Dr. Rachel Maddow: #1 Most-Watched Cable News Host

[ptbw forever]

Dr. Maddow reports facts and truth. We should all appreciate that. I sure do.

Calling Madcow "Doctor" is like calling Jeffrey Dahmer "Chef."

She is a Rhodes Scholar

Which proves that such distinctions no longer mean anything.

 

[rightwinger]

Dr. Maddow reports facts and truth. We should all appreciate that. I sure do.

Calling Madcow "Doctor" is like calling Jeffrey Dahmer "Chef."

She is a Rhodes Scholar

Which proves that such distinctions no longer mean anything.

More attacks against education; from the right

 

[ptbw forever]

Dr. Maddow reports facts and truth. We should all appreciate that. I sure do.

Calling Madcow "Doctor" is like calling Jeffrey Dahmer "Chef."

She is a Rhodes Scholar

Which proves that such distinctions no longer mean anything.

More attacks against education; from the right

Actually, I attack "education" from mostly a left wing direction(you know, not the "**** white people and **** Christians" anti-humanist pseudo left wing that you idiots follow).

Unfortunately for you, your "education" hasn't taught you to truly understand what the political spectrum is and you simply follow the racist anti-white prism that your media gods have erected for you in place of it.

The fact that you think Maddow gives you "facts and truth" about anything that isn't inconsequential or even absolutely hypocritical in its origin is a testament to the fact that "education" just makes people dumber and more vulnerable to suggestion from unelected authority figures.

 

[rightwinger]

Dr. Maddow reports facts and truth. We should all appreciate that. I sure do.

Calling Madcow "Doctor" is like calling Jeffrey Dahmer "Chef."

She is a Rhodes Scholar

Which proves that such distinctions no longer mean anything.

More attacks against education; from the right

Actually, I attack "education" from mostly a left wing direction(you know, not the "**** white people and **** Christians" anti-humanist pseudo left wing that you idiots follow).

Unfortunately for you, your "education" hasn't taught you to truly understand what the political spectrum is and you simply follow the racist anti-white prism that your media gods have erected for you in place of it.

The fact that you think Maddow gives you "facts and truth" about anything that isn't inconsequential or even absolutely hypocritical in its origin is a testament to the fact that "education" just makes people dumber and more vulnerable to suggestion from unelected authority figures.

Dr Maddow is a Rhodes Scholar

A fact beyond the comprehension of conservatives who worship college drop outs

 

[tycho1572]

Calling Madcow "Doctor" is like calling Jeffrey Dahmer "Chef."

She is a Rhodes Scholar

Which proves that such distinctions no longer mean anything.

More attacks against education; from the right

Actually, I attack "education" from mostly a left wing direction(you know, not the "**** white people and **** Christians" anti-humanist pseudo left wing that you idiots follow).

Unfortunately for you, your "education" hasn't taught you to truly understand what the political spectrum is and you simply follow the racist anti-white prism that your media gods have erected for you in place of it.

The fact that you think Maddow gives you "facts and truth" about anything that isn't inconsequential or even absolutely hypocritical in its origin is a testament to the fact that "education" just makes people dumber and more vulnerable to suggestion from unelected authority figures.

Dr Maddow is a Rhodes Scholar

A fact beyond the comprehension of conservatives who worship college drop outs

Are we talking about the same crazy dyke who spent a week hyping you tards about Trump’s tax return that showed he paid millions?

 

[Nova78]

+++++++

She is a Rhodes Scholar

Which proves that such distinctions no longer mean anything.

More attacks against education; from the right

Actually, I attack "education" from mostly a left wing direction(you know, not the "**** white people and **** Christians" anti-humanist pseudo left wing that you idiots follow).

Unfortunately for you, your "education" hasn't taught you to truly understand what the political spectrum is and you simply follow the racist anti-white prism that your media gods have erected for you in place of it.

The fact that you think Maddow gives you "facts and truth" about anything that isn't inconsequential or even absolutely hypocritical in its origin is a testament to the fact that "education" just makes people dumber and more vulnerable to suggestion from unelected authority figures.

Dr Maddow is a Rhodes Scholar

A fact beyond the comprehension of conservatives who worship college drop outs

Are we talking about the same crazy dyke who spent a week hyping you tards about Trump’s tax return that showed he paid millions?

She is the one that straps it on when the lights dim.

 

[ptbw forever]

Calling Madcow "Doctor" is like calling Jeffrey Dahmer "Chef."

