Does Trump sign or veto the Epstein bill?

[d0gbreath]

He'll sign it, knowing that a veto would be absolutely curtains for him. He ain't quite as dumb as he seems.

 

[Rawley]

Then why are Democrats asking for their release now? If what you say is true, they would not be doing this.

TDS. Like you, they didn't say boo about the Epstein filed for four years while they were in control. Now it's all they and you talk about.

 

[WorldWatcher]

He'll sign it, knowing that a veto would be absolutely curtains for him. He ain't quite as dumb as he seems.

Trump: "Hold my beer!"

WW

 

[odanny]

Because Trump screamed for their release until Pam Bondi told him his name was all over them.

Trump never did though, he hesitated when he was asked if he would release the files, saying there could be a lot of "fake accusations" in them, all but confirming his guilt.

He knew he was in there, and he largely avoided the topic. Now he is calling it all a "hoax".

At least we get to see the true colors of his defenders. They are okay with it.

 

[TimFitz]

TDS. Like you, they didn't say boo about the Epstein filed for four years while they were in control. Now it's all they and you talk about.

Take that up with your beloved fuhrer.

He’s the one who abruptly reversed course, and now wants them covered up.

 

[TimFitz]

Prove it.

All you have to do is watch how he runs away from questions, Bondi’s deliberate stonewalling, and the lies you Are being fed to know that.

I don’t know why you would demand proof of front page news.

 

[Rawley]

Take that up with your beloved fuhrer.

Trump turned you into a raging hypocrite? Nah, I'll bet you were born that way.

 

[dblack]

Hmmm... so recent headlines are saying Trump is directing the DOJ to investigate something or another related to Epstein. Probably to give him cover for a veto, or to persuade the Rs breaking rank to follow along. That's my prediction. We'll see.

 

[kyzr]

Trump needs the files released so the democrats can move on to their next talking point: AFFORDABILITY or ACA

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

He'll sign it, knowing that a veto would be absolutely curtains for him. He ain't quite as dumb as he seems.

Friendly bet.

No he will not.

 

[TimFitz]

Trump turned you into a raging hypocrite? Nah, I'll bet you were born that way.

O,

I didn’t give a shit about Epstein until Trump started to try and cover it up.

 

[Crepitus]

The Democrats are celebrating the passage in the House that would require release of whatever materials exist in the Epstein case.

But that's not the end of it. The Senate has to approve it. Most indications are that it will pass there too.

But then the bill would go to Trump. Does he sign it or veto it?

What’s next in Congress on the push to release the Epstein files

Veto, of course.

 

[Nostra]

Because Trump screamed for their release until Pam Bondi told him his name was all over them.

Prove it.

 

[Nostra]

All you have to do is watch how he runs away from questions, Bondi’s deliberate stonewalling, and the lies you Are being fed to know that.

I don’t know why you would demand proof of front page news.

So you have nothing.

Got it.

 

[j-mac]

I think Trump will sign it, the files will release, and there will be nothing but a bunch of the left exposed, then there will be crickets from the screaming monkeys in here.

 

[Crepitus]

It wouldn't be a good look if he vetoes it, but he's not running for re-election. IF he did something wrong, this would be more important to him than how this would play in the midterms.

Also, after the way Bondi and Patel have downplayed the materials, if Trump lets the materials see the light of day, and if they're bad, would pretty much wreck them, wouldn't it?

Let's just get this over with, one way or the other. But if there's a bunch of rich and powerful assholes in those materials, I think we should know about it. And they should pay a price.

To tRump and his loyal Oompa-Loompas the release is unthinkable. As long as it's "maybe", and "allegedly" to them it never happened.

Thinking people (which they most definitely are NOT) will know the only reason for a veto is to avoid criminal charges.

The tRumplings will imagine ten thousand excuses ranging from improbable to incredible.

 

[Crepitus]

I think the only way he vetoes it is if he broke a law. And I doubt that happened. If whatever he did was sleazy and ugly and shitty, the American people have already given him a pass on all that. Or maybe he doesn't want Melania to see something.

But if there are guys who helped Epstein/Maxwell with the trafficking, and/or had sex with minors, or abused women, then I would love to see all the perp walks. So would my daughters. This guy was the P Diddy of politics/finance.

Never gonna happen my friend.

 

[22lcidw]

I think the only way he vetoes it is if he broke a law. And I doubt that happened. If whatever he did was sleazy and ugly and shitty, the American people have already given him a pass on all that. Or maybe he doesn't want Melania to see something.

But if there are guys who helped Epstein/Maxwell with the trafficking, and/or had sex with minors, or abused women, then I would love to see all the perp walks. So would my daughters. This guy was the P Diddy of politics/finance.

Most likely no Progs will ever go to jail. in Prog areas the judicial system is letting out dangerous repeat criminals for heinous crimes.

 

[Crepitus]

It has not passed. The Discharge petition forces a vote on it, if no one takes their signature off of it. From your own link:

WASHINGTON (AP) — The House is speeding toward a vote next week on releasing files related to the sex trafficking investigation into Jeffrey Epstein, a step that comes after months of resistance from Republican leaders.

Signatures cannot be removed at this point.

 

[BackAgain]

We just observed how the Dims (via their house organ, The New York Slimes) released a few of the emails for public consumption and manipulation. The Republicans response was to basically release the rest of them and in-redact Guiffre’s name.

She had clearly made it known that Trump had never done anything inappropriate with her. She had previously worked for the Trump organization (I believe it had been at Mar a Lago). Epstein and Jizzlaine had stolen her away.

So, the inference the selected (but partially redacted) emails which the Dims had released was supposed to have made the public come to was destroyed by a more complete release — and with a fair share of corroboration, like her book.

The Dims are giddy with hope that something may someday stick as against President Trump. And they don’t give a shit who they damage along the way. They certainly don’t care about honesty and neither do the News outlets on the leftist MSM.

But it only took a day to expose the Dims’ latest dishonesty.

Trump knows that a veto could damage his own position. “What is he hiding?” That’s what our libtards will rhetorically “ask.” But Trump isn’t generally moved too much anymore by that attempted manipulation.

I’d be ok with his veto.