Does Adam Schiff Lie?

What a stupid, ridiculous post.

It's not "VS", it's the fact that Russians ran an illicit campaign of interference in 2016 election against Hillary Clinton and for the benefit of Donald Trump.
You can't prove it was for the benefit of Donald Trump. That's prog spin. Russians always meddle in our elections. The Sussman trial debunked all this nonsense already. Hillary ran the whole Russiagate campaign and paid for it.
 
What a stupid, ridiculous post.

It's not "VS", it's the fact that Russians ran an illicit campaign of interference in 2016 election against Hillary Clinton and for the benefit of Donald Trump.



And the evidence actually shows they did more for that bitch than they did for Trump.

Were you born this stupid or did you take a lot of drugs?
 
And the evidence actually shows they did more for that bitch than they did for Trump.

Were you born this stupid or did you take a lot of drugs?
You didn't refute even a single word of what you quoted.

And do you seriously imagine that I will just take your crazy, ignorant word over the carefully detailed findings of Mueller's 2 year investigation?

Your total lack of awareness is mindboggling.
 
Moron, that number is IN THE CHARGES FILED BY DOJ.


11. Defendants CONCORD MANAGEMENT AND CONSULTING LLC (Конкорд Менеджмент и Консалтинг) ....CONCORD funded the ORGANIZATION as part of a larger CONCORD-funded interference operation that it referred to as “Project Lakhta.”...By in or around September 2016, the ORGANIZATION’s monthly budget for Project Lakhta submitted to CONCORD exceeded 73 million Russian rubles (over 1,250,000 U.S. dollars), including approximately one million rubles in bonus payments.

When you say $100,000 number comes from Mueller you clearly don't know wtf you are talking about. As usual.
When did this case go to trial?
 
You didn't refute even a single word of what you quoted.

And do you seriously imagine that I will just take your crazy, ignorant word over the carefully detailed findings of Mueller's 2 year investigation?

Your total lack of awareness is mindboggling.
Why should we take your word for it?
 
Take that number and put it back where it came from - your ass. Russian troll farm was burning through over a million a month before 2016 election.


Aside from troll farm specific Russian GRU operatives were indicted for their hacking of American political organizations and operatives.


The indictments were brought 2 years after the alleged interference and all charges were dropped in March 2020. Some might suggest the indictments were politically motivated by the democrats that never had any real basis in facts, just innuendo.


CrowdStrike, the private cyber-security firm that first accused Russia of hacking Democratic Party emails and served as a critical source for U.S. intelligence officials in the years-long Trump-Russia probe, acknowledged to Congress more than two years ago that it had no concrete evidence that Russian hackers stole emails from the Democratic National Committee’s server.

CrowdStrike President Shawn Henry's admission under oath, in a recently declassified December 2017 interview before the House Intelligence Committee, raises new questions about whether Special Counsel Robert Mueller, intelligence officials and Democrats misled the public. The allegation that Russia stole Democratic Party emails from Hillary Clinton, John Podesta and others and then passed them to WikiLeaks helped trigger the FBI's probe into now debunked claims of a conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russia to steal the 2016 election. The CrowdStrike admissions were released just two months after the Justice Department retreated from its its other central claim that Russia meddled in the 2016 election when it dropped charges against Russian troll farms it said had been trying to get Trump elected.



Note the date: 2020/05/13. Do you remember any democrat telling us in December 2017 or thereafter that they had no concrete evidence of Russians hacking into the DNC? Yeah, me neither but what I do remember is Adam Fucking Schiff telling us almost daily that he had solid, incontrovertible proof of Russian hacking. He was and is a lying pos.


I recall the US tried to interfere with Israel's election when Obama was in office cuz he didn't like Netanyahu, remember that? So, they do it but so do we.
 
The indictments were brought 2 years after the alleged interference and all charges were dropped in March 2020. Some might suggest the indictments were politically motivated by the democrats that never had any real basis in facts, just innuendo.

facepalm.jpg


Mueller is a REPUBLICAN.
 
In name only.
According to braindead tools like you anyone who doesn't push Trumpian bs is "in name only"

You seriously will grasp at ANY straw, no matter how desperate to keep reapeating your insane, counterfactual bullshit.
 
According to braindead tools like you anyone who doesn't push Trumpian bs is "in name only"

You seriously will grasp at ANY straw, no matter how desperate to keep reapeating your insane, counterfactual bullshit.



Like me?

YOU are the fucking morons who have been screaming "Russia, Russia, Russia" for YEARS!

Asshole!
 
Moron, that is not at all relavant. The point is that CLEARLY Mueller investigation concluded that Russian efforts in 2016 electioneering were significant and seriously funded.
We know the entire case was bogus. Mueller filed it just so he could claim there was actually some Russian hacking going on. The case was dropped and the evidence was never vetted.

End of story.
 
Hillary ran the whole Russiagate campaign and paid for it.
I find it difficult not to note the irony of you employing that colossal lie in another of the endless threads from the world of make believe where Mueller exonerated Trump. Here are some facts to chew on.


It is a bit of a mug’s game at this point to fight over whether what either Mueller or the Intelligence Committee found constitutes collusion and, if so, in what sense. The question turns almost entirely on what one means by the term “collusion”—a word without any precise meaning in the context of campaign engagement with foreign actors interfering with an election.

So rather than engaging over whether the Intelligence Committee found collusion, we decided to read the document with a focus on identifying precisely what the committee found about the engagement over a long period of time between Trump and his campaign and Russian government or intelligence actors and their cut-outs.

Whether one describes this activity as collusion or not, there’s a lot of it: The report describes hundreds of actions by Trump, his campaign, and his associates in the run-up to the 2016 election that involve some degree of participation by Trump or his associates in Russian activity. In this post—which we are generating serially as we read through the document—we attempt to summarize, precisely and comprehensively, what the eight Republicans on the committee, along with their seven Democratic colleagues, report that the president, members of his campaign and his associates actually did.


Not that you'll take the time to examine any of it.
 
I find it difficult not to note the irony of you employing that colossal lie in another of the endless threads from the world of make believe where Mueller exonerated Trump. Here are some facts to chew on.


It is a bit of a mug’s game at this point to fight over whether what either Mueller or the Intelligence Committee found constitutes collusion and, if so, in what sense. The question turns almost entirely on what one means by the term “collusion”—a word without any precise meaning in the context of campaign engagement with foreign actors interfering with an election.

So rather than engaging over whether the Intelligence Committee found collusion, we decided to read the document with a focus on identifying precisely what the committee found about the engagement over a long period of time between Trump and his campaign and Russian government or intelligence actors and their cut-outs.

Whether one describes this activity as collusion or not, there’s a lot of it: The report describes hundreds of actions by Trump, his campaign, and his associates in the run-up to the 2016 election that involve some degree of participation by Trump or his associates in Russian activity. In this post—which we are generating serially as we read through the document—we attempt to summarize, precisely and comprehensively, what the eight Republicans on the committee, along with their seven Democratic colleagues, report that the president, members of his campaign and his associates actually did.


Not that you'll take the time to examine any of it.
The FBI knew that day after Sussmann visited that the who Russiagate scandal was a con. That was testified to under oath. When are you morons going to face facts and admit that Hillary has been exposed beyond all doubt ? Mueller's bullshit accusations are meaningless because he knew there was no there there the day after he was put on the case.
 
"We" is anyone who knows the facts
You are really bad with facts, I've shown that many times over in this thread.

You were plainly factually wrong, wrong wrong and wrong again. What you know first and foremost is beliving your own politico fantasies of convinience.
 

Forum List

Back
Top