Winston
Platinum Member
Look, I don't care which side of the political spectrum you are on. Something has to be done about prescription drug prices. Half a trillion dollars last year was spent on prescription drugs. But today, checking on my insurance claims so far this year, I spotted the claim for my blood pressure medicine from CVS. It cost me nothing out of pocket. It cost the insurance company $23, that was the "negotiated discount" by the pharmacy benefit manager. Retail, $78. But hell, I could buy the same medication for seven dollars online, ten and have it auto refilled and sent to my doorstep every month WITH NO INSURANCE AND NO DISCOUNT CARD.
Many people complain about the manufacturers of those prescriptions. But look at CVS. Someone walks in with no insurance, no discount card and BAM they slam them with a 1000% higher price than the online drugstore. In any other market segment that would be clear and criminal price gouging. And that is bad, but yeah, you might attempt to argue that is what the person gets for not having insurance and not even downloading a discount card. But worse, who the hell is the PBM? What the hell kind of a "discount" did he "negotiate" when he is willing to pay $22 for a $7 medicine? Well let me tell you how this works. That $22 that the insurance paid, $14,50 went to CVS, and $7.50 went to the PBM working out of his home office in his boxer shorts. I know there is a special place in hell reserved just for him, a couple levels under Hitler.
Now here is the takeaway. The BBB act addressed this very problem. Those kickbacks to the PBM should be going to savings for the consumer, PERIOD. First of all, that means my insurance company would have had to pay no more than $14.50 for my prescription. But second, what kind of perverse incentive is working here. The PBM is not incentivized to work to decrease the cost of the drug. Hell, it is exactly the opposite. He wants to keep the price as high as he can over the true market clearing price in order to pad his fat ass wallet. Sinema and Manchin, well that addressing of the PBM kickbacks was the first thing they wanted eliminated from the BBB. I mean these people are absolute scoundrels with no morals whatsoever.
Many people complain about the manufacturers of those prescriptions. But look at CVS. Someone walks in with no insurance, no discount card and BAM they slam them with a 1000% higher price than the online drugstore. In any other market segment that would be clear and criminal price gouging. And that is bad, but yeah, you might attempt to argue that is what the person gets for not having insurance and not even downloading a discount card. But worse, who the hell is the PBM? What the hell kind of a "discount" did he "negotiate" when he is willing to pay $22 for a $7 medicine? Well let me tell you how this works. That $22 that the insurance paid, $14,50 went to CVS, and $7.50 went to the PBM working out of his home office in his boxer shorts. I know there is a special place in hell reserved just for him, a couple levels under Hitler.
Now here is the takeaway. The BBB act addressed this very problem. Those kickbacks to the PBM should be going to savings for the consumer, PERIOD. First of all, that means my insurance company would have had to pay no more than $14.50 for my prescription. But second, what kind of perverse incentive is working here. The PBM is not incentivized to work to decrease the cost of the drug. Hell, it is exactly the opposite. He wants to keep the price as high as he can over the true market clearing price in order to pad his fat ass wallet. Sinema and Manchin, well that addressing of the PBM kickbacks was the first thing they wanted eliminated from the BBB. I mean these people are absolute scoundrels with no morals whatsoever.