Does winning an election override the Constitution?

This is what you stated in a previous post: "The constitution assigns interpretation to the courts."

I don't see that in the Constitution.

In fact, it isn't in the Constitution. You're rattling off about 'Marbury' isn't the Constitution.
Article 3
 
They have gone so far as to call judges communists simply for ruling against trump.
Does trump's election override the constitution and the courts?
1 man. One man is not they.
 
Show me where in the Constitution it says the president has unlimited power or the law does not apply to them.
Same bullcrap from the leftards.

All the time.

This is why their popularity is in the toilet.

20% and falling.
 
This is a valid question given that trump and his supporters claim he was elected to deport people, and that judges who rule against him are wrong because the people elected trump. They have gone so far as to call judges communists simply for ruling against trump.
Does trump's election override the constitution and the courts?
AI Overview
Learn more

Yes, the president has the authority to deport people. This authority stems from the Constitution and federal laws, specifically the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA). The president can prevent illegal aliens from entering the country and, under certain circumstances, can also detain and deport individuals.

Here's a more detailed explanation:
  • Constitutional Authority:
    The President's authority to act on immigration matters is rooted in the Constitution, including Article II, which vests the president with power to enforce laws and conduct foreign relations.

  • Immigration and Nationality Act (INA):
    The INA grants the president broad authority to control immigration, including the ability to prevent entry and to deport individuals who are not eligible to remain in the United States.

    • Alien Enemies Act:
      This law, passed in 1798, allows the president to detain and deport non-citizens from enemy nations during wartime or if the U.S. faces an invasion or predatory incursion.
 
Please quote the law or constitutional provision that precluded Biden running for office. Otherwise, you're just spouting crap.
~~~~~~
You don't need a law created in the Constitution to preclude an infirmed dementia old man riddled with advanced prostate cancer from running for president. You need level minded people smart enough to chose someone capable of running this country. Something that you refuse to respond to.
Then you forget that there are provisions within the Constitution it's the 25th Amendment something that Democrats have referred to in the case reference president Trump to ensure that a president should be mentally and physical capable to run the country.
Something that Joey B was incapable to do from day one.

Just for you... Read more:
 
No idea where. The code include much. You need to be more specific.
I'll let you do your own education, lazy leftard.

It's clear you know nothing about the law you're screaming so loudly about.

You should educate yourself before you open your mouth.
 
The inferior courts are the creations of the legislature.
The U.S. Constitution, specifically Article III, Section 1, establishes the judicial system by stating:


"The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish."


This language designates inferior courts as subordinate to the Supreme Court, meaning they operate under its authority and are subject to its rulings. Additionally, the Judiciary Act of 1789 further structured the federal court system, creating district courts and circuit courts as lower extensions of the Supreme Court.
 
I wonder, how many of our constitutional protections went by the wayside while you gleefully lived under Democratic administrations?

If it is truly sacrosanct, you fight for people's rights, no matter who they are or what they believe, and you call any transgressions against them out regardless of who's in power. Do you do that? Have you? Will you?
Not sure what any of that has to do with this thread. If you have questions about my personal life, IM me.
 
we knew y'all would pull out all stops in an attempt to prevent Trump from deporting criminal illegals and violent wife beating gang members .. the op is stupid and pathetic ..
Thank you for sharing. I love you too.
 
Not sure what any of that has to do with this thread. If you have questions about my personal life, IM me.
I asked you a direct question, which is perfectly pertinent to this thread.

If you took it personally, that's a you problem. That shows I hit home with the question.
 
dictators don't leave office .. are you saying Trump will try to be POTUS after his 4 yr term is over ? answer honestly ..
I'm saying trump tried to stay in office in 2020. He's talked about serving another term after this one. He's a scam artist. It's possible he might try again.
 
Wrong again.
Trump illegally expanded the law to included:
  • Nationwide application: Instead of limiting expedited removal to border regions, Trump’s policy allowed it to apply anywhere in the U.S..
  • Longer presence threshold: Under Trump, undocumented immigrants who had been in the U.S. for less than two years could be deported without a court hearing, compared to Clinton’s 14-day limit.
  • Increased enforcement: Trump directed ICE and DHS to prioritize deportations beyond just criminals, affecting a broader range of undocumented individuals.

This expansion meant that many undocumented immigrants who had lived in the U.S. for months or even over a year—but were not previously subject to expedited removal—became deportable without judicial review.

That's policy, not law.

Stop with the gaslighting.

The law is public, anyone can read it.

Even you.
 
I'm saying trump tried to stay in office in 2020. He's talked about serving another term after this one. He's a scam artist. It's possible he might try again.
get help ..

1084582-b6dcf4b105f4f23d9bf7d6529ecb0bbc.webp
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom