What does the data and facts say?
This is a really good read.Lawfare:
You can live out the rest of your life being a fool, a useful idiot, and a tool to your lying leftist-infiltrated Trump-hating media if you want to, that's all fine and dandy with me.
But I'll let you in on a little secret: Most of us knew the "dossier" was bogus from the start.
This is the part where I throw back my head and laugh derisively.
The Steele Dossier: A Retrospective
[ The dossier is actually a series of reports—16 in all—that total 35 pages. Written in 2016, the dossier is a collection of raw intelligence. Steele neither evaluated nor synthesized the intelligence. He neither made nor rendered bottom-line judgments. The dossier is, quite simply and by design, raw reporting, not a finished intelligence product.
In that sense, the dossier is similar to an FBI 302 form or a DEA 6 form. Both of those forms are used by special agents of the FBI and DEA, respectively, to record what they are told by witnesses during investigations. The substance of these memoranda can be true or false, but the recording of information is (or should be) accurate. In that sense, notes taken by a special agent have much in common with the notes that a journalist might take while covering a story—the substance of those notes could be true or false, depending on what the source tells the journalist, but the transcription should be accurate. ]
read the letter, and thenabout ignorance
I read it...…
All the participants involved in pushing this bull shit should be in prison.
Your comment makes absolutely no sense given the context of what is being discussed. Not liking the fact that an investigation is ongoing, does not show the investigation to be unwarranted.
again: Lawfare:
The Steele Dossier: A Retrospective
and the Rosenstein letter together, prove you to be 'out there' somewhere
This is a really good read.Lawfare:
You can live out the rest of your life being a fool, a useful idiot, and a tool to your lying leftist-infiltrated Trump-hating media if you want to, that's all fine and dandy with me.
But I'll let you in on a little secret: Most of us knew the "dossier" was bogus from the start.
This is the part where I throw back my head and laugh derisively.
The Steele Dossier: A Retrospective
[ The dossier is actually a series of reports—16 in all—that total 35 pages. Written in 2016, the dossier is a collection of raw intelligence. Steele neither evaluated nor synthesized the intelligence. He neither made nor rendered bottom-line judgments. The dossier is, quite simply and by design, raw reporting, not a finished intelligence product.
In that sense, the dossier is similar to an FBI 302 form or a DEA 6 form. Both of those forms are used by special agents of the FBI and DEA, respectively, to record what they are told by witnesses during investigations. The substance of these memoranda can be true or false, but the recording of information is (or should be) accurate. In that sense, notes taken by a special agent have much in common with the notes that a journalist might take while covering a story—the substance of those notes could be true or false, depending on what the source tells the journalist, but the transcription should be accurate. ]
Written by the Russians?
Without the Russians, Trump wouldn’t have won
By Max Boot
Columnist
July 24
Washington Post: Breaking News, World, US, DC News & Analysis
Yes, Russian Election Sabotage Helped Trump Win
Republicans want you to think that meddling didn’t figure in the 2016 election result. Don’t.
By
Albert R. Hunt
July 24, 2018
Bloomberg - Are you a robot?
[ Former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper now says the evidence that Russian President Vladimir Putin swung the election to Trump “is staggering.” Noting that fewer than 80,000 votes in Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin decided the contest, he wrote in a book released in May, “I have no doubt that more votes than that were influenced by the massive effort by the Russians.” ]
How Russia Helped Swing the Election for Trump
A meticulous analysis of online activity during the 2016 campaign makes a powerful case that targeted cyberattacks by hackers and trolls were decisive.
By Jane Mayer
October 1, 2018 Issue
How Russia Helped Swing the Election for Trump
good gawd, the deflections, the red herring, the bs.This is a really good read.Lawfare:
You can live out the rest of your life being a fool, a useful idiot, and a tool to your lying leftist-infiltrated Trump-hating media if you want to, that's all fine and dandy with me.
But I'll let you in on a little secret: Most of us knew the "dossier" was bogus from the start.
