Does Adam Schiff Lie?

[norwegen]

Schiff is honest as the day is long.

This is the shortest day of the year.

Finally, you said something sort of right.

 

[Canon Shooter]

I don't know they have never been under oath, but all 3 should be.

Schiff is honest as the day is long.

Wow, you really did swallow all the Kool Aid, didn't you?

 

[Sixties Fan]

(None so blind as those who do not wish to see )


Since the Mueller report came out last year, Trump and his minions have insisted it found no evidence of collusion. In fact, Mueller explicitly wrote that he was not investigating collusion at all. (“We did not address ‘collusion,’ which is not a legal term. Rather, we focused on whether the evidence was sufficient to charge any member of the campaign with taking part in a criminal conspiracy.”)

Unlike Mueller’s tightly circumscribed criminal probe, the Senate Intelligence Committee report did investigate collusion. The most important evidence of collusion has either already been exposed (Trump officials taking a meeting with a Russian agent offering Vladimir Putin’s help with the campaign) or happened right in front of our eyes (Trump going on television to ask Russia to steal and publish Hillary Clinton’s emails). The real question is how extensively or tightly Trump’s campaign managed to coordinate its activity with Russia. And while it lacked the broad-ranging investigative powers Mueller could have used if he wanted, the Senate Intelligence Committee turned up damning evidence.

The primary focus of Russian interference was Russian hacking of Democratic emails and then leaking them in order to benefit Trump’s campaign. Two Trump advisers seem likely to have been involved in this scheme: campaign manager Paul Manafort and outside adviser Roger Stone.

------
Stone also spoke at length with Manafort, and the next day spoke with Trump, and then drafted tweets for Trump to send, expressing a desire for friendlier relations with Russia (i.e., “I want a new détente with Russia under Putin”). Trump never sent those tweets, but the sequence of events strongly indicates Stone’s belief that Trump’s foreign policy toward Russia was linked with Russia’s campaign assistance.

The committee did not establish a quid pro quo. But Stone, like Manafort, did not cooperate. Instead, he lied to investigators. Trump also lied (in written answers to Mueller) about his conversations with Stone. You can say this is a lack of proof, but it is certainly not a lack of evidence of collusion. The evidence is extensive.

In a court of law, any defendant is entitled to a presumption of innocence. In the court of public opinion, the rules work differently. All the evidence points to the conclusion that Trump colluded with Russia and persuaded his top lieutenants to cover up their guilt. The traditional investigative technique of exposing a corrupt organization by flipping the mid-level staff against the boss doesn’t work when the boss has the power to pardon them and is shameless enough to use it. But the bipartisan Senate report has laid bare enough of the reality that was clear all along: They acted guilty because they were guilty.

(full article online)

Bipartisan Senate Report Shows How Trump Colluded With Russia in 2016

Trump and his advisers acted guilty because they were.

nymag.com

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

(None so blind as those who do not wish to see )


Since the Mueller report came out last year, Trump and his minions have insisted it found no evidence of collusion. In fact, Mueller explicitly wrote that he was not investigating collusion at all. (“We did not address ‘collusion,’ which is not a legal term. Rather, we focused on whether the evidence was sufficient to charge any member of the campaign with taking part in a criminal conspiracy.”)

Unlike Mueller’s tightly circumscribed criminal probe, the Senate Intelligence Committee report did investigate collusion. The most important evidence of collusion has either already been exposed (Trump officials taking a meeting with a Russian agent offering Vladimir Putin’s help with the campaign) or happened right in front of our eyes (Trump going on television to ask Russia to steal and publish Hillary Clinton’s emails). The real question is how extensively or tightly Trump’s campaign managed to coordinate its activity with Russia. And while it lacked the broad-ranging investigative powers Mueller could have used if he wanted, the Senate Intelligence Committee turned up damning evidence.

The primary focus of Russian interference was Russian hacking of Democratic emails and then leaking them in order to benefit Trump’s campaign. Two Trump advisers seem likely to have been involved in this scheme: campaign manager Paul Manafort and outside adviser Roger Stone.

