Dr. Fauci and Dr. Birx Used Imperial College Model — NOW CONFIRMED AS A COMPLETE FRAUD — To Persuade President Trump to Lock Down Entire US Economy

If you'd check ... it was the individual State governors that shut down their states ... not the President shutting down the nation ... there's a difference ...

Not that I'm apologizing for The Donald ... he's been pointing out all the fake news swamping our media outlets and here we have a good case that "grabbing headlines" is bad for our nation ... We the People are at fault for allowing this, "2 million will die" is obviously hysteria, yet we will collectively forget by the time actual scientific numbers are published ... when will We the People punish commercial media for lying to us? ...

For the record ... the model is fine as long as the input data is good ... but as with any mathematical construct; garbage in, garbage out ... in this case, they fraudulently and grossly inflated the "rate of contagion" factor in order to generate hysterical numbers for the added profit ... how much money did commercial media pay them to make these bogus predictions? ... how much was paid to those 534 yellow-bellied cowards on Capitol Hill? ...

Don't forget to call your doctor today to find out if Zhologium™ is right for you ... you don't need toe-nail fungus when C-19 is sweeping the nation ... didn't you just hear how deadly this fungus virus can be ...
"2 million will die"

Obviously you didn't understand what was said. It was 2 million will die without mitigation.


"When asked later if he believed the death toll numbers, Trump again suggested that the higher estimate from the model was because it didn’t incorporate any mitigation efforts.

“Well, that’s with no mitigation. We’re doing mitigation. We have a lot of mitigation,” he said. “The fact that they’re out — they’re mitigating. They’re social distancing. They all know that. They’re washing their hands a lot. But we have to get our country open. We have to open our country.”

-Drumpf
The stuff about “without mitigation” was not contained in the original 1.7-2.2 million proclaimations that got us locked down.
Sure it was. Dont get infuriated because you were too dumb to understand the report. How is it that everyone else came away with that knowledge except you poor ignorant Drumpftards? Even Drumpf got that one right.
Nope. Revisionism to protect your insane agenda.
So youre claiming Drumpf didnt say this? Really?

"When asked later if he believed the death toll numbers, Trump again suggested that the higher estimate from the model was because it didn’t incorporate any mitigation efforts.

“Well, that’s with no mitigation. We’re doing mitigation. We have a lot of mitigation,” he said. “The fact that they’re out — they’re mitigating. They’re social distancing. They all know that. They’re washing their hands a lot. But we have to get our country open. We have to open our country.”

-Drumpf
What he said doesn’t relate to confirming your assertion
 
If you'd check ... it was the individual State governors that shut down their states ... not the President shutting down the nation ... there's a difference ...

Not that I'm apologizing for The Donald ... he's been pointing out all the fake news swamping our media outlets and here we have a good case that "grabbing headlines" is bad for our nation ... We the People are at fault for allowing this, "2 million will die" is obviously hysteria, yet we will collectively forget by the time actual scientific numbers are published ... when will We the People punish commercial media for lying to us? ...

For the record ... the model is fine as long as the input data is good ... but as with any mathematical construct; garbage in, garbage out ... in this case, they fraudulently and grossly inflated the "rate of contagion" factor in order to generate hysterical numbers for the added profit ... how much money did commercial media pay them to make these bogus predictions? ... how much was paid to those 534 yellow-bellied cowards on Capitol Hill? ...

Don't forget to call your doctor today to find out if Zhologium™ is right for you ... you don't need toe-nail fungus when C-19 is sweeping the nation ... didn't you just hear how deadly this fungus virus can be ...
"2 million will die"

Obviously you didn't understand what was said. It was 2 million will die without mitigation.


"When asked later if he believed the death toll numbers, Trump again suggested that the higher estimate from the model was because it didn’t incorporate any mitigation efforts.

“Well, that’s with no mitigation. We’re doing mitigation. We have a lot of mitigation,” he said. “The fact that they’re out — they’re mitigating. They’re social distancing. They all know that. They’re washing their hands a lot. But we have to get our country open. We have to open our country.”

-Drumpf
The stuff about “without mitigation” was not contained in the original 1.7-2.2 million proclaimations that got us locked down.
Sure it was. Dont get infuriated because you were too dumb to understand the report. How is it that everyone else came away with that knowledge except you poor ignorant Drumpftards? Even Drumpf got that one right.
Nope. Revisionism to protect your insane agenda.
So youre claiming Drumpf didnt say this? Really?

"When asked later if he believed the death toll numbers, Trump again suggested that the higher estimate from the model was because it didn’t incorporate any mitigation efforts.