She is a Rhodes Scholar

Which proves that such distinctions no longer mean anything.

More attacks against education; from the right

Actually, I attack "education" from mostly a left wing direction(you know, not the "**** white people and **** Christians" anti-humanist pseudo left wing that you idiots follow).

Unfortunately for you, your "education" hasn't taught you to truly understand what the political spectrum is and you simply follow the racist anti-white prism that your media gods have erected for you in place of it.

The fact that you think Maddow gives you "facts and truth" about anything that isn't inconsequential or even absolutely hypocritical in its origin is a testament to the fact that "education" just makes people dumber and more vulnerable to suggestion from unelected authority figures.

Dr Maddow is a Rhodes Scholar

A fact beyond the comprehension of conservatives who worship college drop outs

She is a tool of the Democrats and the media at large. Smart people don't become tools unless they are literally forced to.

At least Rush learned how to not be a tool.

 

[FA_Q2]

Hannity and Maddow
Wow, really says something about us.
Go ahead and cheer, though. Dumbfuck

Actually it 'says something' about media.

Not really. Media goes where the money is and the viewers dictate that..

That's sort-of what I mean, but no, absolutely the viewers don't dictate that. The broadcaster does. I doubt any viewer petitioned mass media to 'please give us inane shows about naked people on an island forced to eat bugs, and fake wrestling, and on-stage paternity tests and oh can we have a camera truck that goes around following philanderers?" This loserist lowest common denominator swill is concocted to mine the emotions specifically because the concoctors know the somnambulist sponges will sop it up like candy.

You are directly contradicting yourself here. Stating that no one petitioned for that type of programming and then that they sop it up like sponges is directly contradictory.

The people can and do DEMAND that type pf programming and do so when they flock to it and watch it. Your premise that it is the producers forcing that content on the viewers relies on a false premise - that there are no options.

Just as hordes of people did not clamor for Detroit to make too-big inverted bathtubs that they could roll over.

The Three Lies: "This won't hurt a bit", "The check is in the mail" and "We're just giving the public what they want". Except that there actually are times when this won't hurt and the check really is in the mail.

NOBODY gives the public "what they want" over "what will sell". That whole "we're just giving the public what they want" lie is a crutch they use to avoid taking responsibility for their offering's obvious flaws.

Again, that is based on the false idea that those customers have no options.

Face the facts, there is a reason that entities like FOX and CNN absolutely blow PBS out of the water when it comes to viewership and it is NOT because people are forced into that type of content. It is because they want that content over something like actual news. If they really wanted it then they would be watching the content that is already there for them. 100 percent of ALL television viewers tuning into FOX and CNN have access to far less biased content through NPR. Every single one of them. And yet that content draws ever larger audiences. This is the same reason that Hannity and Maddow continually do FAR better than commentators like Smerconish - people WANT the divisiveness and confirmation bias and they willingly go along with it.

Do you honestly think that the media giants forced people to migrate from news shows to places like the tonight show where most youth gets news these days or can you see the truth that this is what people want and so they are getting it?

If the media were to suddenly grow a soul and start broadcasting real news in an unbiased manner all that would happen is 'news' outlets like Breitbear would become the new leaders.

The fact that people flock to this type of media says a lot more about them than it does about the media. It is not as though there are not other options out there, just that most do not want reason and discussion. They want talking points and hate.

Again, it's got nothing to do with "what they want" -- it's "what they'll accept" that's served up to them on Toiletvision, which has already indoctrinated them to sit down, shut up, and watch whatever turds we hand you. Nor does the public have any avenue to make such a request anyway.

Emotion sells, and broadcasters know that well. Aside from that, the fact that one slanted talking head is overdrawing another slanted talking head doesn't mean people are "flocking" to either one; without bothering to look it up I have no doubt both Hannity's and Maddow's ratings are dwarfed by the big hitters of those other options in that same time slot. Sitcoms, dramas, people stranded on an island eating bugs, whatever they are.

As stated above, as there are options out there your premise that they are forced into this type of 'news' is simply false.

That does not relive those entities of the responsibility that they bear but it does mean that they are not the cause but rather the symptom of a far larger problem.

You do realize that NPR and PBS are just CNN in a nicer suit, right(and CNN is just MSNBC in a very slightly nicer suit)?

Of course you do, you contemptible liar.

And yet another case in point.

