Don t Let Anybody Tell You That Businesses Create Jobs

The customer base doesn't happen unless there's a product or service to sell. Supply side economics does work, you're full of shit and never operated a one man business.

Employees spend money, as the business grows it hires, builds and invests more. All of that raises the tide of economics. People wanting something doesn't do shit. People wanted cool air before air conditioners were invented.

In all fairness, he sits in his moms basement and his friends text him "dude, got any weed?" So he figures that the sales he does are driven by demand. His customers demand he sell to them.

Yeah he refused to comment on grocery stores which run on a notoriously small profit margin, kinda like his brain, notoriously small ................
 
Yeah he refused to comment on grocery stores which run on a notoriously small profit margin, kinda like his brain, notoriously small ................
Many restaurants run on very thin margins as well. Any increase in overhead could kill them. But he flies around in his jet and can't be bothered with the little people.
 
I haven't read much of this thread since you showed up, but let me just tell you something I've observed as a MACRO ******* ECONOMIST.

I know dozens and dozens and dozens of very wealthy people, very talented people, very "educated" people, people with fancy titles like General or Company President or Doctor or Lawyer who don't know shit about how the macro economy works.

Don't know shit.

I can now add you to my long list.

Why would they need too? Doctor and Lawyer are specialized degrees. A GM handles day-to-day operation of a company. A Company President provides an extended business platform for expansion and hires an Economist since Economist is a specialized degree.

Since you're a 'MFE' I have a question for you. What year was the greatest economic increase for the middle class? I'll give you a hint; The pro-Union Republicans helped make it happen.
 
Yeah he refused to comment on grocery stores which run on a notoriously small profit margin, kinda like his brain, notoriously small ................

When I was working on my MBA, a team I was on did a project on Vons, a California grocery chain. It was startling what a thin margin they ran on. Loss of a day's dairy or a weeks produce would put them in the red for 6 months. The store we studied was on the brink of bankruptcy at all times. The GM said "that's just the business."
 
I'm simply putting a kabosh on the belief that owning a business is some type of complicated endeavor.

Yes, but you're an ignorant troll who sells weed out of moms basement and thinks you have a business.


Not true, he said has more money and a bigger dick than anyone on this board.

What was that, you say he is a bigger dick than anyone on this forum??

Yup and he bragged about them 20 year old's he used it on.
 
Hi 1%
1. If you believe in paying 23.50 per hour, why not set an example and pay this yourself to the workers of your company who built it for you? Go back amd calculate paying them 23.50 an hour and see if you would still make tens of millions selling your Company.

The lowest hourly rate I pay is $23.50/hr, plus company paid PPO PLUS Aflac type supplemental, PLUS a European based vacation program with four weeks paid at five years. The company netted 20% last year.

2. When the Greens help cmunities issues local currency, they set up the rates themselves. They dont wait for govt or fed. So they practice what they preach, dont preach to others what to practice.
Its all by free market choice!

There is no free market, it's fixed.

3. Thanks for answering honestly that you did NOT treat the employees as equal owners and builders of your company. You can always go back and pay them equal shares if you REALLY believed and valued them equally.

My company isn't an employees owned company.

So you agree that you should have
More say as the owner.

As far as expansion, yes. Day-to-day operations are controlled by field teams using set parameters based on safety, goals, and quality.

Wouldnt it be exploitation not to pay them equally if you really believe your employees built your company and did all the work for you?

Exploitation is a Republican ideology. I'm not a Republican.

So now I will change the Bullring challenge to either pay your workers backpay at 23.50 per hour ie the difference you owe them
Or split the sales value with them

Or admit you either DONT believe the workers really did all that work for you but you created and provided equal services to them in jobs and what you paid per hour already, which is the point about businesses providing stable work for ppl,
Or admit you are a hypocrite for saying one thing but not doing it
With your company when you did
Exactly what the people are saying-that the owners like you
Provide a higher level of mgmt than the workers in building and making the busness work.

I challenge you to pay back 5 million to your workers or else
Raise 5 million in capital to create campus that teaches workers to build their own businesses like you did.

so you will NOT be a hypocrite but you will practice the points you preach. Let's build a campus to train ppl, i'm with you on this as a fellow Democrat, Green supporter of sustainable fair trade, and of the
Occupy volunteers that liked the plan to set up historic houses for Vets in a campus setting with work and educational internships and services on site. Thanks! I hope you accept the Bullring challemge
To prove you really believe in
Practicing your own principles....

I don't for a minute believe you are a Democrat.

