Speaking of

are you REALLY trying to claim that former President George W. Bush "broke" Iraq?


It wasn't Saddam who did that?
Iraq was just humming along merrily until Booooooosh?
Saddam could have been dealt with like we did Egypt's Hosni Mubarak, Libya's Muammar Gaddafi, Tunisia etc. Then use elite forces & drones to cut off the head of the snakes threatening the US.
Bush had US soldiers stand down in Tora Bora to let Afghans negotiate a ceasefire with Osama Bin Laden so he could get away. This is after Bush refused to go after Bin Laden or arrest the known hijackers in the US before 9/11 because "Bin Laden is faking his plot to attack to us distract US from Saddam".
After Bush let Bin Laden go he quagmired our troops in Iraq & destabilized the mid-east destroying Iraq"s opposing force to Iran's power.
You dumb bell.
Libya is devolving into civil war. Egypt is not much better off.
Everything Obumbler touches turns to shit because that community organizer cretin doesn't have ANY actual grasp of the meaning of a "policy" or "principle."
And W never refused to go after bin Laden, either, you pissant. What W DID suggest was that bin Laden ALONE was not the point. W once again was right. Obumbler gets some credit for dispatching bin Laden and it's one of the precious few things Obumbler deserves credit for allowing. But that NEVER should have been touted as the decimation of al qaeda and al qaeda was not the sole player in the world of terrorist organizations anyway.
The balance of your post is as factually accurate as you are persuasive which is to say: not at all.