This is the part where I throw back my head and laugh derisively.
The Steele Dossier: A Retrospective
[ The dossier is actually a series of reports—16 in all—that total 35 pages. Written in 2016, the dossier is a collection of raw intelligence. Steele neither evaluated nor synthesized the intelligence. He neither made nor rendered bottom-line judgments. The dossier is, quite simply and by design, raw reporting, not a finished intelligence product.
In that sense, the dossier is similar to an FBI 302 form or a DEA 6 form. Both of those forms are used by special agents of the FBI and DEA, respectively, to record what they are told by witnesses during investigations. The substance of these memoranda can be true or false, but the recording of information is (or should be) accurate. In that sense, notes taken by a special agent have much in common with the notes that a journalist might take while covering a story—the substance of those notes could be true or false, depending on what the source tells the journalist, but the transcription should be accurate. ]
Suppose I wanted a FISA warrant to spy on you. And suppose the justification for the warrant could be "true or false, depending on what the source" tells the judge, even though the transcription was "accurate."
How would you feel then?
Your problem is that you have blinders on when you come to your TDS.....not a word about him pulling troops out of the ME. I thought that was a BIG DEAL for you people....you all went crazy when we had Gulf war I and Ii... so we put little value to what you spew!The full context of Isikoff’s interview makes it clear, though, that Trump is overstating the extent to which he can claim to have been vindicated in the matter. “In broad strokes, Christopher Steele was clearly onto something,” Isikoff said in the interview, which was posted Saturday. “That there was a major Kremlin effort to interfere in our elections, that they were trying to help Trump’s campaign, and that there were multiple contacts between various Russian figures close to the government and various people in Trump’s campaign.”
Trump cites Yahoo News' Michael Isikoff in claiming vindication on 'Steele dossier'
By more sensational I think he is referring to the "golden showers".
Only irrelevant if you want to spin and play games. If the Chinese or Russians helped elect Hillary, you loons would be having conniptions.
Without the Russians, Trump wouldn’t have won
By Max Boot
Columnist
July 24
Washington Post: Breaking News, World, US, DC News & Analysis
Yes, Russian Election Sabotage Helped Trump Win
Republicans want you to think that meddling didn’t figure in the 2016 election result. Don’t.
By
Albert R. Hunt
July 24, 2018
Bloomberg - Are you a robot?
[ Former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper now says the evidence that Russian President Vladimir Putin swung the election to Trump “is staggering.” Noting that fewer than 80,000 votes in Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin decided the contest, he wrote in a book released in May, “I have no doubt that more votes than that were influenced by the massive effort by the Russians.” ]
How Russia Helped Swing the Election for Trump
A meticulous analysis of online activity during the 2016 campaign makes a powerful case that targeted cyberattacks by hackers and trolls were decisive.
By Jane Mayer
October 1, 2018 Issue
How Russia Helped Swing the Election for Trump
Whether the Russians had anything to do with Trump winning is purely academic and has reached the point of being irrelevant.
But if they did, that's fine with me. There's also nothing you can do about it, so might as well enjoy the freedom President Trump has given you.
good gawd, the deflections, the red herring, the bs.This is a really good read.Lawfare:
You can live out the rest of your life being a fool, a useful idiot, and a tool to your lying leftist-infiltrated Trump-hating media if you want to, that's all fine and dandy with me.
But I'll let you in on a little secret: Most of us knew the "dossier" was bogus from the start.
This is the part where I throw back my head and laugh derisively.
The Steele Dossier: A Retrospective
[ The dossier is actually a series of reports—16 in all—that total 35 pages. Written in 2016, the dossier is a collection of raw intelligence. Steele neither evaluated nor synthesized the intelligence. He neither made nor rendered bottom-line judgments. The dossier is, quite simply and by design, raw reporting, not a finished intelligence product.