I believe that the minimum wage for all jobs in the US should be $23.50/hr, which is what I pay, so how could I be a hypocrite?
 
I'm simply putting a kabosh on the belief that owning a business is some type of complicated endeavor.

Yes, but you're an ignorant troll who sells weed out of moms basement and thinks you have a business.


Not true, he said has more money and a bigger dick than anyone on this board.

What was that, you say he is a bigger dick than anyone on this forum??

Yup and he bragged about them 20 year old's he used it on.

I thought they had to be 21 to get into the gay bath houses? :dunno:
 
[QUOTE="EconChick, post: 10071076, member: 47383"
I love it when a Democrat elitist talks about making employees bust their buts for him. LOL.

Hypocrisy much? LMAO[/QUOTE]

I pay them very well to do it. If I didn't, I'd be a Republican.
 
I'm simply putting a kabosh on the belief that owning a business is some type of complicated endeavor.

Yes, but you're an ignorant troll who sells weed out of moms basement and thinks you have a business.


Not true, he said has more money and a bigger dick than anyone on this board.

What was that, you say he is a bigger dick than anyone on this forum??

Yup and he bragged about them 20 year old's he used it on.


Wait it's all becoming quite clearly now, someone told him to put his money into "houses and lots", so he bought two whore "houses" with hopes of having "lots" of *****, wasn't quite the business man he had thought he was so he had to run things by "hand" until he could find a rube to sell off to ........................
 
I don't for a minute believe you are a Democrat.

I believe that the minimum wage for all jobs in the US should be $23.50/hr, which is what I pay, so how could I be a hypocrite?

I don't believe for a moment that you've ever held a job, much less turned a profit.

Nor does anyone else on the board.

man-with-empty-pockets-blink-images.jpg
 
Last edited:
Demand comes from people with jobs, so saying "demand creates jobs" is circular logic. What you're saying is that jobs create themselves, or that demand creates demand. Only a libturd could possibly swallow such "logic."

So we should gear ALL business subsidies toward employees. THANK YOU!!!!!!
 
[QUOTE="EconChick, post: 10071087, member: 47383"
You're a dead on ringer, alright.

You should run for president. Democrat that is.....you're too elitist for us little conservative people.[/QUOTE]

Unless you're a rich white guy you're not a true conservative.....you're cheap.
 
15th post
Demand comes from people with jobs, so saying "demand creates jobs" is circular logic. What you're saying is that jobs create themselves, or that demand creates demand. Only a libturd could possibly swallow such "logic."

So we should gear ALL business subsidies toward employees. THANK YOU!!!!!!

Why do we need to give subsidies??
 
Why would they need too? Doctor and Lawyer are specialized degrees. A GM handles day-to-day operation of a company. A Company President provides an extended business platform for expansion and hires an Economist since Economist is a specialized degree.

Since you're a 'MFE' I have a question for you. What year was the greatest economic increase for the middle class? I'll give you a hint; The pro-Union Republicans helped make it happen.


Yo Mr. Business mogul;

In business, the term "P&L" stands for;

A.) Production and Labor
B.) Pulleys and Levers
C.) ***** and Lube

G&A is

A.) Gigantic Assets
B.) Galvanized and Amalgamated
C.) Gross and Astounding

The "Bottom Line" is;

A.) The last rung on a ladde
B.) The lowest possible amount you can pay a worker to exploit them
C.) The thick, bold line at the bottom of a power point, below which you put your name.

"Full Tag" refers to;

A.) The big square tag on underwear
B.) hitting with the full hand when playing tag
C.) Some type of HTML

Answer these and prove you really know something about business....
 
Demand comes from people with jobs, so saying "demand creates jobs" is circular logic. What you're saying is that jobs create themselves, or that demand creates demand. Only a libturd could possibly swallow such "logic."

So we should gear ALL business subsidies toward employees. THANK YOU!!!!!!

I asked why we need to give subsidies and you do not answer, I can only presume you just do not know ...................

sub·si·dy
ˈsəbsədē/
noun
plural noun: subsidies
  1. 1.
    a sum of money granted by the government or a public body to assist an industry or business so that the price of a commodity or service may remain low or competitive.
    "a farm subsidy"
  2. 2.
    historical
    a parliamentary grant to the sovereign for state needs.
    • a tax levied on a particular occasion.
Origin

So if the point is to keep goods or services low and competitive how again would paying the employee accomplish this??

See, when you break it down to plain and simple English that any moron can understand your suggestions screams STUPIDITY!!!
 
Back
Top Bottom