 

[rightwinger]

She is a Rhodes Scholar

Which proves that such distinctions no longer mean anything.

More attacks against education; from the right

Actually, I attack "education" from mostly a left wing direction(you know, not the "**** white people and **** Christians" anti-humanist pseudo left wing that you idiots follow).

Unfortunately for you, your "education" hasn't taught you to truly understand what the political spectrum is and you simply follow the racist anti-white prism that your media gods have erected for you in place of it.

The fact that you think Maddow gives you "facts and truth" about anything that isn't inconsequential or even absolutely hypocritical in its origin is a testament to the fact that "education" just makes people dumber and more vulnerable to suggestion from unelected authority figures.

Dr Maddow is a Rhodes Scholar

A fact beyond the comprehension of conservatives who worship college drop outs

She is a tool of the Democrats and the media at large. Smart people don't become tools unless they are literally forced to.

At least Rush learned how to not be a tool.

She does quite well on her own

She is well prepared for each show and tells a great story.

 

[Aba Incieni]

She hash a cleft palate.

 

[Pogo]

Hannity and Maddow
Wow, really says something about us.
Go ahead and cheer, though. Dumbfuck

Actually it 'says something' about media.

Not really. Media goes where the money is and the viewers dictate that..

That's sort-of what I mean, but no, absolutely the viewers don't dictate that. The broadcaster does. I doubt any viewer petitioned mass media to 'please give us inane shows about naked people on an island forced to eat bugs, and fake wrestling, and on-stage paternity tests and oh can we have a camera truck that goes around following philanderers?" This loserist lowest common denominator swill is concocted to mine the emotions specifically because the concoctors know the somnambulist sponges will sop it up like candy.

You are directly contradicting yourself here. Stating that no one petitioned for that type of programming and then that they sop it up like sponges is directly contradictory.

The people can and do DEMAND that type pf programming and do so when they flock to it and watch it. Your premise that it is the producers forcing that content on the viewers relies on a false premise - that there are no options.

Just as hordes of people did not clamor for Detroit to make too-big inverted bathtubs that they could roll over.

The Three Lies: "This won't hurt a bit", "The check is in the mail" and "We're just giving the public what they want". Except that there actually are times when this won't hurt and the check really is in the mail.

NOBODY gives the public "what they want" over "what will sell". That whole "we're just giving the public what they want" lie is a crutch they use to avoid taking responsibility for their offering's obvious flaws.

Again, that is based on the false idea that those customers have no options.

Face the facts, there is a reason that entities like FOX and CNN absolutely blow PBS out of the water when it comes to viewership and it is NOT because people are forced into that type of content. It is because they want that content over something like actual news. If they really wanted it then they would be watching the content that is already there for them. 100 percent of ALL television viewers tuning into FOX and CNN have access to far less biased content through NPR. Every single one of them. And yet that content draws ever larger audiences. This is the same reason that Hannity and Maddow continually do FAR better than commentators like Smerconish - people WANT the divisiveness and confirmation bias and they willingly go along with it.

Do you honestly think that the media giants forced people to migrate from news shows to places like the tonight show where most youth gets news these days or can you see the truth that this is what people want and so they are getting it?

If the media were to suddenly grow a soul and start broadcasting real news in an unbiased manner all that would happen is 'news' outlets like Breitbear would become the new leaders.

The fact that people flock to this type of media says a lot more about them than it does about the media. It is not as though there are not other options out there, just that most do not want reason and discussion. They want talking points and hate.

Again, it's got nothing to do with "what they want" -- it's "what they'll accept" that's served up to them on Toiletvision, which has already indoctrinated them to sit down, shut up, and watch whatever turds we hand you. Nor does the public have any avenue to make such a request anyway.

Emotion sells, and broadcasters know that well. Aside from that, the fact that one slanted talking head is overdrawing another slanted talking head doesn't mean people are "flocking" to either one; without bothering to look it up I have no doubt both Hannity's and Maddow's ratings are dwarfed by the big hitters of those other options in that same time slot. Sitcoms, dramas, people stranded on an island eating bugs, whatever they are.

As stated above, as there are options out there your premise that they are forced into this type of 'news' is simply false.

That does not relive those entities of the responsibility that they bear but it does mean that they are not the cause but rather the symptom of a far larger problem.

You do realize that NPR and PBS are just CNN in a nicer suit, right(and CNN is just MSNBC in a very slightly nicer suit)?

