DOJ looking for ways to ban trans people from owning guns

Ok....So, you don't see any unforeseen problems with red flag laws eh?
If the graph below is even close to accurate, it serves as justification for not allowing trannies to own guns via red flag laws.
1757284803821.webp

Any police officer, or true constitutionalist will tell you that you shouldn't be relying on police, or politicians to "keep you safe"...
True, the crooked DAs in urban shitholes proved that already.
What training does a judge have that you or I don't?
Its called "due process", if a Doctor or psychiatrist tells the judge that a patient should not have access to guns, and presents the medical justification, that should suffice. The judge could even request a 2nd opinion, but time would be extended, and who pays?
Again, often we see police fail at protecting rights on a daily basis. Believe me when I say I back police, they have a very difficult job. But, when it comes to upholding our rights, not so much.
Its our lawyers and the judges that protect our rights. Police have other responsibilities, based on "reasonable suspicion"
"Should be?" I call bull. The very fact that you don't know what kind of effect they would have only strengthens my argument against them.
See the graph above. "Should be" is a mathematical probability, not a guarantee.
I'm sorry to say that you're looking at it the wrong way. We protect our Sporting events with armed security, we protect Concerts, and other events with armed security and checkpoints, yet our schools are wide open? Why?
1. COST.
2. Lack of effectiveness. In FL, at Parkland, they paid for an armed "resource officer" who ran away when the shooting started
https://www.cnn.com/2023/06/29/us/scot-peterson-parkland-shooting-trial-thursday
3. In TX, at Uvalde, the police failed to enter, and failed to shoot the mass murderer
kyzr, I agree with you on most of your postings, however, this appeal to emotion here is beneath you....
Its not emotion, its logic and math.
1. Do something, or do nothing?
2. Do something based on probability that will affect the cohort of mass shooters, but not affect the large majority of gun owners under the 2A.
 

Attachments

  • 1757284683044.webp
    1757284683044.webp
    28.7 KB · Views: 17
I'm an NRA member, so would I support any law that affects "the right to bear arms?". NO

However, public safety requires some regulation of firearms. State Red Flag laws appear to be legal constitutionally.
Due process could be that a judge reviews the "red flag" and decides if that person is psychologically capable to own guns. If not, the FBI and local police should be notified. A very small cohort of citizens would not be allowed to have guns, yet mass shootings should be prevented/reduced. Many mass shooters were simple to predict if red flag laws were available.

Should kids be allowed to have guns?
How about retards?
How about crazy people?
How about non-citizens?
How about criminals?
How about probable mass shooters?
What about Jews?
What about Blacks?
What about Hispanics?
What about me?
 
Should kids be allowed to have guns?
How about retards?
How about crazy people?
How about non-citizens?
How about criminals?
How about probable mass shooters?

Limiting or refining gun rights via "red flag" laws is a good thing.
Criminals.??? People convicted of DUIs or vehicular manslaughter do not permanently lose their right to own a car.
 
Thank you for admitting that you you so ignorant that you do not know that there are people who are not clearly male or female biologically. Stop being anti-science.

You’re still hanging onto the .00000001% of the population thingy you’ve been fed. So sad.
 
If the graph below is even close to accurate, it serves as justification for not allowing trannies to own guns via red flag laws.
Again, it's not. It's just fraudulent BS.
 
Drs. will be required to notify the FBI and local law enforcement to "red flag" person-X. Period.
The FBI so they can't buy guns.
Law enforcement to collect and store their guns.
So now you’re for gun confiscation of whomever the State deems unworthy?
 
15th post
The left has been telling us for decades we need mental health evaluations on people who want to buy guns -- the moment Trump agrees and wants to apply them to transgenders, they back away, crying and screaming.

I cannot help but laugh. :auiqs.jpg:
 

New Topics

Latest Discussions

Back
Top Bottom