“Well, that’s with no mitigation. We’re doing mitigation. We have a lot of mitigation,” he said. “The fact that they’re out — they’re mitigating. They’re social distancing. They all know that. They’re washing their hands a lot. But we have to get our country open. We have to open our country.”

-Drumpf
What he said doesn’t relate to confirming your assertion
My assertion is the same as his. That 2.2 million number was with no mitigation dummy.
 
I'm not quantifying it. I am saying you left that part out.

You're not quantifying the "rate of contagion"? ... then what are you basing the 2 million dead number on? ...

We have to have a base-line ... if we did nothing, how fast would this virus spread through the population? ... right now we can only guess, science will need time to properly measure ... I guess that allows for wild speculation on anybody's part ... whatever gets clicks ...

There's free software you can download and YouTube videos explaining how to set up this model ... run it yourself and see what it does ... you'll see which numbers we're guessing and which we know ...
 
If you'd check ... it was the individual State governors that shut down their states ... not the President shutting down the nation ... there's a difference ...

Not that I'm apologizing for The Donald ... he's been pointing out all the fake news swamping our media outlets and here we have a good case that "grabbing headlines" is bad for our nation ... We the People are at fault for allowing this, "2 million will die" is obviously hysteria, yet we will collectively forget by the time actual scientific numbers are published ... when will We the People punish commercial media for lying to us? ...

For the record ... the model is fine as long as the input data is good ... but as with any mathematical construct; garbage in, garbage out ... in this case, they fraudulently and grossly inflated the "rate of contagion" factor in order to generate hysterical numbers for the added profit ... how much money did commercial media pay them to make these bogus predictions? ... how much was paid to those 534 yellow-bellied cowards on Capitol Hill? ...

Don't forget to call your doctor today to find out if Zhologium™ is right for you ... you don't need toe-nail fungus when C-19 is sweeping the nation ... didn't you just hear how deadly this fungus virus can be ...
"2 million will die"

Obviously you didn't understand what was said. It was 2 million will die without mitigation.


"When asked later if he believed the death toll numbers, Trump again suggested that the higher estimate from the model was because it didn’t incorporate any mitigation efforts.

“Well, that’s with no mitigation. We’re doing mitigation. We have a lot of mitigation,” he said. “The fact that they’re out — they’re mitigating. They’re social distancing. They all know that. They’re washing their hands a lot. But we have to get our country open. We have to open our country.”

-Drumpf
The stuff about “without mitigation” was not contained in the original 1.7-2.2 million proclaimations that got us locked down.
Sure it was. Dont get infuriated because you were too dumb to understand the report. How is it that everyone else came away with that knowledge except you poor ignorant Drumpftards? Even Drumpf got that one right.
Nope. Revisionism to protect your insane agenda.
So youre claiming Drumpf didnt say this? Really?

"When asked later if he believed the death toll numbers, Trump again suggested that the higher estimate from the model was because it didn’t incorporate any mitigation efforts.

“Well, that’s with no mitigation. We’re doing mitigation. We have a lot of mitigation,” he said. “The fact that they’re out — they’re mitigating. They’re social distancing. They all know that. They’re washing their hands a lot. But we have to get our country open. We have to open our country.”

-Drumpf
What he said doesn’t relate to confirming your assertion
My assertion is the same as his. That 2.2 million number was with no mitigation dummy.
These were after the fact observations. We were closed down over bold headlines of 1.7-2.2 million fatalities projected Period.
 
If you'd check ... it was the individual State governors that shut down their states ... not the President shutting down the nation ... there's a difference ...

Not that I'm apologizing for The Donald ... he's been pointing out all the fake news swamping our media outlets and here we have a good case that "grabbing headlines" is bad for our nation ... We the People are at fault for allowing this, "2 million will die" is obviously hysteria, yet we will collectively forget by the time actual scientific numbers are published ... when will We the People punish commercial media for lying to us? ...

For the record ... the model is fine as long as the input data is good ... but as with any mathematical construct; garbage in, garbage out ... in this case, they fraudulently and grossly inflated the "rate of contagion" factor in order to generate hysterical numbers for the added profit ... how much money did commercial media pay them to make these bogus predictions? ... how much was paid to those 534 yellow-bellied cowards on Capitol Hill? ...

Don't forget to call your doctor today to find out if Zhologium™ is right for you ... you don't need toe-nail fungus when C-19 is sweeping the nation ... didn't you just hear how deadly this fungus virus can be ...
"2 million will die"

Obviously you didn't understand what was said. It was 2 million will die without mitigation.