------
Stone also spoke at length with Manafort, and the next day spoke with Trump, and then drafted tweets for Trump to send, expressing a desire for friendlier relations with Russia (i.e., “I want a new détente with Russia under Putin”). Trump never sent those tweets, but the sequence of events strongly indicates Stone’s belief that Trump’s foreign policy toward Russia was linked with Russia’s campaign assistance.

The committee did not establish a quid pro quo. But Stone, like Manafort, did not cooperate. Instead, he lied to investigators. Trump also lied (in written answers to Mueller) about his conversations with Stone. You can say this is a lack of proof, but it is certainly not a lack of evidence of collusion. The evidence is extensive.

In a court of law, any defendant is entitled to a presumption of innocence. In the court of public opinion, the rules work differently. All the evidence points to the conclusion that Trump colluded with Russia and persuaded his top lieutenants to cover up their guilt. The traditional investigative technique of exposing a corrupt organization by flipping the mid-level staff against the boss doesn’t work when the boss has the power to pardon them and is shameless enough to use it. But the bipartisan Senate report has laid bare enough of the reality that was clear all along: They acted guilty because they were guilty.

(full article online)

Bipartisan Senate Report Shows How Trump Colluded With Russia in 2016

Trump and his advisers acted guilty because they were.

nymag.com

Fresh proof the Russiagate ‘scandal’ was created by the Hillary Clinton campaign

A federal grand jury handed up an indictment requested by special counsel John Durham — and it’s fresh proof that the entire Russiagate “scandal” was manufactured by Hillary Clinton’s campaign.…

nypost.com

And then the Progs wonder why no one believes them.

Prog slaves are such stupid people.

 

[TNHarley]

Schiff is honest as the day is long.

Thats the cult talking

 

[Nostra]

If his mouth is open (and it isn't full of some dude's junk) he is lying.

 

[BluesLegend]

The sun rises each day and Schiff lies, both can be counted on.

 

[Sixties Fan]

Fresh proof the Russiagate ‘scandal’ was created by the Hillary Clinton campaign

A federal grand jury handed up an indictment requested by special counsel John Durham — and it’s fresh proof that the entire Russiagate “scandal” was manufactured by Hillary Clinton’s campaign.…

nypost.com

And then the Progs wonder why no one believes them.

Prog slaves are such stupid people.

View attachment 578521

John Durham was appointed by Trump to discredit the Bipartisan finding. Bipartisan as in Republicans and Democrats, not Democrats only.

Don Jr. and others meeting with Russians before the 2016 election is not something to wonder about? Why Russians? What did they want from the Trump family or campaign?

The result is there. Believe in it or not.

 

[Auld Phart]

I don't know they have never been under oath, but all 3 should be.

Schiff is honest as the day is long.

Schiff is honest as the day is long.

 

[Sixties Fan]

Fresh proof the Russiagate ‘scandal’ was created by the Hillary Clinton campaign

A federal grand jury handed up an indictment requested by special counsel John Durham — and it’s fresh proof that the entire Russiagate “scandal” was manufactured by Hillary Clinton’s campaign.…

nypost.com

And then the Progs wonder why no one believes them.

Prog slaves are such stupid people.

View attachment 578521

Why is it that some many of the Trump supporters do nothing but curse and swear at those who do not support Fox Faux news and their endless attempt to make people look there and not here?

Demeaning Biden's IQ, or his experience in helping the country for all Americans as he has done for decades leads to what level of intelligence on the Trump side?

Trump takes the vaccine before he leaves, not wanting others to do so. Just had a booster and wants others to do so as well. And NOW, they will not follow him, believe in him.

It is a Mad, Mad, Mad, Mad World, just like the movie.

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

John Durham was appointed by Trump to discredit the Bipartisan finding. Bipartisan as in Republicans and Democrats, not Democrats only.

Don Jr. and others meeting with Russians before the 2016 election is not something to wonder about? Why Russians? What did they want from the Trump family or campaign?

The result is there. Believe in it or not.

No John Durham was not appointed by President Trump, but the AG at the time. If John Durham is lying he could be replaced with another investigator by the current AG. But since Hitlery isnt worth anything anymore, the radical Dems dont care if she sinks like the Titanic.

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

Why is it that some many of the Trump supporters do nothing but curse and swear at those who do not support Fox Faux news and their endless attempt to make people look there and not here?

Demeaning Biden's IQ, or his experience in helping the country for all Americans as he has done for decades leads to what level of intelligence on the Trump side?

Trump takes the vaccine before he leaves, not wanting others to do so. Just had a booster and wants others to do so as well. And NOW, they will not follow him, believe in him.

It is a Mad, Mad, Mad, Mad World, just like the movie.

Demeaning Biden's IQ, or his experience in helping the country for all Americans as he has done for decades


Like calling black children "roaches", or black men as "predators" while he and his children have been racketeering millions of dollars from countries like Ukraine and China? I am not demeaning Joe Biteme's intelligence, because i have known him as long as he has been in office(and always the wrong side of history) , but i am demeaning the Joe Biteme voter because they are as stupid as the chart shows.

A Joe Biden voter deserves all the misery and poverty that Democrats force upon them, because they are that stupid to vote against their best interests.

 

[Sixties Fan]

No John Durham was not appointed by President Trump, but the AG at the time. If John Durham is lying he could be replaced with another investigator by the current AG. But since Hitlery isnt worth anything anymore, the radical Dems dont care if she sinks like the Titanic.

Clinton has not sunk as the Titanic did. Yes, Barr appointed him.

And the Trump side cursing continues.

Here is the whole Bipartisan investigation :

https://www.intelligence.senate.gov/sites/default/files/documents/Report_Volume1.pdf

The nearly 1,000-page report, the fifth and final one from the Republican-ledSenate intelligence committee on the Russia investigation,

Senate panel finds Russia interfered in the 2016 U.S. election

The report purposely does not come to a final conclusion, as the other reports did, about whether there is enough evidence that Trump’s campaign coordinated or colluded with Russia to sway the election, leaving its findings open to partisan interpretation.

www.pbs.org

REPUBLICAN LED investigation.


Let us see any one of you find fault in the Republican led conclusions

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Why is it that some many of the Trump supporters do nothing but curse and swear at those who do not support Fox Faux news and their endless attempt to make people look there and not here?

Demeaning Biden's IQ, or his experience in helping the country for all Americans as he has done for decades leads to what level of intelligence on the Trump side?

Trump takes the vaccine before he leaves, not wanting others to do so. Just had a booster and wants others to do so as well. And NOW, they will not follow him, believe in him.

It is a Mad, Mad, Mad, Mad World, just like the movie.

You are a typical lying libtard!

Biden had the first vaccine shot in December 2020. In January, the vaccines were given only to medical personnel and first responders.

 

[Nostra]

John Durham was appointed by Trump to discredit the Bipartisan finding. Bipartisan as in Republicans and Democrats, not Democrats only.

Don Jr. and others meeting with Russians before the 2016 election is not something to wonder about? Why Russians? What did they want from the Trump family or campaign?

The result is there. Believe in it or not.

The RUSSIA RUSSIA RUSSIA ship has sailed. Let it go

 

[The Original Tree]

Opinion | What Are the Consequences for Adam Schiff’s Lies?


Fox News Host Sean Hannity: “Adam Schiff Is A Proven Liar”

Gingrich: Adam Schiff is a ‘clear, proven liar,’ Trump should ‘cut ties with him’

Rep. Adam Schiff and media acolytes are proven liars



Disinformation from Schiff, media damaged America

Adam Schiff lied about the Trump investigation — and the media let him

Schiff claimed numerous times that he had evidence Trump colluded with the Russians but he never presented it.

Got Naked Trump?

 

[Sixties Fan]

Demeaning Biden's IQ, or his experience in helping the country for all Americans as he has done for decades


Like calling black children "roaches", or black men as "predators" while he and his children have been racketeering millions of dollars from countries like Ukraine and China? I am not demeaning Joe Biteme's intelligence, because i have known him as long as he has been in office(and always the wrong side of history) , but i am demeaning the Joe Biteme voter because they are as stupid as the chart shows.

A Joe Biden voter deserves all the misery and poverty that Democrats force upon them, because they are that stupid to vote against their best interests.

View attachment 578530

Still believing what Fox Whatever says.

You are not going to find any proof of Biden demeaning Black people as you attempt to do, nothing out of his mouth or mind.

Instead of being able to prove anything you attempt to lessen the other side with allegations you are not going to be able to prove.

Proof. All the African Americans who voted for him.

Proof. The respect he is shown by African Americans
in Congress who actually have known him personally, all of these decades, unlike you and others who are not getting your way with whatever your wishes for your life or for the country happen to be.

 

[The Original Tree]

I don't know they have never been under oath, but all 3 should be.

Schiff is honest as the day is long.

Shows what a pathological liar you are.

 

[ColonelAngus]

I don't know they have never been under oath, but all 3 should be.

Schiff is honest as the day is long.

Really walked into that one, huh?

The shortest day of the year was yesterday...this is the 2nd or 3rd shortest day.

So Schiff IS NOT honest.

 

[The Original Tree]

(None so blind as those who do not wish to see )


Since the Mueller report came out last year, Trump and his minions have insisted it found no evidence of collusion. In fact, Mueller explicitly wrote that he was not investigating collusion at all. (“We did not address ‘collusion,’ which is not a legal term. Rather, we focused on whether the evidence was sufficient to charge any member of the campaign with taking part in a criminal conspiracy.”)

Unlike Mueller’s tightly circumscribed criminal probe, the Senate Intelligence Committee report did investigate collusion. The most important evidence of collusion has either already been exposed (Trump officials taking a meeting with a Russian agent offering Vladimir Putin’s help with the campaign) or happened right in front of our eyes (Trump going on television to ask Russia to steal and publish Hillary Clinton’s emails). The real question is how extensively or tightly Trump’s campaign managed to coordinate its activity with Russia. And while it lacked the broad-ranging investigative powers Mueller could have used if he wanted, the Senate Intelligence Committee turned up damning evidence.

The primary focus of Russian interference was Russian hacking of Democratic emails and then leaking them in order to benefit Trump’s campaign. Two Trump advisers seem likely to have been involved in this scheme: campaign manager Paul Manafort and outside adviser Roger Stone.

------
Stone also spoke at length with Manafort, and the next day spoke with Trump, and then drafted tweets for Trump to send, expressing a desire for friendlier relations with Russia (i.e., “I want a new détente with Russia under Putin”). Trump never sent those tweets, but the sequence of events strongly indicates Stone’s belief that Trump’s foreign policy toward Russia was linked with Russia’s campaign assistance.

The committee did not establish a quid pro quo. But Stone, like Manafort, did not cooperate. Instead, he lied to investigators. Trump also lied (in written answers to Mueller) about his conversations with Stone. You can say this is a lack of proof, but it is certainly not a lack of evidence of collusion. The evidence is extensive.

In a court of law, any defendant is entitled to a presumption of innocence. In the court of public opinion, the rules work differently. All the evidence points to the conclusion that Trump colluded with Russia and persuaded his top lieutenants to cover up their guilt. The traditional investigative technique of exposing a corrupt organization by flipping the mid-level staff against the boss doesn’t work when the boss has the power to pardon them and is shameless enough to use it. But the bipartisan Senate report has laid bare enough of the reality that was clear all along: They acted guilty because they were guilty.

(full article online)

Bipartisan Senate Report Shows How Trump Colluded With Russia in 2016

Trump and his advisers acted guilty because they were.

nymag.com

You mean the campaign they spied on by committing Felonies when they filed False Affidavits in The FISA court? The Campaign they could not find had committed any crimes despites wasting what was it $50 Million investigating over a false accusation they knew was false?