Does Trump sign or veto the Epstein bill?

[Crepitus]

Curtains? Political suicide?

You know he can't run for re-election.

Don't you?

What?

Why not?

Reportedly once its done and sealed they can't change their minds.

 

[Rawley]

There’s no way his MAGA supporters will still support him if he vetos this….

Frankly, 99% of MAGA supporters don't give a rat's ass either way.

 

[HikerGuy83]

The Democrats are celebrating the passage in the House that would require release of whatever materials exist in the Epstein case.

But that's not the end of it. The Senate has to approve it. Most indications are that it will pass there too.

But then the bill would go to Trump. Does he sign it or veto it?

What’s next in Congress on the push to release the Epstein files

Doesn't this belong in the betting forum.

It's not about politics.

It's all about speculation.

I guess Mac1958 is low on drama fluid.

 

[XponentialChaos]

There’s no way his MAGA supporters will still support him if he vetos this….

I don’t know about that…

I think this was actually very accurate.

 

[Seymour Flops]

View attachment 1184324

Dude, the pizzeria didn't even have a basement.

Did you even read what I posted?

I doubt it. I rarely find what you post worth reading.

What was it this time? Something about a pizzaria? What?

 

[Seymour Flops]

Reportedly once its done and sealed they can't change their minds.

Done and "sealed?"

Dude, you need to stop making shit up.

 

[excalibur]

LOL Dems imploding. Good!

So, let me get this straight: With the release of Epstein's emails, we found out that

• Epstein hated Trump.
• Didn't trust him.
• They weren't friends.
• The NYT directly worked with Epstein to suppress stories about him.
• After Bradley Edwards (the lawyer for the accusers) said that Trump was the only individual to cooperate and help, Epstein said Trump didn't have "one decent cell in his body."
• This was all so compelling that the democrats faked the redaction of a supposed victim's name.
• The name they blocked was Virginia Giuffre, who publicly testified that Trump was innocent.
• Oh, and also, Russiagate was confirmed a hoax, just like we said.

Are democrats retarded?​

 

[Crepitus]

I doubt it. I rarely find what you post worth reading.

What was it this time? Something about a pizzaria? What?

Alrighty then.

You can piss off.

Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay over there somewhere.

What a waste of time you are.

SMH

 

[Nobody911]

Fools rush in where angels fear to tread. Trump is a fool or an angel? lol.

Current Status of the Epstein Files Bill

The bill has passed the House of Representatives through a discharge petition, with 218 signatures secured on November 12, 2025. This was achieved when newly elected Representative Adelita Grijalva was sworn in and signed the petition, joining:

• All Democrats
• Four Republicans:

- Thomas Massie
- Marjorie Taylor Greene
- Lauren Boebert
- Nancy Mace

Potential Challenges and Trump's Stance

Donald Trump is strongly opposed to the release of the Epstein files. He has:

• Posted on Truth Social urging Republicans to focus on the government shutdown
• Claimed Democrats are using this as a "hoax" to deflect from other issues
• Indicated he would likely veto the legislation if it reaches his desk

Senate and Veto Prospects

The bill faces several potential obstacles:
1. Senate Majority Leader John Thune has been noncommittal about bringing the bill to a vote
2. If it passes the Senate, Trump is expected to veto the legislation

Veto Override Potential

Representative Ro Khanna believes there might be enough support to override a potential Trump veto. This would require:

• A two-thirds majority in both the House and Senate
• Something that has only happened twice since 2009

Key Provisions of the Bill

The Epstein Files Transparency Act would require the Attorney General to:

• Release all unclassified records within 30 days
• Include documents related to:

- Epstein and Maxwell
- Flight logs and travel records
- Individuals named in Epstein's investigations
- Entities with ties to Epstein
- Immunity deals and settlements

Conclusion

While the bill has momentum, its ultimate passage remains uncertain. Trump's opposition and potential veto create significant challenges, and the ultimate outcome will depend on congressional support and political maneuvering in the coming weeks.

sources:

1. Trump, Congress and the Epstein files: What happens next?
2. Biggs says he will vote to release the Epstein files

 

[Mac1958]

To tRump and his loyal Oompa-Loompas the release is unthinkable. As long as it's "maybe", and "allegedly" to them it never happened.

Yeah, that's a good point. Plus there's every chance it would, over time, just be buried by more orange stain.

Exactly like the Insurrection. They'd just deny the whole thing and create a new narrative with conspiracy theories. "He and Epstein were never friends. Those videos and photos and emails were rigged. Soros did all that, I saw it on Tucker."

 

[Mac1958]

I didn’t give a shit about Epstein until Trump started to try and cover it up.

This has been nuts. A normal adult would just brush it off. But spoiled children throw a tantrum.

