueless-folks to find links??? )​

 

[California Girl]

You call other people clueless and then link to MSNBC. Seriously?

That's some funny shit right there!

 

[Avatar4321]

Glad to see you start to care for Economics Shaman. Might I suggest a more intellectual read? The Wealth of Nations by Adam Smith is an excellent and classic read on Economics. In fact, I'd say it's fundamental for anyone who wants to understand it.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

If Shaman ever stopped posting like a moron....yeah, I see the problem already. Nevermind.

 

[DiamondDave]

If Shaman ever stopped posting like a moron....yeah, I see the problem already. Nevermind.

Mr. Shithead stopping posting like a moron... I think that is a description of one of the 7 seals in Revelations

 

[topspin]

Maybe shaman will enlighten us as to his own personal economic success.
Tax cuts is believed by millions more than European style benies for sitting on your ass.
Who's clueless?

 

[Mr. Shaman]

You call other people clueless and then link to MSNBC. Seriously?

That's some funny shit right there!

Gee.....a Bubblehead who isn't familiar with Alan Simpson; whatta shocker.

​

 

[topspin]

Here's another econmics 101 for the limosine liberal here. You don't ass **** GM capitalist (shareholders/bondholders) for the benefit of workers and then expect capitalism lovers to vote for you.

 

[Mr. Shaman]

Glad to see you start to care for Economics Shaman. Might I suggest a more intellectual read? The Wealth of Nations by Adam Smith is an excellent and classic read on Economics. In fact, I'd say it's fundamental for anyone who wants to understand it.

Save it!!!

We're talkin' PRESENT-DAY ECONOMICS, here....rather-than economic-theory!!!

You DO seem to be suffering from short-term memory issues!!!!!

LINK​

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

Glad to see you start to care for Economics Shaman. Might I suggest a more intellectual read? The Wealth of Nations by Adam Smith is an excellent and classic read on Economics. In fact, I'd say it's fundamental for anyone who wants to understand it.

I doubt he has the intelligence to be able to understand it.

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

Clueless = Tax-Cut Echo-Chamber

LINK

(Does this make it easier for you clueless-folks to find links??? )​

Well, economics for the clueless is certainly your forte there Ms. Sheman.

 

[Mr. Shaman]

If Shaman ever stopped posting like a moron....yeah, I see the problem already. Nevermind.

Gee.....another "conservative"-neophyte, unfamiliar with Alan Simpson.

 

[Kevin_Kennedy]

You don't think a thread with the word economics in the title should be in the economics forum?

 

[Avatar4321]

Glad to see you start to care for Economics Shaman. Might I suggest a more intellectual read? The Wealth of Nations by Adam Smith is an excellent and classic read on Economics. In fact, I'd say it's fundamental for anyone who wants to understand it.

Save it!!!

We're talkin' PRESENT-DAY ECONOMICS, here....rather-than economic-theory!!!

You DO seem to be suffering from short-term memory issues!!!!!

LINK​

You seem to be under the impression that the laws of nature concerning economics change over time. They haven't changed. They are exactly the same as they've ever been.

Why on earth should we ignore history when dealing with current problems? Nothing has changed. You still create wealth the same exact way.

 

[Mr. Shaman]

If Shaman ever stopped posting like a moron....yeah, I see the problem already. Nevermind.

Mr. Shithead stopping posting like a moron... I think that is a description of one of the 7 seals in Revelations

That's what's needed, when discussing the national-economy....fairy-tales from some religious-fundamentalist whackjob.

​

 

[Gunny]

Clueless = Tax-Cut Echo-Chamber

LINK

(Does this make it easier for you clueless-folks to find links??? )​

Speaking of clueless, guess you missed that subforum titled "Economics"

 

[Mr. Shaman]

You don't think a thread with the word economics in the title should be in the economics forum?

Like I said......we're not talkin' THEORY, here!!

We're talkin' PRESENT-DAY URGENCY!!!!!!​

 

[Kevin_Kennedy]

You don't think a thread with the word economics in the title should be in the economics forum?

Like I said......we're not talkin' THEORY, here!!

We're talkin' PRESENT-DAY URGENCY!!!!!!​

What you're talking is absolutely theory, but regardless, there's no reason you can't do so in the economics forum where threads on economics are supposed to be.

 

[Mr. Shaman]

Clueless = Tax-Cut Echo-Chamber

LINK

(Does this make it easier for you clueless-folks to find links??? )​

Speaking of clueless, guess you missed that subforum titled "Economics"

"Subbing" for a qualified-Administrator, are you?

​

 

[Mr. Shaman]

You don't think a thread with the word economics in the title should be in the economics forum?

Like I said......we're not talkin' THEORY, here!!

We're talkin' PRESENT-DAY URGENCY!!!!!!​

What you're talking is absolutely theory.....

Maybe there's an ADULT, at home, that can explain All Of This, to you?????

​