In the 1940s, we had World War II...
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz..........................
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
In the 1940s, we had World War II...
They are not for no reason. Are you blind ? You haven't seen ISIS come into Iraq right after Obama pulled the troops out n 2010 ? And aren't you aware of the significance of the combination of the largest unproven oil reserves in the world in Iraq, and the wealth to acquire nuclear weapons ? Think man, think.kaz 10588443Not true, Obama has done more damage.
What damage? Just list your too three?
I can name 4484 Bush43 damages in Iraq and that's just American deaths for no reason.
They are not for no reason. Are you blind ? You haven't seen ISIS come into Iraq right after Obama pulled the troops out n 2010 ? And aren't you aware of the significance of the combination of the largest unproven oil reserves in the world in Iraq, and the wealth to acquire nuclear weapons ? Think man, think.kaz 10588443Not true, Obama has done more damage.
What damage? Just list your too three?
I can name 4484 Bush43 damages in Iraq and that's just American deaths for no reason.
In one of his final acts in office, President Bush in December of 2008 had signed a Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA) with the Iraqi government that set the clock ticking on ending the war he’d launched in March of 2003. The SOFA provided a legal basis for the presence of U.S. forces in Iraq after the United Nations Security Council mandate for the occupation mission expired at the end of 2008. But it required that all U.S. forces be gone from Iraq by January 1, 2012, unless the Iraqi government was willing to negotiate a new agreement that would extend their mandate.
Iraq 8217 s Government Not Obama Called Time on the U.S. Troop Presence TIME.com
What a lame answer. Obama didn't try to extend it. Man up and take a position.
My position is we should have left, stayed out and we should stay out of fighting ISIS now. I stand behind leaving.
At least if you say Obama should have tried to stay and didn't, you disagree with him on that you'd be taking a stand on a view.
Just saying it was W means you need political Viagara.
didn't say they that they already did, fool.
And if anyone thinks the USA is immune to all this madness, guess again
They are not for no reason. Are you blind ? You haven't seen ISIS come into Iraq right after Obama pulled the troops out n 2010 ? And aren't you aware of the significance of the combination of the largest unproven oil reserves in the world in Iraq, and the wealth to acquire nuclear weapons ? Think man, think.kaz 10588443Not true, Obama has done more damage.
What damage? Just list your too three?
I can name 4484 Bush43 damages in Iraq and that's just American deaths for no reason.
In one of his final acts in office, President Bush in December of 2008 had signed a Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA) with the Iraqi government that set the clock ticking on ending the war he’d launched in March of 2003. The SOFA provided a legal basis for the presence of U.S. forces in Iraq after the United Nations Security Council mandate for the occupation mission expired at the end of 2008. But it required that all U.S. forces be gone from Iraq by January 1, 2012, unless the Iraqi government was willing to negotiate a new agreement that would extend their mandate.
Iraq 8217 s Government Not Obama Called Time on the U.S. Troop Presence TIME.com
What a lame answer. Obama didn't try to extend it. Man up and take a position.
My position is we should have left, stayed out and we should stay out of fighting ISIS now. I stand behind leaving.
At least if you say Obama should have tried to stay and didn't, you disagree with him on that you'd be taking a stand on a view.
Just saying it was W means you need political Viagara.
It was for historical accuracy. Not only was the date of withdrawal inaccurate but also the fact that it was President Bushes time frame not President Obama's. Furthermore it was the Shiite dominated Iraq government that is mostly responsible for the rekindling of the Iraq Civil war, and the alliance between the Sunnis and ISIS, not Bush, not Obama.
protist 10585507And if anyone thinks the USA is immune to all this madness, guess again
Stupid comment #001. Who thinks the USA is immune to terrorist attacks? It is rather stupid to think such an opinion prevails in sufficient quantity to argue that in building a case that World War Three is upon us.
Today, we have the radical Muslims fighting against everyone who doesn't share their insane ideology.
The far left does apparently as they continue to vote for the destruction of America and the support for ISIS.
They are not for no reason. Are you blind ? You haven't seen ISIS come into Iraq right after Obama pulled the troops out n 2010 ? And aren't you aware of the significance of the combination of the largest unproven oil reserves in the world in Iraq, and the wealth to acquire nuclear weapons ? Think man, think.kaz 10588443Not true, Obama has done more damage.
What damage? Just list your too three?
I can name 4484 Bush43 damages in Iraq and that's just American deaths for no reason.
protectionist: I think we have plenty of oil at home. If the Euroweenies, who pay the brunt of the price both in being targets of terrorism and needing middle east oil want to get behind doing something about the middle east, I can see supporting that effort. Allowing them to be the primary beneficiaries of our doing it ourselves while they stab us in the back I'm not interested in. Let's keep developing oil at home, we're nearing energy independence.
I wasn't talking about the US getting oil. Read my post again.....maybe slower this time.
They are not for no reason. Are you blind ? You haven't seen ISIS come into Iraq right after Obama pulled the troops out n 2010 ? And aren't you aware of the significance of the combination of the largest unproven oil reserves in the world in Iraq, and the wealth to acquire nuclear weapons ? Think man, think.kaz 10588443Not true, Obama has done more damage.
What damage? Just list your too three?
I can name 4484 Bush43 damages in Iraq and that's just American deaths for no reason.
protectionist: I think we have plenty of oil at home. If the Euroweenies, who pay the brunt of the price both in being targets of terrorism and needing middle east oil want to get behind doing something about the middle east, I can see supporting that effort. Allowing them to be the primary beneficiaries of our doing it ourselves while they stab us in the back I'm not interested in. Let's keep developing oil at home, we're nearing energy independence.