 

[kyzr]

Yeah, that's a good point. Plus there's every chance it would, over time, just be buried by more orange stain.
Exactly like the Insurrection. They'd just deny the whole thing and create a new narrative with conspiracy theories. "He and Epstein were never friends. Those videos and photos and emails were rigged. Soros did all that, I saw it on Tucker."

1. There was no insurrection dumbass.
2. Epstein called Trump "evil" and "dangerous".
3. If there was anything there Biden would have published it, duh.

 

[Mac1958]

1. There was no insurrection dumbass.
2. Epstein called Trump "evil" and "dangerous".
3. If there was anything there Biden would have published it, duh.

Maybe Biden was hiding something too, duh.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

No matter, i doubt it all ever actually gets released.

.

tick-tick-tick-tick-tick






.

 

[22lcidw]

Yeah, that's a good point. Plus there's every chance it would, over time, just be buried by more orange stain.

Exactly like the Insurrection. They'd just deny the whole thing and create a new narrative with conspiracy theories. "He and Epstein were never friends. Those videos and photos and emails were rigged. Soros did all that, I saw it on Tucker."

A growing number of Republican voters are realizing you need to be treated as you treat others. Your issue is that you treat al Republican voters the same. When the truth is that those in life that mistreated people and have gotten away with it gives you some power. In truth many of your own are not very good or excellent enough to help our nation continue as the top one.

 

[TimFitz]

So you have nothing.

Got it.

No, I’m just not going to make a fool of myself by
‘proving” something you can plainly see right on your TV screen right now.

 

[TimFitz]

We just observed how the Dims (via their house organ, The New York Slimes) released a few of the emails for public consumption and manipulation. The Republicans response was to basically release the rest of them and in-redact Guiffre’s name.

She had clearly made it known that Trump had never done anything inappropriate with her. She had previously worked for the Trump organization (I believe it had been at Mar a Lago). Epstein and Jizzlaine had stolen her away.

So, the inference the selected (but partially redacted) emails which the Dims had released was supposed to have made the public come to was destroyed by a more complete release — and with a fair share of corroboration, like her book.

The Dims are giddy with hope that something may someday stick as against President Trump. And they don’t give a shit who they damage along the way. They certainly don’t care about honesty and neither do the News outlets on the leftist MSM.

But it only took a day to expose the Dims’ latest dishonesty.

Trump knows that a veto could damage his own position. “What is he hiding?” That’s what our libtards will rhetorically “ask.” But Trump isn’t generally moved too much anymore by that attempted manipulation.

I’d be ok with his veto.

“The Dims are giddy with hope that something may someday stick as against President Trump”

it already has.

Actually, he did it to himself, as he so often does.

We just observed how the Dims (via their house organ, The New York Slimes) released a few of the emails for public consumption and manipulation. The Republicans response was to basically release the rest of them and in-redact Guiffre’s name.

She had clearly made it known that Trump had never done anything inappropriate with her. She had previously worked for the Trump organization (I believe it had been at Mar a Lago). Epstein and Jizzlaine had stolen her away.

So, the inference the selected (but partially redacted) emails which the Dims had released was supposed to have made the public come to was destroyed by a more complete release — and with a fair share of corroboration, like her book.

The Dims are giddy with hope that something may someday stick as against President Trump. And they don’t give a shit who they damage along the way. They certainly don’t care about honesty and neither do the News outlets on the leftist MSM.

But it only took a day to expose the Dims’ latest dishonesty.

Trump knows that a veto could damage his own position. “What is he hiding?” That’s what our libtards will rhetorically “ask.” But Trump isn’t generally moved too much anymore by that attempted manipulation.

I’d be ok with his veto.

The same document dump also revealed that the Trump claim that he broke off with Epstein was a lie.

 

[JimH52]

He will veto it. There is some. very damaging stuff in there. He ordered Clinton to be investigated to deflect.

BTW...he is abusing his powers on a daily basis. If Dems gain Congress next year, the POS will be impeached again. No president has been as criminal as trump. NO ONE!

 

[Crepitus]

Yeah, that's a good point. Plus there's every chance it would, over time, just be buried by more orange stain.

Exactly like the Insurrection. They'd just deny the whole thing and create a new narrative with conspiracy theories. "He and Epstein were never friends. Those videos and photos and emails were rigged. Soros did all that, I saw it on Tucker."

It's already underway. "I kicked him out when I found out" is already changing to "I never really liked him anyway" which is an intermediate stop on the road to "Jeffery who?".

 

[JimH52]

It's already underway. "I kicked him out when I found out" is already changing to "I never really liked him anyway" which is an intermediate stop on the road to "Jeffery who?".

The trump denial/delay cycle.