Does Adam Schiff Lie?

[berg80]

Because I see references made all the time to Schiff's claim he had evidence of collusion, I thought I'd address it.



In other words, Special Counsel Mueller’s inability to prove a criminal conspiracy between the Trump campaign and the Russian government in no way “exonerates” the president of any wrongdoing. The president’s wrongdoing has already been proven. A four-page letter to Congress written by an attorney general Trump appointed because his first attorney general wouldn’t do enough to undercut the investigation doesn’t nullify any of the examples Schiff listed on Thursday.

“I do not think that conduct, criminal or not, is OK,” concluded Schiff. “The day we do think that’s OK is the day we will look back and say that is the day America lost its way.”

Adam Schiff Presents His 'Evidence of Collusion'

The House Intelligence Committee chairman and foe of President Trump delivered a fiery speech on Thursday morning

www.rollingstone.com

He left out this.

US Treasury Provides Missing Link: Manafort’s Partner Gave Campaign Polling Data to Kremlin in 2016

The Treasury Department says Konstantin Kilimnik “provided the Russian Intelligence Services with sensitive information on polling and campaign strategy."

www.justsecurity.org

So the answer to the question about whether Schiff lied about his claim is no. He's right about something else too. America, or at least some Americans, have lost their way. They remain loyal to a traitor who attempted a coup.

 

[ColonelAngus]

You expect me to believe Hannity, Gingrich, Scott, don't lie.

No I believe him over your 3.

Adam Schiff is the biggest liar in the House. That is saying a lot.

 

[HikerGuy83]

Does a bear crap in the woods ?

 

[HikerGuy83]

Because I see references made all the time to Schiff's claim he had evidence of collusion, I thought I'd address it.



In other words, Special Counsel Mueller’s inability to prove a criminal conspiracy between the Trump campaign and the Russian government in no way “exonerates” the president of any wrongdoing. The president’s wrongdoing has already been proven. A four-page letter to Congress written by an attorney general Trump appointed because his first attorney general wouldn’t do enough to undercut the investigation doesn’t nullify any of the examples Schiff listed on Thursday.

“I do not think that conduct, criminal or not, is OK,” concluded Schiff. “The day we do think that’s OK is the day we will look back and say that is the day America lost its way.”

Adam Schiff Presents His 'Evidence of Collusion'

The House Intelligence Committee chairman and foe of President Trump delivered a fiery speech on Thursday morning

www.rollingstone.com

He left out this.

US Treasury Provides Missing Link: Manafort’s Partner Gave Campaign Polling Data to Kremlin in 2016

The Treasury Department says Konstantin Kilimnik “provided the Russian Intelligence Services with sensitive information on polling and campaign strategy."

www.justsecurity.org

So the answer to the question about whether Schiff lied about his claim is no. He's right about something else too. America, or at least some Americans, have lost their way. They remain loyal to a traitor who attempted a coup.

You addressed nothing.

He lied.

That's been shown.

 

[AntonToo]

You addressed nothing.

He lied.

That's been shown.

Liars are those claiming there was no collusion when Trump campaign clearly sought, and recieved, help from Russian govenment.

 

[HikerGuy83]

Liars are those claiming there was no collusion when Trump campaign clearly sought, and recieved, help from Russian govenment.

Democrats are trying to deny their Russian Collusion Scandal

Democrats aren’t buying a yearslong, independent investigation’s findings that the FBI lacked “actual evidence” to justify its probe into whether Donald Trump colluded with Russians to win the 2016 presidential election. Democrats on Capitol Hill said Tuesday that the report by special counsel...

www.usmessageboard.com

You bet........sucker.

 

[AntonToo]

Democrats are trying to deny their Russian Collusion Scandal

Democrats aren’t buying a yearslong, independent investigation’s findings that the FBI lacked “actual evidence” to justify its probe into whether Donald Trump colluded with Russians to win the 2016 presidential election. Democrats on Capitol Hill said Tuesday that the report by special counsel...

www.usmessageboard.com

You bet........sucker.

Trump campaign clearly sought, and recieved, help from Russian govenment - is that true or false?

Think you've got the balls to answer that one?

 

[Nostra]

Liars are those claiming there was no collusion when Trump campaign clearly sought, and recieved, help from Russian govenment.

