What's new
US Message Board 🦅 Political Discussion Forum

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Dominion Had To Use ‘Extraordinary Measures’ To Serve Sidney Powell In Defamation Lawsuit

Juicin

Gold Member
Joined
Mar 2, 2016
Messages
4,594
Reaction score
1,367
Points
210
Protected speech nothing will happen

Anyone hoping for a different outcome is an idiot

What are you worried about? The value of these companies/ Fucking wanna be lefties can't even do that right

Let's all cheer on silencing dissent over VOTING MACHINES. great idea.

You stupid fucks are out of control this is why people voted for trump. Both sides full of retards who cares
 

Fort Fun Indiana

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2017
Messages
59,607
Reaction score
12,765
Points
2,220
In lawsuits there is a thing called 'Discovery"

We have seen liars and cheaters on the Left cover their tracks repeatedly.
In fact, it is their mode of operation. Tons of examples exist. The Broward Supervisor of elections illegally burning ballots in 2012 for example in a democrat fortress.

Democrats have been playing dirty for so long (and getting away with it thanks to a cooperative Establishment) that they no longer feel obligated to follow ANY rules.
You forgot to make any points, there. Discovery? Did you read too many wingnut blogs and think Dominion would have to unveil all their info in these lawsuits? Because they don't.
 
OP
Magnus

Magnus

Diamond Member
Joined
Jun 22, 2020
Messages
1,756
Reaction score
1,306
Points
1,938
Dominion Voting Systems had to hire private investigators and employ other costly measures to serve attorney Sidney Powell in its defamation case against her after she “evaded” their summons, the company said in a court filing Tuesday
Welcome to litigation, twat monkeys.

What a fucking joke.

This is an excuse for delay by Dominion. They don't want this going forward.

They ( Dominion ) are the ones chasing Powell down to get her sorry ass into court and yet they ( Dominion) don’t want this to go forward?

When Powell and the others fail to defend their nonsense in court what will you say then?

Let me guess it will be deep state silencing the truth seekers and Texas must leave the damn Union!
Actually, I don't believe Powell & the gang will appear in court. Chances are they will make a statement and settle out of court. I mean, to appear means they actually have evidence. Which they clearly don't and the reason why Ms. Kracken-pot tried so hard to wiggle out of accepting the lawsuit.
 

Fort Fun Indiana

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2017
Messages
59,607
Reaction score
12,765
Points
2,220
Dominion Voting Systems had to hire private investigators and employ other costly measures to serve attorney Sidney Powell in its defamation case against her after she “evaded” their summons, the company said in a court filing Tuesday
Welcome to litigation, twat monkeys.

What a fucking joke.

This is an excuse for delay by Dominion. They don't want this going forward.

They ( Dominion ) are the ones chasing Powell down to get her sorry ass into court and yet they ( Dominion) don’t want this to go forward?

When Powell and the others fail to defend their nonsense in court what will you say then?

Let me guess it will be deep state silencing the truth seekers and Texas must leave the damn Union!
Actually, I don't believe Powell & the gang will appear in court. Chances are they will make a statement and settle out of court. I mean, to appear means they actually have evidence. Which they clearly don't and the reason why Ms. Kracken-pot tried so hard to wiggle out of accepting the lawsuit.
Absolutely they have no evidence. But she has clearly lost her mind. So do not be surprised if she shows up in court and makes an ass of herself for a week or two, THEN settles.
 

jc456

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 18, 2013
Messages
103,344
Reaction score
14,397
Points
2,180
Dominion Voting Systems had to hire private investigators and employ other costly measures to serve attorney Sidney Powell in its defamation case against her after she “evaded” their summons, the company said in a court filing Tuesday, as the former Trump campaign attorney faces multiple billion-dollar legal challenges for spreading an outlandish conspiracy theory that its voting machines were manipulated to steal the presidential election.

KEY FACTS
  • Dominion filed a court document Tuesday saying it would not oppose Powell’s request for additional time to respond to their defamation claims against her, which allege Powell knowingly harmed the company by making up false claims that their voting machines fraudulently flipped votes to swing the election to Joe Biden.
  • The voting machine maker said it would not oppose the motion as a “professional courtesy” to Powell’s counsel, but noted the request for more time came after Powell “evaded service of process for weeks” and caused Dominion to “incur unnecessary expenses” for the measures they had to take to serve her with their lawsuit.
  • These “extraordinary measures” included “hiring private investigators and pursuing Powell across state lines,” Dominion attorney Thomas Clare wrote, as legal plaintiffs are typically required to serve the people they’re suing in person in order to begin proceedings against them.
  • Powell also “refused to respond to requests” for waivers that could have given her more time to respond to the complaint, Clare noted.
  • Dominion filed its lawsuit against Powell on Jan. 8, but court documents show Powell was not officially served the summons against her until Jan. 28, nearly three weeks later.
  • Powell’s attorney Howard Kleinhendler told Forbes in an email that Powell “did not evade service” as Dominion alleged, saying she frequently travels for work and “has had to take extra precautions concerning her security, which may have made serving her more difficult.”

You know, if Krack-pot Powell had absolute "proof" that there was fraud against her beloved leader Rump, you would think she would welcome the lawsuit, no? I mean, the other chuckle-head pillow-guy ran a two-hour documentary claiming he had evidence. Shouldn't these nitwits be suing Dominion instead of the other way around?

The defendant owed the plaintiff no duty to make serving them cheap or easy.
Sure but these chuckle-heads have been going around claiming that they had "evidence" but no one was giving them a hearing in court so when a law-suit does appear on their doorstep, you would think that they would welcome it instead of evading it, no?