Of course you do, you contemptible liar.

No, you inveterate moron. They're completely unrelated, simmering pool of baboon pus.

Prove me wrong, waste of human protoplasm.

 

[PredFan]

Sean Hannity has been dethroned.

March Maddow-ness.

MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow dethroned Fox News’ Sean Hannity last month to seize the title of most-watched cable news host.

According to figures from Forbes, The Rachel Maddow Show turned in its best-ever performance with an average of 3.058 million viewers, compared to Hannity’s 3 million.

She also beat him among those aged 25-to-54 ― the demographic advertisers most covet ― with an average viewership from that group of 671,000 compared with 616,000 for Hannity.

More: Your New Most-Watched Cable News Host Is ... Rachel Maddow

Congratulations, Dr. Maddow! Go Rachel.

And biggest nut job.

 

[Flash]

You dumb Moon Bat. You are thinking of Ensign Crusher on Star Trek. People often get those two confused.

 

[Pogo]

Actually it 'says something' about media.

Not really. Media goes where the money is and the viewers dictate that..

That's sort-of what I mean, but no, absolutely the viewers don't dictate that. The broadcaster does. I doubt any viewer petitioned mass media to 'please give us inane shows about naked people on an island forced to eat bugs, and fake wrestling, and on-stage paternity tests and oh can we have a camera truck that goes around following philanderers?" This loserist lowest common denominator swill is concocted to mine the emotions specifically because the concoctors know the somnambulist sponges will sop it up like candy.

You are directly contradicting yourself here. Stating that no one petitioned for that type of programming and then that they sop it up like sponges is directly contradictory.

The people can and do DEMAND that type pf programming and do so when they flock to it and watch it. Your premise that it is the producers forcing that content on the viewers relies on a false premise - that there are no options.

Just as hordes of people did not clamor for Detroit to make too-big inverted bathtubs that they could roll over.

The Three Lies: "This won't hurt a bit", "The check is in the mail" and "We're just giving the public what they want". Except that there actually are times when this won't hurt and the check really is in the mail.

NOBODY gives the public "what they want" over "what will sell". That whole "we're just giving the public what they want" lie is a crutch they use to avoid taking responsibility for their offering's obvious flaws.

Again, that is based on the false idea that those customers have no options.

Face the facts, there is a reason that entities like FOX and CNN absolutely blow PBS out of the water when it comes to viewership and it is NOT because people are forced into that type of content. It is because they want that content over something like actual news. If they really wanted it then they would be watching the content that is already there for them. 100 percent of ALL television viewers tuning into FOX and CNN have access to far less biased content through NPR. Every single one of them. And yet that content draws ever larger audiences. This is the same reason that Hannity and Maddow continually do FAR better than commentators like Smerconish - people WANT the divisiveness and confirmation bias and they willingly go along with it.

Do you honestly think that the media giants forced people to migrate from news shows to places like the tonight show where most youth gets news these days or can you see the truth that this is what people want and so they are getting it?

If the media were to suddenly grow a soul and start broadcasting real news in an unbiased manner all that would happen is 'news' outlets like Breitbear would become the new leaders.

The fact that people flock to this type of media says a lot more about them than it does about the media. It is not as though there are not other options out there, just that most do not want reason and discussion. They want talking points and hate.

Again, it's got nothing to do with "what they want" -- it's "what they'll accept" that's served up to them on Toiletvision, which has already indoctrinated them to sit down, shut up, and watch whatever turds we hand you. Nor does the public have any avenue to make such a request anyway.

Emotion sells, and broadcasters know that well. Aside from that, the fact that one slanted talking head is overdrawing another slanted talking head doesn't mean people are "flocking" to either one; without bothering to look it up I have no doubt both Hannity's and Maddow's ratings are dwarfed by the big hitters of those other options in that same time slot. Sitcoms, dramas, people stranded on an island eating bugs, whatever they are.

As stated above, as there are options out there your premise that they are forced into this type of 'news' is simply false.

That does not relive those entities of the responsibility that they bear but it does mean that they are not the cause but rather the symptom of a far larger problem.

You do realize that NPR and PBS are just CNN in a nicer suit, right(and CNN is just MSNBC in a very slightly nicer suit)?

Of course you do, you contemptible liar.

And yet another case in point.

Another case of ---- what? Abject stupidity? The poster makes a completely fallacious comparison attempt.

 

[Snouter]

The Doctor transgender mental case...