"When asked later if he believed the death toll numbers, Trump again suggested that the higher estimate from the model was because it didn’t incorporate any mitigation efforts.

“Well, that’s with no mitigation. We’re doing mitigation. We have a lot of mitigation,” he said. “The fact that they’re out — they’re mitigating. They’re social distancing. They all know that. They’re washing their hands a lot. But we have to get our country open. We have to open our country.”

-Drumpf
The stuff about “without mitigation” was not contained in the original 1.7-2.2 million proclaimations that got us locked down.
Sure it was. Dont get infuriated because you were too dumb to understand the report. How is it that everyone else came away with that knowledge except you poor ignorant Drumpftards? Even Drumpf got that one right.
Nope. Revisionism to protect your insane agenda.
So youre claiming Drumpf didnt say this? Really?

"When asked later if he believed the death toll numbers, Trump again suggested that the higher estimate from the model was because it didn’t incorporate any mitigation efforts.

“Well, that’s with no mitigation. We’re doing mitigation. We have a lot of mitigation,” he said. “The fact that they’re out — they’re mitigating. They’re social distancing. They all know that. They’re washing their hands a lot. But we have to get our country open. We have to open our country.”

-Drumpf
What he said doesn’t relate to confirming your assertion
My assertion is the same as his. That 2.2 million number was with no mitigation dummy.

Did your doctor say Zhologium™ was right for you? ...
 
I'm not quantifying it. I am saying you left that part out.

You're not quantifying the "rate of contagion"? ... then what are you basing the 2 million dead number on? ...

We have to have a base-line ... if we did nothing, how fast would this virus spread through the population? ... right now we can only guess, science will need time to properly measure ... I guess that allows for wild speculation on anybody's part ... whatever gets clicks ...

There's free software you can download and YouTube videos explaining how to set up this model ... run it yourself and see what it does ... you'll see which numbers we're guessing and which we know ...
I'm basing it on the number that was forecast in the report that Drumpf cited.
 
If you'd check ... it was the individual State governors that shut down their states ... not the President shutting down the nation ... there's a difference ...

Not that I'm apologizing for The Donald ... he's been pointing out all the fake news swamping our media outlets and here we have a good case that "grabbing headlines" is bad for our nation ... We the People are at fault for allowing this, "2 million will die" is obviously hysteria, yet we will collectively forget by the time actual scientific numbers are published ... when will We the People punish commercial media for lying to us? ...

For the record ... the model is fine as long as the input data is good ... but as with any mathematical construct; garbage in, garbage out ... in this case, they fraudulently and grossly inflated the "rate of contagion" factor in order to generate hysterical numbers for the added profit ... how much money did commercial media pay them to make these bogus predictions? ... how much was paid to those 534 yellow-bellied cowards on Capitol Hill? ...

Don't forget to call your doctor today to find out if Zhologium™ is right for you ... you don't need toe-nail fungus when C-19 is sweeping the nation ... didn't you just hear how deadly this fungus virus can be ...
"2 million will die"

Obviously you didn't understand what was said. It was 2 million will die without mitigation.


"When asked later if he believed the death toll numbers, Trump again suggested that the higher estimate from the model was because it didn’t incorporate any mitigation efforts.

“Well, that’s with no mitigation. We’re doing mitigation. We have a lot of mitigation,” he said. “The fact that they’re out — they’re mitigating. They’re social distancing. They all know that. They’re washing their hands a lot. But we have to get our country open. We have to open our country.”

-Drumpf
The stuff about “without mitigation” was not contained in the original 1.7-2.2 million proclaimations that got us locked down.
Sure it was. Dont get infuriated because you were too dumb to understand the report. How is it that everyone else came away with that knowledge except you poor ignorant Drumpftards? Even Drumpf got that one right.
Nope. Revisionism to protect your insane agenda.
So youre claiming Drumpf didnt say this? Really?

"When asked later if he believed the death toll numbers, Trump again suggested that the higher estimate from the model was because it didn’t incorporate any mitigation efforts.

“Well, that’s with no mitigation. We’re doing mitigation. We have a lot of mitigation,” he said. “The fact that they’re out — they’re mitigating. They’re social distancing. They all know that. They’re washing their hands a lot. But we have to get our country open. We have to open our country.”

-Drumpf
What he said doesn’t relate to confirming your assertion
My assertion is the same as his. That 2.2 million number was with no mitigation dummy.

Did your doctor say Zhologium™ was right for you? ...
Is that what your doctor told you?
 
If you'd check ... it was the individual State governors that shut down their states ... not the President shutting down the nation ... there's a difference ...