Long ago debunked lies, vermin.

 

[Nostra]

Trump campaign clearly sought, and recieved, help from Russian govenment - is that true or false?

Think you've got the balls to answer that one?

False

 

[task0778]

Does Adam Schiff Lie?​

Does a bear shit in the woods? The only time that truth comes out of his mouth is by accident.

 

[HikerGuy83]

Trump campaign clearly sought, and recieved, help from Russian govenment - is that true or false?

Think you've got the balls to answer that one?

False.

Do you think you've got balls ?

 

[AntonToo]

False.

Do you think you've got balls ?

What part is false exactly?

When Trump JR. eagerly met with Russian goverment rep at Trump tower, seeking compromat on Clinton and discussing sanctions...what was that if not an act of collusion?

When Russians hacked DNC/Podesta and released those materials in co-ordination with Stone, right after PussyGate tape shows up...what was that if not collusion?

When Trump's campaign chair Paul Manafort was meeting with, and providing internal campaign materials to an FSB agent...what was that if not collusion?


Trump campaign solicited Russian gov help and thats exactly what they've got. Those are the facts and therein was the collusion.

 

[Nostra]

What part is false exactly?

When Trump JR. eagerly met with Russian goverment rep at Trump tower, seeking compromat on Clinton and discussing sanctions...that was what exactly if not an act of collusion?

All of it.

 

[HikerGuy83]

What part is false exactly?

That you've got balls.

 

[struth]

Trump campaign clearly sought, and recieved, help from Russian govenment - is that true or false?

Think you've got the balls to answer that one?

False

 

[AntonToo]

Yep, this has been another fun episode of trying to meaningfully converse with rightwingers.

 

[HikerGuy83]

All of it.

Yes, notice how the term collusion takes on a whole new meaning when Trump's name is associated with it. But let Biden or Clinton be involved in something (i.e. the Steele Dossier) and it's a whole new story.

Additionally, it seems so strange to me that the so-called election fraud...was not, by definition.....fraud because the courts rejected the claims.

Yet, Trump has never faced any repercussions. So, by definition....no collusion.

Hillary got whacked with a 100K fine for failing to adequately or truthfully disclose what a large sum of money was used for (ultimately the debunked Steele Dossier).

Cato does a good job of putting it all in perspective here:

https://www.cato.org/commentary/stop-saying-donald-trump-colluded-russia

The Mueller Report did not find evidence to warrant any criminal indictments regarding offenses having to do with those central accusations—not against Trump, his associates, or any other American. Specifically, the report stated: “[T]he investigation did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities.” The Intercept’s Glenn Greenwald provided a succinct summary of the results, asserting that Mueller “did not merely reject the Trump‐Russia conspiracy theories. He obliterated them.” Greenwald added: “Several of the media’s most breathless and hyped ‘bombshells’ were dismissed completely.”

It further goes on to say:

Conspiracy aficionados in Congress and the media did not abandon their Russia collusion theory, however. Indeed, there were constant echoes of the original allegations when House Democrats pressed their case for Trump’s impeachment in late 2019. The ostensible grounds for impeachment were Trump’s supposed misconduct toward the government of Ukraine, but always lurking in the background was the innuendo that his actions deliberately served Moscow’s interests.

 

[AntonToo]

Yet, Trump has never faced any repercussions. So, by definition....no collusion.

You clearly don't even know that definition.

Ignoramus, collusion is not a legal concept. There is not a law against collusion per se...maybe there should be.

Law is about CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY and not all colluding rises to criminal level.

And no reprecussions?

Papadopolous - convicted.
Manafort - convicted.
Stone - convicted.

 

[HikerGuy83]

All of it.

And here we have a goalpost moving asswipe on the left talking about something that apparently lacks import even though it was majorly investigated.

As CATO indicated.....debunked through and through.

 

[Nostra]

You clearly don't even know that definition.

Ignoramus, collusion is not a legal concept. There is not a law against collusion per se...maybe there should be.

Law is about CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY and not all colluding rises to criminal level.

And no reprecussions?

Papadopolous - convicted.
Manafort - convicted.
Stone - convicted.

Weird, none of those were convicted of “CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY”, Vermin.