In that sense, the dossier is similar to an FBI 302 form or a DEA 6 form. Both of those forms are used by special agents of the FBI and DEA, respectively, to record what they are told by witnesses during investigations. The substance of these memoranda can be true or false, but the recording of information is (or should be) accurate. In that sense, notes taken by a special agent have much in common with the notes that a journalist might take while covering a story—the substance of those notes could be true or false, depending on what the source tells the journalist, but the transcription should be accurate. ]
Suppose I wanted a FISA warrant to spy on you. And suppose the justification for the warrant could be "true or false, depending on what the source" tells the judge, even though the transcription was "accurate."
How would you feel then?
The FISA warrant needs to be attacked to protect the guilty. Stop acting like a defense lawyer for a cheap thug, a Mutt (thank you DiNiro) like Trump.
and notice none of the wingnuts address the points made, because they haven't the taking points in hand.. so they deflect and play silly little gamesThis is a really good read.Lawfare:
You can live out the rest of your life being a fool, a useful idiot, and a tool to your lying leftist-infiltrated Trump-hating media if you want to, that's all fine and dandy with me.
But I'll let you in on a little secret: Most of us knew the "dossier" was bogus from the start.
This is the part where I throw back my head and laugh derisively.
The Steele Dossier: A Retrospective
[ The dossier is actually a series of reports—16 in all—that total 35 pages. Written in 2016, the dossier is a collection of raw intelligence. Steele neither evaluated nor synthesized the intelligence. He neither made nor rendered bottom-line judgments. The dossier is, quite simply and by design, raw reporting, not a finished intelligence product.
In that sense, the dossier is similar to an FBI 302 form or a DEA 6 form. Both of those forms are used by special agents of the FBI and DEA, respectively, to record what they are told by witnesses during investigations. The substance of these memoranda can be true or false, but the recording of information is (or should be) accurate. In that sense, notes taken by a special agent have much in common with the notes that a journalist might take while covering a story—the substance of those notes could be true or false, depending on what the source tells the journalist, but the transcription should be accurate. ]
somebody save this post
your projections mirror the way Trump walks through life'read the letter, and then
I read it...…
All the participants involved in pushing this bull shit should be in prison.
Your comment makes absolutely no sense given the context of what is being discussed. Not liking the fact that an investigation is ongoing, does not show the investigation to be unwarranted.
again: Lawfare:
The Steele Dossier: A Retrospective
and the Rosenstein letter together, prove you to be 'out there' somewhere
Your denial of reality doesn’t make sense….
You know if the situation were reversed you
would have a different perspective.
You and many like you are ate up with Zealotry.
It’s a fool that has a closed mind…..
You libtards are all fools.
Only irrelevant if you want to spin and play games. If the Chinese or Russians helped elect Hillary, you loons would be having conniptions.
Without the Russians, Trump wouldn’t have won
By Max Boot
Columnist
July 24
Washington Post: Breaking News, World, US, DC News & Analysis
Yes, Russian Election Sabotage Helped Trump Win
Republicans want you to think that meddling didn’t figure in the 2016 election result. Don’t.
By
Albert R. Hunt
July 24, 2018
Bloomberg - Are you a robot?
[ Former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper now says the evidence that Russian President Vladimir Putin swung the election to Trump “is staggering.” Noting that fewer than 80,000 votes in Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin decided the contest, he wrote in a book released in May, “I have no doubt that more votes than that were influenced by the massive effort by the Russians.” ]
How Russia Helped Swing the Election for Trump
A meticulous analysis of online activity during the 2016 campaign makes a powerful case that targeted cyberattacks by hackers and trolls were decisive.
By Jane Mayer
October 1, 2018 Issue
How Russia Helped Swing the Election for Trump
Whether the Russians had anything to do with Trump winning is purely academic and has reached the point of being irrelevant.
But if they did, that's fine with me. There's also nothing you can do about it, so might as well enjoy the freedom President Trump has given you.
Trump gives freedoms? LOL Why do we even a a constitution, when we have your Dear Leader?