I was a college freshman, and I had just figured out that I was gay. I was heady with the self-importance of a 17-year-old who knows everything and is smarter than everybody—a trait that is great at the moment and really hard to live with in retrospect. I decided I was going to come out of the closet in a very confrontational way. I went to Stanford University, and there was nobody else “out” in my freshman class of more than 1,000 people—which I thought was kind of crazy. So a friend who was coming out at the same time and I did an interview with the student newspaper about being the only two gay freshmen on campus. The mistake I made was that I had not come out to my parents. I told the paper, “I will do this on the condition that you will not run the piece until after this weekend, because I will go home this weekend to tell my parents, and I want them to hear it from me instead of reading it in the paper.” And they ran it before the weekend, and indeed some anonymous person helpfully clipped the article and mailed it to my parents—and that’s how my parents found out that I was gay.

Meanwhile, while he contemplates its defective vagina, a flat chest, normal students are reading Dostoyevsky and trying to learn stuff, more concerned with mid-terms than orgasms.

 

[Witchit]

You don’t pay much attention to college kids do you? Does “spring break” ring a bell?

 

[basquebromance]

The president of the United States of America believes Jesse Watters is a reliable source of information and the Washington Post isn’t.

 

[Aba Incieni]

The Doctor transgender mental case...

I was a college freshman, and I had just figured out that I was gay. I was heady with the self-importance of a 17-year-old who knows everything and is smarter than everybody—a trait that is great at the moment and really hard to live with in retrospect. I decided I was going to come out of the closet in a very confrontational way. I went to Stanford University, and there was nobody else “out” in my freshman class of more than 1,000 people—which I thought was kind of crazy. So a friend who was coming out at the same time and I did an interview with the student newspaper about being the only two gay freshmen on campus. The mistake I made was that I had not come out to my parents. I told the paper, “I will do this on the condition that you will not run the piece until after this weekend, because I will go home this weekend to tell my parents, and I want them to hear it from me instead of reading it in the paper.” And they ran it before the weekend, and indeed some anonymous person helpfully clipped the article and mailed it to my parents—and that’s how my parents found out that I was gay.

Meanwhile, while he contemplates its defective vagina, a flat chest, normal students are reading Dostoyevsky and trying to learn stuff, more concerned with mid-terms than orgasms.

Her parents must be dotards. One glance screams penis envy dyke.

 

[Penelope]

Sean Hannity has been dethroned.

March Maddow-ness.

MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow dethroned Fox News’ Sean Hannity last month to seize the title of most-watched cable news host.

According to figures from Forbes, The Rachel Maddow Show turned in its best-ever performance with an average of 3.058 million viewers, compared to Hannity’s 3 million.

She also beat him among those aged 25-to-54 ― the demographic advertisers most covet ― with an average viewership from that group of 671,000 compared with 616,000 for Hannity.

More: Your New Most-Watched Cable News Host Is ... Rachel Maddow

Congratulations, Dr. Maddow! Go Rachel.

Is she promising more of Trump’s tax returns? lol

That stuff was sooo funny!

I infer that Trump or one of his cahoots sent her the 1040 to show at least once he did pay taxes.

 

[Penelope]

The Doctor transgender mental case...

I was a college freshman, and I had just figured out that I was gay. I was heady with the self-importance of a 17-year-old who knows everything and is smarter than everybody—a trait that is great at the moment and really hard to live with in retrospect. I decided I was going to come out of the closet in a very confrontational way. I went to Stanford University, and there was nobody else “out” in my freshman class of more than 1,000 people—which I thought was kind of crazy. So a friend who was coming out at the same time and I did an interview with the student newspaper about being the only two gay freshmen on campus. The mistake I made was that I had not come out to my parents. I told the paper, “I will do this on the condition that you will not run the piece until after this weekend, because I will go home this weekend to tell my parents, and I want them to hear it from me instead of reading it in the paper.” And they ran it before the weekend, and indeed some anonymous person helpfully clipped the article and mailed it to my parents—and that’s how my parents found out that I was gay.

Meanwhile, while he contemplates its defective vagina, a flat chest, normal students are reading Dostoyevsky and trying to learn stuff, more concerned with mid-terms than orgasms.

Her parents must be dotards. One glance screams penis envy dyke.

I'm sure they are very proud of her. Just like Cheney is proud of his dtr, and Laura Ingraham is proud of her brother.