I know all that. And it is all 100% irrelevant to what I was saying in the post you quoted.They are not for no reason. Are you blind ? You haven't seen ISIS come into Iraq right after Obama pulled the troops out n 2010 ? And aren't you aware of the significance of the combination of the largest unproven oil reserves in the world in Iraq, and the wealth to acquire nuclear weapons ? Think man, think.kaz 10588443Not true, Obama has done more damage.
What damage? Just list your too three?
I can name 4484 Bush43 damages in Iraq and that's just American deaths for no reason.
In one of his final acts in office, President Bush in December of 2008 had signed a Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA) with the Iraqi government that set the clock ticking on ending the war he’d launched in March of 2003. The SOFA provided a legal basis for the presence of U.S. forces in Iraq after the United Nations Security Council mandate for the occupation mission expired at the end of 2008. But it required that all U.S. forces be gone from Iraq by January 1, 2012, unless the Iraqi government was willing to negotiate a new agreement that would extend their mandate.
Iraq 8217 s Government Not Obama Called Time on the U.S. Troop Presence TIME.com
They are not for no reason. Are you blind ? You haven't seen ISIS come into Iraq right after Obama pulled the troops out n 2010 ? And aren't you aware of the significance of the combination of the largest unproven oil reserves in the world in Iraq, and the wealth to acquire nuclear weapons ? Think man, think.kaz 10588443Not true, Obama has done more damage.
What damage? Just list your too three?
I can name 4484 Bush43 damages in Iraq and that's just American deaths for no reason.
In one of his final acts in office, President Bush in December of 2008 had signed a Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA) with the Iraqi government that set the clock ticking on ending the war he’d launched in March of 2003. The SOFA provided a legal basis for the presence of U.S. forces in Iraq after the United Nations Security Council mandate for the occupation mission expired at the end of 2008. But it required that all U.S. forces be gone from Iraq by January 1, 2012, unless the Iraqi government was willing to negotiate a new agreement that would extend their mandate.
Iraq 8217 s Government Not Obama Called Time on the U.S. Troop Presence TIME.com
What a lame answer. Obama didn't try to extend it. Man up and take a position.
My position is we should have left, stayed out and we should stay out of fighting ISIS now. I stand behind leaving.
At least if you say Obama should have tried to stay and didn't, you disagree with him on that you'd be taking a stand on a view.
Just saying it was W means you need political Viagara.
Come back when you know what to say.In the 1940s, we had World War II...
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz..........................
I didn't say ISIS was World War III. ISIS is one jihadist group in the world war, among dozens of others scattered all over the globe.They are not for no reason. Are you blind ? You haven't seen ISIS come into Iraq right after Obama pulled the troops out n 2010 ? And aren't you aware of the significance of the combination of the largest unproven oil reserves in the world in Iraq, and the wealth to acquire nuclear weapons ? Think man, think.kaz 10588443Not true, Obama has done more damage.
What damage? Just list your too three?
I can name 4484 Bush43 damages in Iraq and that's just American deaths for no reason.
If we- the United States- had not taken down Sadam, ISIS would be no danger in Iraq.
Sadam was a nasty son of a *****- vicious- lying- etc- but he kept Islamic extremists down. We dismantled Iraq, and opened it up to Islamic sectarianism and ISIS.
And no- ISIS is not World War 3- ISIS is a regional problem, with the potential to harm Americans- not America.
They are not for no reason. Are you blind ? You haven't seen ISIS come into Iraq right after Obama pulled the troops out n 2010 ? And aren't you aware of the significance of the combination of the largest unproven oil reserves in the world in Iraq, and the wealth to acquire nuclear weapons ? Think man, think.kaz 10588443Not true, Obama has done more damage.
What damage? Just list your too three?
I can name 4484 Bush43 damages in Iraq and that's just American deaths for no reason.
In one of his final acts in office, President Bush in December of 2008 had signed a Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA) with the Iraqi government that set the clock ticking on ending the war he’d launched in March of 2003. The SOFA provided a legal basis for the presence of U.S. forces in Iraq after the United Nations Security Council mandate for the occupation mission expired at the end of 2008. But it required that all U.S. forces be gone from Iraq by January 1, 2012, unless the Iraqi government was willing to negotiate a new agreement that would extend their mandate.
Iraq 8217 s Government Not Obama Called Time on the U.S. Troop Presence TIME.com
What a lame answer. Obama didn't try to extend it. Man up and take a position.
My position is we should have left, stayed out and we should stay out of fighting ISIS now. I stand behind leaving.
At least if you say Obama should have tried to stay and didn't, you disagree with him on that you'd be taking a stand on a view.
Just saying it was W means you need political Viagara.
It was for historical accuracy. Not only was the date of withdrawal inaccurate but also the fact that it was President Bushes time frame not President Obama's. Furthermore it was the Shiite dominated Iraq government that is mostly responsible for the rekindling of the Iraq Civil war, and the alliance between the Sunnis and ISIS, not Bush, not Obama.
This is a current events thread, not a history one.
This is a current events thread, not a history one.
Tell that to Kaz then:
↑
"Not true, Obama has done more damage."
More damage than what or by whom. You can't deny the historical facts when it is claimed that Obama has done more damage than Bush43. That imbecile got 4484 Americans killed in Iraq for no legitimate reason after the terrorists killed 3000 Americans including many at the Pentagon.
Your side makes this about history when the claim is made that Onama is worse than your beloved Bush.
More damage than any modern president before him including Carter..