They don't simply take the asset away. What they do is force the sale of it to a new owner, exactly what is happening. They have to approve the new owner but sterling can pick who he wants to sell it to. It does not seem that he is very cooperative though so they will force the sale either way. Sterling still get the proceeds which is why he also 2 billion richer for an asset that he paid less than 100 million for. MASSIVE profit margin.
My understanding was that they preferred the team be sold, but that they would vote to terminate his ownership if it wasn't. That doesn't sound like they would be forcing the sale.
Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk