Really? So why did gasoline skyrocket to nearly $4 per gallon during the Obama reign of terror? Where did all of these billion and billion barrels of oil go that Bush's boys secured and brought home?!?Oh the irony....nobody has pissed on the values those brave men fought for more than Hillary. She's a pathological liar (I know damn well those men didn't die for the "value" of lying). She's a violated the U.S. Constitution (I know damn well those men didn't die for the "value" of violating the supreme law of the land). She's been involved in cover ups (I know damn well those men didn't die for the "value" of destroying government transparency).
Hillary Clinton @HillaryClinton 11h11 hours ago
72 years after #DDay, let's not just eulogize the brave men who gave their lives. Let's honor them by defending the values they fought for.
1,482 retweets 3,900 likes
Seems Hillary said the same thing.
Amazing how people will twist the facts, hey?
Well, I'd say Bush Dubya pissed on those who fought more than Hillary. He sent them to war in order to make his buddies rich. None of his buddies came back dead or with body parts missing. They just ended up richer.
So according to your tortured logic, he decided not to fix elections that would deliver him a congress that would give him anything he wanted?
Um.....and why would he "need Congress"? Remember - he has a "pen and a phone" and mindless minions like you that support whatever unconstitutional actions he takes. He certainly didn't need Congress when he altered gun laws. He certainly didn't need Congress when he granted amnesty. He certainly didn't need Congress when he entered into "climate change" agreements. I could go on - but I think this is sufficient for illustrating the flaw in your argument.
By the way - I think there is one more important distinction to make. Obama has proven himself completely tone-deaf on everything from the geopolitical spectrum to national security to his constituents and more. Remember when Mitt Romney humiliated him in the debates on all of these issues and history has now proven Mitt right? Well - Obama was too stupid to see the ass-kicking coming. He was tone-deaf (as usual) when he pushed Obamacare against the outraged American people. Not that it would have mattered though. He wouldn't stick his neck out for anybody else other than himself. Especially since in his mind he doesn't need Congress. He ignores the U.S. Constitution just like you do.
So according to your tortured logic, he decided not to fix elections that would deliver him a congress that would give him anything he wanted?
Um.....and why would he "need Congress"? Remember - he has a "pen and a phone" and mindless minions like you that support whatever unconstitutional actions he takes. He certainly didn't need Congress when he altered gun laws. He certainly didn't need Congress when he granted amnesty. He certainly didn't need Congress when he entered into "climate change" agreements. I could go on - but I think this is sufficient for illustrating the flaw in your argument.
By the way - I think there is one more important distinction to make. Obama has proven himself completely tone-deaf on everything from the geopolitical spectrum to national security to his constituents and more. Remember when Mitt Romney humiliated him in the debates on all of these issues and history has now proven Mitt right? Well - Obama was too stupid to see the ass-kicking coming. He was tone-deaf (as usual) when he pushed Obamacare against the outraged American people. Not that it would have mattered though. He wouldn't stick his neck out for anybody else other than himself. Especially since in his mind he doesn't need Congress. He ignores the U.S. Constitution just like you do.
So according to your tortured logic, he decided not to fix elections that would deliver him a congress that would give him anything he wanted?
Um.....and why would he "need Congress"? Remember - he has a "pen and a phone" and mindless minions like you that support whatever unconstitutional actions he takes. He certainly didn't need Congress when he altered gun laws. He certainly didn't need Congress when he granted amnesty. He certainly didn't need Congress when he entered into "climate change" agreements. I could go on - but I think this is sufficient for illustrating the flaw in your argument.
By the way - I think there is one more important distinction to make. Obama has proven himself completely tone-deaf on everything from the geopolitical spectrum to national security to his constituents and more. Remember when Mitt Romney humiliated him in the debates on all of these issues and history has now proven Mitt right? Well - Obama was too stupid to see the ass-kicking coming. He was tone-deaf (as usual) when he pushed Obamacare against the outraged American people. Not that it would have mattered though. He wouldn't stick his neck out for anybody else other than himself. Especially since in his mind he doesn't need Congress. He ignores the U.S. Constitution just like you do.
You should give up thinking, you have zero idea how to do it and when you try, you sound like a ******* moron.
Your premise is that Obama has the ability to fix elections and that somehow and for some reason he decided not to engineer the outcomes of off year elections.
Comical doesn't begin to describe it.
But wait, it gets better. 2014, according to you, was not rigged because of the 2012 IRS scandal and the congressional scrutiny that would come with it. Yet when you are asked how Romney won any States or how the GOP won any seats in 2012 or 2010, mysteriously , Obama decided to allow the Repubs some victories.
Why would he do that?
You just proved my point, asshole.[/QUOTE]
you are a fat dog bimbo....