Not that I'm apologizing for The Donald ... he's been pointing out all the fake news swamping our media outlets and here we have a good case that "grabbing headlines" is bad for our nation ... We the People are at fault for allowing this, "2 million will die" is obviously hysteria, yet we will collectively forget by the time actual scientific numbers are published ... when will We the People punish commercial media for lying to us? ...

For the record ... the model is fine as long as the input data is good ... but as with any mathematical construct; garbage in, garbage out ... in this case, they fraudulently and grossly inflated the "rate of contagion" factor in order to generate hysterical numbers for the added profit ... how much money did commercial media pay them to make these bogus predictions? ... how much was paid to those 534 yellow-bellied cowards on Capitol Hill? ...

Don't forget to call your doctor today to find out if Zhologium™ is right for you ... you don't need toe-nail fungus when C-19 is sweeping the nation ... didn't you just hear how deadly this fungus virus can be ...
"2 million will die"

Obviously you didn't understand what was said. It was 2 million will die without mitigation.


"When asked later if he believed the death toll numbers, Trump again suggested that the higher estimate from the model was because it didn’t incorporate any mitigation efforts.

“Well, that’s with no mitigation. We’re doing mitigation. We have a lot of mitigation,” he said. “The fact that they’re out — they’re mitigating. They’re social distancing. They all know that. They’re washing their hands a lot. But we have to get our country open. We have to open our country.”

-Drumpf
The stuff about “without mitigation” was not contained in the original 1.7-2.2 million proclaimations that got us locked down.
Sure it was. Dont get infuriated because you were too dumb to understand the report. How is it that everyone else came away with that knowledge except you poor ignorant Drumpftards? Even Drumpf got that one right.
Nope. Revisionism to protect your insane agenda.
So youre claiming Drumpf didnt say this? Really?

"When asked later if he believed the death toll numbers, Trump again suggested that the higher estimate from the model was because it didn’t incorporate any mitigation efforts.

“Well, that’s with no mitigation. We’re doing mitigation. We have a lot of mitigation,” he said. “The fact that they’re out — they’re mitigating. They’re social distancing. They all know that. They’re washing their hands a lot. But we have to get our country open. We have to open our country.”

-Drumpf
What he said doesn’t relate to confirming your assertion
My assertion is the same as his. That 2.2 million number was with no mitigation dummy.
These were after the fact observations. We were closed down over bold headlines of 1.7-2.2 million fatalities projected Period.
Just because you were too stupid to know that was "without mitigation" doesnt mean everyone else shares your stupidity. What kind of idiot thinks that many people are going to die if you take protective measures like closing down?
 
If you'd check ... it was the individual State governors that shut down their states ... not the President shutting down the nation ... there's a difference ...

Not that I'm apologizing for The Donald ... he's been pointing out all the fake news swamping our media outlets and here we have a good case that "grabbing headlines" is bad for our nation ... We the People are at fault for allowing this, "2 million will die" is obviously hysteria, yet we will collectively forget by the time actual scientific numbers are published ... when will We the People punish commercial media for lying to us? ...

For the record ... the model is fine as long as the input data is good ... but as with any mathematical construct; garbage in, garbage out ... in this case, they fraudulently and grossly inflated the "rate of contagion" factor in order to generate hysterical numbers for the added profit ... how much money did commercial media pay them to make these bogus predictions? ... how much was paid to those 534 yellow-bellied cowards on Capitol Hill? ...

Don't forget to call your doctor today to find out if Zhologium™ is right for you ... you don't need toe-nail fungus when C-19 is sweeping the nation ... didn't you just hear how deadly this fungus virus can be ...
"2 million will die"

Obviously you didn't understand what was said. It was 2 million will die without mitigation.


"When asked later if he believed the death toll numbers, Trump again suggested that the higher estimate from the model was because it didn’t incorporate any mitigation efforts.

“Well, that’s with no mitigation. We’re doing mitigation. We have a lot of mitigation,” he said. “The fact that they’re out — they’re mitigating. They’re social distancing. They all know that. They’re washing their hands a lot. But we have to get our country open. We have to open our country.”

-Drumpf
The stuff about “without mitigation” was not contained in the original 1.7-2.2 million proclaimations that got us locked down.
Sure it was. Dont get infuriated because you were too dumb to understand the report. How is it that everyone else came away with that knowledge except you poor ignorant Drumpftards? Even Drumpf got that one right.
Nope. Revisionism to protect your insane agenda.
So youre claiming Drumpf didnt say this? Really?

"When asked later if he believed the death toll numbers, Trump again suggested that the higher estimate from the model was because it didn’t incorporate any mitigation efforts.