Or, does that kind of logic fly over the heads of trumptards?
They do! Why did dominion not provide the machines, if she was wrong? You get that right?
 

jc456

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 18, 2013
Messages
103,344
Reaction score
14,397
Points
2,180

Fort Fun Indiana

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2017
Messages
59,607
Reaction score
12,765
Points
2,220
Why did dominion not provide the machines, if she was wrong?
Because they have zero obligation to do so. You Trumpers love that principle. Did you already forget?
Then how do they prove she’s wrong?
They don't have to prove she is wrong. They only have to prove she has zero evidence and her intent was malicious. She will prove the first part herself by having no evidence, and the plaintiffs will then try to establish a pattern of her broadcasting the lies for personal gain in a knowing act of fraud.
 

jc456

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 18, 2013
Messages
103,344
Reaction score
14,397
Points
2,180
Why did dominion not provide the machines, if she was wrong?
Because they have zero obligation to do so. You Trumpers love that principle. Did you already forget?
Then how do they prove she’s wrong?
They don't have to prove she is wrong. They only have to prove she has zero evidence and her intent was malicious. She will prove the first part herself by having no evidence, and the plaintiffs will then try to establish a pattern of her broadcasting the lies for personal gain in a knowing act of fraud.
How will they do that, she has affidavits from people who used them? This is gonna be fun
 

Fort Fun Indiana

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2017
Messages
59,607
Reaction score
12,765
Points
2,220
How will they do that, she has affidavits from people who used them?
No she doesn't. And affidavits arent evidence anyway. They are testimony, and that is only if the judges accepts them as testimony.
 

jc456

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 18, 2013
Messages
103,344
Reaction score
14,397
Points
2,180
How will they do that, she has affidavits from people who used them?
No she doesn't. And affidavits arent evidence anyway. They are testimony, and that is only if the judges accepts them as testimony.
Affidavits are what people sign when they whistleblow. You remember that word? Got to believe them all! Remember?
 

Aletheia4u

Gold Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2017
Messages
7,745
Reaction score
1,369
Points
195
 

struth

Platinum Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2021
Messages
12,682
Reaction score
7,810
Points
918
Wow, they are not attempting to sue the Attorney? If you needed any more proof this is nothing more then a political stunt, and a gross unprecedented attempt to chill first speech this is it.

The left wants to now sue attorneys that advocate for their clients! Lawyers have been immune from such lawsuits, because we have a judicial system, that is adversarial, and expects, lawyers to be zealous advocates for their clients.
 

Johnlaw

Diamond Member
Joined
Sep 16, 2012
Messages
12,153
Reaction score
11,512
Points
2,255
Dominion Voting Systems had to hire private investigators and employ other costly measures to serve attorney Sidney Powell in its defamation case against her after she “evaded” their summons, the company said in a court filing Tuesday, as the former Trump campaign attorney faces multiple billion-dollar legal challenges for spreading an outlandish conspiracy theory that its voting machines were manipulated to steal the presidential election.

KEY FACTS
  • Dominion filed a court document Tuesday saying it would not oppose Powell’s request for additional time to respond to their defamation claims against her, which allege Powell knowingly harmed the company by making up false claims that their voting machines fraudulently flipped votes to swing the election to Joe Biden.
  • The voting machine maker said it would not oppose the motion as a “professional courtesy” to Powell’s counsel, but noted the request for more time came after Powell “evaded service of process for weeks” and caused Dominion to “incur unnecessary expenses” for the measures they had to take to serve her with their lawsuit.
  • These “extraordinary measures” included “hiring private investigators and pursuing Powell across state lines,” Dominion attorney Thomas Clare wrote, as legal plaintiffs are typically required to serve the people they’re suing in person in order to begin proceedings against them.
  • Powell also “refused to respond to requests” for waivers that could have given her more time to respond to the complaint, Clare noted.
  • Dominion filed its lawsuit against Powell on Jan. 8, but court documents show Powell was not officially served the summons against her until Jan. 28, nearly three weeks later.
  • Powell’s attorney Howard Kleinhendler told Forbes in an email that Powell “did not evade service” as Dominion alleged, saying she frequently travels for work and “has had to take extra precautions concerning her security, which may have made serving her more difficult.”

You know, if Krack-pot Powell had absolute "proof" that there was fraud against her beloved leader Rump, you would think she would welcome the lawsuit, no? I mean, the other chuckle-head pillow-guy ran a two-hour documentary claiming he had evidence. Shouldn't these nitwits be suing Dominion instead of the other way around?
The best defense, moron, is to own and possess and wipe the evidence, which is exactly what Dominion has done.
Are you paid to post stupidity or are you just stupid?
With a post like yours, I would not be calling anyone else stupid.
 
Last edited:

jc456

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 18, 2013
Messages
103,344
Reaction score
14,397
Points
2,180
ffidavits are what people sign when they whistleblow.
And are not evidence. I don't think you are getting this.
Where are you getting this information? Of course it's evidence, and certainly can be admissiable in Court. It's a sworn, under oath, statement. They are used all the time.
whistleblower is what it is. And we were told they all should be heard. Unlesssssssssssssssssss................
 

jc456

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 18, 2013
Messages
103,344
Reaction score
14,397
Points
2,180

jc456

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 18, 2013
Messages
103,344
Reaction score
14,397
Points
2,180
ffidavits are what people sign when they whistleblow.
And are not evidence. I don't think you are getting this.
the fk they're not. you have issues. Whistleblower, heard of that word before? you all said they must be heard... So why do you want these whistleblowers shut down? please, are you maintaining your hypocrisy awards?
 

USMB Server Goals

Total amount
$85.00
Goal
$350.00

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top