“Well, that’s with no mitigation. We’re doing mitigation. We have a lot of mitigation,” he said. “The fact that they’re out — they’re mitigating. They’re social distancing. They all know that. They’re washing their hands a lot. But we have to get our country open. We have to open our country.”

-Drumpf
What he said doesn’t relate to confirming your assertion
My assertion is the same as his. That 2.2 million number was with no mitigation dummy.
These were after the fact observations. We were closed down over bold headlines of 1.7-2.2 million fatalities projected Period.
Just because you were too stupid to know that was "without mitigation" doesnt mean everyone else shares your stupidity. What kind of idiot thinks that many people are going to die if you take protective measures?
Your MSM blared the headlines 1.7-2.2 to die. That’s what got you candy assed liars scared shitless and over course of time those numbers were shown to be absurd so you went on the defensive and added the “without mitigation” on page 32 after the fake front page headlines. You all ALWAYS fall back on “ we did not say that” when you are busted and bested
 
If you'd check ... it was the individual State governors that shut down their states ... not the President shutting down the nation ... there's a difference ...

Not that I'm apologizing for The Donald ... he's been pointing out all the fake news swamping our media outlets and here we have a good case that "grabbing headlines" is bad for our nation ... We the People are at fault for allowing this, "2 million will die" is obviously hysteria, yet we will collectively forget by the time actual scientific numbers are published ... when will We the People punish commercial media for lying to us? ...

For the record ... the model is fine as long as the input data is good ... but as with any mathematical construct; garbage in, garbage out ... in this case, they fraudulently and grossly inflated the "rate of contagion" factor in order to generate hysterical numbers for the added profit ... how much money did commercial media pay them to make these bogus predictions? ... how much was paid to those 534 yellow-bellied cowards on Capitol Hill? ...

Don't forget to call your doctor today to find out if Zhologium™ is right for you ... you don't need toe-nail fungus when C-19 is sweeping the nation ... didn't you just hear how deadly this fungus virus can be ...
"2 million will die"

Obviously you didn't understand what was said. It was 2 million will die without mitigation.


"When asked later if he believed the death toll numbers, Trump again suggested that the higher estimate from the model was because it didn’t incorporate any mitigation efforts.

“Well, that’s with no mitigation. We’re doing mitigation. We have a lot of mitigation,” he said. “The fact that they’re out — they’re mitigating. They’re social distancing. They all know that. They’re washing their hands a lot. But we have to get our country open. We have to open our country.”

-Drumpf
The stuff about “without mitigation” was not contained in the original 1.7-2.2 million proclaimations that got us locked down.
Sure it was. Dont get infuriated because you were too dumb to understand the report. How is it that everyone else came away with that knowledge except you poor ignorant Drumpftards? Even Drumpf got that one right.
Nope. Revisionism to protect your insane agenda.
So youre claiming Drumpf didnt say this? Really?

"When asked later if he believed the death toll numbers, Trump again suggested that the higher estimate from the model was because it didn’t incorporate any mitigation efforts.

“Well, that’s with no mitigation. We’re doing mitigation. We have a lot of mitigation,” he said. “The fact that they’re out — they’re mitigating. They’re social distancing. They all know that. They’re washing their hands a lot. But we have to get our country open. We have to open our country.”

-Drumpf
What he said doesn’t relate to confirming your assertion
My assertion is the same as his. That 2.2 million number was with no mitigation dummy.
These were after the fact observations. We were closed down over bold headlines of 1.7-2.2 million fatalities projected Period.
Just because you were too stupid to know that was "without mitigation" doesnt mean everyone else shares your stupidity. What kind of idiot thinks that many people are going to die if you take protective measures?
Your MSM blared the headlines 1.7-2.2 to die. That’s what got you candy assed liars scared shitless and over course of time those numbers were shown to be absurd so you went on the defensive and added the “without mitigation” on page 32 after the fake front page headlines. You all ALWAYS fall back on “ we did not say that” when you are busted and bested
Well you know what you can do to convince me right? Show me a link that says 2.2 million are going to die without it mentioning that number is without mitigation. Can you do that? Yeah I though not.
 
I leave the verification to the experts. I don't have a degree in virology or disease forecasting and modeling. Are you saying you have verified the number?

I've made no claims ... you have ... I'm just pointing out how easy it is to commit fraud with these mathematical models ... I'm not saying there was fraud, more of over-reaction, we don't know if these extreme mitigation efforts work all that well, as measured against the financial hardships we will be enduring ...
 

Forum List

Back
Top